📄 Extracted Text (17,902 words)
[00:00:02] [music]
[00:00:12] You're off the case. We'll take it from
[00:00:14] here.
[00:00:38] volume. Welcome, welcome, welcome. Huge
[00:00:41] shout out to Matt Baker for that one.
[00:00:43] [snorts] Um, I just couldn't resist. Eh,
[00:00:45] I could not resist our boy Matt Baker
[00:00:49] coming in hot.
[00:00:51] Too much fun. Be sure to follow Slave to
[00:00:54] Liberty for more good good clean fun
[00:00:58] like that. Total legend. And it's also
[00:01:03] doesn't hurt that Matt is a great
[00:01:05] reporter. He's a total legend. Um you'll
[00:01:07] get lots of great information on his
[00:01:09] channel as well as well as uh awesome AI
[00:01:13] edits and all the rest. Um [snorts]
[00:01:17] thanks for uh your patience this
[00:01:18] evening. Um, we had a little bit of
[00:01:20] technical difficulties getting into the
[00:01:21] stream. Reream kind of uh broke on me
[00:01:24] and had to do some last minute fixes,
[00:01:26] but it's good to have you all here.
[00:01:28] Thanks for being here. Welcome to this
[00:01:30] special episode of Free Speech Friday.
[00:01:33] This week, I guess it's Fed Slot Friday.
[00:01:35] This week on Fed Slot Friday, we're
[00:01:37] going to discuss all things about the
[00:01:40] Charlie Kirk case, past and present. Um,
[00:01:42] honing in on a few specific pieces that
[00:01:44] are most critical. [snorts] Um, I think
[00:01:47] you already have some ideas as to what
[00:01:50] because there's a lot of breaking news.
[00:01:52] There's a lot of developments right now
[00:01:54] that are extremely significant
[00:01:57] and there's a huge
[00:02:00] slop storm around me personally because
[00:02:04] of what has been transpiring between me
[00:02:06] and Nick Fuentes in the last several uh
[00:02:09] days here, last week or so, and how it
[00:02:12] has brought renewed attention to the 306
[00:02:17] and to the rifle.
[00:02:21] Is my audio keep going in and out, chat?
[00:02:23] Is my audio okay?
[00:02:25] Chat, if my audio is having big problems
[00:02:27] right now while I'm talking, you let me
[00:02:29] know. Drop it in the chat right now.
[00:02:32] Yeah, it's fine, right? Yeah. Yeah.
[00:02:34] Cool. [snorts]
[00:02:37] Um,
[00:02:39] by the way, huge shout out to the homies
[00:02:40] I see in the chat. I see Valhalla VFT in
[00:02:42] the chat. Um, I saw Z Boyin in the chat
[00:02:44] earlier. I know there's a couple of
[00:02:46] homies that I that I'm forgetting that I
[00:02:47] missed that I see in the chat, but
[00:02:48] thanks for being here, guys. Awesome to
[00:02:50] see the legend in the chat. Um, we're
[00:02:53] going to be uh raiding Valhalla's
[00:02:54] channel after this is over and sending
[00:02:56] everybody over to watch Valhalla VFT.
[00:02:57] And I hear that he's going to have some
[00:02:59] hilarious and spicy commentary on some
[00:03:02] of the things that are relevant to this
[00:03:03] this show here, but that I'm not going
[00:03:05] to really directly cover here. Um, I'll
[00:03:08] just leave it at that. So, by the end of
[00:03:10] my show, maybe you'll have an idea of
[00:03:11] what Nate's going to talk about tonight.
[00:03:12] And I think it's going to be hilarious.
[00:03:15] Um, but [snorts] tonight's a very
[00:03:17] serious show. We're going to be all
[00:03:18] serious. only serious, the most serious
[00:03:20] show. Only the most serious people on
[00:03:23] the show, as you might have been able to
[00:03:26] tell from the intro,
[00:03:29] but
[00:03:32] we have some breaking news and I want to
[00:03:36] just run over everything we're going to
[00:03:38] cover today up front so you guys kind of
[00:03:40] know what's going on here and know what
[00:03:41] to expect and then we'll kind of get
[00:03:43] into the thread that sort of ties
[00:03:45] everything together.
[00:03:47] So, Tyler Robinson finally appeared in
[00:03:50] court and it was televised and there's a
[00:03:53] lot we still don't know based upon this
[00:03:55] one televised appearance, but we know
[00:03:57] he's a real person, which is great. Um,
[00:04:00] I to be clear, I never believed that he
[00:04:02] wasn't, but it's good to see him in
[00:04:04] person and have that fully confirmed.
[00:04:07] Um, we also know a little bit about the
[00:04:09] the media policy that we will be
[00:04:11] expecting going forwards
[00:04:14] and we might be able to expect to have
[00:04:18] video of the whole trial possibly. We'll
[00:04:21] talk about that. We'll talk about the
[00:04:23] security around the the trial and a
[00:04:24] couple of things that stood out from the
[00:04:26] trial. There was a secret portion of the
[00:04:28] trial and I've got a great video that
[00:04:30] from a guy that was there that
[00:04:31] summarizes
[00:04:33] uh what that was all about. We have
[00:04:35] Erica Kirk making the rounds and a whole
[00:04:37] bunch of very heated, complex,
[00:04:39] controversial discussion about Erica and
[00:04:42] what that means and what she's saying.
[00:04:45] And she's kind of say she got caught in
[00:04:48] a lie.
[00:04:50] Erica Kirk got caught in a lie already.
[00:04:53] Um, and it kind of either forced
[00:04:57] Candace's hand or gave Candace the
[00:04:59] opportunity today live on Jimmy Door
[00:05:02] podcast to come out and say who she had
[00:05:05] this information from about Charlie
[00:05:07] apparently text messaging that they were
[00:05:10] going to kill him. Um, and Candace has
[00:05:12] fully pointed the finger at who is
[00:05:14] responsible for
[00:05:17] that text message and who we might
[00:05:19] expect to see it from or never see it
[00:05:22] from. um which is all very interesting.
[00:05:25] Then um we're going to tie together a
[00:05:28] whole bunch of the the Fed slop
[00:05:29] conversation on X and look at why it's
[00:05:31] all happening, what is so important
[00:05:33] about it happening. We'll just briefly
[00:05:35] talk to Nick Fuentes, but only the
[00:05:36] briefest little bit as we skip over into
[00:05:40] some some pretext for this whole
[00:05:41] conversation. other shootings where
[00:05:44] similar things have happened that are
[00:05:46] now being held up as like, oh my gosh,
[00:05:48] that how would that ever make your
[00:05:50] theory work when we have plenty of
[00:05:52] historical context for such things. So,
[00:05:55] I see the chat asking if Candace is on
[00:05:57] today. My understanding is that Candace
[00:05:58] is not on today. I actually asked her
[00:06:01] team specifically if she was going to be
[00:06:02] on today and it was earlier in the
[00:06:04] morning, but at the at the time they
[00:06:05] were thinking today was a research day
[00:06:07] for them. So, hence why we're going a
[00:06:08] little earlier on uh free speech Friday
[00:06:11] tonight.
[00:06:13] So,
[00:06:15] at the start, I I I don't want to keep
[00:06:18] [ __ ] on Nick. The point of this is
[00:06:19] not to keep [ __ ] on Nick, but at the
[00:06:22] start, in order to understand where the
[00:06:24] conversation is at right now and why X
[00:06:26] is a total [ __ ] storm right now, um, we
[00:06:30] kind of need to start with a little
[00:06:33] piece of the videos that I made about
[00:06:36] him over the last week, responding to
[00:06:39] his ongoing attacks and his ongoing
[00:06:43] responses and ad homonyms and all of
[00:06:45] that good stuff because
[00:06:48] It very much paints the picture, or
[00:06:51] rather it very much sets the stage for
[00:06:53] what's happening now and why it's
[00:06:54] happening right now.
[00:06:57] And I saw Ian Carol came out today on a
[00:07:01] live stream pleading with me to join in
[00:07:04] on the conspiracy.
[00:07:06] If you think that, I feel sorry for you
[00:07:10] because you are [ __ ]
[00:07:13] >> So, I'm sure you've seen them by now.
[00:07:16] Um, I fired back at Nick once and then I
[00:07:19] fired back at Nick twice and I'll just
[00:07:21] play the the little intro here and
[00:07:22] that'll set the stage. Um, and the point
[00:07:24] of this is not to keep poking Nick,
[00:07:26] honestly, like whatever. [snorts] Um,
[00:07:29] the point is to show how this has
[00:07:33] blown up a really important piece of the
[00:07:34] conversation, not even about Nick.
[00:07:37] Apparently Nick's theory based on the
[00:07:40] expert that he cited by name, our French
[00:07:42] guy. Apparently, Nick's theory is that
[00:07:46] the bullet didn't even hit the spine on
[00:07:49] the way in. It entered Charlie's neck
[00:07:52] here, passed beyond his spine into the
[00:07:54] back, and bounced off of his skin, and
[00:07:58] then did a 180 degree turn, a 306
[00:08:02] bullet, and was trampolined with so much
[00:08:06] speed back into Charlie's spine that it,
[00:08:09] I guess, according to the official
[00:08:11] narrative that Nick is paring, then
[00:08:13] shattered his C2 all the way down to his
[00:08:16] C7, just obliterated his spine, and then
[00:08:19] just lodged right beneath the skin
[00:08:22] down by T1. Nick is being forced to
[00:08:25] continually respond to this over and
[00:08:27] over and over and just like make more
[00:08:28] and more mistakes because his own fans
[00:08:30] are sending him super chats being like,
[00:08:32] "Nick, this is not a good look, bro.
[00:08:33] Nick, you should not don't keep doing
[00:08:35] this. Nick, you're [ __ ] you're
[00:08:37] [ __ ] it up, Nick."
[00:08:41] >> I thought that was a pretty good intro.
[00:08:42] Honestly,
[00:08:42] >> Nick Fuentes just can't help himself.
[00:08:44] We're going to get into some of the
[00:08:45] little
[00:08:47] up
[00:08:49] >> um a good discussion about
[00:08:52] >> what's really going on out here and
[00:08:54] who's really got information and who's
[00:08:56] got a whole bunch of logical fallacy ad
[00:08:59] homonym and generally emotional uh
[00:09:05] like I I I hesitate to use the word
[00:09:07] crashing out but it kind of feels like
[00:09:10] an animal back limb. We can all watch. I
[00:09:12] don't have to keep on just handing out G
[00:09:14] large substance of your answers, the
[00:09:17] substance of your argument. Skipping
[00:09:19] over the part,
[00:09:19] >> don't worry. This one's not going to
[00:09:20] have to be two hours long because we
[00:09:22] already did that. We already beat that
[00:09:23] horse to death. And because Nick's uh
[00:09:27] points are getting more and more hollow
[00:09:29] and more and more easily debunked, but
[00:09:32] they do give us space for a very
[00:09:34] interesting conversation. And they give
[00:09:36] a space to address some of the experts
[00:09:38] that have conveniently flooded the zone
[00:09:41] right after I brought up a whole bunch
[00:09:43] of noise about how we literally the
[00:09:46] first piece of evidence, the bullet, the
[00:09:48] gunshot does not work. The gun that they
[00:09:51] say was used. The gun that links Tyler
[00:09:53] Robinson to the scene. The gun that
[00:09:56] Tyler Robinson's dad did not see a photo
[00:09:58] of when he said that that was why he
[00:10:00] knew it was his son that did the murder.
[00:10:02] That gun is not the gun. The the bullet
[00:10:05] doesn't match. Even though they've not
[00:10:06] shown it to us. They've not shown us the
[00:10:08] autopsy, but they've leaked enough and
[00:10:10] they've confirmed enough of their
[00:10:12] official narrative that we very well
[00:10:14] know that this is not possible.
[00:10:18] So, we're going to use this opportunity
[00:10:21] to kind of laugh at Nick Fuentes's
[00:10:25] whatever you want to call it and also
[00:10:27] address some of the other experts that
[00:10:29] have been coming out to call me names
[00:10:31] online
[00:10:33] because
[00:10:35] bringing up the rifle again right now is
[00:10:38] a critical piece. a critical piece that
[00:10:42] cannot happen because the rifle is the
[00:10:46] only thing tying Tyler to the scene. The
[00:10:48] only concrete piece of evidence at
[00:10:50] least. The rifle is so important to the
[00:10:53] mainstream narrative, to the fed case
[00:10:57] and to convicting Tyler Robinson of this
[00:10:59] crime.
[00:11:01] And if it was if it appeared to be the
[00:11:04] rifle that took the shot, then I'd be
[00:11:06] all for it. Obviously, if if the
[00:11:08] evidence seemed to align with the crime,
[00:11:10] then obviously I would be all for trying
[00:11:13] Tyler based on that evidence and letting
[00:11:16] the jury decide.
[00:11:18] The problem is that right from day one,
[00:11:23] every military expert, every special
[00:11:25] forces guy, every ballistics expert
[00:11:27] immediately threw the flag at the wound
[00:11:31] that we saw, the damage that we saw
[00:11:33] Charlie sustain.
[00:11:35] And the rifle that we were told was
[00:11:37] used.
[00:11:39] And interestingly, in starting beef with
[00:11:44] Nick about the rifle,
[00:11:46] the conversation about the rifle reached
[00:11:48] a way larger audience. It it actually
[00:11:52] blew up across huge swaths of the
[00:11:54] internet all over again and became a
[00:11:57] major flash point all of a sudden. Right
[00:11:59] as Tyler Robinson was about to appear in
[00:12:02] court, right as Erica Kirk was about to
[00:12:05] start doing these interviews, right at
[00:12:07] this critical juncture before everyone
[00:12:10] goes off home for the holidays where
[00:12:12] they need everyone to be going home and
[00:12:14] talking about how that crazy Tyler kid
[00:12:16] did it. And Candace has gotten so far
[00:12:20] down the rabbit holes, digging in the
[00:12:23] garden, as Theo Von puts it,
[00:12:26] that it's become easy for her critics to
[00:12:30] smear her based upon what she's
[00:12:32] investigating now
[00:12:35] and forget about the fact that
[00:12:40] this all started because the mainstream
[00:12:42] case does not add up. The mainstream
[00:12:45] case does not make sense. And the rifle
[00:12:48] is one of the most obvious and key
[00:12:50] pieces, but it is far from the only
[00:12:52] piece. You can remember when they
[00:12:54] released the text messages, the alleged
[00:12:56] text messages, and the whole internet
[00:12:57] came together left and right around how
[00:13:00] no one was buying that [ __ ]
[00:13:03] Interestingly, pretty much everyone
[00:13:05] who's a Zionist has now flipped. And
[00:13:09] though they may have laughed at those
[00:13:10] text messages initially, now they feel
[00:13:12] very confident that those text messages
[00:13:14] are all good. In fact, there's a strange
[00:13:18] pattern of Zionism in general in the
[00:13:20] people that are attacking Candace and
[00:13:22] attacking me and that are shilling the
[00:13:23] Fed narrative with a few glaring
[00:13:26] exceptions like our boy Nick. Um,
[00:13:32] but it all adds up to a very strange
[00:13:34] propaganda campaign. And I don't mean to
[00:13:37] say or suggest by my words that everyone
[00:13:40] that disagrees with me is a Fed or
[00:13:42] everyone that disagrees with me is part
[00:13:44] of a propaganda campaign. What I mean is
[00:13:46] that we're seeing something very similar
[00:13:48] to what we saw during COVID where you
[00:13:50] form a mass uh psychosis and it sweeps
[00:13:55] regular people along with it that go
[00:13:57] along with the crowd. They go along with
[00:13:59] the narrative because you get them
[00:14:00] emotionally riled up
[00:14:03] and then they parrot your own talking
[00:14:04] points for you. They parrot the
[00:14:06] narrative. They they enforced the
[00:14:07] narrative.
