📄 Extracted Text (11,430 words)
[00:00:00] It's always the obvious questions that
[00:00:02] are so vigorously discouraged. And one
[00:00:05] of the questions that's been the most
[00:00:06] discouraged over the past 30 years are
[00:00:09] what are those lines in the sky that you
[00:00:11] see trailing jets? What is that? Some
[00:00:15] people call them chemtrails.
[00:00:18] Claim that somehow the US government is
[00:00:20] spraying poison on the population. Those
[00:00:22] people are clearly crazy. Wikipedia
[00:00:24] calls them crazy. Every news outlet
[00:00:26] calls them crazy. But the trails are
[00:00:29] still there and it's clearly not water
[00:00:31] vapor because that doesn't make sense at
[00:00:32] all. So what are they? We spent the last
[00:00:36] 6 months trying to find someone credible
[00:00:38] who could explain that to us. A serious
[00:00:41] sane person with an engineering
[00:00:43] background who could tell us what are we
[00:00:44] looking at cuz we're looking at
[00:00:46] something and I don't care what names
[00:00:47] you call me. I still want to know what
[00:00:49] it is. And we think we have found that
[00:00:52] person. Dne Wigington of Northern
[00:00:55] California has been on this subject for
[00:00:57] almost 30 years and has compiled what we
[00:00:59] believe after looking at it pretty
[00:01:01] carefully is the most comprehensive
[00:01:04] account of what we're seeing. And it's
[00:01:07] very bad. [music]
[00:01:22] >> [music]
[00:01:28] >> Dane, thanks a lot for joining us. Um, I
[00:01:32] never knew what to think of this topic,
[00:01:34] chemtrails or contrails or the the the
[00:01:36] stripes in the sky that linger after
[00:01:39] airplanes pass. I don't remember those
[00:01:41] them as a child. They're very common
[00:01:44] now. I've heard people say there's
[00:01:45] something up, something nefarious going
[00:01:47] on. So, I go to Wikipedia to see what
[00:01:50] they say, and I want to read you the
[00:01:52] Wikipedia entry, the first part of it on
[00:01:54] this question. Okay, you may have seen
[00:01:56] this, and I'm quoting from Wikipedia as
[00:01:58] of this morning. The chemtrail
[00:02:00] conspiracy theory is the erroneous
[00:02:02] belief that long-lasting condens
[00:02:04] condensation trails left in the sky by
[00:02:06] high-flying aircraft are actually quote
[00:02:09] chemtrails consisting of chemical or
[00:02:11] biological agents sprayed for nefarious
[00:02:13] purposes undisclosed to the general
[00:02:14] public. Period. Believers in this
[00:02:17] conspiracy theory say that while normal
[00:02:19] contrails dissipate relatively quickly,
[00:02:21] contrails that linger must contain
[00:02:23] additional substances. Those who
[00:02:26] subscribe to the theory speculate that
[00:02:28] the purpose of the chemical release may
[00:02:30] be solar radiation management, weather
[00:02:32] modification, psychological
[00:02:34] manipulation, human population control,
[00:02:37] biological or chemical warfare, or
[00:02:39] testing of a biological or chemical
[00:02:40] agent on the population. and that the
[00:02:42] trails are causing respiratory illnesses
[00:02:44] and other health problems. So I read
[00:02:46] that and the purpose of course of that
[00:02:48] paragraph is not to illuminate what this
[00:02:50] might be, but to attack anyone who
[00:02:52] speculates about what it might be. It's
[00:02:55] a form itself of psychological warfare
[00:02:57] of propaganda. And when I read that, I
[00:03:00] said to myself, there's clearly
[00:03:01] something going on because the people
[00:03:03] who control Wikipedia, which would be
[00:03:04] the intel agencies as we know, um don't
[00:03:07] want anyone to talk about this. So with
[00:03:10] that lengthy preface explaining why this
[00:03:13] conversation is taking place, I will
[00:03:15] turn it over to you to explain what are
[00:03:17] these lines in the sky that we have all
[00:03:20] seen.
[00:03:22] There's sprayed particulate dispersion.
[00:03:24] There is no theory in this equation.
[00:03:27] Bottom line is when we have up close
[00:03:28] film footage of these aircraft at
[00:03:30] altitude KCT10s, KC135s,
[00:03:33] C17 Globe Masters with nozzles visible
[00:03:36] turning dispersions on and off. This is
[00:03:38] not quote condensation. Geogwatch.org is
[00:03:41] the only only entity that has taken a
[00:03:44] Noah flying lab, National Oceanic and
[00:03:46] Atmospheric Administration flying lab,
[00:03:48] top scientists in it to sample what
[00:03:49] these heavy aircraft are emitting at
[00:03:51] altitude. That sample was processed at
[00:03:53] rinser polytenic
[00:03:55] in New York, one of the world's most
[00:03:56] renowned testing institutions. We found
[00:03:58] exactly what we knew we would find.
[00:03:59] Starting with aluminum nano particles,
[00:04:02] bioavailable free form aluminum is toxic
[00:04:04] to all life. Period. That element is
[00:04:06] named in numerous climate engineering
[00:04:08] patents as part of a geoengineering
[00:04:11] dispersion element. So again, there's no
[00:04:14] theory involved in any of this. And
[00:04:15] what's so incredibly
[00:04:18] profound in this equation, Tucker, you
[00:04:20] have the entire global climate science
[00:04:23] community, governments all over the
[00:04:24] world saying we need to put aircraft in
[00:04:26] the air immediately to disperse light
[00:04:28] scattering particles. And we use the
[00:04:29] science terms at geomagingwatch.org
[00:04:31] Because the chemtrails term is the
[00:04:33] instant marginalization term by design.
[00:04:35] You bring that term up, any elected
[00:04:37] official won't talk to you anymore.
[00:04:38] Media will immediately marginalize you.
[00:04:41] Solar radiation management,
[00:04:42] stratospheric aerosol injection, cloud
[00:04:44] albido enhancement, climate engineering.
[00:04:47] If we stick to the science terms, they
[00:04:48] can't marginalize us. So again, this
[00:04:51] elephant in the sky that we are told is
[00:04:54] a conspiracy theory is exactly what the
[00:04:57] entire global climate science community
[00:04:58] says we need to deploy immediately to
[00:05:00] slow down the warming of the planet.
[00:05:02] Stated purpose to deflect some of the
[00:05:03] sun's incoming thermal energy. We know
[00:05:05] these programs, not surprisingly, are
[00:05:07] making a bad situation worse, not
[00:05:09] better. And Tucker, they're being used
[00:05:11] as a form of warfare. And we know that
[00:05:14] we have countries like Iran
[00:05:17] constantly demonized. Of course, as you
[00:05:19] well know, immediately after 9/11, we
[00:05:21] have the list of countries to be
[00:05:24] targeted, given to General Wesley Clark,
[00:05:26] a list that clearly existed before 9/11
[00:05:28] even occurred. Subsequently, every one
[00:05:31] of those countries, every one of them
[00:05:33] was endured a once in 1,000-year
[00:05:35] drought. Statistically, mathematically,
[00:05:37] that's impossible without climate
[00:05:39] intervention operations. And we have the
[00:05:40] leader of Iran on the floor of the UN in
[00:05:43] on film on the record stating NATO was
[00:05:45] cutting off their precipitation. We have
[00:05:47] Iranian top scientists recently stating
[00:05:49] NATO's been doing this for 40 years.
[00:05:51] Destabilize the food supply by
[00:05:54] destabilizing the rain and you
[00:05:55] destabilize the population.
[00:05:59] >> So it's you just said a bunch of amazing
[00:06:02] things. All of which I just want to say
[00:06:04] sound plausible to me. Um but let's just
[00:06:08] back up a little bit. So you're calling
[00:06:09] this geoengineering.
[00:06:12] The term
[00:06:13] >> the term chemtrails you say is a
[00:06:17] propaganda term designed to discredit
[00:06:20] people who ask sincere questions about
[00:06:22] what the hell am I looking at?
[00:06:23] >> So Google that term they'll get what you
[00:06:26] got and that's what we try to avoid. If
[00:06:28] anybody is unfamiliar with the issue and
[00:06:29] they Google that term that's the end of
[00:06:31] their search most likely. So we try to
[00:06:33] point semantics matter in this in this
[00:06:36] case.
[00:06:36] >> Okay. So the the first line of the
[00:06:38] Wikipedia entry
[00:06:41] points out something true, which is that
[00:06:43] when you look at these lines in the sky
[00:06:47] and you're told, "Well, it's just
[00:06:48] condensation. It's water vapor."
[00:06:51] >> You know that maybe that's not the right
[00:06:53] explanation because water vapor
[00:06:55] dissipates and doesn't remain in the sky
[00:07:00] >> for like 20 minutes after the plane
[00:07:01] leaves. that suggests
[00:07:04] bigger particles in in the mist, the
[00:07:07] particulate matter in the mist. Is is
[00:07:10] that correct?
[00:07:11] >> Exactly correct. If you see, for
[00:07:13] example, breath condensing, if you see
[00:07:14] some researchers in the Arctic and their
[00:07:16] breath is condensing because it's very
[00:07:17] cold, do they get a cloud starting to
[00:07:18] form over their head? If you have a
[00:07:20] vehicle that's exhaust condensing in the
[00:07:22] morning, do you have a freeway with
[00:07:24] giant clouds hanging over it from the
[00:07:26] condensation from the vehicles in some
[00:07:27] cold region? No, that's not how
[00:07:29] condensation behaves. And again, my
[00:07:32] journey into this whole battle of now 27
[00:07:35] years. But when I built my off-grid home
[00:07:39] in Northern California, middle of the
[00:07:40] wilderness, it was the cover of the
[00:07:42] world's largest renewable energy
[00:07:43] magazine. I have solar, wind, and hydro.
