youtube

Untitled Document

youtube
P19 V16 V11 D1 P17
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (1,540 words)
[00:00:00] I know that everyone wanted me to talk [00:00:01] about Baron Coleman's new electric [00:00:03] electrocution by a microphone idea. [00:00:05] >> Conspiracy [music] theories are entering [00:00:07] a dangerous [00:00:08] >> information is the oxygen of the [00:00:11] democracy. [00:00:11] >> There's [music] so much evidence out [00:00:13] there that even if less than 1% is true [00:00:17] that enough to collapse the current [00:00:19] paradigm and change the whole planet. [00:00:25] >> Um was what I saw and that's [00:00:28] unfortunate. I'm really bummed that she [00:00:29] feels that way. I'm bummed that that [00:00:31] that happened. Um I think that when you [00:00:34] get into the YouTube space, there's a [00:00:36] lot of nuance to sourcing stuff [music] [00:00:39] and and crediting people. And sometimes [00:00:42] people's toes get stepped on, [00:00:43] unfortunately. [00:00:46] And I just I hope that there's no bad [00:00:48] blood there. I hope that Baron can sort [00:00:49] that out with Ally and can properly [00:00:51] apologize if she feels slighted. Whether [00:00:52] or not that was his intention, I I'm [00:00:54] Baron seems like an amazing guy and I [00:00:56] don't believe that his intention would [00:00:58] be to steal someone's work or anything. [00:00:59] I think there was some misunderstanding [00:01:01] and miscommunications there. Um, and [00:01:03] they both were obviously contributing [00:01:05] very thoroughly to that. That was very [00:01:06] much like let's not lose Ally Files's [00:01:09] contribution to that work. Um, but [00:01:12] because she's a faceless account on [00:01:14] Twitter, not a video podcaster on [00:01:17] YouTube, it's very easy to forget that [00:01:19] often the anons on Twitter contribute [00:01:22] the most. Often the anons on Twitter are [00:01:24] the unsung heroes of the whole thing. [00:01:26] And it is important to credit anons on [00:01:28] Twitter and everywhere else because they [00:01:30] are just as much investigators as the [00:01:32] rest of us and they are just as powerful [00:01:34] as the rest of us when they uncover that [00:01:36] one little thing. And so it's important [00:01:39] to give credit where credit's due and to [00:01:42] um to [00:01:45] not change that philosophy based upon [00:01:48] the perceived size of someone's platform [00:01:50] because in some ways it's almost more um [00:01:54] it's almost more important to credit the [00:01:56] small accounts because they have no [00:01:58] power to get that credit for themselves. [00:02:00] And if you're a big account getting [00:02:01] something from a small account, it's [00:02:03] it's you have so much more to offer them [00:02:05] by just giving them a good shout out and [00:02:07] and saying thanks for their work and [00:02:09] helping them grow because you never know [00:02:11] when some really amazing researcher [00:02:13] might be in some small little account [00:02:15] that might have so much to contribute if [00:02:18] they can just get noticed and and [00:02:20] someone can see how good their work is. [00:02:22] And so, um, yeah, my understanding is [00:02:26] that, um, Baron is sorting that out and [00:02:29] and is giving credit and is I he seems [00:02:31] like a great guy to me. So, that's the [00:02:33] first layer there is I'm I'm hoping that [00:02:35] they sort that out well. And from all [00:02:37] indications I'm seeing, they are. And [00:02:39] it's unfortunate that that little [00:02:40] misunderstanding happened. I did not [00:02:42] know that microphone electrocutions were [00:02:44] a thing at all. But apparently, they are [00:02:48] a thing just outside of government [00:02:51] assassination plots. Apparently [00:02:52] microphone uh electrocutions are like a [00:02:55] legitimate stage concern for people [00:02:58] using [music] wireless microphones is my [00:03:01] understanding. Um and that does kind of [00:03:03] make sense [00:03:05] once I thought about it and once I [00:03:06] looked at the history of such things [00:03:09] happening and that's [ __ ] wild. [00:03:11] That's horrifying. I did not know that. [00:03:13] That makes me scared to to hold a [00:03:15] microphone. Um that being said, I don't [00:03:19] understand the current version of the [00:03:20] theory. Um, and I haven't watched [00:03:22] everything about it, but I'm very [00:03:25] hesitant to put my platform behind new [00:03:28] theories until I investigate them for [00:03:29] myself for my own level of vetting. For [00:03:32] example, I haven't dove into Candace's [00:03:36] new story about the new whistle like [00:03:38] leaker, whistleblower, military guy that [00:03:40] gave her that new story because I just [00:03:42] don't know the information about it. I [00:03:43] haven't vetted it. I don't really have a [00:03:45] way to vet it. So, I'm not just going to [00:03:46] assume that it's true just because [00:03:48] Candace said it, okay? because um that [00:03:52] wouldn't benefit anyone. It wouldn't it [00:03:53] wouldn't benefit the truth. It wouldn't [00:03:55] benefit Candace. It wouldn't benefit me. [00:03:56] If she's got the receipts, she's going [00:03:58] to present the receipts. And if somehow [00:04:00] it's some dude fooling her with all [00:04:02] these receipts, then it's like, okay, [00:04:03] what the [ __ ] is that? If some if [00:04:05] there's some organized operation to like [00:04:09] discredit Candace by creating all these [00:04:11] fake government documents and fake [00:04:13] storyline and whistleblower and all this [00:04:15] [ __ ] then