[00:14:09] And
[00:14:12] for COVID,
[00:14:15] they had the leftists dialed in. And it
[00:14:16] was the right-wing that wasn't buying
[00:14:18] it. But this time, they've got the
[00:14:21] rightwing dialed in. And it's a lot of
[00:14:23] leftists that aren't buying it as well
[00:14:25] as a lot of right-wing people.
[00:14:28] And they achieved that, I suppose. I
[00:14:30] mean, I'm no psychologist, but the way
[00:14:32] from what it looks to me, they achieved
[00:14:34] that by killing our guy, so to speak.
[00:14:38] And I know Charlie wasn't really my guy,
[00:14:40] but they achieved it by kill by killing
[00:14:43] Maga's guy and getting emotions all
[00:14:46] riled up around it and then parading his
[00:14:48] widow around and, you know, having all
[00:14:50] of his friends come out and give
[00:14:51] heartwarming testimony and having all
[00:14:53] these memorials and stuff.
[00:14:55] And I don't think personally that most
[00:14:59] of them are in on it. I don't think that
[00:15:01] most of Turning Point knows anything
[00:15:02] about whatever happened. I think most of
[00:15:05] them are being swept along in whatever
[00:15:07] wave is hitting everybody also. Um,
[00:15:11] I want to believe that that's what's
[00:15:13] happening with Erica, too.
[00:15:16] But there's a lot of people in that
[00:15:19] TPUSA
[00:15:21] right-wingy camp
[00:15:24] that are lying, that are being caught
[00:15:26] lying on camera.
[00:15:28] And there's even more people that are
[00:15:30] misrepresenting Charlie Kirk.
[00:15:33] Things that he did say, things that he
[00:15:35] did text, things that he did tweet.
[00:15:39] as well as things that are just a little
[00:15:42] more subtle and subversive.
[00:15:45] So, it felt appropriate and it seems
[00:15:48] like it always feels appropriate to
[00:15:50] start with this classic clip of Charlie
[00:15:53] just to remind us all where we're
[00:15:55] starting out here
[00:15:57] because I learned during co I learned
[00:16:00] when they told us that it came from a
[00:16:01] bat in the Himalayas. I learned when
[00:16:03] they told us the vaccine was safe and
[00:16:05] effective. I learned when they told us
[00:16:07] that Ivormectum was horsepaced that you
[00:16:10] better keep asking questions because
[00:16:12] it's the only thing that keeps us free.
[00:16:14] Thank you so much.
[00:16:16] Because it's the only thing that keeps
[00:16:19] us free.
[00:16:20] >> [snorts]
[00:16:20] >> And I suspect
[00:16:22] that that perspective is only going to
[00:16:25] become more and more apparently
[00:16:27] prophetic as we move closer and closer
[00:16:30] to resolution
[00:16:33] in this murder investigation and in the
[00:16:37] subsequent
[00:16:38] unfolding of events that will come as a
[00:16:40] result of how this goes.
[00:16:47] And so this week,
[00:16:50] Erica Kirk came out
[00:16:53] and did a total of
[00:16:56] six different media hits by my count.
[00:17:00] It's possible I missed one, but I
[00:17:02] believe at least six mainstream media
[00:17:05] hits, mostly all on Fox News.
[00:17:10] And
[00:17:12] I think a lot of people are having
[00:17:14] trouble squaring
[00:17:16] her emotions and her requests and her
[00:17:20] demands and her sort of her output
[00:17:24] with her choices
[00:17:27] to
[00:17:29] do so much media. Her choice in the
[00:17:31] first place to accept the role as CEO.
[00:17:35] her choice to publish an Instagram video
[00:17:38] of her kissing Charlie's dead hand just
[00:17:41] days after the shooting.
[00:17:44] Excuse me.
[00:17:46] There's a lot of inconsistencies here
[00:17:48] and some people are feeling emotionally
[00:17:51] off about it. Some people are feeling
[00:17:53] downright suspicious and conspiratorial
[00:17:55] about it. Some people are like fully
[00:17:58] wrapped their whole house in tin foil at
[00:17:59] this point and they're about to turn the
[00:18:00] microwave on. And I get it. I totally
[00:18:03] get it. Um,
[00:18:06] I am made uncomfortable by the apparent
[00:18:09] lies that are coming up in this
[00:18:11] testimony as well, and we're going to
[00:18:12] look at a few of them. This is the most
[00:18:15] important one.
[00:18:16] >> Do you think Charlie knew to some degree
[00:18:19] and had made the conscience the
[00:18:21] conscious choice that
[00:18:24] I I may be taken out early? Not saying
[00:18:27] he knew that that day, but that he had
[00:18:30] any inkling that this might come his way
[00:18:34] and that he intentionally chose to move
[00:18:37] forward
[00:18:39] with faith in God.
[00:18:41] >> It's interesting because we always we
[00:18:44] have I mean I still I have unbelievable
[00:18:46] amounts of death threats. My kids have
[00:18:49] kidnapping threats, death threats. Our
[00:18:51] whole team has death threats.
[00:18:54] We we knew that there was always going
[00:18:56] to be a threat, but Charlie and I always
[00:18:58] we promised each other we would never
[00:18:59] live in fear. And he would say, "If
[00:19:01] they're going to get me, they're going
[00:19:02] to get me." But he was not messaging
[00:19:05] people the day before saying, "I'm going
[00:19:08] to be murdered. They're coming after me.
[00:19:11] Someone's going to kill me." He didn't
[00:19:13] he didn't say that. And I have his cell
[00:19:15] phone.
[00:19:17] >> Didn't say that. And so what I do know
[00:19:21] is that we believe in the power of
[00:19:22] prayer. And what I do know is that we
[00:19:24] believe in our sovereign God. And what I
[00:19:27] do know is that that night before we did
[00:19:30] what we usually did before tours, we
[00:19:33] said our prayer and we asked the Lord to
[00:19:36] protect us and we asked the Lord that
[00:19:38] his will be done.
[00:19:41] Listen, I'm not trying to make a huge
[00:19:43] deal out of this point, but for me, I
[00:19:45] have had trouble squaring when are we
[00:19:49] going to get tissue Erica and when are
[00:19:51] we going to get these other Ericas and
[00:19:54] there feels like there's just a really
[00:19:56] distinct line between the two and it
[00:19:59] felt like tissue Erica just went on and
[00:20:01] on and on and on and on and every day at
[00:20:04] every media appearance it was a full-on
[00:20:06] tissue Erica constantly crying in every
[00:20:09] interview which is understandable. If
[00:20:11] that's how you grieve, that's how you
[00:20:12] grieve. But it feels like it was a hard
[00:20:17] cut off as though something changed, as
[00:20:19] though something happened. And we went
[00:20:21] from constantly tearful Erica, which is
[00:20:24] totally within her rights, not trying to
[00:20:26] shame her for that, to a very much more
[00:20:30] like warrior, righteous indignation,
[00:20:32] anger Erica all at once. And I don't
[00:20:35] know what caused that shift. I think a
[00:20:38] lot of people are speculating about what
[00:20:39] might have caused that shift, but it
[00:20:41] feels like a very distinct departure
[00:20:43] from tissue Erica all of a sudden. And
[00:20:46] we no longer have tissue Erica. And
[00:20:48] that's not like some huge breaking
[00:20:50] detail in the case. It's just these
[00:20:53] little personal um these like little
[00:20:57] things you notice about people that kind
[00:21:00] of make you feel comfortable or
[00:21:01] uncomfortable trusting them and what
[00:21:04] they're saying. And as the widow of the
[00:21:07] deceased and the new CEO of the company,
[00:21:10] um, she's in a very difficult position
[00:21:13] regardless of how suspicious you want to
[00:21:15] be of her.
[00:21:17] But
[00:21:20] that doesn't excuse the fact that she is
[00:21:24] in that position and therefore she is
[00:21:26] the one that requires people's judgment.
[00:21:29] She is the arbiter of TPUSA's narrative,
[00:21:32] truth, and final word.
[00:21:35] and it was her choice to be there and it
[00:21:37] was TPUSA's choice to put her there. And
[00:21:39] if you want to be conspiratorial about
[00:21:41] it,
[00:21:43] that's a pretty good shield to put out
[00:21:45] in front of yourselves. It's the widow
[00:21:47] of the deceased whether she knows
[00:21:50] anything about the crime or not. And I'm
[00:21:54] not I don't have any evidence that she
[00:21:56] does, but I do have evidence. Suddenly,
[00:21:58] the whole world has evidence that the
[00:22:01] statement she just made for Glenn Beck
[00:22:03] here. Woof, that is a hell of a screen
[00:22:06] to come back to. That was not
[00:22:08] intentional.
[00:22:09] >> Threats. We We knew that there was
[00:22:12] always going to be a threat, but Charlie
[00:22:13] and I always we promised each other we
[00:22:15] would never live in fear. And he would
[00:22:17] say, "If they're going to get me,
[00:22:18] they're going to get me." But he was not
[00:22:21] messaging people the day before saying,
[00:22:24] "I'm going to be murdered. They're
[00:22:26] coming after me. Someone's going to kill
[00:22:28] me." He didn't
[00:22:31] >> He was not messaging people the day
[00:22:33] before. They're coming. I'm going to be
[00:22:35] murdered. They're coming after me.
[00:22:36] Someone's going to kill me. So, she made
[00:22:38] a number of blanket kind of statements
[00:22:41] that were like, "He wasn't messaging
[00:22:43] anything like these three statements is
[00:22:46] what she appeared to have just said."
[00:22:49] Um,
[00:22:50] >> I know. I love
[00:22:53] >> I don't know if we need to belabor the
[00:22:54] point of reminding us all of the type of
[00:22:56] Instagram really personal emotional post
[00:23:00] that she put out right after he was
[00:23:02] killed that I don't think anyone enjoyed
[00:23:05] or had I don't think anyone [ __ ] with
[00:23:08] this post. I feel like this post was
[00:23:10] deeply inappropriate
[00:23:13] um and deeply emotionally manipulative
[00:23:15] feeling and it does not help the
[00:23:18] narrative that she is being put out in
[00:23:20] front as a grieving widow on purpose. Um
[00:23:23] it very much fed that narrative. So, um,
[00:23:30] so there's this critical question, and
[00:23:33] we're going to come back to the evidence
[00:23:34] of what is actually going around right
[00:23:35] now, but there's this critical question
[00:23:37] of where was Charlie Kirk really
[00:23:39] standing? What did he really feel? Um,
[00:23:42] what was his opinion on Zionism and
[00:23:45] Israel at the end of his life? Because
[00:23:48] when Candace first broached the subject
[00:23:50] that this was a shifting topic for him,
[00:23:54] the whole apparatus came out to call her
[00:23:57] a liar, to call her crazy, to call her
[00:24:00] all of the names. BB Netanyahu himself
[00:24:03] all the way down to his lowest peasant
[00:24:05] foot soldiers like Josh Hammer. They all
[00:24:09] tried to Israel wash Charlie's memory.
[00:24:14] Erica should have known that all of that
[00:24:16] was lies.
[00:24:18] Unless Charlie was keeping that a secret
[00:24:20] from her. Unless Charlie was keeping
[00:24:23] this a secret from her
[00:24:25] because Candace produced these text
[00:24:27] messages which apparently Andrew Kulit
[00:24:28] had also had and we all know the text
[00:24:31] messages by now.
[00:24:33] But I don't think you
[00:24:36] just throw around unseriously
[00:24:40] to a bunch of to a text group text with
[00:24:43] a bunch of Jewish donors in it. You
[00:24:45] don't just throw out that I have no
[00:24:47] choice but to leave the pro-Israel
[00:24:48] cause. Like that's not a joke.
[00:24:52] Cernovich was positing a theory today on
[00:24:54] on X that this was him gaming it so that
[00:24:57] he would get other donors to donate so
[00:25:00] that he could play them off each other.
[00:25:02] And it's like
[00:25:06] may maybe
[00:25:10] but if we are as we believe as we've
[00:25:13] been told if we are to understand that
[00:25:15] he had been telling people behind the
[00:25:16] scenes that he was afraid that Israel
[00:25:18] would kill him if he turned on them
[00:25:21] then that is not the kind of text that
[00:25:23] you would send lightly or to play donors
[00:25:26] off of each other or to you know get a
[00:25:29] leg up.
[00:25:31] [snorts] Not not one bit.
[00:25:35] And just today, Candace weighed in more
[00:25:37] because
[00:25:39] Erica called her a liar. And so Candace
[00:25:43] came clean on Jimmy Door's show just
[00:25:45] earlier today
[00:25:46] >> since um they were all trying to say
[00:25:48] that it wasn't true that Charlie had
[00:25:50] turned on the Greater Israel Project.
[00:25:52] And you said that you had um
[00:25:54] >> uh text messages. They said it was a
[00:25:56] lie. And then you of course revealed
[00:25:58] them. Here's the uh Jewish donors play
[00:26:01] into all the worst stereotypes. I cannot
[00:26:03] and will not be bullied like this,
[00:26:05] leaving me no choice but to leave the
[00:26:07] pro-Israel cause. And so you when you
[00:26:09] produce It's funny, you know, they tell
[00:26:12] you uh you're lying and then you produce
[00:26:14] them and then they go, "Well, why would
[00:26:15] you release
[00:26:17] why would you release private text
[00:26:18] >> private text messages?"
[00:26:20] So, you can't you're you're you're
[00:26:22] there's they they create this scenario
[00:26:24] where you can't win. No matter if if you
[00:26:27] prove them to be liars, uh you shouldn't
[00:26:30] have done it. It was inappropriate. And
[00:26:31] if you don't prove them to be liars,
[00:26:33] then you're the one who's lying.
[00:26:35] >> And so, I I just I I can't get over
[00:26:38] again that they think this is going to
[00:26:40] work. And and so I just wanted to bring
[00:26:41] this up. uh Erica Kirk. Now there's a
[00:26:44] new one uh where you are you have
[00:26:48] relayed uh information that Charlie Kirk
[00:26:51] told people the day before he was killed
[00:26:53] that he said they are going to kill me.
[00:26:55] >> Mhm.
[00:26:56] >> And so Erica was asked about this by uh
[00:26:59] uh Glenn Beck. I miss how he used to cry
[00:27:02] all the time. I don't know why he
[00:27:03] doesn't do that anymore. I miss it. But
[00:27:04] um Eric he's my favorite crier. Um but
[00:27:08] here we go. Here's here's what she had
[00:27:10] to say about it.
[00:27:12] We have I mean I still I have
[00:27:14] unbelievable amounts of death threats.
