Untitled Document

[00:00:05] Last week, I received a cease and desist [00:00:07] letter from Turning Point. This is the [00:00:09] first step in a lawsuit. [00:00:12] If I post this video, Turning Point will [00:00:14] likely sue me and try to destroy my [00:00:17] life. I have a choice to make. I can [00:00:20] speak the truth, but it will cost me [00:00:23] everything I have. [00:00:26] The corrupt Turning Point executives [00:00:28] have forgotten something. [00:00:30] In 1941, Pearl Harbor was attacked by [00:00:34] Japan. Hundreds of Japanese planes [00:00:37] destroyed much of the US fleet and the [00:00:39] planes on the ground. The attack was [00:00:41] such a surprise most US planes on the [00:00:43] island were not able to take off. But a [00:00:47] handful of brave US pilots without [00:00:49] orders jumped in their planes managed to [00:00:52] take off and engage with the enemy. One [00:00:56] of them, Philip Rasmusen, was still in [00:00:58] his pajamas. This is how he describes [00:01:01] the attack in his own words. I was in my [00:01:04] pajamas and I yelled down the hallway [00:01:06] that we were being attacked by the [00:01:08] Japanese. And I ran to my room and I [00:01:11] strapped a webbed belt around my waist [00:01:13] and a 45 caliber pistol in my holster [00:01:15] that was on this belt and put on a pair [00:01:17] of shoes and ran for the flight line. A [00:01:21] handful of US pilots faced off against [00:01:23] hundreds of Japanese planes. That is [00:01:27] courage under fire. And they kept Pearl [00:01:30] Harbor from being even worse. [00:01:32] 2,43 [00:01:34] Americans died in the attack on Pearl [00:01:36] Harbor. Being brave is part of what it [00:01:40] means to be an American. That is [00:01:42] something that Charlie Kirk understood [00:01:45] and it's something that I try to live up [00:01:47] to. I owe it to those brave Americans [00:01:51] who gave their lives. So, I have one [00:01:54] message for all you patriots out there. [00:01:56] It's time to fly. [00:02:03] >> [music] [00:02:15] >> I believe what is going on at Turning [00:02:17] Point is so much worse than anything [00:02:19] I've talked about so far. It is so bad [00:02:22] that it would implicate the entire [00:02:24] leadership at Turning Point. And it has [00:02:27] to do with ballot harvesting. I want to [00:02:30] start by addressing some criticism. [00:02:32] Since I started posting videos about [00:02:34] financial irregularities at Turning [00:02:36] Point, I have been viciously attacked. [00:02:40] One of these people is a lawyer named [00:02:42] Robert Barnes. It [00:02:44] >> says, "Any comment on the financial [00:02:46] fraud that Wolves of and Finance has [00:02:48] pointed out?" I know your answer to [00:02:49] this, Robert. [00:02:50] >> Wolves in Finance is a big fat fraud. [00:02:52] He's a joke. He's a disgrace. He's a [00:02:53] liar. [00:02:55] Liar uh about the records of TPUSA. He [00:02:59] falsely stated that the TPUSA's uh [00:03:02] didn't have a uh they didn't have an [00:03:05] address at at a basically a mail drop at [00:03:07] a at a at a location. He was lying about [00:03:09] it. It was right there. It's like, "Oh, [00:03:11] I CAME TO THE MALL AND THERE'S NOTHING [00:03:12] HERE. IT MUST BE A TOTALLY fake [00:03:14] business." Uh everybody uses mail drops [00:03:16] for the most part. For if you're TP USA, [00:03:19] you have very good security reasons for [00:03:21] doing so. The And he just lied about it. [00:03:23] Wolves in finance, fraud, fake, phony. [00:03:26] That's all he is. That's all he's ever [00:03:27] going to be. Uh the he lied about how [00:03:29] tax law works. He lied about how [00:03:31] charitable work law works. He lied about [00:03:34] what TPU He was like, "Look at this TP [00:03:36] action 2024 has made a bunch of money. [00:03:38] Maybe they made it in secret from [00:03:40] Charlie Ker. IT WAS THEIR GET OUT THE [00:03:42] VOTE OPERATION for 2024, you nitwit." I [00:03:44] mean, he just lied about every basic [00:03:46] things. Wolves in finance, big fat [00:03:48] fraud. He wants to get into the [00:03:49] clickbait horror world with Candace [00:03:51] Owens, who's [laughter] the queen of the [00:03:52] brothel there. Uh, and he that's all he [00:03:55] did well and that's the only thing he [00:03:56] did right. [00:03:57] >> Let me tell you what I think of Robert [00:03:59] Barnes. [00:04:01] I actually really like the guy. I've [00:04:03] been a fan of his for a long time. He's [00:04:06] a lawyer. He's an expert on [00:04:08] constitutional law and you have to [00:04:10] respect that. That clip was from the [00:04:12] Viva Fry podcast which is a podcast that [00:04:15] Robert Barnes is on a lot. I also really [00:04:18] like Viva Fry. Viva Fry is one of the [00:04:21] few podcasters that is brave enough to [00:04:24] accurately cover the pipe bomber story, [00:04:26] which is something I care a lot about. [00:04:29] Robert Barnes also has a long resume in [00:04:31] his legal work, including working on the [00:04:33] Alex Jones defamation lawsuits, the Kyle [00:04:35] Writtenhouse case, and the Amish farmers [00:04:37] who refused USDA inspection. So, he's [00:04:40] obviously a really good lawyer. But more [00:04:43] than that, he's just a really likable [00:04:46] person. Do you know anyone like this? [00:04:49] He's one of these guys. You cannot help [00:04:52] but like him. I know that he's going [00:04:55] around saying all these mean and [00:04:56] horrible things about me. But I still [00:04:59] like the guy. I can't help it. He's just [00:05:02] a likable person. Now, obviously, he's [00:05:06] wrong about me. Anyone who has seen my [00:05:08] videos knows he's clearly [00:05:10] misrepresenting what I am saying, but [00:05:12] I'm not going to hold that against him. [00:05:14] Everyone is allowed to have a bad take [00:05:16] once in a while. I'm not going to let it [00:05:18] bother me. He's allowed to have his own [00:05:20] opinion. What he's not allowed to do is [00:05:24] argue with the facts. Robert Barnes went [00:05:27] on a podcast called Paramount Tactical [00:05:29] and they discussed a letter that was [00:05:31] allegedly sent from the IRS to Turning [00:05:33] Point. [00:05:35] All right. So, that is just kind of the [00:05:37] tip of the iceberg as far as the [00:05:39] allegations I know that uh Wolves and [00:05:41] Finances have kind of brought to the [00:05:43] four against TPUSA. [00:05:46] And Robert, I know I actually got some [00:05:49] of the documents uh the letter from the [00:05:52] IRS to Erica Kirk and TPUSA that talks [00:05:56] about what their situation is as regards [00:05:58] to the IRS. This letter has been [00:06:01] floating around and reported on by [00:06:02] mainstream news outlets like CBS, except [00:06:05] the letter itself has never been shown [00:06:08] until Paramount Tactical's podcast. In [00:06:11] fact, I'm guessing he was not supposed [00:06:14] to show this to his audience because it [00:06:16] is quite shocking. It is a two-page [00:06:19] letter on Department of the Treasury [00:06:20] letter head. It says it is responding to [00:06:22] a request from Erica Kirk. It says one, [00:06:26] there is no IRS investigation currently [00:06:28] underway on Turning Point. Two, all four [00:06:32] 990 forms were filed by May 15, 2025. [00:06:36] Three, the next year's forms will be [00:06:38] filed by May 15th, 2026. The letter is [00:06:41] signed by Treasury Secretary Scott [00:06:43] Bassant. Paramount Tactical is [00:06:45] presenting this letter as some kind of [00:06:46] evidence that there is no fraud at [00:06:48] Turning Point. [00:06:50] That is ridiculous for a number of [00:06:52] reasons. We all know this because all of [00:06:56] us deal with the IRS. We all know this [00:06:59] is not normal behavior. [00:07:01] Have any of you ever received a letter [00:07:04] from the IRS saying, "Just letting you [00:07:07] know we're not doing an investigation on [00:07:09] you?" [00:07:11] No, of course you have not because the [00:07:13] IRS does not do this and it's not coming [00:07:16] from the IRS. The letter is signed by [00:07:18] the Treasury Secretary Scott Basant. To [00:07:22] me, this looks more like a political [00:07:24] favor to Donald Trump's personal friends [00:07:26] than a legitimate IRS communication. [00:07:29] Second, the wording in this letter does [00:07:32] not mean anything. [00:07:34] Just because the IRS is not [00:07:35] investigating does not mean there is no [00:07:38] fraud going on. This does not mean that [00:07:41] donors cannot sue Turning Point to get [00:07:43] their money back. This does not mean [00:07:45] that state attorney generals cannot file [00:07:48] criminal charges against Turning Point [00:07:50] executives. [00:07:52] This letter does not disprove my [00:07:54] concerns about their finances. And what [00:07:57] is this? [00:07:59] What is this? At the top of the page, [00:08:02] someone has crossed out Mrs. Kirk and [00:08:04] wrote in Erica. [00:08:06] It looks like someone is proofreading [00:08:09] Scott Basent's letter. Who could that [00:08:12] be? [00:08:14] I have reviewed so many White House [00:08:16] documents and in my opinion that [00:08:18] handwriting looks like it was written by [00:08:21] Donald Trump. If you compare it to other [00:08:24] samples of his writing, he does a [00:08:26] consistent method where he writes a name [00:08:28] dash name dashn name dash. The K is very [00:08:33] much like this K. The E is written the [00:08:36] same way as this W. This handwriting [00:08:39] looks like it belongs to Donald Trump. [00:08:43] This letter does not look like it came [00:08:45] from the IRS. It looks like it came from [00:08:48] the president of the United States. Do [00:08:51] you understand what this means? [00:08:54] This is the only document the Democrats [00:08:57] need to impeach President Trump. [00:09:01] This looks like the president's [00:09:02] handwriting on official letterhead of [00:09:05] him interfering in an IRS investigation [00:09:08] of his personal friends. [00:09:11] Let me remind you of Richard Nixon. [00:09:14] Nixon faced impeachment charges for [00:09:16] interfering with the FBI investigation [00:09:18] into the Watergate scandal. The main [00:09:21] evidence was secret tape recordings of [00:09:23] conversations in the Oval Office. Donald [00:09:25] Trump is doing the same thing with the [00:09:28] IRS investigation, but this time we have [00:09:30] what looks like his handwriting on [00:09:32] official letterhead. [00:09:35] It looks like the White House is now [00:09:37] part of the coverup at Turning Point. [00:09:40] Let me give some free accounting advice [00:09:42] to Donald Trump. You get this one for [00:09:44] free, Donald. [00:09:46] Stop [snorts] [00:09:47] writing letters like this. [00:09:50] Why isn't he distancing himself from [00:09:52] this scandal? [00:09:54] I highly doubt that Donald Trump was [00:09:56] aware of what Tyler Boyer was doing [00:09:58] behind the scenes. But now with this [00:10:00] letter, Donald Trump looks like he's [00:10:03] getting involved. And I'm saying this as [00:10:05] someone who likes Donald Trump. And this [00:10:07] letter deeply bothers me. People have a [00:10:11] right to be upset about this. Turning [00:10:14] Point has been raising millions of [00:10:16] dollars from donations. [00:10:18] Most people don't know what has been [00:10:20] happening with the donations. [00:10:23] I received a message from someone named [00:10:25] Margaret. Like many other people, she [00:10:27] donated money to Turning Point USA [00:10:29] because she was moved by Charlie Kirk's [00:10:31] death. She was told if she gave a [00:10:34] donation that she would receive a hat as [00:10:37] part of their fundraising effort. Here [00:10:39] is the message. Thank you for your [00:10:41] contribution to Turning Point USA with [00:10:43] the official Turning Point email [00:10:44] address. And it says, "Shipping of your [00:10:47] hat could take up to 10 to 12 weeks." [00:10:50] She donated on September 16th. 12 weeks [00:10:53] would have been the second week in [00:10:54] December. Margaret has never received a [00:10:57] hat. [00:10:58] Instead, she received this card with a [00:11:01] rubber bracelet. They are sending [00:11:04] bracelets to people instead of the hat [00:11:06] they promised. And this is not an [00:11:08] isolated incident. Here is a Facebook [00:11:10] post. Made a $25 donation to TPUSA back [00:11:14] in September that was supposed to come [00:11:15] with a 47 hat free for making the [00:11:18] donation. Never got hat. Tried texting [00:11:21] them and calling them several times and [00:11:23] have not gotten response. did get one [00:11:26] response from someone named Anika who [00:11:28] said she had no record of the [00:11:29] transaction. Have sent them copies of my [00:11:32] receipt with no response. Called and [00:11:34] left my name and contact info on their [00:11:36] voicemail because they never answer the [00:11:38] phone and they don't even call you back. [00:11:41] Loved Charlie Kirk and watched him [00:11:42] religiously, but this has totally [00:11:44] disappointed me. We'll call my bank and [00:11:47] see if I can get reimbursed for the [00:11:48] donation. And the replies are full of [00:11:51] comments saying the same thing. [00:11:54] All I got was a bracelet. We got a [00:11:57] bracelet. No hat as promised. Got a [00:12:00] cheap rubber band bracelet and no hat. [00:12:03] That's a big way to turn people away. [00:12:05] Just make false promises. Same thing [00:12:08] happened to my husband. No hat. Gave a [00:12:10] donation back in September. And it goes [00:12:12] on and on and on. [00:12:16] People need to realize what Turning [00:12:18] Point has been doing to get donations [00:12:19] since Charlie Kirk's death. [00:12:22] They are lying to people to get their [00:12:24] money and then sending them rubber [00:12:26] bracelets. [00:12:28] Let's look at the big picture. When [00:12:30] someone gives money to Turning Point [00:12:32] USA, what do they think they are giving [00:12:34] money to? Most people think they're [00:12:37] giving money to campus events like what [00:12:40] Charlie Kirk did. He would go to college [00:12:42] campuses and answer questions. This is [00:12:46] such a good nonprofit idea. Everyone [00:12:49] supports that idea. [00:12:51] Everyone knows that there is a major [00:12:53] problem in the United States with [00:12:55] college campuses. We have professors [00:12:58] teaching communism and woke ideas in the [00:13:02] classroom. [00:13:03] How do we fix this? One way is what [00:13:06] Charlie Kirk was doing. He was creating [00:13:09] spaces on college campuses where [00:13:11] students could talk about capitalism and [00:13:13] free markets. He was allowing free [00:13:15] speech where people could make fun of [00:13:18] being woke. [00:13:19] Everyone likes this idea. Everyone wants [00:13:22] more of this. If this was all Turning [00:13:24] Point was doing, no one would have a [00:13:27] problem with it. What people are now [00:13:29] realizing from Turning Point's financial [00:13:31] information is that they are involved in [00:13:34] a whole lot more. Let us look again at [00:13:36] the four nonprofit companies. We have [00:13:39] Turning Point USA, Turning Point Action, [00:13:41] Turning Point Endowment, and America's [00:13:43] Turning Point. Three of these companies [00:13:45] are 501c3 organizations. Turning Point [00:13:48] Action is a 501c4. [00:13:51] The difference is that a 501c3 is not [00:13:54] allowed to participate in political [00:13:55] activity. A 501c4 can participate in no [00:13:59] more than 50% political activity. And [00:14:02] then there is also turning point pack [00:14:04] which is 100% political activity. Now I [00:14:08] have seen arguments from people claiming [00:14:09] that this is normal. They say it is [00:14:11] normal for nonprofits to have multiple [00:14:14] different companies. [00:14:16] Not like this. It's not. Do not let [00:14:18] people gaslight you about what's going [00:14:20] on here. Let me explain what is unusual. [00:14:25] You would normally create different [00:14:26] shell companies for different types of [00:14:28] activities. For instance, Turning Point [00:14:30] Endowment is for their investments. [00:14:33] That's clearly a different type of [00:14:34] activity. It gets its own company. That [00:14:37] makes sense. Turning Point Action is a [00:14:39] 501c4. That's a different type of [00:14:42] activity. So, it gets its own company. [00:14:44] What is this? [00:14:46] Why is America's turning point separate? [00:14:50] The company descriptions on the 990 form [00:14:52] are very similar. It's basically [00:14:55] education for young people. So why are [00:14:58] these two different companies? [00:15:00] The only major difference that I see is [00:15:02] that Charlie Kirk managed Turning Point [00:15:04] USA and Tyler Ber managed America's [00:15:07] Turning Point. So in a way, America's [00:15:10] Turning Point existed to give Charlie [00:15:12] Kirk plausible deniability. It gave [00:15:15] Tyler Ber his own 501c3 where he could [00:15:18] do whatever he wanted and Charlie Kirk [00:15:20] would not necessarily know about it. [00:15:23] This is explained in the fine print of [00:15:25] the 990 form for Turning Point USA which [00:15:27] says Turning Point USA's other [00:15:29] educational programs include campus [00:15:32] leadership programs which are hosted by [00:15:34] Turning Point USA's related entity [00:15:36] America's Turning Point with grants [00:15:37] totaling $8.6 million. So what is Tyler [00:15:41] Ber doing with these students? It sounds [00:15:44] like this leadership program is a [00:15:46] pipeline for these students to go work [00:15:48] for Tyler Ber. I wonder what these [00:15:51] students are doing that costs $8.6 [00:15:54] million. [00:15:56] We're going to get into that in a [00:15:57] minute. The other obvious question for [00:15:59] most people is how does Turning Point [00:16:02] get involved in so much political [00:16:04] activity? The only companies that are [00:16:06] allowed to do political activity are up [00:16:08] to 50% of Turning Point Action and [00:16:10] Turning Point Pack. What happens in the [00:16:12] real world is that a lot of 501c3s will [00:16:15] perform what they call get out the vote [00:16:17] efforts or voter education. This is [00:16:20] defined in Treasury regulation 1527-6B5. [00:16:25] Get out the vote campaigns must not be [00:16:27] specifically identified by the [00:16:29] organization with any candidate or [00:16:32] political party. As long as these are [00:16:34] nonpartisan activities, they are [00:16:36] considered not political, and that is [00:16:38] the loophole that is allowed for a [00:16:40] 501c3. [00:16:42] This would include things like signing [00:16:44] people up for new voter registration, [00:16:46] but you cannot be pushing for Republican [00:16:48] or Democrat. It has to be completely [00:16:51] nonpartisan. Here's the problem. Turning [00:16:54] Point USA is a 501c3. [00:16:57] They are supposed to be non-political. [00:17:00] But then we see Erica Kirk endorsing JD [00:17:03] Vance