Untitled Document

[00:00:00] In case you didn't know, Tyler Ber has [00:00:03] been putting a lot of effort into the [00:00:05] size of his coahones. [00:00:07] Um, he's obviously been putting more [00:00:09] effort into his own ball sack than into [00:00:12] his transparency, his company, his legal [00:00:15] threats, his investigation skills, [00:00:18] anything else. [00:00:19] But at least he's putting a lot of [00:00:21] effort into his ball sack. [00:00:22] >> Conspiracy [music] theories are entering [00:00:24] a danger. [00:00:25] >> Information is the oxygen of the [00:00:27] democracy. There's so much evidence out [00:00:29] there that [music] even if less than 1% [00:00:32] is true, [00:00:33] that will be enough to collapse the [00:00:35] current paradigm and change the whole [00:00:38] planet. [00:00:42] Doodle, [00:00:44] what's up? Shout out to Coach Colin. [00:00:47] Shout out to Coach Colin on the intro. [00:00:49] It's okay, Gigi. Gigi got freaked out by [00:00:51] Coach Colin's doodaloo. [00:00:54] Yeah, Gigi, it's okay. We're just We're [00:00:55] just learning from coach. Yeah, don't [00:00:57] worry. There's no intruders. You're all [00:00:59] good. We have got some spicy new [00:01:02] developments in the financial situation [00:01:05] around Turning Point USA. Um, show of [00:01:08] hands in the chat. Have you guys caught [00:01:10] Wolves and Financ's video yet this [00:01:12] morning about what's going on at TPUSA? [00:01:15] About the legal threats that are getting [00:01:16] sent out, [00:01:18] threats to sue. [00:01:22] Yeah, there's some there's some [00:01:23] developments in the story today. Because [00:01:26] if you're trying to come in here and [00:01:28] send legal threats about [00:01:31] financial auditing of your company, if [00:01:34] you're coming after little old YouTubers [00:01:36] that [snorts] are just looking at your [00:01:38] finances, [00:01:40] well, I can't think of a better reason [00:01:42] for us to look harder at your finances [00:01:44] and to support that exact YouTuber that [00:01:47] you're coming after. We're going to play [00:01:48] it on 1.25x speed. If it's too fast for [00:01:50] y'all, we might slow it down a bit. But, [00:01:53] um, I want to I want to basically just [00:01:55] watch the whole thing segment by segment [00:01:56] and then throw in his other clips [00:01:58] between. So, we're just going to watch [00:01:59] it all through together and, uh, see [00:02:01] what's going on. So, welcome to the [00:02:04] party. Um, I hope you got a beverage. I [00:02:06] hope you're comfy. Hope you're having a [00:02:07] great Sunday. [00:02:09] And here we go. This week, I received a [00:02:12] letter from Turning Point titled, [00:02:13] "Demand to cease and desist defamatory [00:02:15] comments." This is the first [00:02:17] >> Wow, he just like totally threw his [00:02:19] whole name up there. Step when someone [00:02:20] sues you for defamation. I know there [00:02:23] are a lot of people out there making [00:02:24] videos about Turning Point, so you [00:02:26] should pay attention to this. They Let's [00:02:28] note that who they have not sent a cease [00:02:31] and desist letter to Candace Owens. [00:02:34] Nope. No cease and desist letter to [00:02:36] Candace Owens. Myself? Nope. No cease [00:02:39] and desist letter to myself. At least [00:02:41] not that I know of. To be fair, they [00:02:43] might try to send a cease and desist [00:02:45] letter to me, but I don't even have a [00:02:46] mailbox, so I don't know how they would [00:02:48] send it. [00:02:50] If they had sent one, I wouldn't know. [00:02:52] Um, so turning point, if you're trying [00:02:54] to get in touch with your boy, um, try [00:02:56] harder. As far as I'm aware, no cease [00:02:59] desist letters to Coach Colin, no season [00:03:01] desist letters to Valhalla or to Baron [00:03:03] Coleman, to anyone as far as I'm aware, [00:03:08] just to Wolves in Finance. [00:03:10] And that's interesting. [00:03:12] To be fair, he's been digging harder [00:03:14] into the financials than just about [00:03:16] anyone. And he's been doing more [00:03:18] condensed, sharable financial digging [00:03:22] than just about anyone. And that [00:03:24] represents a specific type of threat, [00:03:26] especially when you think about all the [00:03:28] things that we've been talking about on [00:03:30] these streams about the money that [00:03:33] funded places like Liberty University, [00:03:35] the money that funds these sorts of deep [00:03:37] state operations. We were just drawing [00:03:38] the parallels to the moon cult and how [00:03:41] these like pseudo religious culty kinds [00:03:43] of organizations that are these vast [00:03:45] sprawling multiconglomerates of LLC's [00:03:48] and shells and companies and such, how [00:03:51] that is a a very important shell game of [00:03:53] money and money is what you know makes [00:03:55] everything happen. So it's not entirely [00:03:58] surprising that the first cease and [00:03:59] desist letter goes out to the guy that's [00:04:01] digging into the money. Just worth [00:04:03] noting that they didn't send one to [00:04:05] Candace. They have started sending out [00:04:07] cease and desist letters and for some [00:04:09] reason they've decided to start with me. [00:04:11] Apparently, they cannot handle the [00:04:13] criticism from my teeny tiny YouTube [00:04:15] channel. [00:04:17] >> Hey, come on. Come on, Zach. Your [00:04:18] YouTube channel is not that small, bro. [00:04:19] You're doing awesome. You got 353,000 [00:04:21] subscribers. You're crushing it, dude. [00:04:23] And hopefully we can get more [00:04:24] subscribers for Zach right now. If you [00:04:27] aren't already subscribed to Wolves and [00:04:28] Finance on YouTube right now, go open up [00:04:30] another tab and hit that little [00:04:32] subscribe button. Type in Wolves and [00:04:33] Finance. Support the homie. He's doing [00:04:35] amazing work. Go subscribe to him right [00:04:37] now. Whether you're watching this on [00:04:38] Twitch with us or you're watching this [00:04:40] later on YouTube, go subscribe right [00:04:42] now. [00:04:44] >> Showing the world the type of [00:04:45] organization Turning Point has become [00:04:46] under Erica Kirk. They want to send [00:04:48] legal letters to small YouTube creators. [00:04:52] So, we're going to go through this [00:04:53] letter. And by the way, if any of you [00:04:55] know a good lawyer in Arizona that [00:04:57] handles defamation cases, have them send [00:04:58] me an email through my website because [00:05:00] I'm looking for a lawyer. [00:05:03] I don't think there are any good lawyers [00:05:04] in Arizona because Arizona is corrupt as [00:05:06] [ __ ] Arizona is a problem. [00:05:11] Turning Point states in the letter, [00:05:13] "Turning Point entities are not looking [00:05:14] for litigation. Rather, their interest [00:05:16] is in the truth and making sure the [00:05:17] public record is accurate." [00:05:19] >> Whoa. Whoa. Lest you be confused out [00:05:22] there, chillins, Turning Point is not [00:05:25] looking for litigation. Turning Point is [00:05:29] interested in the truth and making sure [00:05:31] that the public record is accurate. [00:05:35] Would you wouldn't you know it? All that [00:05:37] Turning Point wants is the truth. They [00:05:40] want the truth about who shot Charlie [00:05:42] Kirk. They want the truth about was [00:05:45] there any co-conspirators? They want the [00:05:48] truth about is Tyler Robinson the right [00:05:51] guy. They're asking all the questions. [00:05:54] All the right questions. Obviously, [00:05:56] Turning Point just wants to get to the [00:05:57] bottom of it. Thanks, November 5. Thanks [00:06:00] for being here. November is a good [00:06:02] month, by the way. So, let the record [00:06:05] show that Turning Point is only [00:06:07] interested in the truth. [00:06:10] So, they are claiming they do not want [00:06:12] to sue me, but I view this letter as a [00:06:15] threat to sue, and I think any [00:06:16] reasonable business person would do the [00:06:18] same. [00:06:19] >> A cease and desist letter is the first [00:06:20] step towards a defamation lawsuit. I [00:06:23] interpret this letter as Turning Point [00:06:25] telling me to shut my mouth or they're [00:06:27] going to sue me. I do not understand [00:06:29] what Erikica Kirk is doing. Out of the [00:06:32] hundreds of people posting on So, she's [00:06:34] making a mistake. That's what she's [00:06:36] doing. Zack, if in case you weren't [00:06:38] aware, she's [ __ ] up, which is kind [00:06:41] of her mo ever since she's been a CEO. [00:06:44] She's [ __ ] up bigly. And I don't know [00:06:47] if this was her decision or her [00:06:48] handler's decisions or Tyler Boyer's [00:06:51] decisions or someone else's decisions, [00:06:54] but it was a bad decision [00:06:58] because welcome to the court of public [00:07:00] opinion. Welcome to the internet where [00:07:02] we all have opinions. Just opinions. No [00:07:06] accusations. Just opinions. By the way, [00:07:10] >> social media about Turning Point. Why [00:07:12] are they targeting me? Why are they so [00:07:15] worried about what I am saying that [00:07:16] they're sending me legal letters? I am [00:07:18] one of the smallest YouTube channels in [00:07:20] my market segment. [00:07:21] >> Who do they think I am? I'm a working [00:07:24] accountant with a small YouTube channel. [00:07:26] I have no money. I have no power. I have [00:07:28] no influence. I don't know how much [00:07:30] money they think they're going to get. [00:07:31] Don't sell yourself short, Zach. You [00:07:33] have lots of power and influence and you [00:07:35] and you're great. And