📄 Extracted Text (1,540 words)
[00:00:00] I know that everyone wanted me to talk
[00:00:01] about Baron Coleman's new electric
[00:00:03] electrocution by a microphone idea.
[00:00:05] >> Conspiracy [music] theories are entering
[00:00:07] a dangerous
[00:00:08] >> information is the oxygen of the
[00:00:11] democracy.
[00:00:11] >> There's [music] so much evidence out
[00:00:13] there that even if less than 1% is true
[00:00:17] that enough to collapse the current
[00:00:19] paradigm and change the whole planet.
[00:00:25] >> Um was what I saw and that's
[00:00:28] unfortunate. I'm really bummed that she
[00:00:29] feels that way. I'm bummed that that
[00:00:31] that happened. Um I think that when you
[00:00:34] get into the YouTube space, there's a
[00:00:36] lot of nuance to sourcing stuff [music]
[00:00:39] and and crediting people. And sometimes
[00:00:42] people's toes get stepped on,
[00:00:43] unfortunately.
[00:00:46] And I just I hope that there's no bad
[00:00:48] blood there. I hope that Baron can sort
[00:00:49] that out with Ally and can properly
[00:00:51] apologize if she feels slighted. Whether
[00:00:52] or not that was his intention, I I'm
[00:00:54] Baron seems like an amazing guy and I
[00:00:56] don't believe that his intention would
[00:00:58] be to steal someone's work or anything.
[00:00:59] I think there was some misunderstanding
[00:01:01] and miscommunications there. Um, and
[00:01:03] they both were obviously contributing
[00:01:05] very thoroughly to that. That was very
[00:01:06] much like let's not lose Ally Files's
[00:01:09] contribution to that work. Um, but
[00:01:12] because she's a faceless account on
[00:01:14] Twitter, not a video podcaster on
[00:01:17] YouTube, it's very easy to forget that
[00:01:19] often the anons on Twitter contribute
[00:01:22] the most. Often the anons on Twitter are
[00:01:24] the unsung heroes of the whole thing.
[00:01:26] And it is important to credit anons on
[00:01:28] Twitter and everywhere else because they
[00:01:30] are just as much investigators as the
[00:01:32] rest of us and they are just as powerful
[00:01:34] as the rest of us when they uncover that
[00:01:36] one little thing. And so it's important
[00:01:39] to give credit where credit's due and to
[00:01:42] um to
[00:01:45] not change that philosophy based upon
[00:01:48] the perceived size of someone's platform
[00:01:50] because in some ways it's almost more um
[00:01:54] it's almost more important to credit the
[00:01:56] small accounts because they have no
[00:01:58] power to get that credit for themselves.
[00:02:00] And if you're a big account getting
[00:02:01] something from a small account, it's
[00:02:03] it's you have so much more to offer them
[00:02:05] by just giving them a good shout out and
[00:02:07] and saying thanks for their work and
[00:02:09] helping them grow because you never know
[00:02:11] when some really amazing researcher
[00:02:13] might be in some small little account
[00:02:15] that might have so much to contribute if
[00:02:18] they can just get noticed and and
[00:02:20] someone can see how good their work is.
[00:02:22] And so, um, yeah, my understanding is
[00:02:26] that, um, Baron is sorting that out and
[00:02:29] and is giving credit and is I he seems
[00:02:31] like a great guy to me. So, that's the
[00:02:33] first layer there is I'm I'm hoping that
[00:02:35] they sort that out well. And from all
[00:02:37] indications I'm seeing, they are. And
[00:02:39] it's unfortunate that that little
[00:02:40] misunderstanding happened. I did not
[00:02:42] know that microphone electrocutions were
[00:02:44] a thing at all. But apparently, they are
[00:02:48] a thing just outside of government
[00:02:51] assassination plots. Apparently
[00:02:52] microphone uh electrocutions are like a
[00:02:55] legitimate stage concern for people
[00:02:58] using [music] wireless microphones is my
[00:03:01] understanding. Um and that does kind of
[00:03:03] make sense
[00:03:05] once I thought about it and once I
[00:03:06] looked at the history of such things
[00:03:09] happening and that's [ __ ] wild.
[00:03:11] That's horrifying. I did not know that.
[00:03:13] That makes me scared to to hold a
[00:03:15] microphone. Um that being said, I don't
[00:03:19] understand the current version of the
[00:03:20] theory. Um, and I haven't watched
[00:03:22] everything about it, but I'm very
[00:03:25] hesitant to put my platform behind new
[00:03:28] theories until I investigate them for
[00:03:29] myself for my own level of vetting. For
[00:03:32] example, I haven't dove into Candace's
[00:03:36] new story about the new whistle like
[00:03:38] leaker, whistleblower, military guy that
[00:03:40] gave her that new story because I just
[00:03:42] don't know the information about it. I
[00:03:43] haven't vetted it. I don't really have a
[00:03:45] way to vet it. So, I'm not just going to
[00:03:46] assume that it's true just because
[00:03:48] Candace said it, okay? because um that
[00:03:52] wouldn't benefit anyone. It wouldn't it
[00:03:53] wouldn't benefit the truth. It wouldn't
[00:03:55] benefit Candace. It wouldn't benefit me.