[00:07:46] And I was losing on some days from what
[00:07:48] these aircraft were emitting, 50, 60,
[00:07:50] even 70% of my solar uptake from what
[00:07:54] these aircraft were emitting. I knew
[00:07:55] that could not be condensation. When I
[00:07:58] began to research, I was very surprised
[00:07:59] at the mountain of information on
[00:08:01] geoengineering, solar radiation
[00:08:03] management, and I'd look for primary
[00:08:05] elements. I begin to test my
[00:08:06] precipitation. I hoped I would not find
[00:08:09] these elements in my rain because I knew
[00:08:11] if I did, it would change the entire
[00:08:12] course of my life. I cannot look the
[00:08:13] other way. I came up with seven parts
[00:08:17] per billion in my first rain test over
[00:08:18] the next 18 months because I took that
[00:08:20] long researching before I was willing to
[00:08:22] speak out on this issue. At the end of
[00:08:24] 18 months, I had single rain events with
[00:08:26] 3,450 parts per billion of aluminum in
[00:08:29] my rain. This is bioavailable free form
[00:08:32] aluminum, which is toxic to all life
[00:08:33] forms. Period. Primary element named in
[00:08:36] climate engineering patents. And we have
[00:08:37] the world's most recognized geoengineers
[00:08:39] specifically stating on film on the
[00:08:41] record their goal of using aluminum in
[00:08:45] these programs because of its high
[00:08:46] reflectivity with no consideration of
[00:08:48] the consequences. That's how I got into
[00:08:50] this battle. So, if I understand what
[00:08:52] you're saying,
[00:08:54] this what we're watching is an attempt,
[00:08:57] I assume, by governments, and we'll get
[00:08:59] into who's doing this, to mitigate the
[00:09:02] effects of climate change, to reflect
[00:09:05] back rays from the sun so that the earth
[00:09:08] doesn't warm at a at a pace that is
[00:09:11] dangerous to whatever they think it's
[00:09:12] dangerous to. Um, but this is a this is
[00:09:15] a global warming mitigation effort. Is
[00:09:17] that correct? That is the stated
[00:09:19] purpose. We know this is
[00:09:21] >> that is the stated purpose. So I think
[00:09:23] that's plausible because there is so
[00:09:24] much energy um commitment sincere
[00:09:27] commitment in some cases obviously uh
[00:09:30] fake commitment in others but there and
[00:09:32] so much money behind this effort to
[00:09:34] mitigate global warming that that makes
[00:09:36] absolute sense. It is a religion. Um,
[00:09:38] and you're saying that you were not
[00:09:40] originally aware of this or interested
[00:09:42] in it, but because you live off-rid and
[00:09:45] you derive a lot of your electricity
[00:09:46] from solar and you clearly have an
[00:09:47] engineer brain, you were wondering like,
[00:09:50] why the hell is my solar not working
[00:09:51] correctly? And that got you into this
[00:09:54] process of learning about it.
[00:09:56] >> Correct. And I have friends in the solar
[00:09:58] industry and who off the record
[00:10:02] inform me that some of the commercial
[00:10:04] solar plants are producing half their
[00:10:06] design output and they won't talk about
[00:10:08] why because they don't want to lose
[00:10:10] subsidies. So again this this is a very
[00:10:14] known element in many fields. In fact,
[00:10:17] with the nation's weathermen, National
[00:10:19] Weather Service and Noah, National
[00:10:21] Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
[00:10:22] there is an illegal federal gag order on
[00:10:25] all agency operations with those two
[00:10:28] entities. Why would our government feel
[00:10:30] the need to gag the weathermen? I had no
[00:10:32] scientist state to my face, quote, "We
[00:10:33] all know this is going on. We have no
[00:10:35] first amendment protection. We don't
[00:10:36] know what to do." So the bottom line is
[00:10:38] let's all just pretend this isn't going
[00:10:40] on while it's virtually dismantling the
[00:10:43] planet's primary life support systems
[00:10:45] and ubiquitously contaminating
[00:10:46] everything everywhere. Not just talking
[00:10:48] about aluminum. We have in lab tests and
[00:10:51] again we've done hundreds of lab tests.
[00:10:52] We did 500 working with the University
[00:10:54] of Minnesota an internationally
[00:10:56] recognized agricultural institution. We
[00:10:58] have aluminum, berium, strontium,
[00:11:00] maganesees, surfactants, polymer fibers,
[00:11:03] graphine. All of this coming down in our
[00:11:05] breathable air column. Tucker,
[00:11:08] >> that's horrifying. People worry about
[00:11:10] the safety of their home now more than
[00:11:12] ever. Simply Safe is an amazing
[00:11:13] solution. And with the early access
[00:11:16] Black Friday sale upon us, there's never
[00:11:18] been a better time to protect your
[00:11:21] house, your family this way. So, typical
[00:11:24] security systems react after someone's
[00:11:25] already broken into your house. It seems
[00:11:27] a little late, really. Simply Safe takes
[00:11:29] the opposite approach to stop bad
[00:11:32] things, [music] home invasions for
[00:11:33] example, before they happen. How active
[00:11:36] guard outdoor protection cameras detect
[00:11:38] threats outside your house. Alert real
[00:11:40] security agents who take action while
[00:11:42] the intruder is still outside, not in
[00:11:44] your bedroom.
[00:11:46] Why doesn't everyone do this? [music] We
[00:11:49] don't know. But this is a great idea.
[00:11:51] And Simply Safe works whether you're
[00:11:53] home or not. You could be around the
[00:11:54] world. It's got 247 coverage no matter
[00:11:56] where you are. There are no long-term
[00:11:58] contracts, no hidden fees. You can
[00:12:00] cancel at anytime you want. It's been
[00:12:02] repeatedly named best home security
[00:12:04] system for a good reason. Plus, there's
[00:12:05] a 60-day money back guarantee, so you're
[00:12:07] not risking anything. Don't miss out on
[00:12:09] Simply Sales's biggest sale of the year.
[00:12:11] 60% off right now. Listeners, get 60%
[00:12:13] off a Simplysafe home security system at
[00:12:16] simplysafe.com/tucker.
[00:12:19] Simplysafe simlisafe.com/tucker.
[00:12:23] That's the kind of safety you want. So,
[00:12:26] who's doing this specifically?
[00:12:30] Ultimately, all roads lead to those who
[00:12:32] print the money. But we know as far as
[00:12:34] the coordinating entities, certainly
[00:12:37] DoD, DARPA, and we have documents to
[00:12:41] prove the existence of these programs
[00:12:43] going back decades, documents hundreds
[00:12:45] of pages long. We have an 800page US
[00:12:47] Senate document from 1978 outlining the
[00:12:51] scope and scale of these programs then
[00:12:53] specifically calling for
[00:12:54] intergovernmental cooperation even
[00:12:56] between quote otherwise adversarial
[00:12:58] nations because of the crossber
[00:13:01] ramifications of these programs. You
[00:13:02] can't just geoengineer over your own
[00:13:04] country. Who's the biggest player?
[00:13:06] Obviously the United States of America
[00:13:08] because the size of our military we have
[00:13:10] the US military has three times more
[00:13:13] aerial tankers which are the primary
[00:13:16] aircraft used in these operations. Three
[00:13:18] times more than all other militaries in
[00:13:20] the world combined. And if I could back
[00:13:22] up to the whole condensation trail
[00:13:24] narrative again, which is perhaps one of
[00:13:25] the greatest lies ever perpetrated on
[00:13:27] populations all over the world. All
[00:13:29] military tankers and all commercial
[00:13:31] aircraft are equipped with what's known
[00:13:32] as a high bypass turboan jet engine.
[00:13:35] That's a jet powered fan. 90% of the air
[00:13:38] that moves through that engine is not
[00:13:40] combusted. So by design, that engine is
[00:13:42] nearly incapable of producing any
[00:13:44] condensation material except under rare
[00:13:45] and extreme circumstances which are
[00:13:48] diminishing by the day because of the
[00:13:50] warming that's occurring in the
[00:13:52] troposphere.
[00:13:54] So much warming. We've had two former
[00:13:57] military pilots that fly py aircraft,
[00:13:59] private aircraft. Important people have
[00:14:02] contacted us at gogwatch.org. In both
[00:14:04] cases, they were off the coast of the
[00:14:07] Pacific Northwest, and their aircraft
[00:14:08] were forced into emergency auto descents
[00:14:12] because the air outside that aircraft
[00:14:13] was 45 to 50° above what it should have
[00:14:17] been. The air was not dense enough to
[00:14:19] carry those aircraft. These people are
[00:14:20] very, very alarmed, but very afraid to
[00:14:23] speak out.
[00:14:24] >> Well, that's an amazing that's an
[00:14:26] amazing fact and it and it points up
[00:14:28] something that I think is indisputably
[00:14:29] true, which is the climate is changing.
[00:14:31] Um why it's changing is a is a whole
[00:14:33] separate set of debates. Of course it's
[00:14:35] always changed. Um
[00:14:36] >> climate injuring alone though if I could
[00:14:38] elaborate I mean climate injuring alone
[00:14:39] if and I'm I'm not negating the other
[00:14:41] sources of damage of the planet. We've
[00:14:43] been very poor stewards but our point at
[00:14:45] geo engineering watch.org is how could
[00:14:47] anybody from any perspective and and the
[00:14:50] environmental left is the most reluctant
[00:14:51] to face this issue and we know why
[00:14:53] Tucker because they don't want to lose
[00:14:55] their 501c3 nonprofits. Our attorneys at
[00:14:57] gwatch.org spoke to attorneys from every
[00:15:00] major environmental group. Greenpeace,
[00:15:01] Sierra Club, WWF, all of them, they will
[00:15:04] not address this issue because they
[00:15:05] don't want to lose their nonprofit
[00:15:07] status. Is that not criminal hypocrisy?
[00:15:09] So, we're stating in in the case of
[00:15:11] trapping more heat than it deflects,
[00:15:13] causing far more harm than any perceived
[00:15:15] good. They're simply using it as a
[00:15:17] weapon under the guise of trying to
[00:15:19] mitigate the climate. So, again, these
[00:15:21] operations are taking us from the frying
[00:15:24] pan into the fire, so to speak. So
[00:15:26] again, the the greatest most damaging
[00:15:29] form of human activity on the planet at
[00:15:31] this moment in time must be considered
[00:15:34] these operations, climate engineering.
[00:15:36] >> Well, sure. I mean, geoengineering by
[00:15:38] its very nature is just like textbook
[00:15:41] hubris
[00:15:42] >> where you think you're God and you're in
[00:15:44] charge of the weather and the planet.
[00:15:46] No, you're just some lumpy furry schmuck
[00:15:50] living out an incredibly short lifespan
[00:15:52] with no ability to make anything better
[00:15:54] because you're not God. Like just the
[00:15:57] whole mindset is the mindset that gets
[00:15:59] us to nuclear war. So I'm opposed to it
[00:16:01] on those grounds. But
[00:16:03] before we ascend too much higher, let's
[00:16:06] just come back down a little bit and to
[00:16:07] the specifics. So where these aircraft
[00:16:10] seem to be everywhere in the United
[00:16:11] States, where are they taking off from?