we got your back. [00:07:37] We've all got your back out here. Okay. [00:07:39] Don't think we're going to leave you [00:07:40] hanging high and dry, bro. from suing [00:07:43] me. All I have is the truth and I'm not [00:07:46] going to stop speaking the truth because [00:07:48] Erica Kirk doesn't like it. [00:07:49] >> Well, Turning Point's here to take that [00:07:51] truth away from you because all they're [00:07:52] interested in is the truth. They want to [00:07:53] collect all that truth and stuff stuff [00:07:56] it away into Terrell Farnsworth's [00:07:58] pockets, where the truth belongs, where [00:08:01] evidence belongs, where SD cards belong, [00:08:03] where mints belong, where everything [00:08:05] belongs in Terrell Farnsworth's back [00:08:07] pocket. So, they're here to take your [00:08:09] truth and keep it safe, obviously. [00:08:12] because the authorities were asking for [00:08:13] it. [00:08:16] >> The one good thing about a lawsuit is [00:08:18] that everything will be out in the open [00:08:20] and Turning Point will quickly find out [00:08:22] that I have nothing to hide. The letter [00:08:24] came from a lawyer named Paul Edgar [00:08:26] Herald from Southbend, Indiana. It seems [00:08:28] like this is Turning Point's lawyer. I [00:08:30] looked him up and I cannot find that [00:08:32] he's been admitted to the State Bar of [00:08:33] Arizona in order to practice law in [00:08:34] Arizona. So, I'm not exactly sure how [00:08:36] he's going to sue me in Arizona, but [00:08:38] maybe he's working with other lawyers. [00:08:40] In the letter, they order me to please [00:08:42] confirm that you will publicly correct [00:08:44] your false statements immediately. This [00:08:46] is not what I was going to talk about [00:08:47] this week, but [snorts] Turning Point is [00:08:49] demanding I communicate their statements [00:08:51] publicly. [00:08:52] >> So, here we go. [00:08:54] >> They include a whole list of statements [00:08:56] they claim are false that I have made in [00:08:58] my videos about Turning Point. [00:09:00] >> Now, I'm not interested in spreading [00:09:02] false information. So, I'm glad that [00:09:04] Turning Point reached out to me because [00:09:05] if I said something wrong, I am happy to [00:09:07] correct it. So, let us go through the [00:09:09] statements where they have a problem. [00:09:11] And you're going to want to hear this [00:09:12] because some of these are wild on. [00:09:15] >> Correct. [00:09:17] They are wild. And we've got some of his [00:09:20] clips pulled up to see what he actually [00:09:22] said [00:09:24] and we'll just I posted a video called [00:09:26] Bombshell. Did Turning Point USA commit [00:09:28] fraud? [00:09:29] >> You'll notice that that video is now [00:09:31] titled Bombshell. Did Turning Point USA [00:09:33] commit fraud allegedly. [00:09:38] Good move, bro. [00:09:39] >> They say these are false claims. Charlie [00:09:42] Kirk ordered a Doge style audit that was [00:09:44] never conducted here. [00:09:45] >> Claim one. [00:09:47] >> These are false claims. Charlie Kirk [00:09:49] order. [00:09:52] They're claiming that Charlie Kirk did [00:09:55] not order a Doge style audit that was [00:09:58] never conducted. That's their claim. [00:10:00] That's how they're going to open it up [00:10:03] when we have the official file. A doge [00:10:06] style audit that was never conducted. [00:10:08] Here is my first problem with this [00:10:10] letter. They do not include the actual [00:10:12] quote that I said in the video. This is [00:10:14] a paraphrase statement of what I said [00:10:17] and they are saying that the paraphrase [00:10:18] statement is a lie. You have to tell me [00:10:22] exactly what I said that was supposedly [00:10:24] a lie. And they do this through the [00:10:26] whole letter. So, my request to this [00:10:28] lawyer in future letters, because I'm [00:10:30] assuming there's going to be more, [00:10:32] please include the actual quote that I [00:10:34] said so that I can respond to your [00:10:35] accusation, [00:10:37] but I'm going to at least try to [00:10:38] interpret what they're saying. I spoke [00:10:40] in my video about a about the official [00:10:44] memo [00:10:45] that has been released that we all have. [00:10:52] Effective immediately, Justin Strife is [00:10:54] taking on a new elevated role with [00:10:55] Turning Point USA as its chief operating [00:10:57] officer. Since joining Turning Point USA [00:10:59] in 2020, Justin has led Turning Point's [00:11:01] fundraising division and in more recent [00:11:02] years has been involved in some [00:11:03] organizational operations, filling this [00:11:05] COO role in many ways, but now [00:11:07] officially taking on the title and [00:11:09] expanded responsibilities. In this COO [00:11:11] role, Justin will directly oversee [00:11:14] development, events, finance, TPS faith, [00:11:16] media, marketing, productions, asset [00:11:17] management, distribution, turning point, [00:11:19] education, bleit, HR, and legal. Justin [00:11:21] will also closely coordinate with Andrew [00:11:23] Cipher on the national field program. In [00:11:25] this role, I have empowered Justin among [00:11:28] other priorities to engage in an [00:11:30] organizationalwide Doge effort. Effort [00:11:34] doesn't say audit, it says Doge effort. [00:11:38] Justin will be assembling a small team [00:11:40] to assist in this effort, which is [00:11:41] focused on TurningPoint USA, becoming [00:11:44] more efficient, becoming more [00:11:45] cost-effective, unifying organizational [00:11:47] success around companywide metrics and [00:11:48] goals, and reshaping company culture. I [00:11:51] expect many positive changes to come [00:11:53] from this forthcoming initiative and [00:11:54] Justin's expanded role, [00:11:58] a Doge effort, [00:12:00] because we don't know what that means. [00:12:02] No one knows who knows what a Doge [00:12:04] effort is. I mean, Doge could mean So, [00:12:07] he's buying Dogecoin. Is he buying [00:12:10] Dogecoin? [00:12:11] >> A memo that Charlie Kirk wrote eight [00:12:13] days before he was murdered. In the [00:12:15] cease and desist letter, they say, [00:12:17] "Indeed, Turning Point USA's COO [00:12:19] announcement concerning the Doge effort [00:12:21] never used the word audit." [00:12:24] No [ __ ] That is literally [00:12:28] their first point. Um, we said effort, [00:12:31] not audit. And so when we canled the [00:12:33] effort, not the audit, we were just [00:12:36] there was no effort. [00:12:40] Defamation. [00:12:42] Well, in my opinion, tell me if tell me [00:12:45] if you think differently, chat, but in [00:12:46] my opinion, that makes Turning Point [00:12:49] look like a [ __ ] [00:12:51] In my opinion, that makes Turning Point [00:12:54] look [ __ ] [00:12:57] And it actually makes Turning Point look [00:12:59] more guilty. [00:13:01] And it actually makes me wonder what the [00:13:02] hell happened to the Doge effort. [00:13:06] What exactly happened to the Doge [00:13:08] effort, Erica? Because your husband's [00:13:12] last official announcement within the [00:13:15] company, it would seem [00:13:20] virtually his last announcement within [00:13:22] the company was that he wanted a little [00:13:24] bit of Doge effort. And we're not seeing [00:13:27] any effort. It was like he died and then [00:13:32] suddenly no one wanted to give any [00:13:34] effort. [00:13:36] You bunch of slackers. [00:13:38] Are you a bunch of slackers, Erica? You [00:13:40] slacking off on your Doge effort. [00:13:44] H. [00:13:48] So, this is breaking news. Turning [00:13:50] Point's attorney has now confirmed that [00:13:52] the Charlie Kirk memo is authentic. We [00:13:55] now have legal confirmation this did [00:13:57] happen. It seems like their problem with [00:13:59] my video. [00:13:59] >> Bingo. Cuz remember that was leaked. [00:14:02] [snorts] That was leaked. Once again, a [00:14:05] leak that we were told didn't happen. [00:14:07] That we were told Candace didn't really [00:14:09] have [00:14:11] that is later confirmed by TPUSA as [00:14:13] having been true and that they all knew [00:14:14] about it. [00:14:16] Apparently, one would assume that TPUSA [00:14:19] knew about it cuz they're the ones that [00:14:20] had it. [00:14:22] But that didn't stop anyone from trying [00:14:23] to slander Candace when she was talking [00:14:25] about it before released before it was [00:14:27] released [00:14:31] is that I called it a Doge audit when in [00:14:34] the memo it is written as Doge effort. [00:14:37] So they want everyone to use the word [00:14:38] effort and not use the word audit. [00:14:41] This letter is [00:14:44] I mean it would be a real shame if we [00:14:47] had a bunch of effort memes popping up [00:14:49] all over the internet. It'd be a real [00:14:50] shame if Erica were to do some Doge [00:14:53] effort. Maybe if we were to ask Tyler [00:14:55] Boyer to put in just a little bit of [00:14:57] effort to making sure that they're not [00:15:00] committing fraud. Maybe just a little [00:15:02] bit of effort to make sure that [00:15:07] Charlie was actually killed by a 306 and [00:15:10] a lone gunman instead of by, you know, [00:15:12] the people that he personally said he [00:15:14] was afraid were going to kill him. [00:15:17] A little bit of effort. Um, [00:15:20] >> seriously hurting my head. Whatever word [00:15:23] you use, the memo is clearly talking [00:15:25] about an evaluation of Turning Point. [00:15:28] But we cannot use the word audit. We [00:15:29] have to call it an effort or they are [00:15:31] going to sue you. The letter goes on to [00:15:33] say, "The announcement makes clear that [00:15:35] Turning Point USA was doing what it has [00:15:37] always pledged to donors, ensuring it [00:15:38] was being efficient with its funds and [00:15:40] time and making changes to foster [00:15:41] greater efficiencies. Moreover, Turning [00:15:43] Point USA hires a third party audit firm [00:15:45] to conduct an audit every year. Listen, [00:15:52] turning point, turning point. Listen, [00:15:54] turning point. And all of y'all shills. [00:15:58] Just cuz you're [ __ ] doesn't mean we [00:16:01] all have to be [ __ ] too. [00:16:04] We all know what he meant when he said a [00:16:06] Doge effort. [00:16:09] Obviously. And obviously, this wasn't [00:16:12] it. He already had an audit every year. [00:16:15] That's not what he was talking about. [00:16:19] >> This is all just their opinion. This is [00:16:21] how they are interpreting Charlie Kirk's [00:16:23] memo. They think that Charlie Kirk wrote [00:16:25] this memo and they think it means that [00:16:27] they do not have to do anything. How [00:16:30] convenient. They think that Charlie Kirk [00:16:33] wrote a memo just to tell people to keep [00:16:35] doing business as usual. Well, my [00:16:37] opinion and the opinion of many other [00:16:39] people was that Charlie Kirk's memo [00:16:40] meant something different. My opinion is [00:16:44] that y'all purport to have loved the [00:16:45] man. One of you is his [ __ ] wife. [00:16:50] All the rest of you are claiming to be [00:16:52] his best friend. [00:16:54] And y'all out here acting like he was [00:16:57] [ __ ] Like he was writing nonsense [00:17:00] memos for no reason that meant nothing. [00:17:04] Acting like his last dying wishes were [00:17:07] meaningless. [00:17:11] Erica is his wife [00:17:14] and she's out here trying to convince us [00:17:16] that we're the [ __ ] for saying, "Um, [00:17:18] excuse me, Charlie's dying wishes. [00:17:20] Excuse me." [00:17:24] Y'all look guilty as hell. [00:17:26] Y'all look guilty as all hell. [00:17:30] And you look guiltier and guiltier every [00:17:31] single day. Every time something like [00:17:33] this happens, it just makes you look [00:17:35] guiltier. in my opinion. [00:17:38] If I were to put some effort into my [00:17:40] opinion, [00:17:42] you look guilty as hell. This is not a [00:17:45] statement of fact. It is an opinion. [00:17:46] This is another problem I have with this [00:17:48] letter. Most of the statements they [00:17:50] mention are opinions just like this one. [00:17:53] If you are going to accuse me of [00:17:54] defamatory statements, they need to be [00:17:56] facts, not opinions. If I have a fact [00:17:59] wrong, let me know and I will happily [00:18:01] correct it. But I will. They should have [00:18:03] just written this whole thing and been [00:18:04] like, "You're an anti-semite. This [00:18:06] opinion is anti-Semitic, and that's [00:18:07] against the law. This opinion is also [00:18:09] anti-Semitic, and that's against the [00:18:11] law." Because in America, if you weren't [00:18:13] aware, you're actually allowed to have [00:18:15] whatever opinion you want. It's called [00:18:17] freedom of speech. It's the First [00:18:18] Amendment, freedom of thought, freedom [00:18:19] of consciousness. Think whatever you [00:18:22] want. Except [00:18:24] not if you're an anti-semite. If you [00:18:26] think that Israel or Jewish people have [00:18:28] ever done anything bad in all of [00:18:30] history, no matter where you got it, [00:18:32] that is actually illegal. Um, just to [00:18:35] clarify, and you're not allowed to have [00:18:37] that opinion because that would be [00:18:38] anti-Semitic. And then the ADL would spy [00:18:40] on you, report you to the FBI, and tell [00:18:42] their FBI lackeyis to go and arrest you. [00:18:45] So, welcome to 2026 in the United States [00:18:47] of Israel. And I just wanted to clarify [00:18:49] that that difference between your [00:18:51] opinion and being a [ __ ] anti-semitic [00:18:55] bigot. [00:18:56] There's a there's a distinction [00:18:59] now because they have laws. So just to [00:19:04] clarify, you should put a little effort [00:19:06] into distinguishing between your [00:19:08] anti-semitic bigotry and your opinion. [00:19:10] And if they had accurately called Zach [00:19:14] an anti-semite, then maybe they'd have a [00:19:16] leg to stand on. Maybe next time they'll [00:19:18] they'll wisen up and put a little more [00:19:20] effort into their legal statements. [00:19:21] >> Will not change my opinion of this memo [00:19:23] to whatever you want. But since it is so [00:19:25] important for Turning Point, I have no [00:19:27] problem with specifying that Charlie [00:19:28] Kirk's memo used the words Doge effort, [00:19:31] not Doge audit. The next statement is [00:19:33] someone at Turning Point decided not to [00:19:35] file 990 forms. At the time I made that [00:19:37] video, those forms were not publicly [00:19:39] posted. [00:19:40] Let's really quickly take a break and go [00:19:42] and see what exactly did he post. What [00:19:44] exactly did he post? [00:19:48] This is what he said about Charlie [00:19:49] Kirk's memo in his original video that [00:19:52] they are claiming was evil and [00:19:54] defamatory. [00:19:56] You replace their position, you start a [00:19:59] new audit, and you work on moving that [00:20:00] person out of your company. Now, Tyler [00:20:03] Boyer has responded to this allegation [00:20:05] with this post on X.com. He says, "Made [00:20:09] up. I haven't been COO of TPUSA for over [00:20:13] 3 years. You're listening to people [00:20:15] making things up. He posts a screenshot [00:20:18] of his LinkedIn profile as evidence, [00:20:20] showing that he was the chief operating [00:20:22] officer of Turning Point Action since [00:20:24] July 2022, implying that he had nothing [00:20:26] to do with Turning Point USA or Charlie [00:20:28] Kirk's memo. I find Tyler Boyer's post [00:20:31] ridiculous. We were not born yesterday. [00:20:34] To my knowledge, since Tyler Boyer's [00:20:36] change in title in 2022, no one has held [00:20:39] the position of COO at Turning Point USA [00:20:41] until Charlie Kirk's memo appointing [00:20:43] Justin Strife. And anyone who has worked [00:20:45] in corporate America knows that if you [00:20:46] get a title change and no one backfills [00:20:49] your position, you still end up doing [00:20:50] your old job. So, it is still likely [00:20:53] that Charlie Kirk's memo was attempting [00:20:54] to minimize Tyler Ber's influence at the [00:20:56] company. What is even more compelling is [00:20:58] that Tyler Boyer's post is contradicted [00:21:00] by his own words. The Washington Post [00:21:03] obtained a secret audio recording of [00:21:05] Tyler Ber. This is from late 2022 after [00:21:08] his supposed change in title. Take. [00:21:10] >> So, if you didn't notice, this is [00:21:12] actually not quite the right clip, but [00:21:13] this part's spicy anyway. So, we're just [00:21:14] going to play through it. [00:21:15] >> But listen, [00:21:16] >> I'm happy to share with you the history [00:21:17] point. You excited? Because like I [00:21:20] bottom up, so you do realize you're [00:21:21] talking to the guy that basically runs [00:21:22] everything. [00:21:23] >> Tyler Boyer said on a secret audio [00:21:25] recording, I built the whole thing from [00:21:27] the bottom up. So, you do realize you [00:21:29] are talking with the guy who basically [00:21:31] runs everything. [00:21:34] Notice he is talking specifically about [00:21:36] Turning Point USA, not the other shell [00:21:38] companies. And he says, "You are talking [00:21:40] with the guy who basically runs [00:21:42] everything." This is Tyler Boyer in his [00:21:45] own words months after he supposedly [00:21:47] changed his title. So, which one is it, [00:21:49] Tyler? Were you lying then or are you [00:21:52] lying now? Or are you just lying all the [00:21:54] time? The Washington Post also recorded [00:21:56] Tyler Ber saying this. [00:21:58] >> And honestly, I have giant balls and I [00:22:01] don't care. I'll walk in and talk to [00:22:02] anybody. I'm a transparent piece of [00:22:04] glass here on everything that I do and [00:22:05] everything I'm involved with. [00:22:13] In case you didn't know, Tyler Ber has [00:22:16] been putting a lot of effort into the [00:22:18] size of his coahones. [00:22:20] Um, he's obviously been putting more [00:22:22] effort into his own ball sack than into [00:22:25] his transparency, his company, his legal [00:22:28] threats, his investigation skills, [00:22:31] anything else. [00:22:33] But at least he's putting a lot of [00:22:34] effort into his ball sack, you know. You [00:22:37] know, and you would think if he had such [00:22:39] big balls, he'd be a little more uh [00:22:40] predisposed to doing a Doge audit [00:22:42] because, you know, Doge and you know, [00:22:46] right? But anyways, so apparently he has [00:22:49] giant balls. [laughter] [00:22:54] Okay, so now the next thing that Wolves [00:22:55] and Finance is getting ready to talk [00:22:56] about is these missing form 9990s. Let's [00:22:58] see what he said about that. [00:23:03] This is missing 8.6 million. I think [00:23:07] red flag. So Tyler Ber is being snarky [00:23:11] on X.com and telling people to go look [00:23:13] at the annual financial audit. [00:23:16] Several of the 990 forms are missing. [00:23:20] Turning Point USA lists four related [00:23:23] entities. There is Turning Point USA, [00:23:25] Turning Point Endowment, Turning Point [00:23:27] Action, and America's Turning Point. All [00:23:30] different organizations do slightly [00:23:32] different things. The form 9990 for [00:23:34] fiscal year 2024 is posted for Turning [00:23:36] Point USA, but it is missing for all the [00:23:39] other three