for president. [00:17:05] >> We're going to ensure that President [00:17:06] Trump has Congress for all four years. [00:17:10] [cheering] [00:17:12] [applause] [00:17:14] We are going to get my husband's friend [00:17:17] JD Vance elected for 48 and the most [00:17:21] resounding way possible. [cheering] [00:17:27] >> [applause] [00:17:28] >> This is at America Fest, Turning Point [00:17:31] USA's largest event with the CEO in a [00:17:34] flashy pants suit giving a speech [00:17:36] endorsing a political candidate. This is [00:17:39] strictly forbidden under the law for a [00:17:42] 501c3. [00:17:44] You cannot endorse political candidates. [00:17:47] That is political activity. In my [00:17:49] opinion, what Erica Kirk just did was [00:17:52] illegal. [00:17:54] This is effectively using their tax [00:17:56] exempt donations to create a campaign [00:17:58] commercial for JD Vance. And before you [00:18:02] say, well, maybe it was paid for by one [00:18:04] of the other companies that allow [00:18:06] political activity. [00:18:08] No, no, no. It says Turning Point USA [00:18:12] behind her head during the speech. The [00:18:16] tickets for the event were sent out from [00:18:17] TurningPoint USA. The fact page for the [00:18:20] event is hosted at tpusa.com and at the [00:18:24] bottom of the web page, it explicitly [00:18:26] says TurningPoint USA is a 501c3. [00:18:30] It looks to me like the executives at [00:18:32] Turning Point are playing pretty fast [00:18:34] and loose with the laws concerning [00:18:36] 501c3s. [00:18:38] Remember why this is important. A 501c3 [00:18:41] is taxexempt, which is a tax subsidy. [00:18:45] you are paying more in taxes so that [00:18:47] they do not have to. So, is it fair that [00:18:52] Democrats are paying taxes that fund a [00:18:55] campaign commercial for JD Vance? [00:18:58] This is so unjust, which is why there [00:19:00] are so many laws against what Erica Kirk [00:19:03] just did. If she wants to endorse a [00:19:06] candidate, that's fine, but she needs to [00:19:08] pay for it out of turning point pack. [00:19:11] I'm going to give you the exact wording [00:19:12] from IRS revenue rule 2007-41. [00:19:16] A 501c3 does not participate in or [00:19:19] intervene in, including the publishing [00:19:21] or distributing of statements, any [00:19:24] political campaign on behalf of or in [00:19:26] opposition to any candidate for public [00:19:29] office. That seems pretty clear that [00:19:32] Erica Kirk's statement was illegal. So [00:19:35] the only nonprofit that is supposed to [00:19:36] do political activity is the 501c4 [00:19:39] turningpoint action. There is a special [00:19:42] section on their 990 form where they are [00:19:44] supposed to list out the political [00:19:45] activity they are engaged in. Schedule [00:19:48] C. Now everyone should go check out [00:19:51] schedule C for turning point action [00:19:53] because it is quite shocking. for FY24. [00:19:58] On line two, they listed that they spent [00:20:01] $637,500 [00:20:03] on political campaign activity [00:20:05] expenditures. [00:20:07] Now, just let that sink in for a moment. [00:20:10] Out of Turning Point Actions $21 million [00:20:13] budget, they only spent 3% on political [00:20:17] activity. [00:20:19] Now, just from what you know about what [00:20:21] Turning Point Action does, does that [00:20:24] seem right to you? [00:20:26] Now, they actually provide a description [00:20:28] of what the $637,500 [00:20:31] was spent on. They claim it was [00:20:34] specifically political campaign [00:20:36] activities include event expense. So, [00:20:39] they spent this money on some kind of [00:20:41] event. I'm guessing it was a campaign [00:20:43] rally for Donald Trump. And they are [00:20:46] claiming that this is the only thing [00:20:48] that Turning Point Action does that [00:20:50] qualifies as political activity. [00:20:54] all of the rest of the millions of [00:20:56] dollars that they have spent was not for [00:20:58] political activity. [00:21:01] I have a really hard time believing [00:21:03] that. We're going to take a closer look. [00:21:06] If Turning Point Action spent more than [00:21:09] 3% of their budget on political [00:21:11] activity, that means they lied to the [00:21:14] IRS and they lied to their donors and [00:21:16] that is fraud. This would be an omission [00:21:20] of potentially taxable income. So, what [00:21:23] I want to do is an audit. We're going to [00:21:26] do an audit right here, right now, and [00:21:30] you people on the internet can help me [00:21:32] do it. We're going to look at what [00:21:34] Turning Point Action actually does in [00:21:37] real life. And then we are going to [00:21:39] compare that to what they are reporting [00:21:41] in their financials. If it looks like [00:21:44] their political activity exceeds 3%, [00:21:47] that means that they are lying. So to [00:21:50] start out with on their website [00:21:52] tpaction.com [00:21:53] there's an entire page dedicated to [00:21:55] ballot harvesting. It says turning point [00:21:59] actions chase the vote initiative. They [00:22:01] say TP action chased ballots in Arizona, [00:22:05] Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, [00:22:07] Michigan, and Nevada. They describe this [00:22:09] as the radical left was beating us in [00:22:12] the ballot game. In 2024, Turning Point [00:22:15] Action launched the first and most [00:22:18] robust conservative ballot operation. [00:22:21] So, they are specifically saying on the [00:22:23] website that this is partisan. It should [00:22:26] not qualify as a nonpartisan get out the [00:22:29] vote effort. It is extremely partisan. [00:22:33] So, why are the expenses for this not [00:22:35] listed on the 990 form? This chase the [00:22:38] vote initiative sounds like ballot [00:22:40] harvesting. People call this different [00:22:43] names. Ballot harvesting, ballot [00:22:45] chasing, door knocking, whatever you [00:22:48] call it. It involves going to someone's [00:22:50] door and getting their ballot. Ballot [00:22:53] harvesting is not illegal as long as [00:22:55] they follow the rules. Every state has [00:22:57] different election laws. For instance, [00:23:00] in Arizona, ballot harvesting is only [00:23:02] allowed for immediate family members and [00:23:04] caregivers. For the sake of this video, [00:23:07] we are going to assume that Turning [00:23:08] Point