[00:16:13] Where do these chemicals come from? the
[00:16:15] aluminum particulate, the the rest that
[00:16:16] you did, the magnesium, all the rest you
[00:16:18] described, like what's what's kind of
[00:16:20] the chain that gets us to the stripes in
[00:16:24] the sky that we see? Aircraft are taking
[00:16:26] off from countless locations. We we're
[00:16:28] aware of a number of military bases
[00:16:31] where we know they're they're deploying
[00:16:33] from. We also have commercial aircraft
[00:16:36] with commercial markings that we know
[00:16:38] are being used in these operations. We
[00:16:41] know that because we have film footage
[00:16:42] of these aircraft. Retrofit nozzles
[00:16:44] mounted on the wing pylons. We have
[00:16:46] uplose photographs aimed into the
[00:16:48] exhaust jetream to make this look like
[00:16:50] quote condensation. We are not
[00:16:51] implicating commercial pilots or
[00:16:53] personnel, but we are communicating with
[00:16:55] them. Some commercial pilots that
[00:16:57] distribute our printed materials in
[00:16:59] pilot lunchrooms for example covertly
[00:17:02] because they know their aircraft are
[00:17:03] being used. These are automated systems.
[00:17:05] They carry a small payload. You might
[00:17:07] remember about in the year 2000 the
[00:17:10] weight of the aircraft became a very big
[00:17:12] deal. How much luggage you carried on,
[00:17:14] how much weight you carried on. That
[00:17:16] appears to be when this was implemented.
[00:17:18] And we also know that the DoD has leased
[00:17:21] a significant number of commercial
[00:17:23] aircraft with commercial markings. Why
[00:17:25] would the DoD need or want that? And
[00:17:28] again
[00:17:30] for the base material because we're
[00:17:32] talking about an extraordinary amount of
[00:17:33] material here based on our testing with
[00:17:35] University of Minnesota again about 500
[00:17:37] lab tests there and extrapolating how
[00:17:39] much material was in the precipitation
[00:17:41] projecting that globally it appears
[00:17:43] something in the range of 40 to 60
[00:17:46] million tons of nanop particles are
[00:17:48] being dispersed annually in skies all
[00:17:50] over the globe. And the smaller the
[00:17:52] particle, the more toxic it is, the more
[00:17:54] harmful it is, the more bioavailable it
[00:17:56] is. And and all the official air quality
[00:17:59] testing by design doesn't even look for
[00:18:02] these elements, let alone disclose them.
[00:18:04] So official air quality testing is PM10,
[00:18:07] 10 microns, occasionally PM2.5.
[00:18:10] Those are boulders compared to a nano
[00:18:12] particle. You can fit up to a 100,000
[00:18:14] nanop particles across the width of a
[00:18:16] single human hair. It's in they're
[00:18:18] inconceivably small. And the reason they
[00:18:20] use such small particles is because they
[00:18:22] stay aloft longer and that's the goal.
[00:18:24] Keep the particles suspended in the
[00:18:26] atmosphere and there's more volutric
[00:18:28] forcing. There's more surface area the
[00:18:30] smaller the particle for a given amount
[00:18:31] of material. So it appears and we have a
[00:18:35] published study on this. There is a
[00:18:36] peer-reviewed published study that
[00:18:38] implicates coal fly ash as a base
[00:18:41] material for these operations because it
[00:18:43] contains many of the elements the
[00:18:45] climate engineers feel they need to
[00:18:47] disperse in our skies and it provides
[00:18:50] plausible deniability and it gets rid of
[00:18:52] the waste product that they're always
[00:18:53] trying to get rid of. There's other
[00:18:55] elements added. American Elements
[00:18:57] Corporation appears to be one of the
[00:18:59] primary suppliers for these operations.
[00:19:02] But again, the fact that this can go on
[00:19:04] in our skies and the mountain of data
[00:19:06] that exists on this and the continued
[00:19:08] pretending by the so-called climate
[00:19:10] science community that this isn't
[00:19:11] ongoing is mind-numbing and they won't
[00:19:14] be able to hide this for much longer.
[00:19:15] Tucker, I want to I want to stress that
[00:19:17] these programs will be forced to light.
[00:19:19] And if I could end with this, when those
[00:19:22] pretend again like the Wikipedia
[00:19:23] definition you read that this is some
[00:19:26] sort of an outlandish conspiracy, let's
[00:19:28] go all the way back to 1962. 63 years
[00:19:31] ago, President Lyndon Johnson on film on
[00:19:34] the record ranting like a lunatic. It's
[00:19:37] the first 30 seconds of the weekly
[00:19:39] commercial free nonpolitical
[00:19:40] geoengineering watch national broadcast
[00:19:42] we put on radios out of our pock
[00:19:44] stations on out of our pocket across the
[00:19:45] country. But the first 30 seconds is
[00:19:47] this film footage of Johnson stating we
[00:19:49] had the power to control the world's
[00:19:51] cloud layer then and quote he who
[00:19:54] controls the weather controls the world.
[00:19:56] How far have they come since? A new
[00:19:58] study, one of the saddest ever released
[00:20:01] showed that one year after having an
[00:20:02] abortion, women were 50% more likely to
[00:20:05] need [music] psychiatric treatment and
[00:20:08] 87% more likely to experience
[00:20:10] personality disorders or behavioral
[00:20:12] disorders. So abortion is not healthc
[00:20:14] care, it's trauma. It's awful. It's
[00:20:18] [music] the saddest thing. And some
[00:20:19] people get railroaded right into it.
[00:20:20] They think they have no choice. But they
[00:20:22] do. And our friends at Preborn want to
[00:20:24] remind everyone that [music] they do.
[00:20:25] They have a choice. At Preborn, women
[00:20:28] find real care, not lectures about how
[00:20:30] they should have their abortions and
[00:20:31] then brag about them and how they're
[00:20:33] going to feel great after it and whole
[00:20:35] and free. It's all such a lie. You must
[00:20:38] know people who have had abortions.
[00:20:39] Everyone does. They're not freed by it.
[00:20:42] They're enslaved by it. It's the saddest
[00:20:44] thing. And pre-born is pro-life in the
[00:20:47] truest sense. They want women to have an
[00:20:49] actual option. Pre-born's network
[00:20:52] clinics welcome expecting mothers with
[00:20:53] open arms. There's no shame, no guilt.
[00:20:55] There is compassion and support. They're
[00:20:58] introduced to their babies through
[00:20:59] ultrasounds. And for the first time,
[00:21:01] they understand this is alive. This is
[00:21:03] life. This is a miracle. When a mother
[00:21:05] chooses life, Pre-born walks with her
[00:21:07] for up to 2 years, providing maternity
[00:21:09] clothes, diapers, counseling, and
[00:21:11] anything she needs. With Christmas right
[00:21:14] around the corner, we hope you will
[00:21:15] support Pre-born. Pre-born is a fivestar
[00:21:17] rated charity, meaning that when you
[00:21:19] send money to them, they actually use it
[00:21:21] for what they say they're going to use
[00:21:22] it for. It's not for private planes for
[00:21:23] their staff, hardly. Dial pound 250 and
[00:21:26] say the keyword baby. That's pound250
[00:21:29] baby. Or visit pre-born.com/tucker.
[00:21:31] pre-born.com/tucker.
[00:21:33] stand with life, true life, with the
[00:21:35] miracle and the joy of life with
[00:21:37] pre-born.
[00:21:38] Well, it's that kind of lunatic hubris
[00:21:41] that, you know, destroys the world. Um,
[00:21:44] and Johnson was a, of course, whether he
[00:21:47] knew it or not, committed to helping
[00:21:48] destroy the world. Um, so an evil man by
[00:21:51] I think by any metric. Um, so I'm not
[00:21:54] I'm not necessarily surprised. What I am
[00:21:56] surprised by, however, is the fact that
[00:22:00] this program, the one you're describing,
[00:22:02] could have continued for over 60 years
[00:22:04] at this scale, you know, continental
[00:22:06] scale, global scale, and
[00:22:10] no one knows about it or talks about it.
[00:22:12] I mean, you know, we have a huge
[00:22:14] government, lots of elected officials.
[00:22:15] Like, what do they say when you ask
[00:22:17] them? [clears throat]
[00:22:18] >> This this is a bit like the safe and
[00:22:20] effective narrative, isn't it? Let's all
[00:22:22] have the [clears throat] entire medical
[00:22:24] community pretending that injecting
[00:22:27] toxic heavy metals is safe and
[00:22:29] effective. And they still pretend to
[00:22:31] this day that that is the case when it
[00:22:34] doesn't take a large intellect or an
[00:22:37] educated individual to understand that's
[00:22:39] going to do harm. And yet that narrative
[00:22:41] still continues to this day. So again,
[00:22:44] this mass psychosis of denial is
[00:22:48] mind-numbing. But you can't hide this
[00:22:50] for much longer. And we do have the
[00:22:52] climate science community now starting
[00:22:53] to speak out, starting to state how
[00:22:56] incredibly catastrophic these programs
[00:22:58] would be if they were imple implemented.
[00:23:01] They're not outright admitting it yet,
[00:23:02] but they're getting closer. And if you
[00:23:03] look at historical precedent, when did
[00:23:04] the US military start its modification
[00:23:07] in hurricanes? And and there's some
[00:23:08] interesting things going on on the
[00:23:10] hurricane front this year as in none of
[00:23:11] them. They're being deflected. And
[00:23:14] people that pretend that you can't
[00:23:16] manipulate a weather system of that
[00:23:17] size. That's absolute nonsense. The
[00:23:19] science completely disputes that US
[00:23:21] military commenced its hurricane
[00:23:23] modification operations in 1947 with
[00:23:26] project Cirrus and even the results of
[00:23:30] that initial smallcale testing appeared
[00:23:33] to have so much of effect on a cyclonic
[00:23:36] rotation that there were lawsuits
[00:23:37] pending from that at which time they
[00:23:39] begin to be more covert about their
[00:23:41] operations.
[00:23:42] >> And you said you'll notice that there
[00:23:44] aren't hurricanes in Florida. So, the
[00:23:45] last few years, uh, Florida, the West
[00:23:48] Coast of Florida in particular, just
[00:23:50] been hammered, absolutely destroyed. You
[00:23:52] know, billions, tens of billions of
[00:23:54] dollars of damage done by hurricanes, no
[00:23:56] hurricanes this year. And you're saying
[00:23:59] that that's not an accident. Is that
[00:24:02] what you're saying?
[00:24:03] >> I'm saying that we know the technology
[00:24:05] exists to steer storms of that size. And
[00:24:08] let me make a comparison. You could have
[00:24:10] a a 10-year-old child divert the course
[00:24:14] of a 100,000 ton freight train by
[00:24:17] pulling a lever literally and changing
[00:24:20] the tracks.
[00:24:20] >> That's correct.