organizations. It looks like [00:23:42] it was never turned in. This is a [00:23:45] massive red flag. So, Tyler Buer is [00:23:48] being snarky on X.com and telling people [00:23:50] to go look at the annual financial [00:23:52] audit, but the financial audit is [00:23:53] missing from last year for three of the [00:23:56] four organizations. Just to show you how [00:23:58] strange this is, if we go back 2 years [00:24:00] to fiscal year 2023, where we have all [00:24:02] the financial statements, we can see [00:24:04] that in fiscal year 2023, all four [00:24:07] statements were filed on the same day on [00:24:09] 5:15 2024. That is what normally [00:24:12] happens. On May 15th, Turning Point [00:24:14] would file all four financial statements [00:24:16] for their organizations. But for fiscal [00:24:18] year 2024, only one financial statement [00:24:20] was filed for Turning Point USA on 515, [00:24:23] 2025. The other three are missing. This [00:24:27] strange decision to hide their financial [00:24:29] statements happened 4 months before [00:24:30] Charlie Kirk was murdered. I will repeat [00:24:33] for clarity. Someone at Turning Point [00:24:35] decided not to file three of the four of [00:24:38] their annual financial statements four [00:24:39] months before Charlie Kirk appointed a [00:24:41] new COO, requested a new audit, and was [00:24:44] murdered. Requested an effort. Actually, [00:24:47] [clears throat] excuse me. Excuse me, [00:24:49] Zach. He requested an effort. Okay. And [00:24:53] obviously, they were putting all of [00:24:55] their effort into failing at filing [00:24:57] their financial forms, apparently. So, [00:25:00] they just didn't have a lot more effort [00:25:01] to give to the Doge style effort that [00:25:03] was requested by their best friend and [00:25:06] husband. [00:25:08] You know, they were busy. They were busy [00:25:11] doing other things. [00:25:14] So, that is some of what he said about [00:25:16] the missing 990 forms. [00:25:18] >> Those forms were posted after I made [00:25:20] that video, and I have already made a [00:25:21] correction about that. [00:25:22] >> And yes, those forms were posted after [00:25:24] he made that video, which looks even [00:25:27] sketchier. So, just to clarify, Zach [00:25:30] makes that first video and says those [00:25:32] things that we were just watching about [00:25:34] how they have missing form 9990s and [00:25:36] that's really [ __ ] suspicious and [00:25:38] that that decision was made just months [00:25:40] before Charlie was assassinated. And [00:25:42] then miraculously once that video goes [00:25:44] viral, the forms appear. [00:25:50] Weird. [00:25:52] The next statement is in 2023, $650,000 [00:25:55] may have been funneled from TurningPoint [00:25:57] USA through Turning Point Action to [00:25:59] Turning Point Pack to evade campaign [00:26:00] finance restrictions. They are [00:26:02] referencing this chart from my video. [00:26:04] They claim money actually went from [00:26:06] Turning Point Action to Turning Point [00:26:08] USA as a reimbursement for event [00:26:09] expense. There was nothing nefarious [00:26:11] about that transfer. I'm not sure they [00:26:13] are contradicting what I am saying. [00:26:15] According to their own statement, [00:26:17] TurningPoint USA used their own donor [00:26:19] funds to pay for an event on behalf of [00:26:21] Turning Point Action, freeing up Turning [00:26:23] Point Action funds, which they then [00:26:25] transferred to Turning Point Pack. They [00:26:27] are saying that later Turning Point [00:26:28] Action reimburseed Turning Point USA for [00:26:30] that event. You get it? And they're [00:26:34] saying, "No, no, we didn't send the [00:26:35] money to [00:26:38] the middleman. We just paid for their [00:26:41] event." [00:26:44] And then they sent all the money that [00:26:46] they would have spent on the event to [00:26:48] the pack. [00:26:50] And then they later sent money back to [00:26:53] the original organization, [00:26:59] but that doesn't change what I was [00:27:00] saying. Additionally, in my video, I [00:27:03] specifically said, again, this is not [00:27:05] necessarily illegal if they structure [00:27:07] their transactions correctly and utilize [00:27:08] campaign finance loopholes, but it [00:27:10] certainly looks unethical. That is my [00:27:12] opinion. This money did move between the [00:27:15] organizations. I'm allowed to have my [00:27:17] opinion on November. And you'll notice [00:27:19] that he uses words like it looks like. [00:27:21] It seems like suspicious. Not [00:27:24] necessarily. [00:27:25] Probably [00:27:27] effort. He's putting in the effort, [00:27:30] guys. He's putting in the effort. 30th, [00:27:32] I posted a video called Explosive More [00:27:34] Fraud at Turning Point USA. They say [00:27:36] these are false claims. There was more [00:27:38] fraud at Turningoint USA. I assume they [00:27:41] are referring to the title of the video [00:27:42] here. They of course are saying that [00:27:44] there is no fraud at Turningoint USA. [00:27:47] The content of the video is me going [00:27:48] over the evidence of fraud and sharing [00:27:50] my opinion. Now, technically a true [00:27:52] statement would be that no one has been [00:27:53] convicted of fraud at TurningPoint USA. [00:27:55] But whether fraud is going on right now [00:27:57] is an opinion. This is what happens in [00:27:59] every criminal court case. Both sides [00:28:02] look at the facts. One side gives their [00:28:03] opinion that they are innocent. The [00:28:05] other side gives their opinion that they [00:28:06] are guilty. Turning Point is looking at [00:28:08] the financials and claiming that they [00:28:09] are innocent. I understand that. I'm [00:28:11] looking at the same financials and [00:28:13] thinking they look suspicious. I did not [00:28:15] even say in my video that they committed [00:28:17] fraud. I think I'm very fair. And he [00:28:20] actually specifically said in his video [00:28:23] that they did not commit fraud. [00:28:27] right back right about here [00:28:31] are not going to be able to continue [00:28:33] Charlie Kirk's legacy if they are [00:28:34] employing people who are stealing [00:28:36] donations. The reason that people are [00:28:38] concerned about turning point turning [00:28:40] point USA [00:28:44] >> this is the intro to his very first [00:28:46] critical turning point USA. Let me start [00:28:49] off by saying that I believe this is a [00:28:51] good organization and I hope that they [00:28:53] succeed, but they are not going to be [00:28:54] able to continue Charlie Kirk's legacy [00:28:56] if they are employing people who are [00:28:58] stealing donations. The reason that [00:29:00] people are concerned about Turning Point [00:29:01] USA's finances is because statements [00:29:03] made by Charlie Kirk himself. This is a [00:29:06] memo written by Charlie Kirk on [00:29:07] September 2nd, 2025. That is only 8 days [00:29:10] before he was murdered. In this memo, he [00:29:12] promotes Justin Strife as the new chief [00:29:14] operating officer or COO and announces a [00:29:16] new Doge style audit. After this memo [00:29:19] was revealed, people obviously wanted to [00:29:20] know what were the results of the Doge [00:29:23] style audit. [00:29:24] >> Why was Charlie Kirk concerned with the [00:29:25] finances of Turning Point USA right [00:29:27] before he was murdered? [00:29:29] >> Here's an exchange on X.com of someone [00:29:31] asking that question. Why was Charlie [00:29:33] about to audit the finances and will it [00:29:35] still be audited? This was responded to [00:29:37] by someone from TurningPoint named Tyler [00:29:38] Ber saying, "We audit our finances every [00:29:41] year. They were just audited at the end [00:29:42] of our fiscal year in July." He then [00:29:44] goes on to say, "There is no scheming. [00:29:47] Nonprofits have a 990 where everything [00:29:49] is outfront. No one owns anything and [00:29:51] our salaries are transparent. If you'd [00:29:53] like a quick course on nonprofits, here [00:29:54] is a good start." And then he links the [00:29:56] accounting.org website where they talk [00:29:58] about the form 9990. Okay. Number one, [00:30:02] that response by Tyler Boyer is a little [00:30:04] bit snarky. a little bit snarky [00:30:07] >> balanced when I say now for legal [00:30:09] reasons I have to say that I do not have [00:30:10] any evidence of a crime. We would need [00:30:12] an investigation of the books at Turning [00:30:13] Point to know for sure. What I am saying [00:30:16] is that there are red flags in the [00:30:17] financials at Turning Point and a lot of [00:30:19] questions that need to be answered. That [00:30:21] sounds to me to be pretty fair and [00:30:22] balanced and the complete opposite of [00:30:24] what they are accusing me of saying. [00:30:26] They cannot take my statements out of [00:30:27] context and accuse me of defamation. I [00:30:30] have the right as a journalist to report [00:30:32] on Turning Point's financials. [00:30:34] >> Honestly, sounds like they hired Breijg [00:30:36] Mcronone's lawyer. Kind of sounds like [00:30:38] they hired Bridget Mcronone's lawyer, [00:30:40] don't you think? Don't you think? [00:30:45] Sue him for defamation. It's going to go [00:30:46] great. No problem. Put some effort into [00:30:49] the defamation case. [00:30:50] >> Their opinion that they have not [00:30:51] committed fraud is just an opinion. My [00:30:54] opinion is that it looks suspicious. [00:30:56] Now, it is nice that we have this letter [00:30:58] with their official statements. But the [00:31:00] letter does nothing to change my [00:31:01] suspicions. It does not address most of [00:31:04] my questions. Instead of answering my [00:31:06] questions, it is the precursor to a [00:31:08] lawsuit. And it makes us ask more [00:31:10] questions. It makes us even more [00:31:11] suspicious. It makes them look real [00:31:14] [ __ ] sketchy and super guilty. It [00:31:17] makes them look that way. I'm sorry. [00:31:19] That's my opinion. [00:31:22] Sue me, I guess. [00:31:26] First, I'm going to have to get a [00:31:27] mailbox, though. So, I'll work on [00:31:28] getting a mailbox turning point and [00:31:30] y'all can work on drafting up your [00:31:32] letters to tell me to stop. But Tyler, I [00:31:36] will have you know that in case you [00:31:38] needed to know, Tyler, I have huge balls [00:31:40] and I'm like totally transparent about [00:31:42] everything, Tyler. So, just saying I [00:31:45] just thought that the whole world needed [00:31:46] to know that, Tyler. Right. Right. [00:31:49] [snorts] Unless I change my statements. [00:31:51] That does nothing to reduce my [00:31:53] suspicions. For the sake of avoiding [00:31:55] miscommunication, I can change the title [00:31:57] of the video if that makes them more [00:31:58] happy. I already changed it from more [00:32:00] fraud at Turning Point USA to more fraud [00:32:03] at Turning Point USA. Allegedly, [00:32:05] [laughter] the next statement is that [00:32:06] America's Turning Point had ghost [00:32:07] employees. The letter explains America's [00:32:10] Turning Point had 80 employees in FY23 [00:32:12] and 108 in FY24. There was, however, an [00:32:15] inadvertent error in America's Turning [00:32:17] Point filing which failed to note these [00:32:18] employees, and America's Turning Point [00:32:20] is in the process of rectifying that [00:32:22] inadvertent error. So, I was right. They [00:32:25] literally just confirmed they they're [00:32:27] like, "We're going to sue you for [00:32:28] misinformation, for defamation. I or [00:32:30] rather stop being defamatory or we will [00:32:32] sue you because right here you said this [00:32:34] thing that's true and we're correcting [00:32:36] it." [00:32:41] There was something wrong. They did put [00:32:43] incorrect information on the 990 form. [00:32:47] There were missing employees. They were [00:32:48] not reporting. Calm down over there. [00:32:50] >> They have confirmed it. And [snorts] [00:32:51] just to be clear, this was not some [00:32:53] minor mistake. This was around 80 [00:32:55] employees that were somehow missing. [00:32:57] Their complaint is that it's not correct [00:32:59] to use the term 80 employees. Imagine if [00:33:02] it was 80 employees [00:33:04] that are getting paid like $100,000 a [00:33:07] year. [00:33:13] 80 employees getting paid $100,000 a [00:33:16] year. That's $8 million. [00:33:19] Poof. [00:33:22] And some of their employees make a lot [00:33:24] more than $100,000 a year. We're looking [00:33:27] at you, Tyler. We're looking at Tyler [00:33:30] Boyer. [00:33:34] So just 80 missing employees that are [00:33:36] not ghost employees, obviously. Are they [00:33:39] vampire employees? [00:33:42] Are they are they witch employees? Are [00:33:45] they Illuminati employees? Are they [00:33:48] are they Israeli employees? Are they are [00:33:51] they Jewish? Um are they [00:33:56] what kind of employees are they? Turning [00:33:57] point. I mean [00:34:00] not ghosts. [00:34:01] Where the [ __ ] are they? Because that's [00:34:03] a lot of money. And they literally just [00:34:05] confirmed that he was correct. [00:34:10] Ghost employees. I don't know if I [00:34:13] necessarily agree with that opinion, but [00:34:14] that is their position. [00:34:16] I find this incredible. How are they [00:34:19] going to sue me for this? They admit [00:34:21] that I am right that the employees were [00:34:23] not reported correctly. They don't like [00:34:25] the wording I used. How is that [00:34:27] defamatory? [00:34:28] >> Philadelphia employes. [00:34:28] >> The next statement is that donations to [00:34:30] Turning Point Action increased from [00:34:31] $10.7 million in FY23 to $27.2 million [00:34:35] in FY24 and suggested that Tyler Ber may [00:34:38] have been recruiting these donors away [00:34:39] from Turning Point USA to undermine MAGA [00:34:42] and benefit himself. Again, this is not [00:34:44] exactly what I said, and I find their [00:34:46] paraphrasing of my statements a little [00:34:48] silly. They are claiming that Tyler [00:34:51] Boyer never tried to undermine Charlie [00:34:52] Kirk in any of his decisions. Tyler Ber [00:34:55] never tried to benefit himself in his [00:34:57] role at Turning Point. I find those [00:34:59] claims a little excessive. Well, I mean, [00:35:02] come on, Zach. We already know that he [00:35:04] has massive balls and he's as [00:35:05] transparent as a glass window. He said [00:35:07] so himself. So, obviously, like, come [00:35:10] on, man. Come on. Put a little effort. [00:35:12] put a little effort into not defaming [00:35:14] the man Tyler Ber. Right. [00:35:17] Right. Like just a little. [00:35:20] Come on. He's Tyler Ber. He would never [00:35:22] lie. Except for that one time that he [00:35:24] got convicted for lying about the whole [00:35:26] election thing. [00:35:28] Yeah. Don't worry though because he got [00:35:30] his sentence commuted or got pardoned or [00:35:33] whatever it was. He got pardoned, right? [00:35:34] He got pardoned. [00:35:37] Yeah. Yeah. But that wasn't lying. That [00:35:39] was like that was just like helping [00:35:40] Trump get elected. [00:35:42] You know [00:35:44] >> what I actually say in my video was [00:35:46] sharing my opinion on the financials, [00:35:47] which I'm allowed to do. When you see [00:35:49] Tyler Boyer's organization growing so [00:35:51] much faster than Charlie Kirk's [00:35:52] organization, do you see what that is? [00:35:55] Right? Revenue over time of Turning [00:35:57] Point USA and it really flatlined at 80 [00:35:59] million for the last three years. [00:36:05] And then Tyler Boyer's side of the [00:36:06] thing, Turning Point action just bam. [00:36:11] That looks to me down here. He says 4% [00:36:13] increase on Charlie Kirk's side. Turning [00:36:14] point USA, 150% increase on Tyler [00:36:19] Boyer's side. Turning point action. [00:36:23] Whoopsies. Like a corporate takeover [00:36:25] from the inside. That is my opinion [00:36:28] which I'm allowed to have. Just remember [00:36:30] the moon cult. Remember the moon cult? [00:36:33] Remember all the shell organizations and [00:36:35] companies? the money flowing in in weird [00:36:37] ways, being used for weird sketchy [00:36:39] political action in all sorts of [00:36:41] different directions, religious [00:36:42] takeovers, political fundraising, [00:36:45] speaking conferences, sometimes a little [00:36:48] bit of crime on the side. Obviously, I'm [00:36:50] not suggesting that Tyler Ber would ever [00:36:52] commit a crime except for the one that [00:36:54] he was convicted of. But he don't worry, [00:36:56] he got pardoned. He got pardoned by the [00:36:58] guy that he helped, right? The guy [00:37:01] that's currently covering up the Epstein [00:37:02] files. He got pardoned by that guy. [00:37:06] I'm just talking about Moon, obviously [00:37:08] about Moon and how he helped them [00:37:10] smuggle drugs and fund the Contras and [00:37:12] all sorts of other things. Tyler would [00:37:14] never do those sorts of things, though. [00:37:16] Never. Never. Ever. [00:37:18] Because he's got big balls. [laughter] [00:37:22] Now, of course, I cannot know what is [00:37:24] going on inside Tyler Boyer's mind, but [00:37:26] that's not what I said in my video. [00:37:28] >> But, Zach, you know what you can know is [00:37:30] where it's going on in Do you know what [00:37:32] you can know about Tyler Boyer, Zack? [00:37:35] You don't know what's going on inside of [00:37:37] Tyler Boyer's mind, Zach, but [00:37:41] you know, [00:37:46] you know that he has big balls, Zack. [00:37:47] Come on. Come on. [00:37:48] >> I was not speaking about his state of [00:37:50] mind or his motivation. [laughter] I do [00:37:51] not know that. The letter goes on to [00:37:53] explain that donors naturally direct [00:37:55] more money towards election activities [00:37:56] in election years, especially to [00:37:57] organizations like Turning Point Action [00:37:59] that can engage in lobbying and [00:38:00] political activity during election [00:38:01] years. Accordingly, you are wrong to [00:38:03] assert that the increased donations to [00:38:04] Turning Point action evinced any sort of [00:38:06] wrongdoing on Mr. Ber's part. So, their [00:38:08] explanation is that all the changes in [00:38:10] the financials can be explained by the [00:38:12] election. That is their official [00:38:13] explanation. I do not believe it and [00:38:16] that is my opinion. On December 7th, I [00:38:18] posted a video called Top 10 Clowns of [00:38:20] the Year. [00:38:21] >> Strong competition. Strong competition. [00:38:24] I'll have you know. [00:38:26] In this video, I called Turning Point my [00:38:28] number one clown of the year. I talked [00:38:30] about the now infamous interview with [00:38:31] Turning Point's chief security person [00:38:33] talking about the day that Charlie Kirk [00:38:34] was murdered who I am still not sure I I [00:38:38] am still unclear [00:38:40] about whether or not [00:38:43] Thanks Mandana for the subs. Appreciate [00:38:45] it. I am still a little unclear about [00:38:48] whether or not Brian Harpo was actually [00:38:50] still employed by Turning Point USA when [00:38:52] he sat down for this meeting for this [00:38:54] interview. [00:38:56] I received information that seemed to [00:38:57] imply that him and his