is doing ballot harvesting [00:23:10] correctly. I'm just going to assume that [00:23:12] they hired all of these people to [00:23:14] harvest ballots only for their immediate [00:23:16] family members. I know that is a massive [00:23:19] assumption, but we're going to start [00:23:21] there. My problem is not the ballot [00:23:24] harvesting. The problem is how are they [00:23:27] paying for the ballot harvesting? Are [00:23:30] they paying for it out of companies that [00:23:32] are not supposed to be doing political [00:23:34] activity and then not reporting it to [00:23:36] the IRS? Here's a post by Tyler Ber. [00:23:40] Another day, another group of dozens of [00:23:42] full-time ballot chasers being trained [00:23:44] into the field. Hm, I wonder how they [00:23:47] are paying for all of this. [00:23:49] Here's another post by Ashley on X.com. [00:23:53] Ballotchasing in Arizona with TP action. [00:23:56] Make America great again. #Trump2024. [00:24:00] In the photograph, they are wearing red [00:24:02] MAGA hats. Now, in my opinion, if you [00:24:06] are wearing a red MAGA hat and putting [00:24:08] in your social media post #Trump2024, [00:24:12] this is clearly political activity. Her [00:24:14] profile page says she's a college deputy [00:24:16] director at TurningPoint USA, which is [00:24:19] not supposed to do any political [00:24:20] activity. So, is this senior manager [00:24:24] being paid? And where is that money [00:24:26] coming from? Because it does not look [00:24:28] like it was reported as political [00:24:29] activity on the 990 form. Here's a [00:24:32] screenshot from an interview with Tyler [00:24:34] Ber. This looks like he is sitting at [00:24:37] his desk at home. You can see behind his [00:24:39] head a poster that reads, "Knock doors, [00:24:42] win elections." It looks like it is [00:24:44] talking about the Chase the Vote [00:24:46] Initiative. It's on the wall right [00:24:49] behind his desk. for something so [00:24:52] important that Tyler Boyer keeps it [00:24:54] right behind his desk. Does it make [00:24:56] sense to you that political activity [00:24:59] only makes up 3% of the budget of [00:25:01] Turning Point Action? Here's a post from [00:25:04] Matthew Martinez that says, "From [00:25:06] chasing every vote to curing every [00:25:08] ballot. Tonight, TP Action called [00:25:10] thousands of voters to help them cure [00:25:12] their rejected ballots. We are laser [00:25:14] focused on chasing and curing every vote [00:25:17] until polls close here in Wisconsin." On [00:25:20] his profile, he lists Turning Point [00:25:21] Action. I don't know if he works for [00:25:24] them, but it certainly looks like he's [00:25:26] getting paid. This is a post by Janette [00:25:28] Garcia. Some people stack paper. TP [00:25:31] Action stacks paper, and she's holding a [00:25:34] pile of request forms for early voting. [00:25:37] Her profile says she's the CTV deputy [00:25:39] director for Turning Point Action. How [00:25:42] much is she getting paid? She also [00:25:44] posted this meeting today with TP action [00:25:48] chase the vote senior managers and [00:25:50] getting prepared to take on 2026 [00:25:53] and there are all these people. How much [00:25:56] money are these people getting paid? We [00:25:59] know they are getting paid because we [00:26:01] have a job posting now hiring chase the [00:26:05] vote managers in New Hampshire. Visit [00:26:07] tpaction.com/careers. [00:26:10] They are hiring vote managers and paying [00:26:13] them. Here's another advertisement. If [00:26:16] you live in South Phoenix, Lavine, or [00:26:18] downtown Phoenix, Turning Point is [00:26:20] hiring door knockers. Ballot Chasing [00:26:22] representative positions available now. [00:26:25] So, it's not just the managers they're [00:26:27] paying. They are paying the people [00:26:29] knocking on the doors. By the way, the [00:26:32] person who posted this is Tatiana Paya, [00:26:35] who is one of the candidates who paid [00:26:36] money to the UPS store mailbox for 110 [00:26:39] LLC. This is a post from Justine Wadzac, [00:26:43] who is another politician who paid money [00:26:45] to the UPS store mailbox for 110 LLC. [00:26:49] This is wild. This is a series of [00:26:52] photos. Here is Justine wearing a MAGA [00:26:55] hat. She is standing over the shoulder [00:26:57] of a voter watching him fill in the [00:26:59] voting form. She makes sure he fills in [00:27:02] the bubble that she wants and then walks [00:27:04] the voter out to the mailbox to make [00:27:06] sure he puts it in the mail. Now, [00:27:08] correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't [00:27:11] this look like voter intimidation? [00:27:14] I did not know this was legal in the [00:27:16] United States. [00:27:18] How can you look over someone's shoulder [00:27:20] while they are voting? This is not just [00:27:23] doornocking. This is not just talking [00:27:25] about a candidate. This goes so much [00:27:28] further. And also this is extremely [00:27:31] partisan and should be reported in the [00:27:33] financials as political activity. [00:27:36] I want to know how much is this lady [00:27:39] getting paid by Turning Point because [00:27:41] her profile says she is a TP Action CTV [00:27:44] leader and her profile photo shows her [00:27:46] talking on the Charlie Kirk show. How [00:27:50] much is she getting paid? Here's a post [00:27:53] by Sam K. It is currently day six [00:27:57] knocking doors in Mesa, Arizona for the [00:28:00] recall election. Uh it is hot out here. [00:28:04] [snorts] There is not a single cloud in [00:28:06] sight. Super bright. [00:28:09] Um but you know what? I am more [00:28:12] motivated than ever today cuz not only [00:28:14] did I finally get someone to answer the [00:28:16] door after 4 days of knocking and [00:28:19] texting and calling, I don't view this [00:28:21] as work. I view this as a privilege. He [00:28:23] says he does not view this as work. [00:28:26] Really? [00:28:28] How much are you getting paid? [00:28:31] His profile says he's a field [00:28:32] representative for Turning Point Action. [00:28:35] Something else strange. Tyler Ber is [00:28:38] listed on the website of the Arizona [00:28:40] Young Republicans as part of the [00:28:41] advisory board. What is Tyler Ber doing [00:28:44] hanging out with all these young [00:28:46] students? Well, it turns out that he's [00:28:49] paying them