Untitled Document

[00:00:00] instead is the is the House um having [00:00:03] the you know subpoenaing the Clintons [00:00:05] and and past officials of the Department [00:00:07] of Justice um because they want to make [00:00:10] it an Epstein Clinton issue again. And [00:00:12] of course there is plenty to say about [00:00:14] the Epstein Clinton relationship. But [00:00:16] again, a lot of it involves uh Israel [00:00:20] gave any attention to Epstein's 17 [00:00:22] visits to the Clinton White House [00:00:25] >> in the 90s because if they did, uh I [00:00:27] think that would be very problematic [00:00:29] again for both parties and also for [00:00:30] Israel. [00:00:31] >> Whitney Webb reveals why the Epstein [00:00:33] files remain sealed and what's really at [00:00:35] stake for Trump, Epstein, Maxwell, and [00:00:39] the American power structure. She [00:00:40] explains that the narrative is [00:00:42] controlled to protect powerful oligarchs [00:00:44] and transnational networks above [00:00:46] politics. Both parties use media to [00:00:48] focus public attention on partisan blame [00:00:50] while organized crime, intelligence [00:00:53] agencies, and big tech maintain real [00:00:55] control. Web highlights Epstein's ties [00:00:58] to Silicon Valley and warns that these [00:01:00] networks use technology for surveillance [00:01:02] and economic dominance. Before we dive [00:01:05] in, our network of channels, The Other [00:01:07] Side, NDE, Only the Savvy, and Beyond [00:01:10] the Veil, is opening up a rare [00:01:12] investment opportunity. Stay until the [00:01:14] end of this video to see the unique [00:01:15] benefits, or click the link to learn [00:01:17] more. [00:01:18] >> Basically, it's uh it's not good for the [00:01:21] American oligarchy, which uh funds and [00:01:24] manipulates both parties. And I think [00:01:26] they want to keep people looking at [00:01:28] that. And that's why there's been this [00:01:30] renewed focus on both sides on Democrats [00:01:33] and Republicans to make this a partisan [00:01:35] issue again because the way the [00:01:37] narrative management of the Epstein [00:01:38] scandal has been for years has been well [00:01:41] if you're watching a left-leaning [00:01:42] podcast they're going to talk about [00:01:44] Epstein and Trump all day long and if [00:01:46] you watch a right-leaning con uh podcast [00:01:48] they're going to talk about Epstein and [00:01:49] Clinton all day long. Yeah. And trying [00:01:51] to keep people in these partisan divides [00:01:54] but really it's a bipartisan scandal. So [00:01:56] anytime a release of information would [00:01:59] um disabuse people of that uh they it [00:02:03] doesn't benefit them to release it. Is [00:02:05] the is the House um having the you know [00:02:08] subpoenaing the Clintons and and past [00:02:10] officials of the Department of Justice [00:02:13] um because they want to make it an [00:02:14] Epstein Clinton issue again. And of [00:02:17] course, there is plenty to say about the [00:02:18] Epstein Clinton relationship, but again, [00:02:21] a lot of it involves uh Israel, and they [00:02:24] won't touch that with a 10-ft pole. [00:02:26] Instead, they'll focus on Clinton after [00:02:28] he left um office and focus on how [00:02:32] Epstein was very involved with setting [00:02:34] up the Clinton Foundation and the [00:02:35] Clinton postpresidential [00:02:37] philanthropies. [00:02:39] Yes. Um but they won't focus at all in [00:02:42] my opinion. I would be shocked if they [00:02:44] uh gave any attention to Epstein's 17 [00:02:48] visits to the Clinton White House [00:02:50] >> in the '90s because if they did uh I [00:02:53] think that would be very problematic [00:02:54] again for both parties and also for [00:02:56] Israel. You're not going to go to jail. [00:02:58] I mean his whole campaign in 2016 was [00:03:01] lock her up and then he got in office [00:03:02] and was like everyone knows Bill [00:03:05] Clinton's a perve. It's it's it's not [00:03:07] news. But what is news is is the other [00:03:09] stuff they were meeting about. It's not [00:03:11] about uh was Clinton unfaithful to his [00:03:15] wife Hillary. I think everyone knows [00:03:17] that he has been that for a long I think [00:03:20] the the scandals are yes perhaps in uh [00:03:23] well definitely but it it should be just [00:03:25] one of several f uh focus points uh that [00:03:29] Epstein basically helped Clinton set up [00:03:31] the