that's super suspicious as [00:04:17] well. Um, and I do know like Candace's [00:04:20] team is extremely good at vetting [00:04:22] information. They're very thorough and [00:04:23] smart people. And so I inherently do [00:04:26] trust them to do their due diligence, [00:04:28] but with a story that complex, it's like [00:04:31] I'm not just going to overtly trust it [00:04:33] until I see the evidence and I see the [00:04:34] documentation. I'm just going to watch [00:04:36] and and see what comes of it. And I'm on [00:04:38] this other train that's pretty important [00:04:40] right now. So that's where I'm at with [00:04:41] the microphone theory. Same thing. I'm I [00:04:43] I don't have the research and expertise [00:04:45] and haven't had the time to do it for [00:04:47] myself to understand it. Um [00:04:52] my understanding is that the table that [00:04:54] that Charlie is sitting on is very [00:04:56] significant to that theory. And in my [00:04:58] mind, it seems like the table would [00:05:00] separate him from everyone else and keep [00:05:01] the electric shock involved in just him [00:05:04] and not shock everyone else through the [00:05:06] grass or some [ __ ] Um, [00:05:10] and and honestly like if that's what's [00:05:11] happening then I'm assuming that it's [00:05:13] not just like a standard microphone [00:05:15] electric shock. I would be assuming that [00:05:17] it would be like a customized [music] [00:05:19] assassination style weapon that is [00:05:21] disguised as that disguised as gunshots. [00:05:23] Like I I don't know. I don't know. Um [00:05:27] I'm going to watch it and see what comes [00:05:29] of it and I'm going to see I'm shocked. [00:05:32] [snorts] Um, [00:05:34] being on the platform is an interesting [00:05:36] detail. Seeing the photos of Charlie's [00:05:39] arms apparently having discoloration. [00:05:42] Baron actually texted me one of those [00:05:43] photos of Charlie's arm with the red [00:05:45] discoloration down by his hand [music] [00:05:47] and the little bit of blood splatter up [00:05:49] on his forearm. And what I sent back to [00:05:51] him was like, "Hey, it doesn't look like [00:05:53] it's blood because the the blood spatter [00:05:56] on his arm is not wiped off. It's [00:05:57] clearly little speckles of dark red [00:05:59] blood up here. And down here it's like [00:06:01] at best it's blood that has been [00:06:03] thoroughly wiped off of his skin, but [00:06:06] that's it. It those two things don't [00:06:08] square. And so it's like, yeah, it does [00:06:09] look like discoloration in his hand for [00:06:11] some strange reason. Um, and I don't [00:06:14] know what to make of that. I don't know [00:06:17] what to make of that. Um, [00:06:21] discolored because blood pools could be [00:06:23] right. Could be. I'm no expert. [00:06:32] Yeah, I I don't know. I don't know what [00:06:33] to make of it. We know that that some [00:06:36] sort of projectile hit him in the neck [00:06:37] and caused the cavitation that you would [00:06:39] expect to see from a high caliber or a [00:06:42] highowered um rifle round. [00:06:45] Um that's my understanding based on the [00:06:48] research that I've done. So, [00:06:55] I'm glad that lots of people are digging [00:06:57] into lots of theories. I'm glad that [00:06:58] everything's getting explored. Kind of [00:07:01] everything is on the table because I [00:07:03] haven't seen anyone credibly evidence [00:07:07] the Tyler Robinson theory yet. The Tyler [00:07:09] Robinson theory has a thousand holes in [00:07:11] it. and not the least of which being [00:07:12] that the entire Fed slop army is pushing [00:07:16] it exactly like COVID, exactly like BLM, [00:07:20] exactly like every propaganda campaign [00:07:22] ever. And so when that is the army [00:07:25] pushing the the mainstream Fed [00:07:27] narrative, that's just another strike [00:07:29] against it in my book. Um, we weren't [00:07:32] born yesterday. And so if that theory is [00:07:37] is a lie, [00:07:39] then the next most likely things become [00:07:42] very suspicious, very big, probably [00:07:46] foreign government involved. [00:07:49] And [00:07:52] at that point, it's like [00:07:55] look no further than the pager [00:07:57] explosions attack to realize that you [00:08:00] might be dealing with a weapon that you [00:08:02] don't understand. you might be dealing [00:08:03] with a method of assassination that is [00:08:05] sinister and as of yet undisclosed, [00:08:08] unknown. [00:08:10] So, um that's why I'm willing to [00:08:12] entertain like at least briefly the palm [00:08:15] gun theories, the the remote rifle [00:08:18] theories, the remote drone theories, the [00:08:20] electrocution theories, briefly [00:08:23] entertained the explosive theory, [00:08:25] although you can kind of like square in [00:08:27] on like what would that mean? Like how [00:08:29] would that work? And some of them seem [00:08:31] way less likely than others to me. And [00:08:33] honestly, I still think the most likely [00:08:35] theory is just a gun. Um, maybe not from [00:08:39] the same perch. Maybe from the same [00:08:41] perch. Definitely not a 300 6 in my [00:08:43] opinion. That's that's how I feel about [00:08:45] it. Um, [00:08:49] yeah, government tech is far beyond what [00:08:51] we the public see. And you need only do [00:08:54] a little bit of cursory research about [00:08:56] DARPA and the CIA to know that. [00:08:59] >> That would be enough to collapse the [00:09:01] current paradigm and change the whole [00:09:04] planet.
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
yt_eBk6F8s7mYY
Dataset
youtube

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!