money. Here's a post by the [00:28:52] Arizona Young Republicans. Arizona, [00:28:55] let's get Carrie Lake across the finish [00:28:57] line. We need your help to cure ballots. [00:29:00] Sign up with TP Action and help cure [00:29:02] ballots. This was replied to by someone [00:29:04] that says, "Where you all been? You need [00:29:07] to get on board earlier." Arizona Young [00:29:09] Republicans replies, "Most of us [00:29:12] literally work for TP Action, Trump team [00:29:15] or the campaign. I promise you we're [00:29:17] working. LOL. How much money is Tyler [00:29:21] Boyer giving to the students at the [00:29:23] Arizona Young Republicans? So, I have [00:29:26] shown you a lot of information of what [00:29:28] Turning Point Action is actually doing [00:29:30] in real life. I've shown you the photos. [00:29:33] I've shown you the law. I've shown you [00:29:36] how it does not match what is being [00:29:37] reported to the IRS. [00:29:40] To finish this audit, you need to answer [00:29:43] two questions. [00:29:45] Does Turning Point Actions activity [00:29:46] qualify as political activity? And [00:29:49] second, does it seem like that political [00:29:51] activity exceeds the 3% reported to the [00:29:54] IRS on the 990 form? In my opinion, I [00:29:58] think absolutely yes, that they are [00:30:02] lying to the IRS. [00:30:04] What they are doing is so extreme on [00:30:07] such a massive scale with millions of [00:30:10] dollars. I think someone is lying. Now, [00:30:14] for some reason, if you're still not [00:30:16] convinced, [00:30:17] do you remember last week when Turning [00:30:20] Point's lawyer sent me a threatening [00:30:21] letter? That was one of the worst [00:30:24] mistakes that Turning Point has done. [00:30:27] That letter is the key to this entire [00:30:30] story. Because in that letter, they [00:30:33] write out their official reason why [00:30:36] Turning Point Actions budget increased [00:30:38] from $10.7 million in FY23 to $27.2 2 [00:30:42] million in FY24. [00:30:45] This increase of $16.5 million was for, [00:30:49] and I quote, lobbying and political [00:30:53] activity during election years. This is [00:30:56] what Turning Point's own lawyer is [00:30:58] saying this $16.5 million is being used [00:31:01] for. [00:31:03] So why is none of this money being [00:31:06] reported on schedule C in the 990 form? [00:31:11] According to TurningPoint's own official [00:31:13] statement, they are guilty. Now, I [00:31:16] realize we're not doing a real audit [00:31:18] here. We do not have access to all the [00:31:21] financial information. It is possible [00:31:23] that Turning Point has an innocent [00:31:25] explanation for all of this. But from [00:31:28] what little information we do have, it [00:31:31] certainly looks like something illegal [00:31:33] is going on. But here's the crazy part. [00:31:36] Turning Point action is not even my [00:31:39] biggest concern. The biggest problem is [00:31:42] America's turning point, that strange [00:31:45] 501c3 managed by Tyler Ber. It is [00:31:49] managed by the same person who manages [00:31:51] the election focused organizations [00:31:53] Turning Point Action and Turning Point [00:31:55] Pack. But we are supposed to believe [00:31:58] that it is a 501c3 that does absolutely [00:32:02] no political activity whatsoever. [00:32:05] Well, we have already seen the types of [00:32:08] things that Turning Point is not [00:32:09] counting as political activity. [00:32:13] With everything that I have shown you [00:32:14] about Tyler Ber and his operations, [00:32:17] how many of you believe that America's [00:32:20] Turning Point is doing nothing [00:32:22] political? The letter I received last [00:32:24] week from Turning Point's lawyer [00:32:26] revealed the bombshell news that [00:32:28] America's Turning Point was missing [00:32:30] employees on its 990 forms. a lot of [00:32:34] employees. It was around 80 employees [00:32:37] that were not reported. [00:32:39] So now we know these people exist. The [00:32:42] obvious question now is who are these [00:32:46] people? What were these people doing? [00:32:50] One explanation could be doornockers. [00:32:54] Of course, if those doornockers were [00:32:56] wearing MAGA hats, that would make them [00:32:59] political, which would make them illegal [00:33:01] under a 501c3. [00:33:03] America's Turning Point also does not [00:33:06] get donations. It gets all of its [00:33:09] revenue by transferring money out of [00:33:11] Turning Point USA. I mentioned before in [00:33:14] FY24, $8.6 million was transferred from [00:33:18] Turning Point USA to America's Turning [00:33:21] Point. [00:33:23] So, let me tell you what I think is [00:33:24] going on. [00:33:26] Tyler Ber manages these political [00:33:28] companies. The Trump election is coming [00:33:31] up in 2024. [00:33:33] Tyler Boyer realizes he needs more [00:33:35] people to do ballot harvesting. So, he [00:33:38] decides, let's just steal the donations [00:33:42] from Charlie Kirk's Turning Point USA. [00:33:45] So, he transfers $8.6 6 million into the [00:33:48] company he manages, America's Turning [00:33:50] Point. And then he hires a bunch of [00:33:53] people for illegal political activity. [00:33:57] And he tells everyone, "Come on, no one [00:34:00] will ever know. Charlie Kirk doesn't [00:34:02] even have to know. We will just say it [00:34:05] is non-partisan. [00:34:07] We will call it get out the vote [00:34:09] efforts. No one's ever going to ask [00:34:11] questions. No one will ever look at the [00:34:13] photographs. Don't worry about it. [00:34:16] Except I think that Charlie Kirk found [00:34:18] out. This fits the timeline of the Baker [00:34:22] Tilly audit that concluded on June 20th, [00:34:24] 2025 that would have revealed all this [00:34:27] information to Charlie Kirk shortly [00:34:29] before his murder. If all of these [00:34:31] people getting paid from America's [00:34:33] Turning Point are not doing political [00:34:35] activity, then what are they doing? In [00:34:39] none of the photos I have seen is there [00:34:42] anything that would qualify as [00:34:44] non-political activity. [00:34:47] So what are they doing? [00:34:50] In my opinion, this looks blatantly [00:34:53] illegal. It looks like they are stealing [00:34:56] donations and using them for something [00:34:58] different than what they promised the [00:35:00] donors. What they are