[00:24:21] >> And that's the kind of small input,
[00:24:22] massive output that you can have with
[00:24:24] these cyclonic rotations when they have
[00:24:26] the ability to manipulate atmospheric
[00:24:28] pressure zones. This is undisputed
[00:24:30] patented science. So why would we think
[00:24:33] they're not using these type of
[00:24:34] operations? We have historical
[00:24:36] precedent. Project Papey in Vietnam was
[00:24:38] so successful at controlling
[00:24:40] precipitation. This is a historical
[00:24:42] record that in by 1976 they passed the
[00:24:45] INMOD treaties forbidding weather
[00:24:48] manipulation for wartime purposes but
[00:24:50] not over a country's own population. So
[00:24:52] if we look at the
[00:24:54] >> Can can I ask you to stop? I'm I'm sorry
[00:24:56] you're throwing I'm so ignorant on this
[00:24:59] topic but I'm suddenly very interested
[00:25:01] that I just want to make sure we don't
[00:25:02] miss anything. Operation Popeye. Is that
[00:25:04] what you called it in Vietnam?
[00:25:06] >> Correct.
[00:25:07] >> What? I've never even heard of that. I'm
[00:25:09] embarrassed to say. What is it? What was
[00:25:10] it?
[00:25:11] >> Very easily researched historical
[00:25:12] record. US military was so successful at
[00:25:15] controlling precipitation over Vietnam
[00:25:18] that the international community was
[00:25:21] very concerned about this at least on
[00:25:22] the surface. And they passed
[00:25:24] environmental modification treaties in
[00:25:26] 1976, international treaties forbidding
[00:25:28] weather manipulation in wartime. So
[00:25:31] again when when people claim this is
[00:25:32] conspiracy, we don't have this kind of
[00:25:34] power and control and they they try to
[00:25:37] muddy the climate engineering issue as
[00:25:39] being the localized publicized cloud
[00:25:44] seating operations. Those are two
[00:25:45] completely different animals and we see
[00:25:47] even some state legislators doing the
[00:25:49] same. They're and we're trying to
[00:25:51] correct that at geo engineering.org
[00:25:52] because we're working with numerous
[00:25:53] state legislators now and have been.
[00:25:56] There's legislation pending in 36 states
[00:25:58] to ban geoengineering over their skies.
[00:26:01] Tennessee and Florida have already done
[00:26:02] so, but we're we're correcting them and
[00:26:05] giving them a an accurate compass
[00:26:07] heading that the localized publicized
[00:26:10] cloud seating operations, the kind which
[00:26:12] they tried to implicate in the Texas
[00:26:15] floods that killed so many young
[00:26:17] Americans as being connected to a
[00:26:20] localized cloud seating operation, which
[00:26:22] is virtually meaningless
[00:26:24] in comparison to climate engineering.
[00:26:26] It's an ant compared to an elephant. So
[00:26:28] intentionally
[00:26:30] those that control media and are trying
[00:26:32] to control the narrative are trying to
[00:26:34] confuse these two issues. They are
[00:26:36] completely different. They're trying to
[00:26:38] mask or hide the elephant in the sky
[00:26:41] which is climate engineering operations.
[00:26:43] So again these programs are historical
[00:26:46] record. The Chinese government so
[00:26:48] successful at for example engineering
[00:26:51] snowstorms. Tucker do you remember the
[00:26:54] blizzard in New Orleans this January?
[00:26:56] You remember that?
[00:26:57] >> No, I don't.
[00:26:59] >> There was a blizzard in New Orleans.
[00:27:00] First time in recorded history. There
[00:27:02] was a blizzard in Florida. Blizzards on
[00:27:03] the Gulf Coast. That was January 21st,
[00:27:06] by the way. That's an interesting date
[00:27:07] to have that happen. These are
[00:27:09] demonstrations of what climate
[00:27:10] engineering can do. And the Chinese
[00:27:12] government has long since openly stated
[00:27:14] they were engineering snowstorms with
[00:27:17] endothermic reacting elements. These are
[00:27:19] patented elements that can literally
[00:27:22] transition what should be a liquid
[00:27:24] precipitation event, a rain event into
[00:27:26] snow. And these elements, if people
[00:27:28] understand they have a first aid kit
[00:27:29] that sits on their shelf at room
[00:27:30] temperature for 20 years, you mix the
[00:27:32] cold pack together, you have ice
[00:27:33] instantly. That's an endothermic
[00:27:35] reacting element. Yes,
[00:27:36] >> that's being into cloud moisture. And
[00:27:39] they were so successful in China, they
[00:27:40] caused billions of dollars of damage to
[00:27:42] Beijing, at which time they began to be
[00:27:44] less open about this. Everybody covered
[00:27:46] it. CNN, Popular Science, The Guardian,
[00:27:50] everyone. But if you bring that up here,
[00:27:52] suddenly you're a tin foil hatw wearing
[00:27:53] nutcase on that same day while it was
[00:27:56] while it was blizzarding in New Orleans.
[00:27:58] In the polar regions, Alaska, Greenland,
[00:28:01] Iceland, Siberia, it was above freezing
[00:28:04] and raining. Do you remember the deep
[00:28:07] freeze in Texas, Tucker, a few years
[00:28:10] ago? Five years ago, something like
[00:28:11] that.
[00:28:11] >> Yes. Very, very well. Yeah. It shut down
[00:28:13] a lot of their grid.
[00:28:15] >> Correct. So when it was below zero in
[00:28:18] Dallas, it was 33° warmer at the North
[00:28:23] Pole. Think about that. And that's what
[00:28:25] we're not told. So when you have let's
[00:28:29] look at the COP climate conferences. Do
[00:28:30] you know what those are? The
[00:28:31] international climate conferences that
[00:28:33] we have periodically.
[00:28:35] >> Those conferences are not to change
[00:28:37] business as usual. They are to force
[00:28:39] countries to actively or passively
[00:28:41] participate in climate engineering. So
[00:28:43] at some of those conferences, the Cancun
[00:28:45] conference, the Copenhagen conference,
[00:28:47] we had record low temperatures at the
[00:28:49] time of the conference in spite of above
[00:28:51] normal temperatures in all surrounding
[00:28:53] areas. That's a demonstration of what
[00:28:54] climate insurance can do. So back to the
[00:28:57] hurricanes,
[00:28:58] the deflection of hurricanes so far this
[00:29:01] year, is that a demonstration to other
[00:29:04] countries as well as to the power that
[00:29:06] the US military has to manipulate
[00:29:08] atmospheric pressure zones? And again,
[00:29:10] these are patented processes. For
[00:29:12] listeners that have heard of HARP in
[00:29:14] Alaska, I'm not sure if you ever heard
[00:29:15] of that, Tucker. HARP.
[00:29:17] >> No.
[00:29:18] >> Okay. That's
[00:29:20] images of that exist. There's no dispute
[00:29:22] as to its function or what the patents
[00:29:26] outline that it can do. Even Discovery
[00:29:28] Channel did a long episode, which
[00:29:29] they've seem to be taken off the air
[00:29:31] now, called controlling the weather. But
[00:29:34] that's a weapon of mass destruction.
[00:29:36] They play it off as a benign research
[00:29:38] facility. That's an ionosphere heater.
[00:29:40] It transmits 3.6 million watts of power
[00:29:42] to the electrically charged ionosphere
[00:29:44] causing an electrical chain reaction.
[00:29:46] They're literally using the atmosphere
[00:29:48] as a physics lab, which we know they do,
[00:29:50] right Tucker? You know of Project
[00:29:51] Starfish Prime and Project Fishbowl, if
[00:29:53] you've heard of those, those are the the
[00:29:55] US military's experiments with
[00:29:57] detonating hydrogen bombs in the
[00:29:59] magnetosphere, which they thought could
[00:30:00] collapse the whole atmosphere. Did that
[00:30:01] stop them? No, it didn't. So
[00:30:04] installations like HARP are used to
[00:30:07] control atmospheric pressure zones. Back
[00:30:09] to the hurricanes, if you can manipulate
[00:30:11] atmospheric pressure zones with these
[00:30:12] directional ionosphere heaters, you can
[00:30:15] literally manipulate their path. And and
[00:30:18] is that what we see going on? Is that a
[00:30:20] demonstration to others right now? Does
[00:30:21] the administration want to not have a
[00:30:24] big hurricane cataclysm since they've
[00:30:26] gutted all the emergency protection,
[00:30:28] everything? Do they not want to fight
[00:30:29] that battle too right now? We don't
[00:30:31] know. We can speculate on those things,
[00:30:33] but the fact that there is nothing that
[00:30:35] we can call natural at this point is
[00:30:37] indisputable.
[00:30:38] >> That's amazing. When you drink a cup of
[00:30:40] coffee from your typical douchy woke
[00:30:42] coffee company, you're supporting an
[00:30:44] entire agenda you may not be aware of.
[00:30:47] It's not just about coffee. It's about
[00:30:48] Antifa, BLM, transindoation,
[00:30:52] the notion that masculinity is somehow
[00:30:54] toxic, and other programs specifically
[00:30:57] designed to destroy the West from
[00:30:59] within. and they've been pretty
[00:31:00] effective. You shouldn't have to support
[00:31:02] any of that just cuz you want to drink
[00:31:04] great coffee. You can do both. You can
[00:31:07] have an excellent cup of coffee and you
[00:31:09] can defend what matters in your nation.
[00:31:12] Black Rifle Coffee is a really good way
[00:31:14] to do that. Veteran founded,
[00:31:16] missiondriven, Black Rifle Coffee
[00:31:18] donates to groups that you would be
[00:31:20] proud of, not ones that hate you. Their
[00:31:22] money goes to the right places and
[00:31:23] [music] they're going allin this
[00:31:25] Veterans Week. From November 7th until
[00:31:27] the 11th, Black Rifle is raising money
[00:31:29] to eliminate up to $25 million in
[00:31:32] veteran medical debt. That is a
[00:31:34] lifechanging difference. Visit
[00:31:36] blackriflec.com/tucker.
[00:31:39] Use this code Tucker. Pretty simple. For
[00:31:42] 30% off your first order, black rifle
[00:31:44] coffee. It is purely American. A couple
[00:31:48] different threads. One, the US military
[00:31:51] in this country, our military runs
[00:31:53] propaganda operations against our
[00:31:56] population and they do it on social
[00:31:57] media and of course they do it through
[00:31:59] the conventional media as well and they
[00:32:01] have for a long time but it's it's
[00:32:02] certainly gotten more aggressive. So um
[00:32:05] that's illegal, it's immoral, anyone who
[00:32:08] participates in that should be in
[00:32:09] prison. Um but it happens and
[00:32:11] unfortunately we haven't been able to
[00:32:13] stop it. So, we know that they lie to
[00:32:17] our population about a whole bunch of
[00:32:19] things, including what they're doing.
[00:32:21] Two, we know that in the past 15 years,
[00:32:24] you see these kind of fat affeminite
[00:32:25] generals all of a sudden talking about
[00:32:27] how climate change is like one of the
[00:32:29] main national security threats and like
[00:32:31] the purpose of the US military is to
[00:32:32] fight climate change. There's been a lot
[00:32:34] of that and it's very confusing to
[00:32:36] people like me who think of the purpose
[00:32:38] of the US military is like shooting
[00:32:41] people trying to invade our country.