[00:27:15] My kids have kidnapping threats. Death
[00:27:17] threats. Our whole team has death
[00:27:18] threats. We we knew that there was
[00:27:20] always going to be a threat, but Charlie
[00:27:21] and I
[00:27:22] >> So they I just want to stop it for a
[00:27:25] second. This isn't the point of this
[00:27:26] video, but it it she kind of makes it
[00:27:29] sounds like this is new. It's Well,
[00:27:31] she's admitting right there. This is not
[00:27:33] new. This has been always this has been
[00:27:35] so people it sounds like they're trying
[00:27:37] to make it out like you are creating
[00:27:40] these death threats other people have
[00:27:42] >> and it's just she's there admitting that
[00:27:44] we always knew she said and they all
[00:27:46] >> real quick can we just admire Candace's
[00:27:49] CIA fit with her hair back she looks
[00:27:51] like she's legitimately like a like a
[00:27:53] CIA day one recruit I think it's
[00:27:55] hilarious
[00:27:56] >> always were receiving death threats so
[00:27:59] it's not I don't know why they
[00:28:00] >> I was frantically hunting for this clip
[00:28:01] today because I saw saw just her clip. I
[00:28:04] didn't see the Jimmy piece of it at
[00:28:05] first and I was like looking everywhere
[00:28:06] for like where is she put out a live
[00:28:08] stream wearing this outfit where she
[00:28:10] says this. This must be a brand new live
[00:28:11] stream that I can't find. Um and then I
[00:28:13] finally realiz I figured out that it was
[00:28:15] Jimmy Door
[00:28:15] >> bring it up cuz it's not new. Um but
[00:28:18] anyway, here here we go.
[00:28:19] >> We promised each other we would never
[00:28:20] live in fear and he would say if they're
[00:28:22] going to get me, they're going to get
[00:28:23] me. But he was not messaging people the
[00:28:25] day before saying I'm going to be
[00:28:27] murdered. They're coming after me.
[00:28:28] Someone's going to kill me. He didn't
[00:28:30] say that. And I have his cell phone.
[00:28:33] Okay. Well, the problem is we have Frank
[00:28:35] Turk saying that he did say that. So,
[00:28:37] here, let me play that.
[00:28:39] >> And so, I texted him. I said I said,
[00:28:41] "Charlie, I I hope you've increased your
[00:28:44] security detail." And he said, "I have.
[00:28:47] I know they want me dead."
[00:28:51] I know they want me dead is very much a
[00:28:54] statement within the scope of the three
[00:28:57] different types of statements that Erica
[00:28:59] gave saying that he wasn't sending out
[00:29:01] this type of message, this type of
[00:29:02] message, this type of message. I know
[00:29:04] they want me dead is very much within
[00:29:06] the scope of those three things. But
[00:29:08] >> no,
[00:29:10] >> so uh what just go what? Go ahead. Take
[00:29:13] it where you would like on that because
[00:29:15] there here again that we have these
[00:29:17] these people calling you a liar and yet
[00:29:19] we have Frank Turk saying exactly and
[00:29:20] then she kind So they keep contradicting
[00:29:23] each other unwittingly and that it
[00:29:26] indicates that someone's lying and as
[00:29:29] you always point out the only reason you
[00:29:31] would lie is to cover something up. So
[00:29:33] take it where you want.
[00:29:36] Well, here's what I'm just going to tell
[00:29:37] the truth, okay? Um, I did not see that
[00:29:40] she had said that when I did my show
[00:29:42] yesterday and then I saw it after and I
[00:29:45] can tell you
[00:29:48] 1,000%
[00:29:49] that
[00:29:50] >> I kind of think that was Candace
[00:29:51] thinking right there. I don't know. I'm
[00:29:53] just speculating. I kind of think she
[00:29:55] was just thinking this through of like,
[00:29:57] well, sorry, Andrew,
[00:30:01] but
[00:30:02] we're kind of past this point at this
[00:30:04] point.
[00:30:05] that Andrew Kulvette told me the night
[00:30:09] before Charlie was murdered that Charlie
[00:30:12] Kirk texted him and said they are going
[00:30:15] to kill me.
[00:30:17] >> And you're damn straight it's about time
[00:30:18] this came out. It's about time this came
[00:30:22] out. And the big question is why the
[00:30:24] hell hasn't Andrew Kulvit told anyone
[00:30:27] this yet? Aside from in private off the
[00:30:30] record, please don't tell anyone.
[00:30:37] Really?
[00:30:38] >> Andrew Kovette is the person who
[00:30:40] received a text message from Charlie
[00:30:41] Kirk saying they're going to kill me.
[00:30:43] And I'm not getting that third party. I
[00:30:45] got that directly from Andrew Kovette.
[00:30:47] He asked me to keep it off record. And I
[00:30:48] would have kept it off record if Erica
[00:30:50] did not imply that I lied. Right? So I
[00:30:53] mean there I'm not saying she is saying
[00:30:55] Candace is lying. I am saying that since
[00:30:58] I was the one who put it out there,
[00:31:00] she's implying that I'm that I'm lying
[00:31:02] and that that's not true. So, we have a
[00:31:04] scenario here where either Andrew
[00:31:07] Kovette has told an explicit lie or
[00:31:10] Erica Kirk is telling an explicit lie.
[00:31:12] It's not up for me to determine who. Um,
[00:31:15] I didn't receive that text message,
[00:31:17] >> but uh, yeah, and I also was told by a
[00:31:22] person at Turning Point USA, who I'm not
[00:31:24] going to name because they are one of my
[00:31:26] sources, that Dan Flood received the
[00:31:28] same message. So that's Dan Flood, head
[00:31:32] of security.
[00:31:36] First man to touch Charlie after the
[00:31:39] bullet impact.
[00:31:42] >> There you go. I don't know. I I I
[00:31:44] believe that she has his phone. I also I
[00:31:47] maybe somebody deleted it, but I don't I
[00:31:49] don't know why Andrew Kovette 48 hours
[00:31:52] after Charlie was dead, would lie to me.
[00:31:54] He did not sound like he was lying. Um
[00:31:57] he sounded very concerned about it. And
[00:31:59] I I specifically said like, "Who who is
[00:32:00] they?" Like, you know, like he like he
[00:32:02] said, "They're going to kill me." And he
[00:32:02] said, "I don't know. I don't know." He
[00:32:03] was
[00:32:04] >> Cuz think back to 48 hours after the
[00:32:06] shooting. It was before Candace had
[00:32:09] offered any opinions. It was somewhat
[00:32:12] before the Israel narrative had taken
[00:32:14] hold, but it was it was there at that
[00:32:15] point already. Um, but Andrew Kulit, if
[00:32:19] you remember, contacted Candace saying,
[00:32:21] "You and Tucker need to lay low. There's
[00:32:24] a threat against you." And in the same
[00:32:27] conversation, more or less, apparently,
[00:32:29] he said that Charlie had apparently
[00:32:33] texted him saying, "I'm afraid they're
[00:32:35] going to kill me." And he didn't say
[00:32:37] Israel. He didn't say the Jews. He said,
[00:32:39] "They're gonna kill me." And that seems
[00:32:41] to be paired with the same conversation
[00:32:43] of like, "They're gonna come get you,
[00:32:45] too. Spooky, spooky. You should probably
[00:32:47] stay off the air." And so, I don't know
[00:32:49] what Andrew Kulit's motivations would be
[00:32:51] there. I don't know if he's sinister or
[00:32:53] if he's just
[00:32:56] misguided and very scared and not
[00:32:58] sharing information that the whole
[00:32:59] public wants and deserves to know at
[00:33:01] this point.
[00:33:03] But that's damning if if if Kulit has
[00:33:06] that information. And let's be clear,
[00:33:08] let me be ultra clear. I believe Candace
[00:33:12] Owens on this one 100%. Without a doubt.
[00:33:16] Without a doubt. Having seen the inside
[00:33:18] of her operation, having seen how her
[00:33:21] show operates and how her team works and
[00:33:23] just how honest of a person she is in
[00:33:25] general, like how normal of like a
[00:33:28] interaction you have with her and her
[00:33:30] team and everybody when you're there. I
[00:33:32] don't doubt it one bit that she's
[00:33:33] telling the truth on who told her this.
[00:33:37] So, we'll see if Andrew Kovit addresses
[00:33:40] this or not. We'll see what Erica Kirk
[00:33:43] does because that is I mean a Frank Turk
[00:33:47] already kind of spilled the beans all
[00:33:49] over the world and that's a historic
[00:33:50] clip. So,
[00:33:54] yeah, I don't know what to make of
[00:33:56] Andrew Kulovit. not going to, you know,
[00:33:58] blast him as though he's necessarily
[00:34:00] involved, but
[00:34:03] it's not a great look to be keeping that
[00:34:06] kind of a text message secret,
[00:34:08] especially when you can tell that the
[00:34:10] FBI
[00:34:12] has already made up its mind and has no
[00:34:14] interest in pursuing any foreign leads
[00:34:17] or anything of that nature.
[00:34:20] So, I'm very excited to watch this piece
[00:34:25] of the story play out a little more.
[00:34:28] Um,
[00:34:32] and I'm a little nervous because things
[00:34:33] are about to get very hairy.
[00:34:36] This is uh we've already seen this one
[00:34:40] because this is Turk.
[00:34:43] Oh, this is a last minute addition to
[00:34:46] the to the pile here.
[00:34:48] Um, but I thought you guys might find it
[00:34:51] a little spicy to share this. This is um
[00:34:54] sort of some Instagram drama where
[00:34:56] apparently Andrew Kulovit deleted his
[00:34:58] Instagram account cold in the middle of
[00:35:00] the night about two weeks ago when some
[00:35:04] questions came up
[00:35:08] Instagram account. No, because something
[00:35:10] is off here and I'm not going to pretend
[00:35:12] it's not. Last night I tagged Andrew
[00:35:14] Kovette in the comments of one of my
[00:35:15] videos. literally just tagging him in
[00:35:17] this comment saying he should sit down
[00:35:18] with Candace Owens and have a chat.
[00:35:21] Nothing dramatic, right? And around 5:00
[00:35:23] this morning, I woke up and had a
[00:35:25] notification that Andrew Colette had
[00:35:27] responded to my comment telling me to
[00:35:29] private message him. But when I clicked
[00:35:30] it, it was gone. Like wiped, deleted.
[00:35:33] The comment was gone. The page was gone.
[00:35:35] Like I had hallucinated the whole thing.
[00:35:37] So I go digging and tell me why the
[00:35:39] account I had just tagged hours earlier
[00:35:42] was completely deleted. as in Instagram
[00:35:44] said that the page does not exist. But
[00:35:46] wait, because it gets even weirder.
[00:35:49] There's suddenly a brand new Andrew
[00:35:50] Kovette account. Brand new. One post,
[00:35:53] one follower joined November 2025.
[00:35:55] Nothing else on it. No comments, no
[00:35:57] history, no trace of anything that
[00:35:59] existed yesterday. So, let's lay out our
[00:36:01] timeline. Sometime between 10:00 p.m. to
[00:36:05] maybe even 1:00 a.m., I commented and
[00:36:08] tagged Andrew Kvette. He replies to me
[00:36:10] sometime between 1:00 a.m.
[00:36:12] >> So, this all happened, I believe,
[00:36:14] November 22nd, um, end of last month.
[00:36:18] Um, and we're going to go briefly look
[00:36:20] at the video that is where these
[00:36:22] comments occurred. The top commenter
[00:36:24] says, "Was it after Charlie's
[00:36:26] assassination? Did Andrew threaten them
[00:36:27] or was he privy to information inside
[00:36:29] Turning Point? This needs to be
[00:36:31] unpacked. One, yep, he called her from
[00:36:34] the hospital after Charlie was shot."
[00:36:36] That's unclear to everyone. I think it
[00:36:37] would be awesome if Andrew Kulovit would
[00:36:38] just sit down with real Candace Owens
[00:36:40] and talk it out so we could skip all the
[00:36:42] he said she said
[00:36:44] >> in 5:00 a.m. and then his entire page
[00:36:47] disappears immediately after a brand new
[00:36:49] scrubbed clean page magically appears
[00:36:51] and I'm just supposed to believe that
[00:36:53] that's normal. No, sorry, I'm not buying
[00:36:56] it. And to add to the weirdness, Candace
[00:36:58] has confirmed that there is a hit out on
[00:36:59] her bought and paid for by the Mcronone.
[00:37:01] So Andrew, is this the threat that you
[00:37:04] are telling her about? And if so, why
[00:37:05] didn't you elaborate? People don't
[00:37:07] delete their whole identity online at 5
[00:37:09] in the morning by accident. Not right
[00:37:11] after responding to a comment about a
[00:37:13] phone call connected to an assassination
[00:37:15] of their boss. I'm not accusing anyone
[00:37:17] of anything. I'm just saying the timing
[00:37:18] is very convenient and very suspicious.
[00:37:22] You don't wipe your whole footprint
[00:37:23] unless you don't want people seeing
[00:37:25] something. So stay tuned because now I'm
[00:37:28] really paying attention.
[00:37:30] >> Yep.
[00:37:32] So, I went to her account and scrolled
[00:37:33] back to find [snorts]
[00:37:36] what was the video where this comment
[00:37:38] was posted
[00:37:40] and this is it. Quietly revealed
[00:37:43] something massive. On Monday, Candace
[00:37:44] spent most of her show talking about the
[00:37:46] Egyptian airplanes. But she also dropped
[00:37:48] something absolutely huge and it seems
[00:37:51] like almost nobody caught it. She said
[00:37:53] for months that on the day Charlie Kirk
[00:37:54] was shot, someone from Turning Point
[00:37:56] called her and warned her that she and
[00:37:58] Tucker Carlson were on a list and needed
[00:38:00] to lay low because there was a credible
[00:38:02] threat against their lives. And here's
[00:38:04] the part that's always bothered me and
[00:38:05] everyone else. If there was a credible
[00:38:07] threat, why did no one from the
[00:38:08] government, not the FBI, not Homeland
[00:38:10] Security, why didn't they contact
[00:38:12] Candace or Tucker? Not a single official
[00:38:15] warning. But on Monday, she finally
[00:38:17] named the person who made that call. And
[00:38:18] it wasn't just a random employee. It
[00:38:20] wasn't security. It wasn't law
[00:38:22] enforcement. It was Andrew Kovette, the
[00:38:24] top spokesperson for Turning Point USA.
[00:38:27] >> Right. So, Andrew Kovette is the one
[00:38:29] that called Candace warning her and
[00:38:31] talked her to lay low. And he's the one
[00:38:34] that said that maybe paired with that
[00:38:37] same warning that Charlie had texted him
[00:38:41] the night before his death saying, "I'm
[00:38:43] afraid they're going to kill me." And it
[00:38:45] seems like those two messages could go
[00:38:47] hand in hand to try to make Candace more
[00:38:50] afraid,
[00:38:52] but it's unclear what the motivation
[00:38:53] would be here. But when this woman
[00:38:55] started asking questions about it back
[00:38:57] on November 22nd, I believe, suddenly in
[00:39:00] the middle of the night at like 5:00
[00:39:02] a.m. or something, I guess early in the
[00:39:04] morning, Andrew Kovit wiped his entire
[00:39:06] Instagram profile.
[00:39:08] >> Someone extremely [music] close to
[00:39:09] Charlie Kirk, he's the one who told her
[00:39:11] she's on the list. He's the one who told
[00:39:13] her to lay low. and he's the one who
[00:39:15] called it a credible threat. So now I'm
[00:39:17] asking the question no one seems to want
[00:39:18] to say out loud. Was there ever an
[00:39:20] actual outside threat or was that call
[00:39:23] from Kovette himself the actual threat?