Clinton Foundation, the Clinton [00:03:33] Health Access Initiative um and the [00:03:35] Clinton Global Initiative after he left [00:03:39] uh the presidency and helped to design [00:03:41] those philanthropies. He helped design [00:03:43] uh philanthropies for people like Bill [00:03:46] Gates too. Um and a lot of these other [00:03:48] figures. Uh he had a direct line to the [00:03:50] people that decide who gets Nobel prizes [00:03:52] and stuff. Um and had a lot of influence [00:03:56] in the world of quote unquote [00:03:57] philanthropy, which really isn't that. [00:03:59] Um it's influence pedaling and money [00:04:01] laundering a lot of times disguised as [00:04:03] philanthropy. uh when you're talking [00:04:05] about these people and Epstein was a [00:04:07] financial criminal and one of the [00:04:09] reasons he got involved with [00:04:10] intelligence networks [00:04:12] um was was because he was very good at [00:04:15] at working the world of shadow banking. [00:04:18] >> Yeah. [00:04:18] >> You know um and uh that's pretty clear [00:04:21] when you look at his trajectory. He was [00:04:23] he was sought after for for that by the [00:04:25] elites to a big extent. So he was [00:04:28] structuring a lot of these philanthropic [00:04:29] institutions and all of that for them uh [00:04:32] to to benefit to help them expand their [00:04:34] influence and power and you know also [00:04:37] Epstein was interested in eugenics and [00:04:39] so a lot of these Clinton Health Access [00:04:41] Initiative Gate Foundation's stuff you [00:04:44] know kind of arguably have some of this [00:04:47] um you know rebranded eugenic stuff in [00:04:50] them as you know I argued in some of my [00:04:52] work during the co era um but you know [00:04:55] the they're not going to talk about [00:04:57] Epstein and Clinton in the 1990s. Uh and [00:05:01] uh you can read my book if you'd like to [00:05:03] know why, but in short uh the one of the [00:05:05] main people he was meeting with uh at [00:05:07] the White House was this guy named Mark [00:05:09] Middleton. And as the Epstein scandal uh [00:05:13] relatively shortly after uh the details [00:05:16] of Epstein's visits to the White House [00:05:18] were made public, I believe actually it [00:05:19] was the Daily Mail that first sort of [00:05:21] published um some of the logs on them [00:05:24] and revealed that it was he was mostly [00:05:26] knitting with Middleton. Uh Middleton [00:05:28] ended up dead. Um, he was hanging from a [00:05:31] tree by the neck with an extension cord [00:05:32] and had a shotgun blast to the chest and [00:05:35] a court sealed all the forensic evidence [00:05:37] and photos taken at the scene so that no [00:05:40] one can ever look at them. Um, and it's [00:05:43] uh very bizarre cuz that was the same [00:05:45] year that Jean Luke Bernell turned up [00:05:46] dead in a prison and of course Epste [00:05:49] himself turned up dead in a prison. [00:05:51] >> So uh why do they need to get rid of [00:05:55] Mark Middleton? I don't think they want [00:05:56] people asking questions about what was [00:05:58] going on. And Mark Middleton was part of [00:05:59] this huge scandal that was never [00:06:01] properly investigated. Um that is [00:06:04] remembered today as China gate. But it [00:06:05] was really a huge scandal involving [00:06:07] involving arms trafficking and [00:06:08] technology transfer uh involving uh the [00:06:11] state of Israel and also our own [00:06:13] intelligence services uh to undermine uh [00:06:16] the US military advantage by sending a [00:06:19] bud of our a bunch of US uh you know uh [00:06:21] highly specialized military and [00:06:23] technological equipment to China um in [00:06:26] ex and it it's it's very scandalous. So [00:06:29] I'll I'll just leave it there. But at [00:06:32] the same time, uh, well, I should add [00:06:34] this. At the same time he was meeting at [00:06:36] the Epstein, uh, or at the Clinton White [00:06:38] House, Epste had basically through [00:06:40] Wexner just taken control of the main [00:06:41] Iran Contra airline, uh, for that was [00:06:45] used to funnel drugs and weapons, uh, [00:06:47] all over the Americas in the 1980s and [00:06:49] was previously outright owned by the [00:06:51] CIA, Southern Air Transport. um you they [00:06:54] took it over and started moving it from [00:06:56] instead of from you know North America [00:06:59] to South America in Central America, it [00:07:01] started going from Columbus, Ohio where [00:07:03] Wexner is based to Hong Kong. And what [00:07:06] were they trafficking? Well, it's hard [00:07:08] to know, but uh people law enforcement [00:07:10] people like I think the inspector [00:07:12] general or someone prominent in Ohio at [00:07:14] the time called it the mayor Lansky run [00:07:16] basically saying that it was working at [00:07:18] the behest of you know organized crime [00:07:21] interests. So again, I think that's an [00:07:24] untouchable aspect of the Epstein [00:07:26] Clinton relationship. It's very [00:07:27] problematic for them to talk about, but [00:07:30] you think they would love to talk about [00:07:31] it because China and because Clinton, [00:07:34] uh, but they don't touch it. And it's [00:07:36] because, again, if you want the details [00:07:39] and what I just laid out, um, you know, [00:07:41] the details of it are in my book. You [00:07:42] can actually read it for free on [00:07:43] archive.org if you don't uh want to buy [00:07:46] it. But it basically lays it all out. It [00:07:49] involved the state of Israel. It [00:07:51] involved our basically the same crowd [00:07:52] that did Iran Contra was involved in [00:07:54] shady stuff there and they were [00:07:56] undermining um uh you know basically [00:08:00] trying to do a massive technology [00:08:02] transfer of military technology and [00:08:04] satellite technology and no one was ever [00:08:07] prosecuted. [00:08:08] >> The story isn't just about scandals but [00:08:10] about a system of control using [00:08:11] blackmail and influence to protect the [00:08:13] richest and most powerful. Web urges [00:08:15] viewers to look beyond headlines and [00:08:17] follow the money to see who truly holds [00:08:19] power in America and beyond. [00:08:21] >> Same thing. It's the same thing with [00:08:23] Bill Gates, too. So, uh, mainstream [00:08:26] media and the official story would like [00:08:28] you to believe that Epste and Gates [00:08:29] didn't know each other until 2011, but [00:08:31] there's evidence that they knew each [00:08:32] other in the '90s. So, uh, you know, why [00:08:35] would they pick 2011? Well, that's the [00:08:37] year or around the time that Gates [00:08:39] stopped having a major role at [00:08:41] Microsoft. So you're absolving Microsoft [00:08:44] of scrutiny and keep keeping it on on [00:08:46] gates only after this, you know, [00:08:48] critical point. There's so much [00:08:49] narrative management about the Epstein [00:08:52] case and because this has become very [00:08:53] politically uncomfortable for Trump, uh [00:08:55] there's unprecedented efforts at [00:08:57] narrative management now. And I think [00:08:59] it's pretty telling um and I sort of [00:09:01] alluded to this earlier when we talked [00:09:03] about um you know those accusations. A [00:09:06] lot of people that are being interviewed [00:09:07] or named as you know the top uh you know [00:09:10] Epstein researchers or commentators or [00:09:13] whatever um are people that you know [00:09:15] prior to this uh recent bubble up in the [00:09:19] scandal have never been interviewed [00:09:21] about Epstein. [00:09:22] >> So why now? And some of them are former [00:09:25] uh officials in the Trump [00:09:26] administration. Some of them are known [00:09:28] for being extremely pro-Zionist. Um, and [00:09:32] some of them, you know, uh, are known [00:09:34] for taking partisan slants on these [00:09:36] issues or have, you know, past [00:09:38] long-standing affiliations with, uh, [00:09:39] entities like the Hudson Institute, [00:09:42] which if you're not familiar with the [00:09:43] uh, Hudson Institute, it's a neocon [00:09:45] think tank that includes, uh, fellows [00:09:47] like Nikki Haley, William Bar, and Mike [00:09:50] Pompeo. So, uh, again, I think it's [00:09:53] important for everyone to do their own [00:09:55] research. Uh, but please keep in mind, [00:09:57] please believe me when I say this is a [00:09:59] bipartisan scandal and really the only [00:10:02] way to really understand what's going on [00:10:03] here is to look a tier above all the [00:10:06] names that are thrown out most [00:10:07] frequently and look at the oligarchs. [00:10:09] That's follow the money at the end of [00:10:10] the day. Look at the oligarchy and what [00:10:13] they're doing. Um and you know uh a lot [00:10:16] of these people including Epstein were [00:10:18] just middlemen for oligarchs.