[00:32:42] like what does climate change have to do
[00:32:44] with national security? But they've been
[00:32:46] saying that a lot and your description
[00:32:51] suddenly makes it all make sense. Like a
[00:32:54] lot of what they do is trying to
[00:32:56] mitigate or saying they're trying to
[00:32:58] mitigate the effects of climate change.
[00:33:00] I mean, I guess this is more out in the
[00:33:02] open than I realized until right now. I
[00:33:04] I would call it masking the effects
[00:33:07] because they're certainly not mitigating
[00:33:08] it. Everything they do, every short-term
[00:33:11] toxic surface cool down comes at the
[00:33:13] cost of a worsened overall warming and
[00:33:15] damage to the planet. And you're
[00:33:17] completely correct, Tucker, completely
[00:33:18] correct in the US military's top brass
[00:33:21] statements on the record that they
[00:33:23] consider the collapsing climate system
[00:33:25] the greatest national security threat of
[00:33:28] all. So when we have so many military
[00:33:30] bases at sea level, some of which are
[00:33:32] already being inundated, that's a part
[00:33:34] of the problem. But you have other
[00:33:36] elements. For example, and this is from
[00:33:39] a perspective of the existence of the
[00:33:42] human race and how much longer we're
[00:33:43] going to be here. The ozone layer is
[00:33:45] near functional collapse right now. It's
[00:33:47] not the hairspray cans. Single greatest
[00:33:50] damaging factor is climate engineering.
[00:33:52] Period. Not just the oxidizing particles
[00:33:55] that are being dispersed in our
[00:33:56] atmosphere, but the manipulation of
[00:33:58] those particles with extremely powerful
[00:34:00] frequency transmissions. So we know that
[00:34:04] of all the towers being put up
[00:34:05] everywhere for quote communications,
[00:34:08] fake trees and you know all the
[00:34:10] different forms they come in. We know
[00:34:12] that many of those installations are
[00:34:13] being supplied with 10 times more power
[00:34:16] than they need. That's part of my
[00:34:17] background in the electrical field. I
[00:34:18] know people that work on these towers.
[00:34:21] 10 times more power than they need for
[00:34:23] communications. Why do they need that
[00:34:24] much more power? Thousand% more power.
[00:34:27] And we know these facilities are being
[00:34:29] used to manipulate the electrically
[00:34:31] conductive atmospheric particulates.
[00:34:32] There's a repelling effect caused from
[00:34:34] these transmissions because we can see
[00:34:36] the effect on water vapor loops. So, if
[00:34:38] we look at the flash flooding in Texas
[00:34:42] as an example that killed so many young
[00:34:45] Americans, we captured in real time and
[00:34:48] I'm I'm still surprised we have access
[00:34:50] to these data loops because we have
[00:34:51] access to the transmissions from the
[00:34:54] NEXRAD network that are used to
[00:34:56] manipulate weather systems. And what
[00:34:58] happened in that case was because of the
[00:35:01] repelling effect of those transmissions
[00:35:04] and picture picture this scenario when
[00:35:07] there was that convective cell over that
[00:35:09] location and transmitters energized all
[00:35:12] around that cell and we recorded that
[00:35:14] it's posted online that in effect held
[00:35:17] that cell in one place. It precipitated
[00:35:19] out in one location. We can speculate
[00:35:22] about agendas and objectives. We can't
[00:35:23] know that. But the fact that that storm
[00:35:25] was manipulated is beyond dispute. Same
[00:35:27] with Hurricane Helen. We recorded that
[00:35:30] in real time. The frequency
[00:35:32] transmissions manipulating that storm
[00:35:34] and steering into place. It's
[00:35:35] indisputable. These are patented
[00:35:37] technologies. Hurricane Harvey, we
[00:35:38] recorded that. How did meteorologists
[00:35:41] know 7 days in advance that Hurricane
[00:35:44] Harvey was going to go where it went and
[00:35:45] sit there for 3 days? How could they
[00:35:47] possibly know that? Frequency
[00:35:50] transmissions held it there. We recorded
[00:35:51] that in real time. And
[00:35:55] again, these people are reading scripts,
[00:35:57] Tucker. They're literally reading
[00:35:59] scripts passed down to them by Rathon,
[00:36:01] private defense contractors, Rathon and
[00:36:03] Loheed Martin that are neck deep in
[00:36:04] climate engineering, everything,
[00:36:05] patents, operations, everything. And
[00:36:09] they literally supply and provide the
[00:36:13] quote forecast, which is the scheduled
[00:36:15] weather, to the National Weather Service
[00:36:17] in Noah, our nation's weatherman. that
[00:36:18] passes all the way down. And local
[00:36:20] meteorologists simply,
[00:36:23] they know how long their leash is.
[00:36:24] They're protecting their paychecks and
[00:36:26] pensions. They tow the line as well.
[00:36:27] Just like the safe and effective in the
[00:36:28] medical community, everybody just toes
[00:36:30] the line because they don't want to
[00:36:31] disrupt their personal paradigm. These
[00:36:33] storms are being steered and
[00:36:34] manipulated, period. That's beyond
[00:36:36] dispute.
[00:36:38] >> I I'm glad you keep bringing up the
[00:36:40] COVID vax because it would be hard for
[00:36:42] my middle-aged brain to accept
[00:36:45] a lie at this scale. like how could you
[00:36:48] do that? How could you hide something
[00:36:50] this big, this profound from an entire
[00:36:52] population? Um except I just saw it 5
[00:36:55] years ago with the CO facts which was
[00:36:57] like a total lie and now there's no
[00:37:00] dispute about the fact that they lied
[00:37:01] about it but no one was ever punished
[00:37:03] and most people believed it. So I know
[00:37:06] for a fact what you're describing is
[00:37:07] possible. Can you um Well, actually
[00:37:10] before I forget, let me ask what So you
[00:37:14] who pays you to do this? like this
[00:37:16] sounds this is quite an operation that
[00:37:18] you're running. You're clearly I guess
[00:37:21] not in it for the money. Like this is a
[00:37:24] bigger
[00:37:26] movement than I was aware until right
[00:37:28] now. So you're running lab tests on
[00:37:31] rainwater. You're researching this
[00:37:34] actively. Like is this a volunteer
[00:37:37] effort? How and why are you doing this?
[00:37:41] >> Cuz I can find no greater point for
[00:37:43] existing. How can I possibly look the
[00:37:45] other way? I was restoring habitat in
[00:37:47] Northern California, the east side of
[00:37:48] Lake Shasta. Habitat that was decimated
[00:37:50] by irresponsible logging practices. I
[00:37:52] wanted to do that the rest of my life. I
[00:37:54] wanted to plant trees and watch them
[00:37:56] grow the rest of my life.
[00:37:57] >> Ah, good for God bless you.
[00:37:59] >> I I I mean there's no greater solitude
[00:38:02] than what I was doing. But how was I to
[00:38:04] continue doing that knowing what I knew
[00:38:07] when the solar output reduction happened
[00:38:11] that I mentioned earlier?
[00:38:12] [clears throat]
[00:38:13] And I began to test rain knowing the
[00:38:15] implications of toxic rain. Rain that
[00:38:18] [clears throat] contained aluminum. By
[00:38:19] the way, aluminum in regard to not just
[00:38:21] killing soil microbiome, but tree root
[00:38:24] systems. This is peer-reviewed study.
[00:38:26] Sense that bioavailable aluminum, they
[00:38:28] shut down nutrient uptake. So the trees
[00:38:30] die a slow protracted death and all
[00:38:33] official agencies blame beetles. The
[00:38:35] trees are dying because of the beetles.
[00:38:36] That's all we hear. And the bottom line
[00:38:39] is beetles are a symptom of a sick dead
[00:38:42] dying tree. My father was an arborist. I
[00:38:44] know trees. I love trees. When I was in
[00:38:45] kindergarten they had to come out after
[00:38:47] recess and drag me out of the tree
[00:38:49] because I didn't want to come down.
[00:38:50] >> Yeah. I feel the same way.
[00:38:52] >> I I I mean with no trees, no people.
[00:38:54] That's simple, right?
[00:38:56] >> That's right.
[00:38:56] >> So how is I to continue doing that? I
[00:38:59] can't I can't look myself in the mirror.
[00:39:01] I can't look my children in the eyes.
[00:39:02] How could I not do this? And if we carry
[00:39:04] this further, Tucker, you you know the
[00:39:06] bees are collapsing, right?
[00:39:07] >> Oh, of course I know very well.
[00:39:10] >> So, we know this year we were told 70%
[00:39:13] collapse this year. That's staggering.
[00:39:16] That's incredibly alarming. But what's
[00:39:17] the real figure? The real figure is
[00:39:19] that's a 70% collapse of the 20% that
[00:39:22] was remaining. We're down to singledigit
[00:39:25] percentages of pollinators left right
[00:39:28] now. We know insect populations have
[00:39:30] declined, this is terrestrial and
[00:39:32] aquatic insect, 80 to 90% globally.
[00:39:35] >> It's very noticeable. And if you don't
[00:39:37] believe it, remember the windshield on
[00:39:39] your parents station wagon as a child in
[00:39:41] the summertime was covered in bugs. And
[00:39:43] that is not I I drive in a rural area
[00:39:46] every night and no bugs. That's real.
[00:39:48] >> No bugs. No bugs. No people. Also, we
[00:39:51] publicized this in 2012 with my work
[00:39:53] with former government scientists that
[00:39:56] could speak out because they're retired
[00:39:58] and the science community tried to
[00:39:59] marginalize us and now they've had to
[00:40:02] admit to it. If your listeners search
[00:40:03] insect apocalypse, they'll find the
[00:40:04] alarms going off all over the globe
[00:40:06] because this translates to plankton as
[00:40:07] well. No plankton, no people. We have
[00:40:10] peer-reviewed science study now for the
[00:40:11] Atlantic. Plankton population is down
[00:40:14] 90%.
[00:40:15] 90. Other oceans not far behind. That's
[00:40:18] the greatest oxygen producer on the
[00:40:20] planet. That is the base of life on
[00:40:21] Earth. Plankton.
[00:40:23] We are on on a the human race right now,
[00:40:25] Tucker. I've used this example before,
[00:40:28] but it it sends a message that's very
[00:40:30] accurate. It's like occupants of a car
[00:40:32] parked on the railroad track. The train
[00:40:34] is seconds from impact, lights flashing,
[00:40:37] horn blaring, and and they're trying to
[00:40:39] decide what station to put the radio on.