[00:39:26] >> So this is the video from before Kovette
[00:39:29] deleted his Instagram account and then
[00:39:33] the video we watched first was after he
[00:39:35] deleted his Instagram account.
[00:39:39] And I don't know what that means, but
[00:39:42] it's interesting that Kovette is
[00:39:44] allegedly sitting on this tweet. And the
[00:39:46] last time that Candace had a tweet that
[00:39:49] Kovette was also sitting on, it was very
[00:39:51] real. So, I'm inclined to believe that
[00:39:54] that text message, sorry, I keep saying
[00:39:56] tweet for text message.
[00:39:59] I'm inclined to believe that those text
[00:40:00] messages are real.
[00:40:04] Um,
[00:40:06] [clears throat]
[00:40:08] listen,
[00:40:09] listen.
[00:40:12] We don't need to dive super deep into
[00:40:14] this. Charlie was very Jewish. He was a
[00:40:17] very Jewish Christian. Um, and yes, he
[00:40:20] was known to sign off of his show with
[00:40:22] Shabbat Shalom. Um, sometimes he very
[00:40:25] much did love the Sabbath, the Jewish
[00:40:28] Sabbath, and he very much did talk about
[00:40:30] these sorts of things. Um, it was pretty
[00:40:33] awkward and a lot of us kind of poked
[00:40:36] and talk [ __ ] at him during his life for
[00:40:38] it.
[00:40:40] Um, that being said, the book tour, the
[00:40:43] book about it, the like we're just going
[00:40:46] to trust that it's his exact words and
[00:40:48] the way it's being marketed by his widow
[00:40:51] is weird and it's rubbing a lot of
[00:40:53] people in weird ways and it it's weird.
[00:40:56] And our boy Diligent um, brought up a
[00:40:58] really great point. would walk through
[00:40:59] the door, drop his bags, daddy's home,
[00:41:03] take his phone, Friday night, Shabbat
[00:41:05] shalom, throw it in the drunk drawer,
[00:41:07] and it was just all us. And
[00:41:09] >> you know that someone is going to make a
[00:41:11] fire rap edit out of that clip.
[00:41:16] If you haven't done it already, get on
[00:41:18] it, guys. What are you waiting for? Um,
[00:41:22] but Diligent just noticed that like
[00:41:25] she's portraying it as though like he
[00:41:27] always did this. He he observed the
[00:41:29] Jewish Sabbath every Saturday. Kind of
[00:41:30] like it's it's getting presented as
[00:41:32] though like he really did do this. And
[00:41:36] he just asked Grock like, "Hey, did did
[00:41:38] Charlie ever tweet on Saturdays?" And
[00:41:41] the answer is obviously yes. Yeah. Um
[00:41:46] apparently, this is weird. Apparently
[00:41:48] Grock found zero instances of Charlie
[00:41:50] using the word Shabbat, but we we know
[00:41:52] that he did use the word Shabbat shalom
[00:41:54] sometimes kind of like in half halfjest
[00:41:56] friendly friendly jest sort of. Um not
[00:42:00] like he was making fun of it and he
[00:42:03] replied on Sabbath
[00:42:05] all the time, lots of times. Um Grock
[00:42:08] was like there's too many to count. And
[00:42:11] uh for a sample of 120 recent replies
[00:42:14] over the past 3 years, I found 16
[00:42:16] instances during Shabbat or Sabbath um
[00:42:20] provided a bunch of examples. So the
[00:42:22] book marketing is a little weird and
[00:42:23] it's a little intense. And notice that
[00:42:24] we have crying Erica back for this
[00:42:26] interview specifically.
[00:42:28] Um, so I'm trying to I'm trying to just
[00:42:30] understand
[00:42:32] what how do we summon crying Erica
[00:42:35] versus
[00:42:37] uh
[00:42:40] uh e like seriousize Erica. I don't want
[00:42:43] to use insulting words for this kind of
[00:42:47] for this Erica where what's the
[00:42:49] difference between crying Erica and this
[00:42:52] Erica I guess is the question
[00:42:54] >> because let's be real wide spectrum of
[00:42:57] emotions makes perfect sense perfect
[00:42:59] sense um
[00:43:02] but the question is just from like a
[00:43:04] outside perspective is she convincing
[00:43:07] the public or is the public feeling
[00:43:11] underwhelmmed welmed by
[00:43:15] the whole thing.
[00:43:17] And this clip is pretty [ __ ] weird.
[00:43:20] >> Yeah. And I read the whole thing,
[00:43:21] >> you know, and talking about read the
[00:43:24] last few pages. I'm not there yet.
[00:43:27] >> It's just emotionally cuz once this book
[00:43:29] is done, it's done.
[00:43:29] >> Of course. I mean, you know, everybody
[00:43:32] thinks we should all mourn a certain
[00:43:34] way,
[00:43:34] >> right?
[00:43:35] >> Okay. Well, until you walk
[00:43:38] a mile.
[00:43:40] So when you start saying everybody
[00:43:42] mourns a certain way, I don't I don't
[00:43:44] know what about the conversation goes
[00:43:46] here, but when you watch it over and
[00:43:48] over, it very much has the vibe of like
[00:43:50] trying to give someone the eyes of like,
[00:43:52] let's not talk about this. Like,
[00:43:56] right.
[00:43:58] And I'm not I'm not trying to say that
[00:43:59] like, oh, look, she murdered her
[00:44:01] husband. That is not what I'm trying to
[00:44:02] say. What I'm trying to say is it's just
[00:44:04] like
[00:44:06] it makes it all feel like controlled
[00:44:08] media. It all it all feels scripted. It
[00:44:12] all feels kind of weird. It doesn't feel
[00:44:14] super genuine to me. And I think that's
[00:44:16] how a lot of people feel. Fortunately,
[00:44:19] I've never had to go through anything
[00:44:20] like this.
[00:44:21] >> In someone else's shoes, you know, look
[00:44:23] at that. Well, until you walk a mile in
[00:44:25] someone else's shoes, you know. Well,
[00:44:27] until you walk a mile in someone else's
[00:44:29] shoes, you know, don't lecture people.
[00:44:31] >> 100%.
[00:44:38] Right.
[00:44:40] Um,
[00:44:46] I'm sure you've all looked into her
[00:44:48] past. We're not going to get all up into
[00:44:49] Erica Kirk's past right now. Yes, it's
[00:44:52] very suspicious. Yeah, there's a lot in
[00:44:53] her past. Um, I will say that I have
[00:44:56] been trying to source the claim that's
[00:44:58] been going around that her dad founded
[00:45:00] Rathon Israel, and I can't find anything
[00:45:03] to back that up, guys. Honestly, I think
[00:45:06] that that's just a Twitter rumor that
[00:45:08] gained steam and just floated. Uh,
[00:45:11] Rathon doesn't exactly have like an an
[00:45:14] Israel branch, so to speak. And
[00:45:19] uh neither of them ever neither of her
[00:45:20] parents ever officially worked at Rathon
[00:45:23] as far as I can tell. They did have
[00:45:25] contracting with like some amount of
[00:45:26] contracting with Rathon through the
[00:45:29] company, the defense contractor that
[00:45:30] they were at. I'm still looking into it.
[00:45:33] They were certainly involved in
[00:45:34] intelligence operations, defense
[00:45:37] contracting kind of stuff. They
[00:45:39] certainly have the pedigree of intel
[00:45:41] operatives.
[00:45:43] probably going to be impossible to ever
[00:45:45] confirm just how much depth there is to
[00:45:48] that, but there is an interesting slip
[00:45:52] of the tongue. Sort it's not even a slip
[00:45:54] of the tongue. It's like 13 years ago,
[00:45:56] but uh it's interesting
[00:46:00] here. Thanks for being here.
[00:46:02] >> Oh, thank you for having to me. They're
[00:46:04] one of the main reasons why I have the
[00:46:07] freedom of being Miss Arizona USA. and
[00:46:09] it's an honor to represent my state at
[00:46:11] its 100th birthday. But I'm making sure
[00:46:14] that I'm doing things in the community,
[00:46:16] getting out and helping people. I'm
[00:46:18] really active actually with my nonprofit
[00:46:19] called Everyday Heroes Like You. We're
[00:46:21] entering our fifth year. So, I started
[00:46:23] it when I was 17. So, I've been able to
[00:46:25] travel to the Pentagon. I've been able
[00:46:27] to meet General Salazar, who's actually
[00:46:29] out here in Arizona. And I've also been
[00:46:31] able to donate a Johnny's locker to the
[00:46:34] Soldier Nurse Center, which you're
[00:46:35] looking at right now. So there's been a
[00:46:37] lot of things that have been going on
[00:46:38] from working in the military to
[00:46:40] traveling.
[00:46:42] >> So she said she said working in the
[00:46:43] military and let's be real doesn't
[00:46:46] necessarily mean that she was in the
[00:46:48] military. Could just be colloquial thing
[00:46:49] of like like I'm going around doing my
[00:46:52] pageant thing and it's really great to
[00:46:53] work like in with the like with the
[00:46:55] military, you know,
[00:46:57] right? But I just thought it was a a
[00:47:01] good clip to play to remind us all that
[00:47:04] Erica has a background.
[00:47:08] And to be fair,
[00:47:10] that background, it's an extremely
[00:47:13] impressive resume if you think about it
[00:47:16] for whatever position.
[00:47:19] That's the only reason why it's even the
[00:47:20] slightest bit believable that she should
[00:47:22] be CEO of Turning Point USA. because the
[00:47:25] conversation did blow up of like well I
[00:47:28] mean Candace kind of brought it up of
[00:47:29] like being Charlie's wife is not enough
[00:47:33] credentials to be the CEO of T TPUSA and
[00:47:36] Erica does have an impressive background
[00:47:38] with a great resume for running a big
[00:47:42] organization like that
[00:47:44] but the question is is as Charlie's wife
[00:47:47] steps in is is the public going to be
[00:47:49] convinced of her genuiness and of her
[00:47:52] ethic and her moral moral direction
[00:47:56] carrying on in Charlie's legacy. And I
[00:47:59] think the big question on a lot of our
[00:48:01] minds, the big litmus test is, is this
[00:48:05] the last time that Tucker Carlson will
[00:48:07] ever be on the TPUSA stage at this
[00:48:09] Afest?
[00:48:10] And are we going to go straight back
[00:48:13] into the Zionist shilling? Israel,
[00:48:15] Israel, Israel, Israel, which is what it
[00:48:18] looks like we're doing, despite one of
[00:48:20] Charlie Kirk's final text messages
[00:48:23] being, "Leaving me no choice but to
[00:48:25] leave the pro-Israel cause."
[00:48:28] And it's a little awkward that he would
[00:48:31] be sending that text message and sharing
[00:48:34] his whole life with Erica, presumably
[00:48:36] telling her everything. Presumably,
[00:48:39] she's seeing the pressure that these
[00:48:40] donors are putting on him. Presumably,
[00:48:42] she loves him more than anything. And if
[00:48:44] she loves him more than anything, then
[00:48:47] she should hate. The people that are
[00:48:48] pressuring him, the people that are
[00:48:50] making his life hell,
[00:48:53] the people that he's maybe afraid of,
[00:48:56] and the people that he eventually text
[00:48:58] messages and says, "Jewish donors play
[00:49:00] into all the stereotypes.
[00:49:02] I cannot and will not be bullied like
[00:49:04] this, leaving me no choice but to leave
[00:49:06] the pro-Israel cause. She knows who that
[00:49:10] text message was about.
[00:49:13] And for her to take over his company and
[00:49:16] apparently do a U-turn back into Zion
[00:49:19] land,
[00:49:21] I think is leaving a sour taste in a lot
[00:49:23] of people's mouths.
[00:49:28] So, let's transition into the current
[00:49:32] Fed slop. And what better place to start
[00:49:36] than with our independent newsman,
[00:49:40] Jack Pobec,
[00:49:43] he has a very important message for you,
[00:49:45] America.
[00:49:46] >> Tyler Robinson to me seems to be the one
[00:49:49] who did this. And it's very clear. It's
[00:49:51] very clear that Tyler
[00:49:52] >> Listen up potential jurors. It's very
[00:49:55] clear. and important that you clearly
[00:49:57] get this message. Potential jurors
[00:50:00] >> Robinson is the killer because again his
[00:50:02] parents were the ones that turned him
[00:50:04] in. It's really as simple as that. You
[00:50:05] don't have to go any further. You don't
[00:50:06] have to listen to the FBI. You don't
[00:50:08] have to listen to government. You say,
[00:50:09] "Hey, just go look listen to his
[00:50:11] parents. Just go listen to his parents.
[00:50:12] His parents are the ones who turned him
[00:50:14] in." That's why I keep saying it over
[00:50:16] and over.
[00:50:18] You know how like in psychological
[00:50:21] operations they teach you to repeat
[00:50:23] things, to simplify things, to get
[00:50:26] rhythmic with things, to tell people
[00:50:29] over and over and over to trust the
[00:50:31] [ __ ] science
[00:50:35] over and over because none of the other
[00:50:38] theories make any sense beyond that
[00:50:41] point. His parents turned him in.
[00:50:43] >> His parents turned him in. His parents
[00:50:45] turned him in. his parents turned him
[00:50:47] in. Don't dare read the charging
[00:50:49] documents where none of it makes [ __ ]
[00:50:51] sense. We'll get to that. Don't worry,
[00:50:53] Jack.
[00:50:54] >> If your parents believed you did
[00:50:56] something, they would turn you in if
[00:50:58] they're good people. Now, if they were
[00:51:01] bad people, they wouldn't turn you in.
[00:51:02] So, just just think it through
[00:51:03] logically.
[00:51:05] >> Logically,
[00:51:07] I'm glad you're not my [ __ ] dad, you
[00:51:09] prick.
[00:51:11] What? Anyways,
[00:51:14] um
[00:51:16] just want to remind you that just the
[00:51:17] other week, Jack Pobiac got caught
[00:51:20] blatantly taking Tyler Robinson's
[00:51:23] brother's posts, blurring his face on
[00:51:25] all the photos, and then presenting them
[00:51:28] as though it was Tyler Robinson.
[00:51:31] Openly lying, knowingly lying, just to
[00:51:37] contaminate the potential jurors even
[00:51:39] more.
[00:51:41] But don't you dare do that or you're
[00:51:43] bad. You're evil.
[00:51:48] >> And I would just also like to point out
[00:51:50] how easy it would be for them to give us
[00:51:52] anything believable. How would help me
[00:51:53] out, guys. Again, I'm not a legal
[00:51:54] expert. I don't I'm a Glenn Rob Glenn
[00:51:56] Glenn Beck understands this stuff.
[00:51:59] >> Um Oh, I'm actually getting ahead of
[00:52:01] myself there. I want this piece here
[00:52:05] and this piece here
[00:52:08] and maybe even that one. But
[00:52:12] so Jack Bobic wants you to just listen
[00:52:18] to his parents turned him in. Listen to
[00:52:21] the fed slop.
[00:52:23] Listen to the obvious lies that he's
[00:52:26] shilling.
[00:52:29] And this is where we get to the gun
[00:52:33] and to his parents turning him in.
[00:52:35] Apparently I have no [ __ ] clue what
[00:52:37] is up with this part of the story.