security firm [00:39:00] were let go after the big riot that [00:39:03] happened at I think uh U Berkeley, UC [00:39:05] Berkeley, [00:39:07] where a bunch of kids faces got smashed [00:39:09] in and there was a bunch of bunch of [00:39:10] articles and my understanding is that [00:39:13] was before this was filmed. I could be [00:39:15] wrong. [00:39:17] Maybe I need to put a little more effort [00:39:19] into auditing my journalistic practices. [00:39:24] But they definitely cut this boy loose [00:39:26] hard [00:39:28] afterwards. [00:39:32] I point out the massive contradiction [00:39:33] where he says they were not allowed to [00:39:35] fly drones. Then I show the interview [00:39:37] with Frank Turk where he says he was [00:39:38] watching drone footage with Charlie, [00:39:40] >> which he wasn't. If you if you don't [00:39:43] know, if you don't follow based Sam [00:39:45] Parker on X [00:39:48] um [00:39:57] [snorts] base Sam Parker has done a [00:40:00] whole bunch [00:40:02] uh he's moved on to other things now. [00:40:04] Where's my search? [00:40:07] Where where's my search bar? Is this [00:40:09] Yeah. Um, Frank Turk, [00:40:15] he did a whole bunch of examining of [00:40:18] Frank Turk's phone and the reflections [00:40:21] in Frank Turk's phone in closeup detail [00:40:24] and showing that there's like kind of no [00:40:27] way that um what was on Frank Turk's [00:40:30] screen [00:40:32] um Frank Turk [00:40:34] phone will probably hone it down more [00:40:37] showing that what was on Frank Turk [00:40:39] screen [00:40:41] could not have been drone footage. I [00:40:45] don't know if I'm going to be able to [00:40:46] pick out. Yeah, it's like this kind of [00:40:47] stuff where he's going real slow-mo or [00:40:49] rather sorry, not not could not have [00:40:51] been drone footage. Frank Turret claims [00:40:53] that he was FaceTiming [00:40:57] and Sam Parker breaks it down pretty [00:40:59] clearly [00:41:02] that he doesn't have a reflector on his [00:41:03] phone probably and he's not watching [00:41:08] uh a FaceTime, [00:41:11] >> but it does look like we're actually [00:41:13] seeing like a wheel well of a car and [00:41:15] like other stuff on there like a like [00:41:19] people. who knows what it is. [00:41:22] >> But yeah, Basan Parker has been breaking [00:41:24] all kinds of good stuff on this story. [00:41:27] Um, including [00:41:32] Um, where was it? I just saw a post from [00:41:34] this morning that maybe we'll get to [00:41:35] later. [00:41:37] Um, I forget what it was. [00:41:41] Oh, it was about the Road Wireless Pro [00:41:42] mic. It's about the audio, right? It's [00:41:46] about the audio where if Charlie Kirk's [00:41:49] microphone exploded, which is coming to [00:41:51] be the most logical theory at this [00:41:53] point, that means that there's no audio [00:41:55] after he was shot. There's no audio [00:41:57] recording. But if he was shot by Tyler [00:42:00] Robinson, [00:42:03] then there is audio. Then that [00:42:05] microphone was still recording [00:42:08] when the shot occurred, and it would [00:42:09] have kept recording afterwards. And they [00:42:11] should have that recording. [00:42:13] And if they can't produce it, [00:42:16] that's a problem. A big problem. So [00:42:19] definitely follow base Sam Parker on X [00:42:21] for more details on that because he's [00:42:23] breaking it all down. He's been hot on [00:42:25] this case. [00:42:29] Kirk, this part is breaking news because [00:42:32] I'm not aware this has ever been [00:42:33] discussed. The lawyer in this letter [00:42:35] says the following. There was no [00:42:37] discrepancy. UVU prohibited Turning [00:42:39] Point USA from [00:42:40] >> Right. Isn't that a good point? Doesn't [00:42:42] bass Sam Parker bring up a damn good [00:42:44] point there [00:42:46] that that is like 100% confirmation that [00:42:48] if the microphone exploded, there is no [00:42:50] audio. So, they should still have the [00:42:51] audio because it didn't explode, right? [00:42:52] It didn't explode, right? And if they [00:42:54] could put a little effort [00:42:57] into procuring that audio for us to [00:43:00] prove that it was a gunshot and not an [00:43:03] explosion from the microphone, that [00:43:05] would be great. [00:43:07] That would be great. If you could send [00:43:09] that audio to me with the cease and [00:43:11] desist letter, I would really appreciate [00:43:13] it. Turning point, please and thank you. [00:43:16] Flying drones for security purposes [00:43:17] during the event, but did allow a [00:43:19] Turning Point USA says the following. [00:43:22] There was no discrepancy. [00:43:24] >> UVU prohibited Turning Point USA from [00:43:26] flying drones for security purposes [00:43:28] during the event, but did allow a [00:43:30] Turning Point USA media production drone [00:43:32] to briefly fly over the location before [00:43:34] the event to collect limited B-roll [00:43:36] footage. First of all, how could this be [00:43:38] defamatory if I had no idea about any of [00:43:41] this? Second, I find this explanation [00:43:44] absurd. [00:43:46] So, before we get to the other part of [00:43:49] this, [00:43:51] that's breaking news right there. [00:43:54] They've never officially confirmed that [00:43:56] to us. And this is where people are [00:43:57] always like when when Candace sat down [00:44:00] with Erica and just apparently had a [00:44:03] cordial conversation with her, a lot of [00:44:05] people were like freaking out that she [00:44:07] hadn't pressed her on everything. And I [00:44:09] reminded people that the goal is just to [00:44:11] get them to put things on the record [00:44:13] because the more things that Turning [00:44:14] Point puts on the record, the more that [00:44:16] it does not add up, the more that we [00:44:19] have them officially stating things that [00:44:21] don't make any [ __ ] sense. And if [00:44:22] they could put a little more effort into [00:44:25] making their claims add up, that would [00:44:27] be great. That would be great. Actually, [00:44:31] just a little bit of effort into the [00:44:33] cover up. Please. [00:44:36] You are telling me that the security [00:44:37] team was not allowed drones, but the [00:44:39] media team was. That is the official [00:44:42] explanation from Turning Point's lawyer. [00:44:45] My honest opinion is I do not believe [00:44:47] that. [00:44:48] >> [ __ ] [00:44:49] [ __ ] [00:44:51] What kind what kind of explanation is [00:44:53] that? [00:44:54] And who made that decision? And where's [00:44:57] their job? Cuz they should be fired. But [00:45:00] if that did happen, that is really silly [00:45:02] and it may have cost Charlie Kirk his [00:45:04] life. On December 14th, I posted a video [00:45:07] called Tim Pool Rants about Turning [00:45:09] Point. They say these are false claims. [00:45:12] Asking whether money sent to 110 LLC was [00:45:14] to bribe Jay Kaufman. Again, that's not [00:45:17] exactly what I said. They are [00:45:19] complaining that I'm not allowed to ask [00:45:21] questions. I cannot ask questions about [00:45:23] 110 LLC. I cannot ask questions about [00:45:26] Jay Kaufman. I think those are fair [00:45:28] questions to ask given that Turning [00:45:30] Point sends them millions of dollars as [00:45:32] one of their largest independent [00:45:33] contractors. And need we remind you, [00:45:35] Turning Point, that you are funded by [00:45:38] donations. You are a nonprofit beholden [00:45:42] to your donors, the American people. [00:45:47] Right? And I just want to point out how [00:45:49] wonderful it is as we're watching this [00:45:50] to watch the view count just climb and [00:45:53] climb and climb on his video because [00:45:56] everyone's talking about this video. [00:45:57] Everyone's posting this video. This [00:45:59] video is fire right now as it should be. [00:46:02] Everyone should be sharing this video, [00:46:03] clips from this video. Y'all should clip [00:46:05] this video and put clips out and just [00:46:07] spread it because [ __ ] them. [00:46:10] And this is why. Right here, he's about [00:46:11] to explain why. [ __ ] them. [00:46:14] This is America. I'm allowed to ask [00:46:16] questions, but I think it is fair for [00:46:19] Turning Point to also state their [00:46:20] official position. They claim [00:46:22] TurningPoint contracts with 110 LLC for [00:46:24] legitimate services. The money you ask [00:46:26] about is spent on marketing and [00:46:28] advertising services. Any claim that it [00:46:29] is a bribe is false. Remember 110 LLC [00:46:32] was the company with the the advertising [00:46:35] company with the website that was not [00:46:36] listed on Google that no one that you [00:46:38] cannot find that has no updates for [00:46:40] years, [00:46:42] no evidence of any services whatsoever. [00:46:46] I don't know if you're familiar with [00:46:47] advertising and marketing, but being [00:46:48] listed on Google is kind of [ __ ] [00:46:50] important. [00:46:52] The outreach on the internet is kind of [00:46:54] [ __ ] important. [00:47:00] The second statement is asking why [00:47:02] America's Turning Point lists COO Tyler [00:47:05] Boyer as an independent contractor. [00:47:07] Again, they are saying I'm not allowed [00:47:08] to ask questions. [00:47:10] Does Turning Point see the irony in [00:47:12] this? Charlie Kirk died under a tent [00:47:16] with the slogan, "Prove me wrong." His [00:47:18] whole college campus tour was about [00:47:20] asking questions. And now Turning Point [00:47:23] is sending out legal letters to small [00:47:25] YouTube channels accusing them of [00:47:26] defamation for asking questions. I was [00:47:30] asking the question why their COO was an [00:47:32] independent contractor. I think that is [00:47:34] unusual. That is my opinion. Turning [00:47:36] Point is now stating their official [00:47:38] position. America's Turning Point lists [00:47:40] its COO as an independent contractor [00:47:42] because his substantive role for [00:47:43] America's Turning Point is more in line [00:47:44] with a contractor classification. So, [00:47:46] this is new information. Now, we know [00:47:49] Turning Point is intentionally doing [00:47:50] this and it's on the record and it's [00:47:54] [ __ ] weird. I think in my opinion [00:47:57] that it's a little [ __ ] weird. I'm no [00:47:59] expert. I am certainly no expert. Not [00:48:01] even as much of an expert as Zach here. [00:48:03] Certainly not. But I think it's a little [00:48:05] [ __ ] weird. You know who I pay as an [00:48:09] independent contractor? [00:48:11] My boy Kevin who clips my YouTube videos [00:48:14] for me. Who takes the Twitch and clips [00:48:16] it up and puts it on YouTube. [00:48:19] We keep it loose. We keep it easy. [00:48:22] That's an independent contractor. He's [00:48:24] clipping. [00:48:26] He's doing a lot of other cool things, [00:48:27] too. [snorts] [00:48:30] But your COO, your chief operations [00:48:33] officer, [00:48:39] an independent contractor. The guy, [00:48:41] remember his quote on the secret [00:48:43] recording? I b I built the I built the [00:48:46] whole organization myself. You're [00:48:47] talking to the guy that basically runs [00:48:49] everything. That was Tyler Ber's words [00:48:52] earlier, paraphrased. [00:48:55] An independent contractor with big [00:48:57] balls. Obviously. Obviously, he has [00:49:00] massive testicles. [00:49:03] >> This is not a mistake. They are [00:49:04] intentionally classifying their COO as [00:49:07] an independent contractor, which means [00:49:08] they are not withdrawing payroll taxes [00:49:10] to send to the IRS. Now, if I were their [00:49:13] CFO, I would not do this. But for some [00:49:15] reason, their CFO, the politician Justin [00:49:18] Olsen, has determined with all of his [00:49:20] accounting expertise that this is the [00:49:22] best way to classify their employees. [00:49:24] Whatever the reason, this is Turning [00:49:26] Point's opinion about an IRS [00:49:27] classification. It is not a statement of [00:49:29] fact, and I'm allowed my own opinion. [00:49:32] The letter also states, "More generally, [00:49:34] you have accused the Turning Point [00:49:35] entities of being shell companies. This, [00:49:37] too, is false. They are arguing about [00:49:39] what can be defined as a shell company. [00:49:41] They don't want anyone to call Turning [00:49:43] Points multiple organizations shell [00:49:44] companies." You heard it here first, [00:49:46] folks. You're not allowed to call them [00:49:48] shell companies. Can we call them mint [00:49:50] companies? Can we call them mint [00:49:52] companies? Mint distributors? Mint [00:49:54] distribution organizations perhaps. Is [00:49:58] is that allowed? [00:50:00] Can we call them [ __ ] factories? Can [00:50:02] we call them fraudul? It's maybe not [00:50:04] that. Maybe not that. [00:50:14] How about if instead of shell companies, [00:50:17] we call them [00:50:20] marine services institutions. [00:50:22] institutions. [00:50:24] How about we call them aquatic life [00:50:26] distribution centers? [00:50:28] How about if we call them beach heads [00:50:30] for [ __ ] [00:50:33] BS Mints LLC. Fraudulent companies. [00:50:36] [laughter] [00:50:40] Fraudulent companies. [00:50:44] Yeah, we might call them fraudulent [00:50:46] companies. [00:50:48] Philadelphia Mints LLC. [00:50:51] Personally, I do not agree that it is an [00:50:53] incorrect use of the definition. Turning [00:50:55] Point is moving money between [00:50:57] organizations like some kind of shell [00:50:59] game. A shell game is a classic street [00:51:01] hustle and magic trick. So, in my [00:51:03] opinion, I think it would be appropriate [00:51:05] to call them shell companies. But if [00:51:07] Turning Point is so upset about the word [00:51:09] shell company, I have no problem calling [00:51:11] them something else from now on. [00:51:13] >> Solo cups. [00:51:15] Call them solo cups. Call them mint [00:51:18] containers. [00:51:21] Mint condition mint containers. [00:51:26] Whatever you want. Just don't call them [00:51:27] shell companies. Okay, you got that, [00:51:29] [ __ ] [snorts] [00:51:31] You got that, peasants. [00:51:33] Don't you say it. On December 28th, I [00:51:37] posted a video called Shocking Turnpoint [00:51:39] Fraud Gets Worse. They claim you [00:51:41] recklessly repeated many of the [00:51:42] previously described falsehoods and [00:51:44] again directed viewers to the home [00:51:45] address of Mr. Boyer, which has resulted [00:51:47] in threats to Mr. Boyer's safety. This [00:51:49] part's crazy, dude. This part's crazy. [00:51:52] Remember this. They say that he directed [00:51:55] viewers to the home address of Mr. [00:51:56] Boyer, which has resulted in threats to [00:51:58] Mr. Boyer's safety. O they I'm receiving [00:52:01] threats as they send a threat to Zach. [00:52:06] Let me explicitly state that I condemn [00:52:09] any violence, any threat, any harassment [00:52:11] being sent to any employee at Turning [00:52:13] Point. Do not even harass them on X.com. [00:52:17] >> Maybe maybe a little bit of maybe a [00:52:19] little bit maybe ask them questions on [00:52:20] X.com. Maybe ask them about their mint [00:52:23] factories, their their their fraudulent [00:52:26] companies. May maybe ask some questions [00:52:28] on X.com. Don't don't I mean maybe maybe [00:52:31] tell some jokes on X.com. Maybe post [00:52:35] some memes on X.com if you wish to [00:52:37] exercise your freedom of speech rights. [00:52:39] Maybe just a little bit of maybe just a [00:52:42] little bit of memeing, [00:52:44] but obviously don't harass them. [00:52:46] Definitely don't harass them in person. [00:52:47] I'm not I'm not advocating for that. [00:52:51] But like [00:52:53] on X.com, I think you can pretty much [00:52:55] use your freedom of speech. Just don't [00:52:58] criticize Israel or else you're [ __ ] [00:53:00] evil. Do not retweet at them. Do not [00:53:02] send them angry messages. Keep your [00:53:04] comments in my comment section. Just for [00:53:06] the record, I will repeat what I have [00:53:08] previously said. And I have to tell [00:53:10] people, please, this is from his [00:53:12] original video right here. Please do not [00:53:14] go to Tyler Ber's house. That is not [00:53:17] appropriate. I was in no way calling for [00:53:19] violence against Tyler Ber, and you are [00:53:21] absolutely false in claiming that I was. [00:53:24] In the video, I blacked out Tyler Ber's [00:53:26] address, which I did not have to do. He [00:53:28] put the address himself on a public [00:53:30] document. That's not my fault. That's [00:53:32] his fault. Don't blame me when I have [00:53:34] tried to protect his privacy. If he had [00:53:37] put a little more effort into building [00:53:40] his fraudulent companies, we'll say, his [00:53:47] aquatic life distribution centers. He [00:53:49] would have known that he could have set [00:53:50] it up somewhere where it would have kept [00:53:52] his address private, [00:53:55] but he didn't. He made his address [00:53:56] public on the public filings. But Zach [00:53:59] was a good guy and he blacked it out [00:54:01] despite it being public information. [00:54:05] So that is the letter. There are more [00:54:06] paragraphs of legal language that I [00:54:08] skipped, but that is pretty much the [00:54:09] letter. I have to say that in general, [00:54:12] most of the things they brought up were [00:54:13] nitpicky little things like they don't [00:54:15] want me to use the word audit or the [00:54:16] words shell company. Those are not even [00:54:18] facts. But I am going out of my way to [00:54:21] adjust for some of their requests. And I [00:54:23] want to mention something else. Take a [00:54:26] moment and think of all the statements [00:54:27] they listed in this letter as [00:54:28] problematic. I think it's around 11 [00:54:30] statements they are claiming are false. [00:54:33] >> This part's big. [00:54:35] >> Now, think about all the things I've [00:54:36] talked about in my videos on Turning [00:54:38] Point. There are a lot of other things [00:54:40] that I have said in my videos that were [00:54:42] never mentioned in this letter. There's [00:54:45] also a lot of things that people like [00:54:47] Candace Owens said. [00:54:52] a lot of things that people like Baron [00:54:54] Coleman said. [00:54:57] It's interesting. [00:54:59] I mean, I've never said anything. I I [00:55:01] would never I would never say anything [00:55:04] bad about Turning Point USA, obviously. [00:55:08] They did not say I got those statements [00:55:09] wrong. I think that is very telling. [00:55:13] Again, I have no desire to spread false [00:55:14] information. Some of their statements in [00:55:16] this letter were actually very helpful [00:55:17] in answering some of our questions. So, [00:55:19] I hope that this video cleared up any [00:55:21] confusion. I will be honest with you [00:55:22] guys. Getting a legal letter like this [00:55:24] is scary. I don't know why Turning Point [00:55:27] is attacking me like this. I do. [00:55:31] I do. [00:55:33] In my opinion, it's cuz you're over the [00:55:36] target. It's because in my opinion, when [00:55:39] you follow the money, [00:55:42] you find the game. [00:55:44] When you follow the money in a deep [00:55:47] staty organization, [00:55:50] you wind up finding the deep state at [00:55:52] the other end of it. [00:55:55] And