[00:40:41] I I mean no matter what other issue
[00:40:43] we're facing and I would argue power
[00:40:44] structure maneuvering right now from
[00:40:46] conflict zones to carnage zones many
[00:40:49] other factors are directly related to
[00:40:51] the unfolding and accelerating biosphere
[00:40:54] collapse which climate engineering is
[00:40:56] fueling not mitigating it's fueling it
[00:40:59] and they will not let go of this covert
[00:41:01] weapon of control. It is the crown jewel
[00:41:03] weapon with which they can have been and
[00:41:05] are bringing populations to their knees
[00:41:08] including our own. without those
[00:41:10] populations ever even knowing they're
[00:41:12] under assault. They're not going to let
[00:41:13] go of this weapon. In regard to our
[00:41:15] military brothers and sisters that are
[00:41:16] participating in this, because many ask
[00:41:18] that question, why would they? But the
[00:41:20] bottom line is, and I've heard you say,
[00:41:22] I just heard you cite this, and I thank
[00:41:25] you for doing so, that our military
[00:41:26] brothers and sisters took an oath to
[00:41:27] protect their populations. I heard this
[00:41:30] on a former presentation you just made,
[00:41:32] to protect their populations from all
[00:41:34] threats, foreign and domestic. So,
[00:41:36] they're being compartmentalized. They're
[00:41:37] being told that these programs are some
[00:41:39] benevolent necessary operation. Just
[00:41:42] like the pilots in Vietnam, I'm sure,
[00:41:44] were told when they were spraying Agent
[00:41:45] Orange on everybody. They're not told
[00:41:47] this is going to kill your comrade on
[00:41:49] the ground. Of course, they're not told
[00:41:50] that. So, here we are.
[00:41:54] >> And I think in a lot of cases, people
[00:41:55] don't know. They don't they don't think
[00:41:57] it through. I mean, again, they're so
[00:41:59] high on this false feeling of
[00:42:03] omnipotence, like we're in charge. We
[00:42:05] have the technology. we can make things
[00:42:07] better. I mean, people delude
[00:42:09] themselves. I think good people I know
[00:42:11] good people delude themselves into
[00:42:13] committing evil because,
[00:42:15] you know, they think they have this
[00:42:16] power that they actually don't don't
[00:42:18] have. So, okay, the bees start
[00:42:20] disappearing. The bats, as you know, of
[00:42:22] course, insects, plankton, these are all
[00:42:25] phenomena that most people are not going
[00:42:27] to notice because they live in cities.
[00:42:29] They're not in touch with bees, okay, or
[00:42:31] insects. But the trees dying is very
[00:42:35] obvious. I mean, these are, you know,
[00:42:38] plants that live for 100 years and all
[00:42:40] of a sudden they're dying. The fur trees
[00:42:41] are dying. Give us a sense of American
[00:42:46] forestry right now. Like, how are the
[00:42:48] trees in this country?
[00:42:51] >> I think this the more important
[00:42:54] statistic might be globally at this
[00:42:55] point because we have that statistic.
[00:42:58] Tree cover is has declined since
[00:43:03] pre-ivilization baselines. 66%
[00:43:07] 66% gone. The remaining 1/3 is dead and
[00:43:13] dying. Trees.
[00:43:15] We've changed atmospheric chemistry so
[00:43:18] much. Forests do not smell like forests
[00:43:20] anymore. Anybody who knows trees and
[00:43:22] knows what forest once smelled like,
[00:43:25] >> yes,
[00:43:26] >> knows that that scent is gone. Why is it
[00:43:28] gone? Because of the now intense UV
[00:43:31] radiation that's bombarding the planet.
[00:43:32] And we're getting, by the way, UVC in
[00:43:34] the surface. I mentioned the ozone layer
[00:43:36] collapse. Climate engineering single
[00:43:38] greatest factor. And the climate science
[00:43:39] community acknowledges this. By the way,
[00:43:40] Tucker, they acknowledge openly if we
[00:43:43] geoengineer, as if we haven't been for
[00:43:44] 80 years already. By the way, these
[00:43:46] programs are immediately deployed after
[00:43:47] World War II. That's how long they've
[00:43:49] been ongoing. But the science community
[00:43:51] openly admits that if we were to
[00:43:53] geoengineer, it would destroy the ozone
[00:43:55] layer. We have a we had a former NASA
[00:43:57] contract engineer working directly for
[00:43:58] geoatch.org with state-of-the-art
[00:44:00] metering equipment into five figures. we
[00:44:02] supplied
[00:44:04] and and again we do this out of pocket.
[00:44:06] This is we don't monetize anything. Our
[00:44:09] our film, The Dimming, the
[00:44:10] groundbreaking documentary, The Dimming,
[00:44:11] which is the standard on this issue, 26
[00:44:13] million views, non-monetized,
[00:44:16] posted for free the day it was done. I'm
[00:44:17] in this for the cause. If we don't win
[00:44:19] this battle, nothing else matters. And
[00:44:22] back to the trees that don't the forest
[00:44:25] that doesn't smell like forest anymore
[00:44:26] because the trees are shutting their
[00:44:28] stomata. That's a respiratory port on
[00:44:31] the trees allowing them to breathe, to
[00:44:34] feed on carbon, to release oxygen. They
[00:44:36] are not respirating. They're dying a
[00:44:39] slow, protracted death. That's the
[00:44:41] second greatest oxygen producer on the
[00:44:43] planet. Again, from every conceivable
[00:44:46] direction, climate engineering is
[00:44:47] pounding the nails into our collective
[00:44:49] coffins. But they will not let go of
[00:44:51] this covert weapon of control. And for
[00:44:53] those that say they wouldn't do this as
[00:44:54] themselves, again, they already have. We
[00:44:56] detonated 2400 nuclear bombs on the
[00:44:59] planet. How many people know that the
[00:45:01] Nevada detonations, which they did in
[00:45:02] total secrecy, right? We know now from
[00:45:05] peer-reviewed study. The downwind
[00:45:07] fallout from the Nevada nuclear bomb
[00:45:08] detonations killed no less than 700,000
[00:45:11] Americans. That's peer-reviewed study.
[00:45:14] How many people know that? So again,
[00:45:15] they don't care about the consequences
[00:45:17] of what they do. We know as far as
[00:45:19] biological testing, according to the
[00:45:21] Washington Post, as of 1977,
[00:45:24] US military had conducted no less than
[00:45:27] 239 openair biological tests on
[00:45:30] innocent, unknowing civilians.
[00:45:32] >> Oh, come on now.
[00:45:34] >> Biological warfare tests on Americans.
[00:45:37] >> I know you know. You must know that.
[00:45:40] Look it up. I mean, this is historical
[00:45:42] record again covered by matrix
[00:45:44] mainstream media.
[00:45:44] >> We had a revolution over a tea tax,
[00:45:46] dude. I I I feel like this you can't put
[00:45:50] up with this. I don't I don't
[00:45:52] >> I encourage I encourage all of your
[00:45:53] listeners to look up every single thing
[00:45:56] I state that is very easy to find that
[00:45:58] statistic. Washington Post first
[00:45:59] published that in 1977. I I hope it's
[00:46:02] clear from the statistics I'm citing.
[00:46:04] I'm not shooting from the hip. So again,
[00:46:06] this is this is business as usual and
[00:46:09] why people can't face that I is is
[00:46:11] perplexing. And and let's look at Ziggnu
[00:46:13] Brazinski. I know you know who he is.
[00:46:15] former US presidential adviser going all
[00:46:18] the way back to Johnson. What did he
[00:46:19] state in the record? Your listeners can
[00:46:20] look this up very easily as well. He
[00:46:22] stated with today's technology, it's far
[00:46:24] easier to kill a million people than to
[00:46:26] control them. You think these people are
[00:46:28] here to help? Really? So again, I I I
[00:46:32] want to stress that the amount of layers
[00:46:33] with this issue and there's many
[00:46:35] legitimate causes or concerns at this
[00:46:37] point in time. If we don't deal with
[00:46:39] what's happening in our skies, we're not
[00:46:41] going to be here long. And let's look at
[00:46:44] if if we could look at CO for a moment.
[00:46:46] We know that
[00:46:48] >> for one the world's second most
[00:46:50] recognized climate engineer Dr. Ken
[00:46:52] Caldera former DoD scientist.
[00:46:56] We own an audio of him at gingwatch.org
[00:46:59] in his words stating what he did for the
[00:47:01] DoD was to design methods of spraying
[00:47:03] pathogens into clouds to infect the
[00:47:05] populations below. We know in the
[00:47:07] outbreak of CV19 at one point 85
[00:47:10] countries were infected in 3 days.
[00:47:12] That's indicative of an airborne
[00:47:14] dispersion.
[00:47:15] We know from Italian researchers they
[00:47:17] found CV19 attached to airborne
[00:47:19] particullet. Do not all these dots
[00:47:21] connect? They certainly would appear so.
[00:47:23] We know from our precipitation testing
[00:47:26] we have polymer fibers and graphine in
[00:47:29] our rain. Graphine is like a vascular
[00:47:31] machete. I mean that's it's listed in
[00:47:33] geoengineering patents for certain
[00:47:34] purposes. Again they don't care about
[00:47:36] the consequences. But those two elements
[00:47:38] also, Tucker, are used militarily as
[00:47:40] biological carrier platforms to carry a
[00:47:43] pathogen from the clouds to the ground
[00:47:45] to infect the population below. Why is
[00:47:48] that in our reign right now? Could they
[00:47:50] at any point of their choosing put
[00:47:52] something much more lethal into the
[00:47:54] precipitation and level the playing
[00:47:56] field? Certainly they could.
[00:48:00] >> This is also shocking. Have you spoken
[00:48:02] to elected officials about this? Members
[00:48:04] of Congress?
[00:48:06] many and I continue to and many know
[00:48:10] I've had private private meetings with
[00:48:12] Gavin Newsome at this California state
[00:48:15] capital his top aid and not that that
[00:48:17] individual would ever do anything for
[00:48:19] the common good. He wouldn't. He's there
[00:48:21] to serve those who have him on the end
[00:48:24] of their strings. No response there. I
[00:48:27] have on my desk I'm sorry to interrupt.
[00:48:30] So you actually said this or a version
[00:48:32] of this to Gavin Newsome, the governor
[00:48:34] of California. Yes. And in fact, and
[00:48:36] what I conveyed to Newsome also, if
[00:48:39] these programs were allowed to continue,
[00:48:41] because I was focused more on the state
[00:48:42] of California and the impact here, that
[00:48:46] the drought catastrophes in California
[00:48:49] would be catastrophic.
[00:48:51] I supplied data, which he didn't try to
[00:48:53] dispute because I I've had meetings with
[00:48:56] California Energy Commission scientists
[00:48:58] as well, air quality scientists. You
[00:49:00] know, California's been concerned about,
[00:49:01] of course, the lack of precipitation,
[00:49:02] which affects our hydro power
[00:49:04] production, also affects Hoover Dam,
[00:49:06] Canyon Dam.