[00:52:40] I do not know what's up with this part
[00:52:42] of the story. I don't even have a good
[00:52:44] theory for how
[00:52:48] this all adds up
[00:52:50] because there is a blatant
[00:52:53] falsehood
[00:52:54] in the charging documents. So, not the
[00:52:57] affidavit of probable cause, but the
[00:53:00] charging documents,
[00:53:03] which is a 10-page document. And on page
[00:53:08] seven,
[00:53:11] let me line it up here for you.
[00:53:20] Wonder if I can put these away. Yeah.
[00:53:25] So,
[00:53:28] on page seven, it says, "Robinson's
[00:53:31] father reported that when his wife
[00:53:33] showed him the surveillance image of the
[00:53:35] suspected shooter in the news, he agreed
[00:53:37] that it looked like their son."
[00:53:41] We can argue about how clear those
[00:53:43] photos were, but that's not my point. He
[00:53:45] also believed that the rifle that police
[00:53:47] suspected the shooter used matched a
[00:53:50] rifle that was given to his son as a
[00:53:52] gift.
[00:53:54] As a result, Robinson's father contacted
[00:53:57] his son and asked him to send a photo of
[00:53:58] the rifle.
[00:54:05] This is the only photo of the rifle that
[00:54:07] has ever been released.
[00:54:11] And this is not the rifle.
[00:54:16] And you actually know that just from
[00:54:18] this photo. You would know that before
[00:54:21] the New York Post confirmed that this
[00:54:23] was just a stock photo that they put in
[00:54:26] place because they didn't have a real
[00:54:27] photo of the rifle
[00:54:31] because this rifle obviously has a
[00:54:33] composite stock made out of some sort of
[00:54:35] like plastic polymer. It's obviously not
[00:54:37] a World War I era relic.
[00:54:41] Duh.
[00:54:43] And the optic is on kind of weird and
[00:54:45] people had a bunch of questions about
[00:54:46] that and Lord knows why it's like that.
[00:54:48] It was just a random photo of a random
[00:54:51] mouser
[00:54:53] like the one that Tyler allegedly used.
[00:54:57] Like the one that was a handme-down, a
[00:55:00] family heirloom to perfectly connect
[00:55:03] this exact person to the scene of the
[00:55:05] crime, which in psy land is a really
[00:55:08] freaking good thing to have
[00:55:11] as long as it matches the shot.
[00:55:15] Um,
[00:55:18] and listen,
[00:55:20] are we going to come back to it later?
[00:55:25] Yeah, we'll come back to it a little
[00:55:26] later.
[00:55:30] But Jack wants you to know about how his
[00:55:32] parents turned him in. And I have a lot
[00:55:34] of questions about how his parents
[00:55:36] turned him in, how they even knew that
[00:55:37] he was the shooter. Um,
[00:55:43] and I genuinely don't know because
[00:55:44] they're in the courtroom with Tyler when
[00:55:47] Tyler's going into the courtroom.
[00:55:50] And the court trial is going to start in
[00:55:52] January and we're going to see what
[00:55:53] happens
[00:55:55] and I have no idea how it's going to
[00:55:56] play out. But now, let's take a quick
[00:55:59] detour to the courtroom to talk about
[00:56:03] apparently the fact that we're going to
[00:56:06] get to watch it televised, I believe.
[00:56:09] hopefully. So, here's the judge.
[00:56:11] >> First, that the transmission cannot
[00:56:14] begin until court is in session and must
[00:56:16] end uh before as a court ends the
[00:56:19] session and cannot be filmed before or
[00:56:20] after uh the filming of as previously
[00:56:24] stated in the decor EMC must be followed
[00:56:26] to the letter. The sanction uh for today
[00:56:28] uh is that this camera will be relocated
[00:56:31] away from the fence table to uh to where
[00:56:34] the baleiff is, Mr. U where Jeff is
[00:56:36] standing over here. So, they had first
[00:56:39] they had all gotten into court, spent
[00:56:41] like two or three minutes in court, and
[00:56:43] then the judge had been like, "Okay, now
[00:56:44] everybody leave the court. We're going
[00:56:45] to have a secret hearing in here for a
[00:56:47] little bit. We'll invite you back in
[00:56:48] later." Everybody left the court for
[00:56:50] like 2 hours plus. Then they all came
[00:56:52] back in, and we'll get to what that was
[00:56:53] all about in a second. Then they all
[00:56:55] came back in and then immediately there
[00:56:57] was a motion brought by, I believe,
[00:56:59] Tyler's team, the defense, saying,
[00:57:00] "Objection. Your honor, these cameras,
[00:57:02] they're right up in my boy's business.
[00:57:04] They're like, they're filming our camera
[00:57:06] screen or our computer screens. They're
[00:57:08] filming Tyler's shackles. That was
[00:57:10] agreed wouldn't happen. They're actually
[00:57:12] overhearing our private conversations.
[00:57:14] It's a big issue. And the judge was
[00:57:16] like, "Fair, that's a big issue. I told
[00:57:18] them not to do that. We're going to
[00:57:19] relocate the camera." And no more funny
[00:57:21] business. You got to follow the rules or
[00:57:23] I'll kick the cameras out. But he ruled
[00:57:25] that he won't kick the cameras out.
[00:57:26] >> I want to immediately address any
[00:57:28] possible transmission of shackles as
[00:57:30] previously stated by council.
[00:57:31] >> I don't know why the shackles are such a
[00:57:32] big deal. remove the possibility of
[00:57:34] capture of screens of the computers at
[00:57:36] defense council's table as well. In
[00:57:38] addition, if there is further violations
[00:57:40] of the standing to quorum order, this
[00:57:41] court does have the right and will
[00:57:43] exercise termination of broadcast of
[00:57:45] these proceedings. And and I I simply
[00:57:47] want to put all parties on notice to the
[00:57:49] press to all parties that this court
[00:57:51] takes this very seriously. While the
[00:57:52] court believes in openness and
[00:57:54] transparency, it needs to be balanced
[00:57:55] with the constitutional rights of all
[00:57:57] parties in this case. As such, we will
[00:57:59] take a brief recess to allow the
[00:58:01] relocation of the camera and to the
[00:58:03] place indicated by the baiff and then we
[00:58:04] will resume uh these court proceedings.
[00:58:06] Uh I'm anticipating this take perhaps
[00:58:08] five minutes.
[00:58:09] >> All right. And then we'll come back on
[00:58:11] the record and handle the remaining of
[00:58:12] this hearing. I appreciate the patience
[00:58:13] of parties as we move forward. We are
[00:58:16] >> I believe that he says somewhere else um
[00:58:18] he implies somewhere else that it will
[00:58:21] continue, but it's being misconstrued.
[00:58:23] um in there his words sort of say the
[00:58:27] film the filming will be allowed to
[00:58:28] continue for this hearing. He he's
[00:58:30] talking about this particular day's
[00:58:32] hearing. He's not yet ruled on whether
[00:58:34] the cameras will be allowed in back in J
[00:58:36] like in January and going forwards. But
[00:58:39] we would assume that that is the case
[00:58:41] because my understanding which is
[00:58:43] limited is that Utah has an open
[00:58:46] courtroom policy. It's an open state
[00:58:49] where generally these things are filmed
[00:58:51] um and the courtrooms are open and we're
[00:58:53] going to check in with more of an expert
[00:58:55] opinion here in a second um to get a
[00:58:57] little summary of what happened because
[00:58:59] he was there at the court get into that
[00:59:01] >> and he then consults a legal expert at
[00:59:03] the end of this that we're going to skip
[00:59:04] ahead to um really quickly. Let me peep
[00:59:08] my time stamps here.
[00:59:12] Um 135. Oh, boom. Right there. and you
[00:59:17] don't get to listen, you're like,
[00:59:18] >> "So, this is Brian Eton. Um, shout out
[00:59:20] to Brian Etton. Seems like a great
[00:59:21] journalist. I've never seen his work
[00:59:22] before, but I'm going to be following
[00:59:24] him now." If you want updates on the
[00:59:26] Tyler Robinson court cases, I suggest
[00:59:28] that you follow him, too, because he's
[00:59:30] clearly there on the scene and I think
[00:59:32] he intends to be there on the scene for
[00:59:34] the entire case.
[00:59:36] >> Wait, why? And what's going on? So, some
[00:59:38] theories on what that may have been
[00:59:38] about involving Tyler Robinson. I'm
[00:59:39] going to get into that in a little bit,
[00:59:40] but let me just kind of walk you through
[00:59:41] the day. Um, this was the first time
[00:59:43] that we have seen Tyler Robinson in
[00:59:45] person. uh the man accused of
[00:59:46] assassinating Charlie Kirk. I've covered
[00:59:48] the other hearings and the other times
[00:59:50] they were virtual. He was in a uh
[00:59:52] suicide vest, you remember, and they was
[00:59:54] like on this grainy video, like almost
[00:59:55] like Zoom video from the jail. So, today
[00:59:57] was the first time that we were actually
[00:59:58] able to see him for ourselves. Uh and he
[01:00:00] was brought here from the jail to the
[01:00:02] courthouse in downtown Provo. Security.
[01:00:05] I have again I've covered a ton of
[01:00:07] high-profile cases. I have never
[01:00:09] >> This is the part that we're going to
[01:00:10] stick here for is it's in the security
[01:00:12] is interesting. [snorts] Um because we
[01:00:14] don't want this kid to get Lee Harvey
[01:00:16] Oswalded. Okay.
[01:00:19] >> Ever seen security like what I saw here
[01:00:22] um surrounding Tyler Robinson. And I had
[01:00:24] interviewed the sheriff and under
[01:00:25] sheriff I think it's been like a month
[01:00:26] or two ago and they told me like we're
[01:00:28] not taking any chances. And man they did
[01:00:29] not take any chances. I mean they had um
[01:00:31] snipers up on the roof which I got a
[01:00:33] couple of photos of all on different
[01:00:34] sides of the courthouse. When t they
[01:00:36] closed down the roads around the
[01:00:37] courthouse. Uh when Tyler Robinson
[01:00:39] arrived, he was in this like convoy of
[01:00:42] police vehicles, including a Humvey.
[01:00:44] >> It looks like they're ready to fend off
[01:00:45] a MSAD hit squad, honestly. Like just
[01:00:48] making a joke, but it looks like they're
[01:00:51] ready to fend off like a MSAD hit squad.
[01:00:55] They're not like who It's not to protect
[01:00:58] him from like some lone vigilante
[01:01:01] right-winger. It's not why you give them
[01:01:03] that level of security.
[01:01:06] So, it's good to see assuming that the
[01:01:08] threat, the call doesn't come from
[01:01:10] inside the house.
[01:01:12] >> Um, that, you know, you could see coming
[01:01:14] from a mile away. There were drones in
[01:01:15] the air. There was a plane in the air
[01:01:16] that was circling the courthouse. Uh,
[01:01:18] and they brought him in through an
[01:01:19] underground entrance that they had
[01:01:21] blocked off with like black tarps so
[01:01:23] that you couldn't even see that area.
[01:01:24] Um, and so that's how he got to the
[01:01:27] courthouse. Um, I went upstairs uh to
[01:01:30] >> Okay, so very secure courthouse
[01:01:33] apparently.
[01:01:35] Yeah, the chat has some funny opinions
[01:01:36] about the security. Um, we're going to
[01:01:38] jump ahead to where he consults a legal
[01:01:40] expert um about a couple of the aspects
[01:01:42] of this and in particular the closed
[01:01:45] section of the hearing.
[01:01:47] >> Um, heavy on them.
[01:01:48] >> So, I'm joined now by Clayton Sims, a
[01:01:50] defense attorney here in Utah. First of
[01:01:52] all, Clayton, I wanted to ask you there.
[01:01:54] It was kind of surprising. They brought
[01:01:55] us into the courtroom uh and then they
[01:01:58] we were there for 2 minutes and then
[01:02:00] they said all the media and the public
[01:02:01] has to leave. We're going to have this
[01:02:02] closed hearing right off the bat that
[01:02:04] has to do with some kind of transcript
[01:02:06] from October. They didn't give any
[01:02:08] details and then that went on. We were
[01:02:09] all in the hallway for two hours. It was
[01:02:11] it was a long time. What do you think
[01:02:12] that was?
[01:02:13] >> Yes, we don't know. Uh uh but we can
[01:02:16] speculate that it has something to do
[01:02:17] with his first appearance where he was
[01:02:19] in a suicide vest. So, it's likely based
[01:02:21] upon his appearance that they were
[01:02:23] discussing some type of uh jail security
[01:02:26] issues. Uh it's obviously he's um a
[01:02:29] high-risk um inmate. Uh and they may not
[01:02:32] want to talk about things publicly. Uh
[01:02:34] his his psychological sort of
[01:02:36] background. Was he suicidal? Is he still
[01:02:39] suicidal? And what security measures
[01:02:40] they have at the jail? How are
[01:02:43] >> So what they're saying is that there was
[01:02:45] a transcript from October that had been
[01:02:48] sealed and they needed to do some
[01:02:50] discussion in the courtroom during this
[01:02:52] hearing about that transcript and
[01:02:54] whether or not to unseal it. and they're
[01:02:56] talking about how it would be logical to
[01:02:59] assume that the transcript that's sealed
[01:03:01] is discussion of his security within the
[01:03:04] jail and and maybe they don't want to
[01:03:06] give away secrets about how the security
[01:03:08] within the jail works and possibly Tyler
[01:03:11] Robinson's mental state if he had been
[01:03:12] suicidal at one time is maybe they would
[01:03:14] prejudice the jury or the court uh to
[01:03:17] unseal that transcript in talking about
[01:03:20] his previous mental state or something
[01:03:21] like that is sort of the cons the way
[01:03:23] that this um expert sort of frames
[01:03:26] And it makes a lot of sense and it's not
[01:03:27] very significant. It doesn't really
[01:03:28] matter for us going forwards. I don't
[01:03:30] believe
[01:03:32] >> additional security and security where
[01:03:34] he was the only inmate transport looks
[01:03:36] like SWAT in the back. And so under the
[01:03:39] order is difficult from the beginning.
[01:03:41] Um and shackles. Um
[01:03:44] >> so this is where we get to the
[01:03:46] >> to their client to
[01:03:47] >> Kyler Robinson smiling with his
[01:03:49] attorney. Um now the smirk you know to
[01:03:53] >> documents items u that and and not all
[01:03:56] of them have been turned over. Only
[01:03:57] 10,000 or no only 7,000 of those items
[01:04:00] have been turned over. So there's a lot
[01:04:01] of information. In fact the prosecution
[01:04:03] talked about a full-time parallegal
[01:04:05] whose responsibility is gathering up the
[01:04:08] discovery, gathering up video, gathering
[01:04:10] up police reports, gathering up evidence
[01:04:11] and and then turning that over to the
[01:04:13] defense side. So there's a lot of
[01:04:15] material there and there's a lot of
[01:04:16] material that hasn't been disclosed yet.
[01:04:17] the defense attorney said, "Hey, we're
[01:04:19] waiting on things." If you're if you're
[01:04:22] asking for the death penalty, if you're
[01:04:24] stating publicly that we want to put
[01:04:25] this person to death, and at the same
[01:04:27] time, you're saying, "Yes, but we
[01:04:28] haven't given you all the materials."
[01:04:29] >> Right?
[01:04:29] >> Those two those two things don't work.