[00:03:56] If she's got the receipts, she's going
[00:03:58] to present the receipts. And if somehow
[00:04:00] it's some dude fooling her with all
[00:04:02] these receipts, then it's like, okay,
[00:04:03] what the [ __ ] is that? If some if
[00:04:05] there's some organized operation to like
[00:04:09] discredit Candace by creating all these
[00:04:11] fake government documents and fake
[00:04:13] storyline and whistleblower and all this
[00:04:15] [ __ ] then that's super suspicious as
[00:04:17] well. Um, and I do know like Candace's
[00:04:20] team is extremely good at vetting
[00:04:22] information. They're very thorough and
[00:04:23] smart people. And so I inherently do
[00:04:26] trust them to do their due diligence,
[00:04:28] but with a story that complex, it's like
[00:04:31] I'm not just going to overtly trust it
[00:04:33] until I see the evidence and I see the
[00:04:34] documentation. I'm just going to watch
[00:04:36] and and see what comes of it. And I'm on
[00:04:38] this other train that's pretty important
[00:04:40] right now. So that's where I'm at with
[00:04:41] the microphone theory. Same thing. I'm I
[00:04:43] I don't have the research and expertise
[00:04:45] and haven't had the time to do it for
[00:04:47] myself to understand it. Um
[00:04:52] my understanding is that the table that
[00:04:54] that Charlie is sitting on is very
[00:04:56] significant to that theory. And in my
[00:04:58] mind, it seems like the table would
[00:05:00] separate him from everyone else and keep
[00:05:01] the electric shock involved in just him
[00:05:04] and not shock everyone else through the
[00:05:06] grass or some [ __ ] Um,
[00:05:10] and and honestly like if that's what's
[00:05:11] happening then I'm assuming that it's
[00:05:13] not just like a standard microphone
[00:05:15] electric shock. I would be assuming that
[00:05:17] it would be like a customized [music]
[00:05:19] assassination style weapon that is
[00:05:21] disguised as that disguised as gunshots.
[00:05:23] Like I I don't know. I don't know. Um
[00:05:27] I'm going to watch it and see what comes
[00:05:29] of it and I'm going to see I'm shocked.
[00:05:32] [snorts] Um,
[00:05:34] being on the platform is an interesting
[00:05:36] detail. Seeing the photos of Charlie's
[00:05:39] arms apparently having discoloration.
[00:05:42] Baron actually texted me one of those
[00:05:43] photos of Charlie's arm with the red
[00:05:45] discoloration down by his hand [music]
[00:05:47] and the little bit of blood splatter up
[00:05:49] on his forearm. And what I sent back to
[00:05:51] him was like, "Hey, it doesn't look like
[00:05:53] it's blood because the the blood spatter
[00:05:56] on his arm is not wiped off. It's
[00:05:57] clearly little speckles of dark red
[00:05:59] blood up here. And down here it's like
[00:06:01] at best it's blood that has been
[00:06:03] thoroughly wiped off of his skin, but
[00:06:06] that's it. It those two things don't
[00:06:08] square. And so it's like, yeah, it does
[00:06:09] look like discoloration in his hand for
[00:06:11] some strange reason. Um, and I don't
[00:06:14] know what to make of that. I don't know
[00:06:17] what to make of that. Um,
[00:06:21] discolored because blood pools could be
[00:06:23] right. Could be. I'm no expert.
[00:06:32] Yeah, I I don't know. I don't know what
[00:06:33] to make of it. We know that that some
[00:06:36] sort of projectile hit him in the neck
[00:06:37] and caused the cavitation that you would
[00:06:39] expect to see from a high caliber or a
[00:06:42] highowered um rifle round.
[00:06:45] Um that's my understanding based on the
[00:06:48] research that I've done. So,
[00:06:55] I'm glad that lots of people are digging
[00:06:57] into lots of theories. I'm glad that
[00:06:58] everything's getting explored. Kind of
[00:07:01] everything is on the table because I
[00:07:03] haven't seen anyone credibly evidence
[00:07:07] the Tyler Robinson theory yet. The Tyler
[00:07:09] Robinson theory has a thousand holes in
[00:07:11] it. and not the least of which being
[00:07:12] that the entire Fed slop army is pushing
[00:07:16] it exactly like COVID, exactly like BLM,
[00:07:20] exactly like every propaganda campaign
[00:07:22] ever. And so when that is the army
[00:07:25] pushing the the mainstream Fed
[00:07:27] narrative, that's just another strike
[00:07:29] against it in my book. Um, we weren't
[00:07:32] born yesterday. And so if that theory is
[00:07:37] is a lie,
[00:07:39] then the next most likely things become
[00:07:42] very suspicious, very big, probably
[00:07:46] foreign government involved.
[00:07:49] And
[00:07:52] at that point, it's like
[00:07:55] look no further than the pager
[00:07:57] explosions attack to realize that you
[00:08:00] might be dealing with a weapon that you
[00:08:02] don't understand. you might be dealing
[00:08:03] with a method of assassination that is
[00:08:05] sinister and as of yet undisclosed,
[00:08:08] unknown.
[00:08:10] So, um that's why I'm willing to
[00:08:12] entertain like at least briefly the palm
[00:08:15] gun theories, the the remote rifle
[00:08:18] theories, the remote drone theories, the
[00:08:20] electrocution theories, briefly
[00:08:23] entertained the explosive theory,
[00:08:25] although you can kind of like square in
[00:08:27] on like what would that mean? Like how
[00:08:29] would that work? And some of them seem
[00:08:31] way less likely than others to me. And
[00:08:33] honestly, I still think the most likely
[00:08:35] theory is just a gun. Um, maybe not from
[00:08:39] the same perch. Maybe from the same
[00:08:41] perch. Definitely not a 300 6 in my
[00:08:43] opinion. That's that's how I feel about
[00:08:45] it. Um,
[00:08:49] yeah, government tech is far beyond what
[00:08:51] we the public see. And you need only do
[00:08:54] a little bit of cursory research about
[00:08:56] DARPA and the CIA to know that.
[00:08:59] >> That would be enough to collapse the
[00:09:01] current paradigm and change the whole
[00:09:04] planet.
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
yt_eBk6F8s7mYY
Dataset
youtube
Comments 0