they don't really want that. That's [00:55:57] not really That's not good. When you [00:56:00] follow the investigation, when you ask [00:56:02] the questions, when you do a little [00:56:04] digging, you might turn up things like [00:56:06] Erica Kirk in a movie filmed on Fort [00:56:09] Wuka where she's like an assassin or [00:56:12] some [ __ ] [00:56:15] You might find Erica Kirk speaking to [00:56:18] defense contractors on behalf of [00:56:20] intelligence agencies years ago. [00:56:24] You might just turn up some some spooky [00:56:27] stuff. You might even find some mints. [00:56:31] If you look hard enough, if you look [00:56:32] hard enough, you might turn up some [00:56:34] mints and some mint distribution [00:56:37] organizations. [00:56:38] >> I don't have a lot of money. Lawyers are [00:56:40] expensive and I'm going to need a good [00:56:42] one. [00:56:43] So, I'm going to ask for help. If you [00:56:45] like my videos, consider signing up for [00:56:47] a membership. That is money that I would [00:56:49] use if this turns into a lawsuit. [00:56:51] >> If you want to provide additional [00:56:52] support, you can also donate directly [00:56:54] from the homepage of my website on [00:56:55] wolves and finance.com. [00:56:57] >> I really appreciate all my members. So [00:57:00] for your support, especially in times [00:57:02] like these. [00:57:03] >> I'm Zach from Wolves and Finance. Thank [00:57:05] you for watching. [00:57:11] >> [music] [00:57:15] >> Where'd it go? [00:57:17] Where'd it go? [00:57:21] Come on. [00:57:28] Oh, did I already send it? Daily spend [00:57:30] limit is $500. Try again tomorrow. Is [00:57:33] that what's going on? [00:57:36] I that's all we can send him. [00:57:42] It's popping up at the bottom saying I [00:57:44] can't give him more than I I I thought [00:57:46] it was going to give me a confirmation. [00:57:48] Like when it's live it gives you a [00:57:49] confirmation. I guess it's because there [00:57:50] is a chat and it goes through, [00:57:53] but um it won't let me. So [snorts] [00:57:57] everybody go support Zach. Go help him [00:58:00] out. Um and Zach, don't you stop [00:58:03] speaking the truth, bro. Don't you [00:58:05] worry. You keep asking your questions. [00:58:06] We got We all got some questions. [00:58:11] We all got some questions. [00:58:14] And just on the topic of other things [00:58:17] that he talked about [00:58:20] that weren't mentioned, some that were, [00:58:22] some that weren't, some that were, some [00:58:23] that weren't. You know who [00:58:26] what was the $8.6 million spent on? In [00:58:30] my opinion, what I think is happening is [00:58:33] I think there are fake people on the [00:58:35] payroll. I think that paychecks are [00:58:38] getting sent to people who do not really [00:58:40] exist. And that would explain why we [00:58:42] have a company with zero. [00:58:44] >> Notice how he says, "In my opinion, I [00:58:47] think and that would explain [00:58:50] zero employees with millions of dollars [00:58:53] of salary expense." What? Remember those [00:58:57] 80some employees that they just forgot [00:58:59] to put on their forms at the not shell [00:59:02] company that had millions of dollars [00:59:05] flowing through it. Don't worry, that is [00:59:08] not a shell company. That's a mint [00:59:10] distribution factory. [00:59:12] They're turning out all these mints that [00:59:13] Brian Harpel needs in order to keep [00:59:15] Charlie Kirk safe. What about Tyler [00:59:17] Boyer's argument that they have an [00:59:19] annual financial audit every year? If [00:59:22] what I am saying is true, why wouldn't [00:59:25] their annual audit catch these issues? [00:59:28] The annual financial audit for Turning [00:59:30] Point USA, Inc. and its affiliates was [00:59:32] performed by an accounting firm called [00:59:33] Baker Tilly. In the notes, they [00:59:35] explained that they audited Turning [00:59:36] Point USA, Turning Point Action, Turning [00:59:38] Point Endowment, America's Turning [00:59:39] Point, and TPUSA merch. That usually [00:59:41] means they audited all the shell [00:59:42] companies when they provided their [00:59:43] opinion that the statements present [00:59:45] fairly in all material respects. That [00:59:47] means it is a clean audit with no [00:59:49] problems. [00:59:51] That means that Baker Tilly is either [00:59:53] [ __ ] or in on the game. And if you [00:59:57] don't, if you're new to this world, if [00:59:58] you're new to how this works, [01:00:02] let's just say that the auditing firms [01:00:05] tend to be a little suspicious. [01:00:08] Usually the auditing firms [01:00:11] are in on the game in my opinion, [01:00:13] allegedly. [01:00:16] And so I think we have some questions [01:00:17] for Baker Tilly as well. And maybe Baker [01:00:20] Tilly should extract itself from this [01:00:22] [ __ ] issue and come clean. I think [01:00:24] Baker Tilly should maybe come clean. [01:00:27] Personally, I think that's an unethical [01:00:30] way to run a nonprofit. But that's just [01:00:32] my opinion. But what is important here [01:00:35] is what happened to the missing $ 8.6 [01:00:37] million, the amount sent to America's [01:00:40] Turning Point in fiscal year 2024. The [01:00:43] amount of money sent to America's [01:00:44] Turning Point was getting larger and [01:00:46] larger. And because the financial [01:00:48] statements are missing, we cannot tell [01:00:50] how this money was spent. If we look at [01:00:53] the prior year, the majority of the [01:00:55] money was spent on other salaries and [01:00:57] wages. How is this possible when [01:01:00] America's Turning Point reports zero [01:01:03] employees? [01:01:08] Zero employees with $ 8.6 million. [01:01:13] Hm [01:01:15] h [01:01:17] on the NASDAQ website. From 2003 to [01:01:20] 2020, he ran Precision Payroll of [01:01:22] America where he turned that company [01:01:23] into a leader in the complex, highly [01:01:25] regulated world of human resources and [01:01:27] payroll processing. So let's ask the [01:01:30] payroll guy, Tom Sedaka, do you see [01:01:34] anything strange with these payroll [01:01:36] numbers? Now to understand the full [01:01:38] picture, it's not just about where the [01:01:40] money was going to, it's also where the [01:01:43] money was coming from. When I was going [01:01:46] through all the new financial [01:01:47] information, I saw this chart and [01:01:49] immediately I had a good idea of what [01:01:51] was going on. This shows revenue going [01:01:53] into turning point action and you can [01:01:55] see a gigantic leap in revenues [01:01:57] [clears throat] for FY24. It went from [01:01:59] 10.7 million to 27.2 million. That is [01:02:02] over 150% increase in one year. An [01:02:04] extraordinary achievement for a [01:02:06] nonprofit. What is even more curious is [01:02:08] when you put this chart side by side [01:02:10] with Turning Point USA. Turning Point [01:02:12] USA shows a 4% increase. Remember that [01:02:15] Turning Point USA is the main [01:02:16] organization with Charlie Kirk as [01:02:18] president. Charlie Kirk works a lot less [01:02:20] on TurningPoint action and Tyler Boyer [01:02:22] is the COO. Do you see what is [01:02:24] happening? [01:02:26] Do you see what is happening? [01:02:28] Charlie, do you see what is happening? [01:02:33] because [01:02:35] I can't help but wonder [01:02:38] if Charlie saw what was happening. [01:02:42] And um [01:02:54] Oh, no. This is after they [01:02:58] added it. [01:03:00] I think that this is the one [01:03:06] where he's got the memo. [01:03:10] I have empowered Justin among other [01:03:13] priorities to engage in an [01:03:14] organizationalwide Doge effort. [01:03:21] Do you see what is happening, Charlie? [01:03:23] On September 2nd, 2025, I feel like [01:03:26] Charlie saw what was happening. [01:03:29] and he asked for a Doge effort, not an [01:03:32] audit. You filthy peasants. And don't [01:03:35] you get it twisted. [01:03:38] Don't you get it twisted. [01:03:41] So [01:03:43] that that's just a bunch of terrible [01:03:47] opinions, a bunch of anti-semitic [01:03:49] conspiracy theories, a bunch of Jew [01:03:51] hatred. Obviously, [01:03:54] obviously, this program has obviously [01:03:56] just been funded by guitar. Um, and I [01:04:00] just wanted to bring that to all of our [01:04:01] attention in full and to support Zach [01:04:04] and to encourage you all to support Zach [01:04:06] and to keep your eyes on Turning Point [01:04:08] USA's financial [01:04:10] um [01:04:13] um efforts. Let's say efforts, right? [01:04:17] Efforts. [01:04:21] [laughter] [01:04:23] I've got some buddies that are looking [01:04:25] into Turning Points Financials as well. [01:04:26] I'm curious to see what they turn up [01:04:28] because I can't help but wonder [01:04:30] what they're what they're afraid of. [01:04:32] What are they trying to hide? Why is it [01:04:34] that Zach is the one that gets the cease [01:04:37] and desist letter and not Candace? [01:04:44] I'm sure Candace would be happy to have [01:04:45] a cease and desist letter. [01:04:48] I'm sure that she would gladly publish [01:04:49] all of your cease and desisty statements [01:04:52] about what exactly are we getting wrong [01:04:53] out here. What exactly is slanderous out [01:04:56] here? Please put it on record. We would [01:04:58] like to know. [01:04:59] >> Conspiracy theories [music] are entering [01:05:00] a danger. [01:05:01] >> Information is the oxygen of the [01:05:04] democracy. [01:05:04] >> There's so much evidence out there that [01:05:06] even if less than 1% [music] [01:05:08] is true, will that be enough to collapse [01:05:12] the current paradigm and change the [01:05:15] whole planet?