[01:04:31] They're mutually exclusive. They're
[01:04:32] inconsistent. Uh if you're going to seek
[01:04:34] the death penalty, you need to honor
[01:04:36] your discovery obligations and provide
[01:04:38] everything that you have.
[01:04:40] >> So, there's a lot still to come out.
[01:04:43] There's a lot that we are theoretically
[01:04:45] still going to learn.
[01:04:47] And it's going to be a [ __ ] show. It's
[01:04:49] going to be a [ __ ] show on all sides.
[01:04:51] There's going to be narrative control um
[01:04:54] from at least one side [laughter]
[01:04:57] and we're going to do our best to cover
[01:04:59] it as it goes. Um we are just getting
[01:05:02] warmed up here and already the internet
[01:05:05] is a fed slop cess poolool. But before
[01:05:08] we get back to the cesspool and some of
[01:05:09] the more fun and funny parts of our show
[01:05:11] tonight, I'd be remiss not to throw in a
[01:05:14] brief spot for our new buyer app that
[01:05:16] just came out. You may have heard, we're
[01:05:18] only going to talk about it for one
[01:05:19] second here, but man, I'm freaking proud
[01:05:22] of the buyer app. Um, over the weekend,
[01:05:24] I turned my whole set into a little
[01:05:26] grocery store and we scanned a whole
[01:05:27] bunch of products and showed how the
[01:05:28] buyer app works. Um, on launch day, uh,
[01:05:32] we hit number one in health and fitness
[01:05:35] on the app store.
[01:05:37] freaking stoked. And it is available on
[01:05:40] iOS and Google Play now. So go ahead and
[01:05:42] download it. It'll help you uncover and
[01:05:44] unravel who actually owns all the
[01:05:45] products in the grocery store. Who's
[01:05:46] really selling you your frescas and your
[01:05:49] Waterloos and cat food, dog food,
[01:05:52] tampons, shampoo, anything with a
[01:05:54] barcode in the grocery store. Buyer will
[01:05:56] help you figure out who really owns it
[01:05:58] and help you just make more informed
[01:05:59] purchasing decisions. um free version
[01:06:02] will tell you everything you need to
[01:06:03] know and there is a $5 upgrade if you
[01:06:04] want the all of the features um to get
[01:06:07] the full information and support the
[01:06:10] project. Uh, but
[01:06:13] the whole point of it is to help you
[01:06:16] vote with your dollar. Because as I've
[01:06:18] elucidated many times, as my whole
[01:06:20] platform was really built on, the
[01:06:22] corporate control that the corporate
[01:06:25] club exerts upon our nation and upon the
[01:06:28] world is largely because we're all
[01:06:30] ignorant to how they do it. And if you
[01:06:32] start taking more of your money to
[01:06:33] family and founder owned businesses,
[01:06:36] you start taking that corporate control
[01:06:37] away from them. You start taking those
[01:06:39] dollars away from them. you start taking
[01:06:40] their bottom line away from them and you
[01:06:42] force them to change in the process. So
[01:06:44] very proud of buyer. Go hit it up on the
[01:06:47] app store. Uh if you like it, drop a
[01:06:49] solid review for us. Really appreciate
[01:06:50] it. And now
[01:06:54] let's get back to the Fed slop.
[01:06:58] Let's get back to Fedamania
[01:07:04] with a brief clip from Candace Owens
[01:07:06] today.
[01:07:08] Great screenshot.
[01:07:10] >> But I am, who am I? I'm so sorry, Blood.
[01:07:13] I don't explain it to us. But I don't
[01:07:15] understand how if they just released a
[01:07:17] photo, a video of him taking the shot
[01:07:20] because there's there's video of that.
[01:07:22] How would
[01:07:24] uh that ruin their case? How would that
[01:07:26] not support their case actually
[01:07:29] and also support their case with the
[01:07:32] public? Like that would be the first
[01:07:33] thing I would do rather than uh try to
[01:07:36] deploy this this propaganda effort. You
[01:07:39] could just present something solid like
[01:07:41] some
[01:07:41] >> right. I presume that they have the
[01:07:45] video of Tyler Robinson allegedly taking
[01:07:49] this shot. [clears throat] And I know
[01:07:50] that because I visited the campus as I'm
[01:07:53] sure you guys mostly know. And I went
[01:07:56] and looked with my own two eyes at this
[01:07:58] security camera that is positioned right
[01:08:00] here on the corner of this building that
[01:08:02] is pointing squarely at the roof from
[01:08:05] which the shot was taken. Right over
[01:08:07] there. Camera here, roof position there.
[01:08:12] And this is the camera which published
[01:08:13] the video of the suspect running across
[01:08:15] the roof which they suspiciously cut
[01:08:19] right after the shot was taken instead
[01:08:21] of showing the shot being taken. And I
[01:08:23] think a lot of us, including a lot of
[01:08:25] the most expert military men, special
[01:08:27] operators, right when they saw the shot,
[01:08:29] before we even knew where it had
[01:08:31] officially been taken from, a lot of
[01:08:33] them did not think that this was the
[01:08:36] kind of location that actually lined up
[01:08:38] with the wound that we saw. Rob O'Neal
[01:08:41] who famously
[01:08:43] killed Osama bin Laden.
[01:08:47] He initially came out and I think still
[01:08:49] to this day came out and said that that
[01:08:51] looked like an exit wound to him, not an
[01:08:53] entrance wound. I don't know what to
[01:08:54] make of that. I don't know which one it
[01:08:55] is, but a number of ballistic experts
[01:08:57] and special forces people seem to agree
[01:08:59] with him. Other people seem to assert
[01:09:03] that if the wound had been caused from a
[01:09:05] shot at this angle that the actual angle
[01:09:08] and pitch wouldn't have had it hit his
[01:09:10] spine based on where it appeared on his
[01:09:12] neck. And all of that is secondary in my
[01:09:15] opinion to the fact that a 306 has way
[01:09:18] too much power to cause the wound that
[01:09:20] we saw live well
[01:09:23] recorded on camera.
[01:09:26] And now the internet has blown up
[01:09:29] because
[01:09:33] not exclusively because of me but but as
[01:09:35] I started proddding Nick Fuentes
[01:09:39] groper king Nick Fuentes about his
[01:09:42] apparent pariting of the fed slop
[01:09:43] narrative here
[01:09:45] that blew up into a huge conversation
[01:09:48] both around the bullet and the shot and
[01:09:50] the rifle as well as around Nick Fuentes
[01:09:52] and what the [ __ ] is going on with him
[01:09:55] and it's been a great time. Nick, please
[01:09:57] keep talking [ __ ] It's great content.
[01:09:59] It's a ton of fun to make. I I welcome
[01:10:02] your insults and slop.
[01:10:07] But then Candace started picking it back
[01:10:08] up and other people around the internet
[01:10:10] started talking about it more and we got
[01:10:12] a title wave of accounts coming out of
[01:10:16] the woodwork to dispel this narrative
[01:10:18] and to basically just die on the hill of
[01:10:21] it's not that crazy to believe that a
[01:10:24] 306 is lodged in his neck that it hit
[01:10:26] him in the neck and then turned at
[01:10:28] nearly 90 degrees and went downwards
[01:10:30] into his body. That's very normal.
[01:10:34] Very normal. And one of the most
[01:10:36] interesting accounts to do it is this
[01:10:37] Phoenix ammunition guy. And we're not
[01:10:38] going to belabor the point, but he's
[01:10:41] just tweeting like it's his full-time
[01:10:42] job all of a sudden and just going back
[01:10:45] and forth and back and forth and back
[01:10:46] and forth and continuously tweeting at
[01:10:48] people. Um, presenting a lot of
[01:10:50] complexity and a lot of uh I make
[01:10:52] bullets, I make bullets, I make bullets.
[01:10:54] And I showed in my video last time how
[01:10:56] his LinkedIn shows that he was his
[01:10:58] resume is not the kind of resume that
[01:11:01] the special operators have, that the
[01:11:04] Navy Seals have, that the combat
[01:11:06] veterans have that are calling this
[01:11:08] [ __ ] His resume is sort of like
[01:11:10] office jobs before he started this
[01:11:12] ammunition company.
[01:11:14] And then he's getting into it with
[01:11:15] people like Chris Martinson who actually
[01:11:16] ran tests who actually deployed uh 38
[01:11:20] different shots that he filmed that he
[01:11:22] very carefully scientifically documented
[01:11:24] as best as he could shooting through
[01:11:27] boneless pork shoulders and bone in pork
[01:11:29] shoulders and Phoenix always coming back
[01:11:32] with more more complexity basically to
[01:11:35] the point of well if you don't shoot
[01:11:37] someone a that's alive in the neck then
[01:11:40] it's not really a genuine test. So just
[01:11:43] shut up about your test. We don't want
[01:11:44] to hear about your test cuz you're not
[01:11:46] shooting living people in the neck.
[01:11:49] Despite offering Valhalla VFTs footage
[01:11:52] of shooting through steel plates,
[01:11:54] shooting through beef femurss.
[01:11:57] We even had one guy that shot a
[01:11:58] ballistic plate to uh kind of drive the
[01:12:03] point home, so to speak.
[01:12:05] And now people are drawing lines on
[01:12:07] photos again,
[01:12:10] forgetting the fact that we are told
[01:12:12] that it hit his C2
[01:12:15] behind his face, not that it hit his T1.
[01:12:19] And we're not going to get into all the
[01:12:20] specifics, but
[01:12:24] we're in this awkward position where to
[01:12:26] really remind you of how ridiculous this
[01:12:29] is, I would need to show the unedited,
[01:12:31] uncensored video of Charlie being shot
[01:12:33] again. And A, I don't want to do that
[01:12:36] without you having the option not to
[01:12:38] watch. And B, YouTube will mess me up if
[01:12:42] I do that. So, I would invite you if you
[01:12:44] are one of the people that still is on
[01:12:46] the fence about this to go back and
[01:12:48] watch the uncensored videos of Charlie
[01:12:50] being shot in the neck
[01:12:53] and then to watch all of the test videos
[01:12:55] of 306 bullets of all different grain
[01:12:57] weights and varieties just obliterating
[01:13:01] gigantic pieces of meat, bone, living
[01:13:05] game, etc.
[01:13:07] and ask yourself if what you're seeing
[01:13:09] lines up with what was filmed on the day
[01:13:12] of Charlie's murder.
[01:13:14] Because I bring this up because
[01:13:16] specifically,
[01:13:19] if the gun ain't the gun,
[01:13:22] then the whole thing falls apart. If the
[01:13:26] gun ain't the gun, then the whole thing
[01:13:29] is a cover up and a whole bunch of
[01:13:31] people are are incriminated.
[01:13:35] It would then be logical to assume that
[01:13:37] at least some of them are intentionally
[01:13:40] lying. I would imagine that a lot of
[01:13:42] them are would be just swept up in the
[01:13:44] wave.
[01:13:48] But it's important not to get so far
[01:13:50] down the path of trying to figure out
[01:13:51] what did happen that we forget where we
[01:13:54] started where everyone at the start
[01:13:58] pretty much agreed that this was [ __ ]
[01:14:00] weird. And it was very similar to the
[01:14:04] Butler, Pennsylvania shooting of Donald
[01:14:06] Trump where no one was buying the lone
[01:14:09] gunman narrative. Not the right, not the
[01:14:11] left, not [ __ ] no one. The right was
[01:14:14] very quick to realize that that was some
[01:14:16] [ __ ]
[01:14:22] But we're gonna we're gonna play Nick's
[01:14:24] most recent amazing clip before we um
[01:14:30] jump on a little detour here.
[01:14:32] >> You really believe Kirk's neck absorbed
[01:14:33] a 30.06 bullet. Just a simple yes or no
[01:14:35] is fine. [laughter]
[01:14:38] >> First of all, [ __ ] you. You're stupid.
[01:14:40] Stop watching my show tonight. Like
[01:14:43] seriously, unsubscribe and don't watch
[01:14:44] anymore. You hear that guys? [laughter]
[01:14:48] That's what Nick thinks of all of you.
[01:14:50] >> Just a yes or no will do. First of all,
[01:14:52] the nobody's saying that his neck
[01:14:55] absorbed the bullet. What you are saying
[01:14:58] is that there is a mysterious second
[01:15:00] shooter that shot him with another gun
[01:15:04] and some inter agency conspiracy planted
[01:15:07] the wrong gun. Is that what you believe?
[01:15:12] I've said it before and I'll say it
[01:15:14] again.
[01:15:16] Sounds a lot like JFK, huh, Nick?
[01:15:21] You know, the JFK shooting where they
[01:15:24] actually planted the wrong gun on
[01:15:26] accident.
[01:15:28] They were much closer with JFK. It was
[01:15:31] the same type of rifle, but it turned
[01:15:34] out later upon close investigation and
[01:15:37] noticing of details that the gun that
[01:15:40] they planted, seen below here,
[01:15:44] had these strap attachments on the side
[01:15:46] of the rifle.
[01:15:50] So, this upper strap, it wraps up behind
[01:15:52] the rifle and it's attached behind the
[01:15:54] rifle's barrel belly here. And on the
[01:15:57] bottom, it's attached on the side of the
[01:16:00] stock.
[01:16:02] You can see it more clearly in this
[01:16:03] photo here where it attaches on the side
[01:16:06] of the stock and the side of the barrel.
[01:16:09] But the actual rifle that Lee Harvey
[01:16:11] Oswald owned,
[01:16:13] the strap attachments were on the bottom
[01:16:15] of the rifle. And it was also traced to
[01:16:18] the magazine where he purchased it from
[01:16:20] being advertised as having the strap
[01:16:22] attachments on the bottom of the rifle.
[01:16:24] And they got that little detail wrong
[01:16:26] with the rifle that was planted at the
[01:16:28] scene.
[01:16:32] In this case, it was a little different
[01:16:33] because it it apparently I assume it was
[01:16:37] actually Tyler Robinson's rifle, but it
[01:16:40] doesn't seem to match the caliber of the
[01:16:42] round that actually killed Charlie Kirk.
[01:16:46] You know,
[01:16:49] the JFK assassination also gives us
[01:16:51] precedent for
[01:16:53] amazing magical bullets that just seem
[01:16:56] to do bizarre, nearly impossible things
[01:16:59] just right when it's a political
[01:17:01] assassination.
[01:17:03] It's so interesting that bullets
[01:17:05] involved in political assassinations
[01:17:07] just seem to be the exception to the
[01:17:10] norm that do bizarre crazy things and
[01:17:12] you're just supposed to believe that
[01:17:13] that is just it's a miracle.
[01:17:17] It's just a miracle.
[01:17:25] That is what you are supposed to
[01:17:27] believe.
[01:17:29] And it's not the only time that very
[01:17:33] suspect shootings have wound up with
[01:17:35] very suspect
[01:17:38] gun narratives.
[01:17:40] I'll remind you of the Vegas shooting
[01:17:43] in case you had forgotten where there
[01:17:45] was a country music concert being held
[01:17:47] in this parking lot right here. And then
[01:17:51] allegedly a lone gunman busted out the
[01:17:55] window of his hotel room in the Mandalay
[01:17:57] Bay kind of near to the top all the way
[01:18:01] across the street and then he opened
[01:18:03] fire with AR rifles equipped with bump
[01:18:07] stocks
[01:18:10] and killed an incredibly tragic number
[01:18:14] of people with some bullet trajectories
[01:18:17] that did not make any sense.