allegedly using it [00:35:03] for is illegal activity. [00:35:06] This is why the letter with Donald [00:35:08] Trump's alleged handwriting is so [00:35:11] important. It looks like they stole the [00:35:13] money to use on Donald Trump's campaign. [00:35:17] And now Donald Trump himself could be [00:35:19] involved in an attempt to cover up the [00:35:22] fraud at Turning Point. The same fraud [00:35:25] that he himself benefited from. Is this [00:35:28] how Donald Trump is planning for [00:35:30] Republicans to win the midterm [00:35:32] elections? [00:35:33] This week, Candace Owens broke a [00:35:36] shocking news story. [00:35:38] >> Think about the size and scale of the [00:35:40] event that they put on at Charlie's [00:35:42] memorial service. They had AFSE. They [00:35:44] had a huge donor thing at Mara Lago. So, [00:35:47] everyone's been killing themselves. And [00:35:49] no one's getting raises and bonuses. And [00:35:51] yet, according to this person, Turning [00:35:54] Point USA has brought in $250 [00:35:58] million [00:36:00] since Charlie's assassination. [00:36:02] $250 million. [00:36:05] Are the Turning Point executives [00:36:07] planning on stealing those donations and [00:36:10] using those funds illegally for [00:36:12] political activity? [00:36:14] Because that is what it looks like. I'm [00:36:16] a conservative and I do not want the [00:36:19] Republicans to win the midterms if [00:36:21] they're planning on doing it by breaking [00:36:23] the law. [00:36:25] If we have to choose between winning and [00:36:27] doing the right thing, we need to decide [00:36:30] to do the right thing. [00:36:33] Come on. No reasonable person thinks [00:36:36] that Turning Point Action was only [00:36:38] spending 3% of their budget on political [00:36:41] activity. [00:36:42] They should not be stealing donations in [00:36:46] order to win. The ends do not justify [00:36:49] the means. I want to emphasize that this [00:36:52] is not a theoretical discussion about [00:36:54] the tax code. [00:36:56] Turning Point is hurting people. They [00:37:00] are destroying people's lives. [00:37:03] I've talked before about Julie [00:37:05] Spillsbury. What Turning Point did to [00:37:08] her was disgusting. [00:37:10] This was a city council woman, a fellow [00:37:13] Republican, and Turning Point [00:37:15] orchestrated a recall election in the [00:37:17] middle of her term because she would not [00:37:19] vote how they told her to vote. They're [00:37:21] not recalling Democrats. This is what [00:37:24] they're doing to Republicans. Here's the [00:37:27] photo I showed earlier of Turning [00:37:28] Point's shady election practices. [00:37:31] This is how they destroyed the life of [00:37:34] Julie Spillsbury. And it looks like they [00:37:36] did it by violating the tax code. [00:37:39] Baker Tilly is the accounting firm that [00:37:41] has been performing the annual financial [00:37:43] audit for Turning Point. They say there [00:37:46] is nothing wrong with the financials at [00:37:48] Turning Point. [00:37:50] I have to ask Baker Tilly when you were [00:37:53] doing the audit. Did you look around at [00:37:57] what the company was actually doing in [00:37:58] real life? Because [snorts] I can send [00:38:00] you all the photos we were looking at. [00:38:02] We have all seen the video of Erica [00:38:04] Kirk's endorsement of JD Vance. I want [00:38:07] to know what specific audit procedure [00:38:09] you did to make sure that they are not [00:38:11] engaged in any political activity within [00:38:14] their 501c3 organizations [00:38:17] because the evidence to me seems like it [00:38:19] would be incredibly obvious. [00:38:22] If Baker Tilly overlooked these [00:38:24] problems, they can also be criminally [00:38:28] charged. Remember what happened with [00:38:30] Steve Bannon? He had a nonprofit where [00:38:32] he was trying to raise money to build [00:38:34] the wall at the border. He and his [00:38:36] entire leadership team was charged with [00:38:39] fraud because they were accused of using [00:38:42] funds for a different purpose than they [00:38:44] promised donors. Now, I have a whole [00:38:46] separate video going over Steve Bannon's [00:38:48] case, and I think that what happened to [00:38:50] him was unfair and he should never have [00:38:52] been prosecuted, but they were [00:38:55] prosecuted and three executives went to [00:38:58] prison. [00:38:59] The only reason Steve Bannon didn't go [00:39:01] to prison was that he took a deal where [00:39:03] he plead guilty. So if we were to apply [00:39:06] that same standard to the case I have [00:39:08] laid out against Turning Point, the [00:39:10] entire leadership team would go straight [00:39:13] to prison. [00:39:15] Tyler Ber prison. The CFO Justin Olsen [00:39:19] prison. Andrew Colette prison. Blake Nef [00:39:24] prison. Anyone who knew about the [00:39:26] political activity and was involved in [00:39:28] the coverup would go to prison. And yes, [00:39:32] that includes Erica Kirk, whose name is [00:39:35] on the letter with Donald Trump's [00:39:37] alleged handwriting. Donald Trump, who [00:39:40] talks all the time about election [00:39:42] integrity, apparently does not care [00:39:44] about election related fraud when it [00:39:46] deals with his friends. I am angry. [00:39:50] I believed Donald Trump when he said [00:39:52] that the Democrats were cheating in the [00:39:54] elections. [00:39:56] >> It was a rigged election. Everybody now [00:39:57] knows that they found out [00:40:00] people will soon be prosecuted for what [00:40:02] they did. [00:40:05] It's probably breaking news, but it [00:40:07] should be. It was a rigged election. [00:40:09] Can't have rigged elections. [00:40:10] >> But doesn't this make him a hypocrite? [00:40:13] How can he talk about election integrity [00:40:16] and then help to cover up what Turning [00:40:18] Point is doing? If I were Steve Bannon, [00:40:21] I would be so angry. [00:40:24] Steve Bannon's life was destroyed over [00:40:27] his nonprofit. [00:40:29] And what these people at Turning Point [00:40:31] are doing is allegedly so much worse. [00:40:34] And they're not even getting a slap on [00:40:36] the wrist. [00:40:38] This is so unjust and so unfair. I think [00:40:42] it is time for law enforcement to start [00:40:45] taking action. Chris Mays is Arizona's [00:40:48] attorney general. Since I've been [00:40:50] talking about