[00:49:08] >> But if your listeners looked at
[00:49:10] presentations I gave well over a decade
[00:49:11] ago, engineered drought catastrophe
[00:49:13] target California. Everything I said in
[00:49:16] those precipitation or those
[00:49:17] presentations back then is more relevant
[00:49:20] now than ever. Presented that data to
[00:49:22] Newsome
[00:49:23] and these the drought has continued,
[00:49:26] which they're not even disclosing now.
[00:49:27] Even in Northern California right now,
[00:49:28] they show zero drought. That's a blatant
[00:49:32] glaring statistical falsification. It
[00:49:35] has never been drier here in regard to
[00:49:37] soil moisture and fire fuel moisture.
[00:49:41] They're lying about everything. They're
[00:49:42] lying about the UV readings on the
[00:49:44] surface. Blatant glaring lies. They
[00:49:47] meter. We know about every single aspect
[00:49:50] of this equation. They're disposing and
[00:49:52] metering only down to 300 nanometers in
[00:49:55] regard to the UV spectrum. That's half
[00:49:57] of the UVB spectrum. No UVC is even
[00:50:00] metered for, let alone disclosed. Same
[00:50:02] as the air quality particulates. PM10 is
[00:50:05] looked for. Nothing below that. I've had
[00:50:08] California state air quality officials
[00:50:11] in a closed door meeting, five of them,
[00:50:13] tell me to my face, the system is
[00:50:15] rigged. We're testing for combustion
[00:50:16] particulates only. The rest goes out the
[00:50:18] window. Whole system by design to not
[00:50:22] show the immensity of damage being done.
[00:50:24] So, back to Newsome and and those
[00:50:26] officials. No, no, no response. Yes,
[00:50:29] they know the Palisades fire. I'm sure
[00:50:32] that's fresh in your mind, right? You
[00:50:34] very
[00:50:35] >> The ability for the climate engineers to
[00:50:38] shut off precipitation is far greater
[00:50:40] even than their ability to augment it.
[00:50:43] They can shut down rain as long as they
[00:50:45] want as we know from the Middle Eastern
[00:50:46] countries as I just stated on Iran. So,
[00:50:48] in the case of the Palisades, no rain
[00:50:51] for 8 months. It's not an accident.
[00:50:54] These particullet are incendiaries.
[00:50:56] Aluminum nanop particles are such an
[00:50:59] effective incendiary. They're used in
[00:51:00] military demolitions. Thermite that
[00:51:03] incendiary dust
[00:51:04] >> coats the forest floor, coats foliage,
[00:51:07] and when that builds up over time, that
[00:51:09] makes everything more volatile as well.
[00:51:11] I spoke about atmospheric pressure
[00:51:13] zones, which they can and are
[00:51:14] manipulating. And in doing so, they can
[00:51:17] manipulate surface wind flows creating
[00:51:20] extreme
[00:51:22] zonal wind flow patterns. the same as
[00:51:24] they did in Lahina. Same thing,
[00:51:26] extremely anomalous low pressure zones.
[00:51:28] One to the north, which was an engineer
[00:51:30] high pressure zone to the south,
[00:51:32] hurricane Dora. Between those two, you
[00:51:34] create a bellow's effect, a blowtorrch
[00:51:35] effect, whatever the source of ignition.
[00:51:38] And many online speculate about that and
[00:51:40] and very
[00:51:42] fringe
[00:51:44] um ideas of what might cause the
[00:51:48] ignition. Again, that's irrelevant.
[00:51:49] What's setting the template for these
[00:51:51] fires to burn with such ferocity? And
[00:51:53] that is definitely climate engineering.
[00:51:54] And I'll leave it with this. We found a
[00:51:57] 140 page US military document which we
[00:52:00] posted titled wildfires as a military
[00:52:05] weapon. Within that document, 17 sites
[00:52:08] were named in the US as study zones LA
[00:52:12] was one and that described exactly the
[00:52:16] type of pre-preparation that we see
[00:52:18] happening in all these locations. behind
[00:52:19] it was declared a flash drought zone a
[00:52:23] week prior to that incineration. So we
[00:52:25] can speculate on the agendas and
[00:52:27] objectives being carried out. The fact
[00:52:29] that climate engineering is inseparable
[00:52:30] from these equations is absolutely
[00:52:33] indisputable. That document by the way
[00:52:34] also posted at geo engineeringwatch.org
[00:52:36] with the important sections highlighted.
[00:52:38] Shocking data.
[00:52:41] >> Has there been any attempt to push back
[00:52:43] legislatively? Like has the Congress
[00:52:45] ever taken this up?
[00:52:47] >> Yes. Uh again, we have 36 states with
[00:52:51] legislation in some process. Two states
[00:52:54] have already passed it. I'm
[00:52:55] communicating with
[00:52:58] an aid to Dantis. I've had an hour
[00:53:00] conference call with Latapo there on the
[00:53:03] issue. We have some some very rational
[00:53:06] people involved.
[00:53:07] >> He is he very much is. His whole team
[00:53:09] was was on the call. We've had Marjorie
[00:53:12] Taylor Green just address this. That was
[00:53:15] publicized. Well, we tried to reach Mrs.
[00:53:18] Green before this to try to give some
[00:53:21] compass heading because if if you fly
[00:53:23] into this uh blind, it's you can do more
[00:53:26] harm than good. And one thing we
[00:53:28] encourage, unfortunately, Marjorie
[00:53:30] didn't get this message. We hope she
[00:53:32] does at some point, don't open the
[00:53:35] entire climate
[00:53:39] scenario and mix it with this issue. And
[00:53:42] that's that's what she did. We want to
[00:53:43] keep the focus on climate engineering.
[00:53:45] And when there's a denial of the other
[00:53:48] sources of damage to the planet, that
[00:53:50] tends to immediately alienate half the
[00:53:53] people we need in this battle. So what
[00:53:55] we would try to encourage and encourage
[00:53:56] other legislators to do is if the
[00:53:59] subject of the climate comes up that how
[00:54:01] can we have any legitimate discussion of
[00:54:03] climate anything from any perspective
[00:54:05] without first and foremost addressing
[00:54:07] this elephant in the equation. And that
[00:54:09] that narrative is much more productive
[00:54:12] at building bridges instead of burning
[00:54:14] it. running.
[00:54:17] >> So, I mean, I knew the climate was
[00:54:19] changing, of course, because I pay
[00:54:22] attention to nature. Um, but you've just
[00:54:24] single-handedly convinced me that a lot
[00:54:26] of this is driven by human activity,
[00:54:28] just not your suburban and your
[00:54:29] hairspray. It's driven by the US
[00:54:31] military.
[00:54:32] It's both. I want to stress again, we
[00:54:34] are not denying it.org that again aren't
[00:54:37] statistically
[00:54:38] we are putting about
[00:54:42] 100 million tons of carbon into the air
[00:54:46] a day. 26 million tons of coal, 100
[00:54:48] million barrels of hydrocarbon. We're
[00:54:51] cutting down the forest. We're paving
[00:54:52] the planet. We're poisoning the oceans.
[00:54:54] All of these things happen effect. We're
[00:54:56] acknowledging that. But we're saying
[00:54:59] when we have intentional intervention
[00:55:01] which has prevented the planet from
[00:55:03] responding to the damage done. If it w
[00:55:06] if it weren't for toxic rain Tucker the
[00:55:08] forest may have tried to uptake more of
[00:55:10] that carbon and to keep things more in
[00:55:12] balance but they can't. The trees can't.
[00:55:14] Their root systems are being poisoned
[00:55:16] soil microbiome being poisoned. Ozone
[00:55:18] layer being destroyed. These programs
[00:55:20] are literally disabling the planet's
[00:55:23] counterbalancing life support systems.
[00:55:26] So, we will never know now how much
[00:55:28] better a position we would have been in
[00:55:30] [clears throat] had climate engineering,
[00:55:32] aka weather warfare, let's call it what
[00:55:34] it is. It's weather warfare. Had these
[00:55:36] programs never been deployed, we will
[00:55:38] now never know how much better a
[00:55:40] position we might have been in. But
[00:55:42] those in power, again, do not care about
[00:55:44] the consequences of their actions, even
[00:55:46] to themselves. And we know that from
[00:55:47] psychoanalysis. looked at this from a
[00:55:49] psychoanalysis standpoint and it
[00:55:52] specifically cites the kind of
[00:55:55] personality disorders that exist with
[00:55:57] those in power have a common thread and
[00:55:59] that common thread is this
[00:56:00] >> a near total lack of comprehension as to
[00:56:03] the consequences of their actions even
[00:56:04] to themselves that's a power addict and
[00:56:06] I I know you
[00:56:07] >> correct
[00:56:08] >> more than anybody in the world does an
[00:56:10] addict care we're dealing with a
[00:56:12] headless heartless soulless cancer at
[00:56:14] this point and does an addic care the
[00:56:16] next fix may kill
[00:56:18] They don't care. And and and at this
[00:56:20] point, it's a runaway train. So for many
[00:56:22] people that walk away saying they would
[00:56:23] never do this to themselves, we are they
[00:56:25] already have. We know this from the
[00:56:26] nuclear scenario I outlined. And if if I
[00:56:30] could tie one more dot together, forgive
[00:56:32] me, but this is important because it's
[00:56:33] an existential threat. I outlined that
[00:56:36] climate engineering is decimating the
[00:56:38] planet's primary protective life support
[00:56:40] system. Starting with the ozone layer.
[00:56:43] Now we're much more susceptible to a
[00:56:45] CME, a coronal mass ejection solar
[00:56:47] flare. If we have an event like the
[00:56:49] Carrington event in the 1800s, that
[00:56:52] would shut down grid power around the
[00:56:53] world. Now we have nuclear plants that
[00:56:55] can't cool themselves. Now we have
[00:56:57] Fukushima times 100 or 200. Game over.
[00:57:01] Again, directly connected to climate
[00:57:02] engineering.
[00:57:06] >> What is the effect on animal
[00:57:07] populations? I you mentioned bees,
[00:57:10] plankton, and other insects, but what
[00:57:13] about mammals? Do you notice any effect?
[00:57:16] >> Yes. Yes. We have peer-reviewed study of
[00:57:20] whales
[00:57:22] that have extraordinary amounts of
[00:57:24] aluminum in their tissue. Where's that
[00:57:27] coming from? This is bioavailable
[00:57:29] aluminum. And you might hear the attempt
[00:57:31] to debunk this is to say, well,
[00:57:33] aluminum's a very common element, which
[00:57:35] it is. It's the third most abundant in
[00:57:37] the earth strata, but it does not exist
[00:57:40] in free form naturally. Period.
[00:57:42] >> Yes, that's correct.