[01:18:20] But if you wanted any more clarity on
[01:18:22] it, you could go to
[01:18:23] vegasshootingmap.com.
[01:18:25] One of the crazy coolest resources
[01:18:28] on the internet as far as I'm concerned
[01:18:30] for deep state research. It's a live map
[01:18:33] with all the sources live posted from
[01:18:35] 911 calls that you can actually listen
[01:18:37] to to video with timestamps of the
[01:18:40] various gunshot sounds you can hear. All
[01:18:43] timestamped, all linked up, autopsy
[01:18:45] reports linked up. So you can actually
[01:18:48] re-ressearch it in its original form for
[01:18:51] yourself, which is wild and it's
[01:18:53] extremely useful if you want to
[01:18:55] understand it. I'm just going to show a
[01:18:57] little bit of the non of things that I
[01:19:00] don't think YouTube will knock me for.
[01:19:03] Listen to the gunfire in this clip and
[01:19:06] try to convince yourself that you're
[01:19:08] listening to an AR with a bump stock.
[01:19:23] How big of a magazine do you think his
[01:19:25] AR has?
[01:19:30] Everyone that was on the scene that
[01:19:31] night, law enforcement people, military
[01:19:34] people, ex- special forces people, they
[01:19:37] all said it sounded like a beltfed
[01:19:38] machine gun.
[01:19:40] Most of them said that there were
[01:19:42] helicopters up and subsequent
[01:19:44] investigations very well confirmed that
[01:19:47] there seemed to be helicopters up in the
[01:19:49] sky and that it seems likely that the
[01:19:50] gunfire was coming from the helicopters,
[01:19:53] not from the Mandalay Bay. There is so
[01:19:55] much more evidence from the Vegas
[01:19:57] shooting that that was what happened.
[01:20:05] >> Guns start to be shown in that one, so
[01:20:06] I'm not going to show it. And one more.
[01:20:19] And again, no no muzzle flash from the
[01:20:21] hotel,
[01:20:23] although there are videos where you can
[01:20:25] see what appears to be muzzle flash
[01:20:26] floating through the sky.
[01:20:40] And then you can also listen to 911
[01:20:42] calls from way down the Las Vegas strip,
[01:20:47] blocks down the strip, reporting gunmen
[01:20:50] running around with weapons out all the
[01:20:52] way down there.
[01:20:54] And the map makes it hard to conceive of
[01:20:56] how far away that is.
[01:20:58] We're talking gunman being reported all
[01:21:02] the way at the end of the strip.
[01:21:05] Despite the fact that allegedly it was a
[01:21:08] single lone gunman in his hotel room and
[01:21:10] he never left the hotel room and he
[01:21:13] ended it all for himself
[01:21:16] like an hour or more before the police
[01:21:18] even showed up at his door. He had a
[01:21:20] room full of ammunition still ready to
[01:21:22] go and he just got bored and checked
[01:21:25] out.
[01:21:26] That's the narrative. That is the
[01:21:28] accepted narrative about the Las Vegas
[01:21:30] shooting.
[01:21:35] So,
[01:21:37] actually, there's plenty of precedent
[01:21:39] for us to be lied to about the gun,
[01:21:42] about the bullet, about how these
[01:21:44] shootings happen, about what the hell is
[01:21:46] going on.
[01:21:49] And we haven't even mentioned how our
[01:21:50] current FBI, this FBI that's pushing
[01:21:52] this Fed narrative, Nick and all the
[01:21:56] rest of you. That's the FBI covering up
[01:21:58] the Epstein files right now, actively
[01:22:01] trying to pretend that Epste didn't
[01:22:04] anyone to anyone.
[01:22:09] And yeah, maybe we should maybe we
[01:22:11] should dive into the Las Vegas shooting
[01:22:13] again at some point here
[01:22:16] because I think we need a reminder
[01:22:19] of just how much precedent there is for
[01:22:22] major political shootings and
[01:22:24] assassinations
[01:22:28] and mass shootings, just regular old
[01:22:30] apparently regular old mass shootings to
[01:22:32] be extremely suspect.
[01:22:36] Okay,
[01:22:39] to add on to the flurry of new details
[01:22:42] coming out, Tucker Carlson went on Theo
[01:22:46] Vaughn this past week
[01:22:49] and had some very important details to
[01:22:51] adding our system beyond this year.
[01:22:54] Like, if you want the system to
[01:22:56] continue, you have to satisfy people
[01:22:58] that the system is real. And if they're
[01:23:00] convinced that it's not real, at some
[01:23:01] point they'll overthrow it. That's just
[01:23:03] going to happen. Okay. Oh, but mom
[01:23:05] Donnie. Yeah. How do you think we got
[01:23:06] Mundan? Or And you think mom Donniey's
[01:23:08] radical? The dude went to Bowden. It
[01:23:10] could be a lot more radical than that.
[01:23:12] And we're going to get that.
[01:23:13] >> They have a good sailing team there.
[01:23:15] [laughter]
[01:23:16] >> Do they?
[01:23:16] >> Yeah.
[01:23:17] >> Bowden.
[01:23:17] >> I thought it was Bowen, but it's not.
[01:23:19] >> No, it's Bowden. Known really for
[01:23:21] sodomy, but also sailing. I didn't know.
[01:23:22] >> Oh, I didn't know that. Huh.
[01:23:23] >> Enthusiastic. Actually, I think they've
[01:23:25] got one of the
[01:23:26] >> top rated varsity sodomy teams in the
[01:23:29] country.
[01:23:29] >> Hard to starboard
[01:23:30] >> Zen users. But anyway, um, here's
[01:23:33] [laughter] what I
[01:23:34] >> There are so many funny little jokes in
[01:23:36] there, but I want to jump ahead to
[01:23:41] >> this piece right here.
[01:23:43] >> That's what I That's what I'm saying.
[01:23:45] It's just it's a human person.
[01:23:46] >> Well, that's what Candace is. So maybe
[01:23:48] So I have said from the beginning, if
[01:23:50] you don't like what Candace Owens is
[01:23:52] saying, why don't you call her and offer
[01:23:55] a more plausible explanation for what
[01:23:58] happened? OH, SHE'S BAD. SHE'S BAD.
[01:24:01] OKAY. I mean, I like her a lot. I don't
[01:24:03] think she's bad, but I love her,
[01:24:05] actually. But let's just stipulate she's
[01:24:07] bad, but why wouldn't you do that?
[01:24:10] >> I I don't agree with some of the stuff
[01:24:11] that she the rabbit hole she goes down,
[01:24:13] but I don't even know.
[01:24:14] >> But I like the fact that she likes to
[01:24:16] dig in the garden, you know? So, it's
[01:24:18] like I like the fact that she's cur
[01:24:20] >> That might be my new favorite quote.
[01:24:23] >> I don't know about all the rabbles she
[01:24:25] goes down, but I like the fact that she
[01:24:26] likes to dig in the garden.
[01:24:30] And yeah, Candace be digging in the
[01:24:31] garden. And sometimes she's pulling
[01:24:33] stuff out that doesn't make a ton of
[01:24:34] sense.
[01:24:36] But damn, do I like that more than Jack
[01:24:39] Pobic
[01:24:41] trust the narrative.
[01:24:43] Roll up your sleeve,
[01:24:46] you [ __ ] idiot. And this really
[01:24:49] interesting detail came out. And again,
[01:24:52] let's remind ourselves of Tucker
[01:24:54] Carlson's deep history with the
[01:24:57] establishment, with Fox News, with his
[01:24:59] dad's involvement in the CIA. Tucker
[01:25:01] grew up around CIA operatives, and his
[01:25:03] sources are very good. And when Tucker
[01:25:05] says something like this, it means a
[01:25:07] lot. Very, very strange. I knew him
[01:25:11] well. He was right at my house right
[01:25:12] before he was killed. So, I feel
[01:25:14] emotional about it still.
[01:25:15] >> Who was Charlie Kirk?
[01:25:16] >> Yep.
[01:25:17] >> Oh, really?
[01:25:17] >> Oh, yeah. And uh and I love his wife and
[01:25:20] know his wife well details, but I know
[01:25:22] that uh recently Candace said that uh
[01:25:26] Egyptian registered aircraft were
[01:25:29] following uh Erica Kirk Charlie's widow
[01:25:32] around for a number of years in
[01:25:34] different places in the world. That's
[01:25:36] one of the weirdest things I've ever
[01:25:37] heard. And I just want to say that that
[01:25:39] is factually true.
[01:25:41] >> That's true. So that's like the one data
[01:25:42] point that I happen to know is true.
[01:25:44] What does that mean? I have literally no
[01:25:46] idea. I can't even guess. But that's
[01:25:48] very very strange.
[01:25:51] >> Yeah, that is very strange.
[01:25:54] And I'm just speculating here.
[01:25:58] But to me, what that means is that
[01:26:00] Tucker asked people within the CIA or
[01:26:03] NSA.
[01:26:04] I would that's what I would assume. and
[01:26:07] that someone within the system with the
[01:26:09] capability to check on the military view
[01:26:13] of those planes, which is far beyond our
[01:26:15] civilian capacity, and they confirmed to
[01:26:18] him that those planes are real, are on
[01:26:20] the radar, so to speak.
[01:26:25] So,
[01:26:29] I don't know what that means,
[01:26:31] but it doesn't mean nothing. And it
[01:26:34] certainly means that I'm going to be
[01:26:35] spending all next week watching planes
[01:26:37] on radars
[01:26:40] and
[01:26:41] getting lost in the the transponder data
[01:26:44] again.
[01:26:47] Um,
[01:26:48] one of the last little updates here, Sam
[01:26:50] Parker also turned up another little
[01:26:54] inconsistency or lie in uh the narrative
[01:26:57] or testimony of Brian Harple where Brian
[01:27:02] Harple um
[01:27:06] >> I I feel bad for the u hospital staff
[01:27:08] because we showed up looking like that
[01:27:10] and and they didn't know we were coming
[01:27:12] uh even though we we had called 911. But
[01:27:15] I don't know what happened that
[01:27:17] >> there are several issues with this
[01:27:19] narrative by Brian Harpell. Number one,
[01:27:21] I filed a grammar request for all the
[01:27:23] 911 calls relating to the death of
[01:27:24] Charlie Kirk on September 10th and the
[01:27:27] shooting at Utah Valley University.
[01:27:30] Utah sent me the audio for 20 calls
[01:27:33] back. 18 of those calls went to Central
[01:27:36] Utah 911 Dispatch, which is the main
[01:27:38] node that handles 911 calls in Utah
[01:27:41] County, where Utah Valley University is
[01:27:44] located. Two calls were routed to Police
[01:27:46] and Fire Dispatch, which is another node
[01:27:48] that also handles overflow 911 calls.
[01:27:52] None of these 20 calls came from Brian
[01:27:55] Harpole or anybody on his security
[01:27:57] staff. That's problem number one. So he
[01:27:59] claims they called 911, but 911 doesn't
[01:28:03] have any record of his call.
[01:28:07] So Sam Parker
[01:28:10] got the records for all the 911 calls
[01:28:13] in that area on that day. And none of
[01:28:16] them
[01:28:18] matched what Brian Harpel described as
[01:28:20] the 911 call that they made allegedly,
[01:28:24] but it would seem that they didn't make.
[01:28:26] So Sam Parker rightly then says that
[01:28:30] well either Utah has lost the call or is
[01:28:33] hiding the call or Brian Harpole is
[01:28:36] lying and the call was never made.
[01:28:39] And that's pretty weird. Why would you
[01:28:42] lie about that if that's what's
[01:28:44] happening? Or why would Utah hide the
[01:28:47] call or lose it? Sort of how they lost
[01:28:50] the footage of Tyler Robinson turning
[01:28:52] himself in.
[01:28:55] What might these calls or video show? Or
[01:28:59] what don't they show? Why are we not not
[01:29:04] even not allowed to see them? Why are
[01:29:05] they not in existence?
[01:29:08] It kind of makes me feel the same way as
[01:29:10] when it we were asking why are they
[01:29:12] paving over the crime scene 5 days after
[01:29:15] the shooting on a Sunday
[01:29:18] in Utah when Sundays are nothing. Ain't
[01:29:23] no one working on a Sunday in Utah
[01:29:26] except after there's a really important
[01:29:28] political assassination and it's really
[01:29:30] important to change out the sod
[01:29:34] >> the person's name
[01:29:37] [clears throat]
[01:29:38] and I already mentioned this. We don't
[01:29:39] need to go into this clip.
[01:29:41] So,
[01:29:46] we're left at
[01:29:49] a funny point now where everything's
[01:29:52] changing
[01:29:54] and [snorts] everything is ramping up
[01:29:56] and everything's getting really gnarly.
[01:30:00] The Fed slop is getting overwhelmingly
[01:30:03] loud,
[01:30:06] overwhelmingly emotional and vitriolic,
[01:30:09] and
[01:30:12] we still have all the same questions.
[01:30:15] In fact, now we have a few more because
[01:30:18] now we have a few lies stacking up on a
[01:30:21] few lies, stacking up on a few lies. We
[01:30:24] have little bits of evidence seeping out
[01:30:25] here and there that seem to undermine
[01:30:28] the credibility of people that are
[01:30:30] claiming to be Charlie's best friends
[01:30:32] and claiming to represent Charlie's true
[01:30:34] ideology.
[01:30:36] And perhaps most concerning of all is we
[01:30:39] have Charlie's widow apparently
[01:30:41] departing strongly from what would have
[01:30:43] seemed to be Charlie's direction at the
[01:30:46] end.
[01:30:49] And I
[01:30:51] hesitate to even think about how dark
[01:30:53] this conspiracy gets if you bring Erica
[01:30:56] into the fold. And so I'm not going to
[01:30:59] speculate on that.
[01:31:02] I'm just going to look at what she says
[01:31:05] and what actually comes out and I'm
[01:31:08] going to let you all think for
[01:31:09] yourselves about what all that might
[01:31:12] mean.
[01:31:14] Because I think the one thing we can all
[01:31:17] agree on is this opening and closing
[01:31:20] sentiment. Because I learned during co I
[01:31:23] learned when they told us that it came
[01:31:25] from a bat in the Himalayas. I learned
[01:31:27] when they told us the vaccine was safe
[01:31:28] and effective. I learned when they told
[01:31:31] us that Ivormectum was horsepaced that
[01:31:34] you better keep asking questions because
[01:31:36] it's the only thing that keeps us free.
[01:31:38] Thank Yeah. Thank you, Charlie.
[01:31:43] You better keep asking questions.
[01:31:47] And as this trial gets underway, it's
[01:31:49] scheduled to resume in January.
[01:31:53] I think we're going to have a lot of
[01:31:54] questions.
[01:31:58] And maybe we'll get a bunch of answers
[01:31:59] that will be sufficient.
[01:32:02] Maybe
[01:32:05] maybe the autopsy will make it make
[01:32:09] sense.
[01:32:12] Maybe we'll finally see Mikey McCoy's
[01:32:14] phone logs.
[01:32:17] Maybe there will be some explanation for
[01:32:19] the Egyptian planes.
[01:32:24] I don't know.