these issues, she has done [00:40:53] nothing. [00:40:55] Chris Maize, I don't know how much more [00:40:58] evidence I have to show you before you [00:41:00] order a police raid on the offices of [00:41:04] Turning Point. I've done all your work [00:41:07] for you. All you have to do is walk into [00:41:10] court and play my videos. I've reached [00:41:13] out to Turning Point for comment. [00:41:15] They've not responded with answers to [00:41:16] any of my questions as of the time this [00:41:18] video was posted. Now, if you watch my [00:41:21] channel, you know that I like to be fair [00:41:23] and balanced. So, I think we should [00:41:25] bring in our favorite attorney, Robert [00:41:27] Barnes, to give Turning Point side of [00:41:30] the argument about what is going on. [00:41:33] What should people know ultimately about [00:41:36] the claims like people with Wolves and [00:41:39] Finance and all the claims and [00:41:42] allegations of impropriy when it comes [00:41:44] to their funds in general? And then you [00:41:48] know what would you like them to know [00:41:49] about TPUSA when it comes to you know [00:41:52] their finances? [00:41:54] >> So the uh there was nothing wrong at all [00:41:57] with any aspect of TPUSA's finances. [00:42:00] They were clearly complied with tax law. [00:42:03] There was no fraud there. No evidence of [00:42:05] any fraud there misappropriation of any [00:42:07] kind there. Charlie didn't suspect any [00:42:09] kind of misappropriation. He always [00:42:11] wanted to act at maximum efficiency. He [00:42:14] was the most efficient operator. uh [00:42:17] under the most scrutiny of any NGO in [00:42:20] the last half century. I mean so the he [00:42:22] he was very disciplined about that. All [00:42:24] the accusations are false. There's no [00:42:27] proof to them whatsoever. If you look at [00:42:28] the 990 forms, they completely comply [00:42:31] with existing tax law. That's why you've [00:42:33] seen nobody like people on the left that [00:42:35] hate Turning Point, they haven't come [00:42:36] out and made any of these claims because [00:42:38] nobody who understands tax law could [00:42:40] credibly say anything bad about their [00:42:43] >> about their tax returns. [00:42:45] >> And I had thought about that. That would [00:42:47] have been red meat for the left and I [00:42:48] hadn't seen them act on that at all. And [00:42:51] that's that is a really good point on [00:42:54] that. [00:42:55] >> How does he know this? [00:42:57] How does he know the accounting records [00:42:59] of Turning Point so well that he can say [00:43:01] there are no problems with the finances [00:43:04] of Turning Point? [00:43:06] How does he know this? He has no [00:43:09] evidence. He says, "Just trust me, guys. [00:43:13] There's nothing wrong here. [00:43:16] Keep in mind that this conversation was [00:43:18] happening on a podcast called Paramount [00:43:20] Tactical, who recently accidentally [00:43:23] leaked text messages he received from [00:43:25] Andrew Kovvette. This suggests that [00:43:28] Paramount Tactical is really just [00:43:30] propaganda for Turning Point. And then [00:43:33] he goes on [00:43:34] >> and the uh and I think Candace had some [00:43:36] other ambitions with Charlie all the way [00:43:38] back that she was disappointed by and [00:43:40] things that happened. I think there's [00:43:42] maybe more reasons she's anti- Erica uh [00:43:45] than other than people know about, but [00:43:46] I'll leave that as is for now. But [00:43:48] Charlie was one of the great Americans [00:43:50] and we dishonor and disrespect his [00:43:52] legacy and his life by letting Candace [00:43:54] Owen spread false conspiracies that [00:43:56] could let his murderer walk free. I [00:43:58] mean, she has all the fingerprints of a [00:44:00] scop. Do you know what I mean? And then [00:44:01] you look at I mean, she's married to the [00:44:03] son of a British lord. I mean, you know [00:44:05] what I mean? I mean, if I'm looking for [00:44:07] unusual connections, it ain't in Eric or [00:44:10] Kirk's family. It's it's who Candace is [00:44:12] married to. I mean, there's all kinds of [00:44:14] issues there. The uh I mean, she was [00:44:17] known as Queen Candace all the way back [00:44:19] to CPAC. I remember 2018, everybody, all [00:44:22] the other conservatives called her Queen [00:44:23] Candace because that was her mindset [00:44:25] already. So, the idea that we're going [00:44:26] to let this queen I call her the queen [00:44:28] of QAnon now. She's just QAnon part two. [00:44:31] >> Okay, now he's just making up random [00:44:34] stuff. He's just making stuff up. And [00:44:38] this is the guy who's accusing me of [00:44:40] misleading people. [00:44:43] I've got to say that he's starting to [00:44:45] lose his likability. The way Turning [00:44:48] Point is acting reminds me of the mob. [00:44:51] And if you think about the biggest [00:44:52] convictions of mobsters in the US, they [00:44:55] were not convicted of murder. [00:44:58] Al Capone was sentenced to 11 years in [00:45:00] prison for tax evasion. Mickey Cohen was [00:45:03] convicted of tax evasion twice. Frank [00:45:06] Costello was convicted of tax evasion [00:45:08] and sentenced to 5 years in prison. [00:45:10] Enoch Nucky Johnson was convicted of tax [00:45:13] evasion and sentenced to 10 years in [00:45:14] prison. Waxi Gordon was convicted of tax [00:45:17] evasion and sentenced to 10 years in [00:45:19] prison. [00:45:21] These people were not convicted of [00:45:22] murder, violence, trafficking, or money [00:45:25] laundering. They were sent to prison for [00:45:28] tax fraud. Now, I want to hear from you. [00:45:32] Do you think that Turning Point is [00:45:33] committing fraud? Let me know in the [00:45:35] comments down below. And if you like [00:45:37] this video, don't forget to hit that [00:45:38] subscribe button so you don't miss out [00:45:40] on future videos. If you want to support [00:45:42] independent journalism like this [00:45:44] channel, consider signing up for a [00:45:45] membership on my website, [00:45:46] wolvesandenfinance.com. [00:45:48] For $6 a month, your support helps me to [00:45:51] keep making these videos. Thank you to [00:45:53] everyone who has signed up. I'm Zach [00:45:55] from Wolves and Finance. Thank you for [00:45:58] watching. [00:45:59] Heat. Heat. [music] [00:46:05] [music] [00:46:12] [music]