[00:57:44] >> Always bonded to other elements. So
[00:57:45] that's the part that they leave out. So
[00:57:47] when we have even whales absorbing this
[00:57:50] same material having an obvious effect
[00:57:54] in regard to overall global animal
[00:57:56] populations, wildlife populations down
[00:57:59] conservatively about 75%
[00:58:02] in the last four years alone. That's 75%
[00:58:05] of an already depleted population. The
[00:58:08] giant herds of caribou, you've seen
[00:58:09] films of that, right, Tucker? A million
[00:58:11] strong. Some of those herds were were a
[00:58:14] million. They're down to 5,000 or less
[00:58:17] from a million. Virtual crash. And we
[00:58:20] have some extraordinary images from what
[00:58:23] chemical ice nucleation can do. It it is
[00:58:26] profound.
[00:58:28] The when you have an endothermic
[00:58:30] reaction, we know what an exothermic
[00:58:31] reaction is. You have this massive
[00:58:34] energy release. The splitting of an atom
[00:58:36] being the epitome of that. But an
[00:58:37] endothermic reaction is profound in in
[00:58:40] many ways as well. So we have images of
[00:58:42] for example hundreds of water foul
[00:58:45] frozen solid to the surface of a lake.
[00:58:48] How does that happen? We stuck you've
[00:58:50] seen the massive baseball and softball
[00:58:52] size hail falling everywhere. Right.
[00:58:54] >> Yes.
[00:58:56] >> So much so that insurance companies are
[00:58:58] cancelling any hail coverage now because
[00:59:00] it's it's increased. so profoundly.
[00:59:03] That's chemical ice nucleation. The
[00:59:05] extreme form, if your listeners searched
[00:59:07] Lake Michigan ice balls, they can see
[00:59:09] the shores of Lake Michigan coated with
[00:59:11] 75 lb perfectly spherical ice balls.
[00:59:15] They don't fall that big from the sky.
[00:59:16] They form that way in the ocean because
[00:59:18] they're chemically nucleating over the
[00:59:20] Great Lakes constantly. That's how they
[00:59:22] pile up these massive amounts of snow in
[00:59:24] Eerie and Buffalo and they make
[00:59:26] sensationalized headlines. You can
[00:59:28] literally throw a rock to no snow, but
[00:59:31] they only show the 4T or 5 ft of snow in
[00:59:34] Erie and and Buffalo and sensationalize
[00:59:36] look how much snow snow there is while
[00:59:38] we're 80° at the top of the Sierras in
[00:59:42] the middle of winter in California. They
[00:59:43] don't publicize that. Do you remember
[00:59:45] Tucker when um Boston had the record
[00:59:49] lows 2014 I think Boston had record lows
[00:59:51] in the really sensational snow?
[00:59:54] >> What didn't they tell us? Middle of
[00:59:55] winter while Boston was buried in snow.
[00:59:57] It was literally no snow 14,000 ft up in
[01:00:01] the Sierras. They never told us about
[01:00:03] that, did they? So again, it's there's a
[01:00:05] perception aspect in this too. Keeping
[01:00:08] business as usual until the last
[01:00:10] possible moment, until the moment of
[01:00:12] impact, being able to retain their power
[01:00:13] in this way while using weather as a
[01:00:15] weapon. But the crops are shutting down
[01:00:17] as well globally. We have crop collapse
[01:00:19] happening everywhere. Same scenario.
[01:00:21] They're shutting their stomata. They're
[01:00:22] not feeding. They're not absorbing
[01:00:23] carbon. They're not releasing oxygen. So
[01:00:26] again, this is a ubiquitous
[01:00:27] contamination.
[01:00:30] >> I I think the first step is to let
[01:00:32] people know the facts that you just laid
[01:00:36] out and to have, you know, a public
[01:00:38] debate about it. It always begins with
[01:00:40] words. Anything uh good? So could you
[01:00:43] just end by telling us for people who
[01:00:46] have made it to this portion of the
[01:00:48] interview and want to know more, can you
[01:00:50] speak slowly and direct them to where
[01:00:53] they can get more information on this?
[01:00:56] geoengineeringwatch.org strives to be a
[01:00:59] data repository on this issue. And yes,
[01:01:01] >> the only way we can move this fight
[01:01:03] forward is to share credible data from a
[01:01:05] credible source. And we strive to be
[01:01:07] that source. I have one goal, one
[01:01:09] mission. I live for the day when what's
[01:01:11] happening in our skies is fully exposed
[01:01:13] and halted, which Tucker I would argue
[01:01:15] we can only do from the inside out. The
[01:01:17] legislation is good because it puts it
[01:01:19] on the radar, but it's symbolic.
[01:01:22] >> They're not going to stop DoD operations
[01:01:23] from that. Only by pushing this issue to
[01:01:26] the full light of day can we cause a
[01:01:28] shock wave around the world so that
[01:01:30] populations and countries all over the
[01:01:31] world understand what their governments
[01:01:33] have either actively or passively done
[01:01:35] to them without their knowledge or
[01:01:37] consent. And in doing so, our military
[01:01:40] brothers and sisters would hopefully
[01:01:42] awaken to what they're doing to their
[01:01:43] countrymen and one would hope would
[01:01:46] stand down. I know we have the Mgrim
[01:01:48] experiments as an example of most human
[01:01:51] beings if they're being told by someone
[01:01:53] they perceive in authority will carry
[01:01:55] out almost any form of atrocity and we
[01:01:59] need to get past that. But if we can
[01:02:01] fully expose this, the fur will fly. I
[01:02:04] would argue we would alter the equation
[01:02:06] and drag many other issues with it.
[01:02:08] Issues like 9/11 or the safe and
[01:02:10] effective because you can't hide what's
[01:02:12] happening in our sky. There's many
[01:02:13] issues that people can and try to put in
[01:02:16] the rearview mirror. You can't do that
[01:02:18] with this. It's getting worse by the
[01:02:20] day. The damage done is getting worse by
[01:02:22] the day. But if we share credible data
[01:02:24] from a credible source,
[01:02:26] that's much more effective at waking
[01:02:28] people up than running out in the street
[01:02:29] pointing at the sky and ranting. If they
[01:02:31] can look at satellite images, which we
[01:02:33] capture the moment we see them on the
[01:02:35] NASA satellite feed, we capture them
[01:02:36] because they try to scrub them off. We
[01:02:38] have satellite images that are beyond
[01:02:39] shocking that you don't even need to
[01:02:41] know anything about meteorology to know
[01:02:43] something very radical and very wrong is
[01:02:45] going on. And we put that on our printed
[01:02:46] materials which we distribute to all
[01:02:48] legislators and we we supply them for
[01:02:51] activists and populations. There's about
[01:02:53] a half million of our 20page booklets in
[01:02:56] circulation right now. We're trying
[01:02:57] desperately to give visuals which are a
[01:03:00] much better key to the door. We're
[01:03:02] trying desperately again with
[01:03:03] legislators to not open up the whole
[01:03:06] climate condition front or climate
[01:03:08] change front. Stick to this issue. Stick
[01:03:10] to this. And we can't have a discussion
[01:03:12] about climate unless or until we deal
[01:03:14] with this first. We take this out of the
[01:03:16] equation. Then we can assess where we're
[01:03:17] at. So again, by knowing how to play
[01:03:20] chess, by knowing the chess board, we
[01:03:22] need to play effectively and
[01:03:23] efficiently. I mean, if we can do that
[01:03:25] and start spot fires of awareness, ask
[01:03:26] others to do the same, we will put
[01:03:28] enough holes in the dam that those in
[01:03:30] power can't plug the leaks and we will
[01:03:32] push this issue to the full light of
[01:03:34] day. And if we can do that, we will
[01:03:35] alter the equation. And again, time is
[01:03:38] not on our side. We can avoid a toxic
[01:03:41] medical concoction, injection, we can
[01:03:43] avoid a lot of things. We have to
[01:03:44] breathe. Every breath we take is filled
[01:03:47] with these nano particles. In fact, we
[01:03:49] have peer-reviewed studies to prove that
[01:03:50] as well. And we have in the case of the
[01:03:52] nanoplastics,
[01:03:54] the climate science community is now
[01:03:56] starting to admit to that they're
[01:03:57] showing up in human brains, lungs,
[01:03:58] cinch, everything, every human organ.
[01:04:01] And again, we know that these particles
[01:04:02] are not just a result of plastic
[01:04:04] decomposition in the environment because
[01:04:06] our testing with RPI in New York
[01:04:09] conclusively prove that the particles we
[01:04:11] found were manufactured. That means and
[01:04:14] they can tell with their u spec spectoy
[01:04:19] spectroscopy, excuse me, watching too
[01:04:22] much porky pig. Um they know that. So
[01:04:26] bottom line is um we're dealing with a
[01:04:28] ubiquitous contamination of the planet
[01:04:31] and if we can't breathe without inhaling
[01:04:34] that uh the ramifications are beyond
[01:04:36] grave. That's a fight for life right
[01:04:37] here, right now.
[01:04:39] >> Yeah. Are you spraying chemicals into
[01:04:41] the air without telling me using my tax
[01:04:43] dollars? Simple question uh that I plan
[01:04:46] to start asking people uh in leadership
[01:04:49] positions. So, I don't know how I made
[01:04:50] it this long without knowing all of
[01:04:52] this, but I'm grateful uh for this
[01:04:54] conversation and I and I hope it sparks
[01:04:57] a a national conversation and some
[01:04:59] outrage. Dane, thank you very much.
[01:05:01] >> Thank you, Tucker. Thank you so much for
[01:05:03] your voice. Thank you to your team.
[01:05:06] The importance of you and your team at
[01:05:08] this critical moment in human history
[01:05:09] cannot be overstated. And we at
[01:05:11] Geoengineering Watch and our platforms
[01:05:12] which are much smaller than yours. We
[01:05:14] quarter million followers is all nothing
[01:05:17] compared to yours, but everybody in our
[01:05:19] ranks is 1,000% behind you, brother.
[01:05:22] >> Well, that's so nice. Thank you. We want
[01:05:24] to be helpful. I appreciate it.
[01:05:27] >> Thank you, Tucker. [music]
[01:05:32] Since we launched ALP, we've had four
[01:05:34] flavors, but we are proud to announce
[01:05:37] ALP has a brand new flavor, one of
[01:05:39] several we'll be rolling out over the
[01:05:41] next year or so, and it is sweet nectar.
[01:05:48] Now, I have personally tested this
[01:05:50] product two at a time, and it's
[01:05:53] excellent. Sweet nectar, the new flavor
[01:05:55] out from Al. Really, really good. And
[01:05:57] you can order it in bulk, by the pallet
[01:05:59] if you want. I have strongly recommended
[01:06:01] sweet nectar and stay tuned for more
[01:06:03] information.
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
yt_s8A6hkS1CUE
Dataset
youtube
Comments 0