[01:32:27] But
[01:32:30] I definitely am not going to trust the
[01:32:32] government just because they're the
[01:32:33] government. And I'm definitely not going
[01:32:34] to trust the Fed slop just cuz a bunch
[01:32:37] of influencers that are also Zionists
[01:32:41] scream at me really really loud and call
[01:32:44] me mean names and make lots of little
[01:32:46] memes to try to make fun of me.
[01:32:51] And in all of this, the backdrop to all
[01:32:54] of this
[01:32:56] is that Israel has been ramping up its
[01:32:58] propaganda budget incrementally more and
[01:33:01] more and more every single month. It
[01:33:03] seems they're up to almost a billion
[01:33:06] dollars of public relations spending for
[01:33:09] next year.
[01:33:11] They recently multiplied their current
[01:33:13] propaganda budget times 20.
[01:33:16] And when you look at the landscape on X,
[01:33:18] the default discussion platform of our
[01:33:22] day,
[01:33:23] you can watch the vitriol increase and
[01:33:26] you can watch the chillery increase and
[01:33:29] you can watch the Fed slop getting
[01:33:31] pumped harder and harder and harder by
[01:33:34] the all the people you'd expect and by a
[01:33:37] lot of people that you might not expect.
[01:33:40] And so just be very thoughtful when
[01:33:43] you're in the information space right
[01:33:45] now because the information space is the
[01:33:47] first frontline battlefield of modern
[01:33:51] warfare.
[01:33:53] And so I've been thinking about this
[01:33:54] thought a lot over the last few weeks
[01:33:58] about what is the actual role of a
[01:34:00] journalist today? Like am I even really
[01:34:02] a journalist? Are any of us really like
[01:34:03] what is a journalist today? Is it a
[01:34:06] journalist's job to stay out of all of
[01:34:08] that mess and to just write little
[01:34:10] articles for mainstream news or to just
[01:34:12] go out with a camera and hold the live
[01:34:14] camera for mainstream news or whatever
[01:34:16] it is? Or are journalists also the
[01:34:20] people that are in the fray of combat,
[01:34:23] for lack of a better term, in this
[01:34:26] public square that we call X right now?
[01:34:30] And I don't know how you want to define
[01:34:32] journalism, but one thing I do know is
[01:34:34] that today
[01:34:38] groups like Israel and their ad spend,
[01:34:42] for lack of a better term, have made it
[01:34:44] impossible for journalists to be
[01:34:46] effective in the space without waiting
[01:34:48] into the mud.
[01:34:50] Because if you're going to stay out of
[01:34:52] the mud and just write your little
[01:34:53] articles, you're never going to change
[01:34:55] the game. You're not going to make an
[01:34:57] effect because no one's going to hear
[01:34:58] you because everyone is screaming so
[01:35:00] loud, manipulating emotionally, telling
[01:35:03] lies willy-nilly,
[01:35:05] promoting propaganda without disclosing
[01:35:07] it, all sorts of stuff. And if you wait
[01:35:10] into it, you risk getting sucked down
[01:35:12] the rabbit hole into the emotional back
[01:35:16] and forths and into the name calling and
[01:35:19] all the rest of it, the character
[01:35:20] assassinations, etc.
[01:35:22] And so there's some balancing line
[01:35:24] between the two where modern journalists
[01:35:26] are forced to choose what type of
[01:35:28] platform they're going to build and what
[01:35:30] type of output they're going to make in
[01:35:33] order to balance making a big difference
[01:35:35] with being factually clean and pure.
[01:35:39] And the best journalists ride the line
[01:35:41] very well and manage to do both. But
[01:35:45] ultimately that is a moving target that
[01:35:48] gets more and more elusive every day.
[01:35:50] So, we do our best. Um, I don't know as
[01:35:54] I consider myself a journalist. Uh, I'm
[01:35:56] certainly in the field, but you you
[01:35:58] think what you want. Listen to who you
[01:36:00] want and ultimately think for yourself
[01:36:03] and come up with your own conclusions
[01:36:04] and do your own research because yeah,
[01:36:07] when we're digging in the garden, chat,
[01:36:08] when when we're digging in the garden,
[01:36:11] inevitably we're going to get some dirt
[01:36:13] on us. And inevitably, we're going to
[01:36:14] dig up some old bones that don't have
[01:36:16] anything to do with this case. But when
[01:36:19] the case is this important,
[01:36:22] personally, I feel like it's better to
[01:36:25] dig it all up than to just sit there and
[01:36:28] watch the Fed put new grass in over top
[01:36:30] of the crime scene.
[01:36:33] So, with that, we're going to close out
[01:36:36] the show. We're going to come back and
[01:36:38] do a couple of quick super chats before
[01:36:40] we head on off to catch Nate with what I
[01:36:43] think is going to be a very fun show
[01:36:45] over on Valhalla VFT. So stick around
[01:36:47] after this and we will [clears throat]
[01:36:51] bring it back in for some super chats,
[01:36:54] but I want to close one more time with a
[01:36:57] quick reminder that if you love my work
[01:36:59] and if you want to support what I do or
[01:37:00] you want to support family and founder
[01:37:02] owned businesses, go and download the
[01:37:04] buyer app on Google Play or on the app
[01:37:05] store and start scanning things and
[01:37:08] start learning who actually owns
[01:37:10] everything in the grocery store and
[01:37:11] where your money is really going when
[01:37:13] you're buying things.
[01:37:16] You might be a little surprised. And if
[01:37:18] you're not surprised,
[01:37:21] then you're doing it right. Because I
[01:37:25] have to imagine that the people watching
[01:37:26] this program are probably the ones that
[01:37:28] are most aware of the whole corporate
[01:37:31] control system
[01:37:33] that's, you know, quietly pulling
[01:37:34] strings
[01:37:36] all over our nation, all over our world.
[01:37:41] And with that,
[01:37:44] stick around for super chats.
[01:37:46] and then we'll see you next week.
[01:37:48] >> Conspiracy theories are entering a
[01:37:50] danger.
[01:37:50] >> Information is the [music] oxygen of the
[01:37:53] democracy.
[01:37:53] >> There's so much evidence out there that
[01:37:55] even if less than 1% is true,
[01:37:59] that will be enough to collapse the
[01:38:01] current paradigm and change the whole
[01:38:04] planet.
[01:38:11] Alrighty, fam. Let's see if my super
[01:38:14] chat viewer
[01:38:16] is working.
[01:38:26] Oh,
[01:38:28] it is super not working.
[01:38:35] Even though I thought that we fixed it
[01:38:37] last time.
[01:38:41] Even though I thought that we fixed it
[01:38:43] last time.
[01:38:46] Well, [snorts]
[01:38:47] let me pull it up over here.
[01:38:50] [gasps]
[01:38:50] I'm seeing it on my screen over here now
[01:38:52] where where I was giant on half the
[01:38:54] screen. [snorts]
[01:38:58] And let me pull in some of the homies,
[01:39:00] some of the big ones, some of the big
[01:39:02] dogs.
[01:39:04] [snorts] And then I think what we'll do
[01:39:05] is we'll save a bunch of the supers and
[01:39:08] we'll do a whole follow-up show this
[01:39:11] weekend for chat, for Q&A, and for
[01:39:13] supers.
[01:39:15] But Valhalla VFT dropped in with a $100
[01:39:18] donation. New goated intro. Let's go,
[01:39:21] boys. Yeah, Valhalla VFT for real. That
[01:39:24] is the goated intro without a doubt.
[01:39:26] Shout out to Matt Baker again for the
[01:39:28] awesome intro. I'm gonna have to
[01:39:30] download that clip. I'm gonna have to
[01:39:31] get his permission to use it because
[01:39:32] that was fun. I love it. Um,
[01:39:37] Holly Vig with the 50. Look at the
[01:39:39] awning on Charlie Kirk's tent. The
[01:39:40] letter I and American comeback is in the
[01:39:43] shape of an electrical bolt. Interesting
[01:39:45] symbolism. What say you? It's my
[01:39:46] birthday. A comment would be the best
[01:39:47] present. Baron is fire. Baron is fire. I
[01:39:50] don't know what to make of the
[01:39:51] electrocution angle at this point. I am
[01:39:54] no electrical engineer and I don't
[01:39:55] understand electrical
[01:39:57] uh electrocutions. I didn't even know
[01:39:59] that microphones could electrocute
[01:40:00] people before this conversation came up.
[01:40:02] But personally, my understanding is
[01:40:04] you'd have to have two feet on the
[01:40:05] ground for the electricity to pass
[01:40:07] through you. Um, so my my little brain
[01:40:09] is not yet processing the concept. But I
[01:40:12] do love that people are digging into it.
[01:40:14] And the markings on Charlie's hands,
[01:40:17] though fuzzy, do seem to be something
[01:40:20] that's not blood. Um, so I don't know
[01:40:22] what to make of it all, but I'm watching
[01:40:24] closely.
[01:40:26] Um, Titanium 4K with the 50. I'm X Bear
[01:40:29] Sterns repo trader 2008. Contact for
[01:40:31] verification. Epste was the president of
[01:40:33] Liquid Funding. Yeah, dude. I've done
[01:40:34] reporting on Liquid Funding LLC. Holy
[01:40:37] [ __ ] You can find the video on my
[01:40:38] channel. I am of the suspicion, like
[01:40:41] over 70% suspicion that Jeffrey Epste
[01:40:45] was involved in pulling the pin on the
[01:40:47] grenade that was the 2008 financial
[01:40:49] crisis. He was in position to do it. He
[01:40:52] was selling cos. He had worked at Bear
[01:40:54] Sterns and then he was involved with JP
[01:40:56] Morgan and and his timing of dissolving
[01:40:59] his co factory little LLC shell company
[01:41:03] right before it all went belly up sold
[01:41:06] all of his CDOS's onto the market and
[01:41:08] then bounced and dissolved his company.
[01:41:11] Very suspicious.
[01:41:13] Um I saw another enormous one come in
[01:41:15] that we got to get to before we go.
[01:41:23] Where am I losing it at?
[01:41:27] Where?
[01:41:29] Huh? I saw a 200 come in during the
[01:41:32] show. Um, [snorts] but I'm not seeing it
[01:41:35] now.
[01:41:37] So, I'm gonna have to hunt it down
[01:41:41] somehow and we'll bring it in for the
[01:41:43] next show. If you hit the $200 dono, um,
[01:41:48] apologies if I'm missing it because it's
[01:41:50] not in my list here.
[01:41:53] But I do see the cross says the cross.
[01:41:56] The cross says yes with the big 50. Love
[01:41:59] your content. Have you ever heard of
[01:42:00] content creator probably Alexandria? She
[01:42:02] does an excellent job over covering MK
[01:42:05] Ultra and programming
[01:42:07] and how churches and religious
[01:42:08] institutions have been infiltrated by
[01:42:10] the CIA and FBI.
[01:42:12] I have heard of probably Alexandria and
[01:42:14] she's a really interesting content
[01:42:15] creator that um has like a really like
[01:42:17] kind of lowbudget vibe if I remember
[01:42:19] correctly and is kind of esoteric. Um
[01:42:22] and I remember her stuff being pretty
[01:42:23] interesting back when I was made aware
[01:42:24] of it, but I don't follow along with her
[01:42:26] regularly. Um I only have so much time
[01:42:28] in the day to follow content creators.
[01:42:31] Um
[01:42:33] I'd be curious if she's been making any
[01:42:34] stuff around this story at all. And then
[01:42:37] lastly, uh, I do want to give a shout
[01:42:40] out to our boy Zeb, who dropped dropped
[01:42:43] a dono in the chat as well. Donation for
[01:42:44] your Phoenix Ammo Fund. [laughter]
[01:42:47] Zeb Boyin is hilarious. I love him. He
[01:42:49] is one of our actual ballistics experts
[01:42:52] that has been weighing in from the start
[01:42:54] with a very high level understanding of
[01:42:56] ballistics, not just of making
[01:42:58] ballistics ammo, but of actually how
[01:43:01] ballistics function in the air, in
[01:43:03] bodies, on impact, etc. and Zeb has very
[01:43:07] much laid out the case for why this
[01:43:09] doesn't make sense on multiple layers.
[01:43:11] Um, and he's just a funny dude. So, if
[01:43:14] you don't know about Zeb Boyin and
[01:43:15] Outside the Overton, um, definitely go
[01:43:18] give him a check, go check him out and
[01:43:19] give him a follow.
[01:43:21] And I think
[01:43:24] I think what we're going to do now is
[01:43:26] I'm just going to hop into the chat for
[01:43:28] just a second
[01:43:30] and uh we'll wrap this whole thing up
[01:43:34] here. Yeah, Zeb is based. All lies stem
[01:43:37] from Israel. Here here is a thought
[01:43:39] about that chat that chat message. All
[01:43:41] lies stem from Israel 357 small block.
[01:43:45] Do you ever do the thought experiment in
[01:43:47] your mind of thinking what would my
[01:43:49] social media experience be like
[01:43:53] if overnight tomorrow you woke up and
[01:43:56] suddenly there was no Israeli money
[01:43:58] being spent on information warfare?
[01:44:02] Do you ever think about how much less
[01:44:04] vitriol and
[01:44:08] insanity and backwardsness and
[01:44:10] untruthfulness we would have on social
[01:44:12] media if Israel's propaganda were to
[01:44:14] stop overnight?
[01:44:18] because I
[01:44:20] I can't help but assume based upon all
[01:44:24] that I know from research, from
[01:44:25] articles, from their own published
[01:44:27] statistics, their own words, their own
[01:44:30] postings.
[01:44:34] I can't help but feel like overnight we
[01:44:37] would enter into the golden era of truth
[01:44:40] and the vast majority of just backwards
[01:44:43] land ideas would suddenly no longer be
[01:44:46] posted on the internet.
[01:44:49] Because when you have an entire
[01:44:51] ideology, the most funded political
[01:44:54] ideology on the planet, I might add,
[01:44:59] when that ideology is based on needing
[01:45:02] to present lies as truth and evil as
[01:45:05] good and up as down,
[01:45:09] inherently the whole conversation is
[01:45:11] [ __ ]
[01:45:13] because inherently you have this foreign
[01:45:17] funnel of money just and it's also
[01:45:20] coming from inside the house just
[01:45:23] proflegating and promoting
[01:45:26] madeup [ __ ] backwards land
[01:45:28] narratives whether it's about starving
[01:45:30] children in Gaza or it's about terrorism
[01:45:32] in the Middle East or it's about our own
[01:45:35] domestic policies in America or it's
[01:45:37] about hate speech or it's about freedom
[01:45:40] of speech or it's about what you had for
[01:45:42] dinner or it's about literally anything
[01:45:44] at all
[01:45:47] just over and over in every piece of our
[01:45:49] information space. It's being muddied
[01:45:54] subverted
[01:45:56] by Israeli lies.
[01:46:01] And when you look at the Charlie Kirk
[01:46:05] conversation,
[01:46:06] I think that a lot of the people that
[01:46:08] are weighing in on the side that you
[01:46:11] would say is like the other side from me
[01:46:13] on the Fed narrative side, a lot of them
[01:46:16] I think are genuine people that
[01:46:18] genuinely believe what they're saying. I
[01:46:20] don't think they're all paid by Israel.
[01:46:22] That's not my opinion.
[01:46:25] But the narratives that those mostly
[01:46:28] Zionists
[01:46:30] roll with,
[01:46:32] the base layer of those narratives are
[01:46:35] funded by Israel. The initial consensus
[01:46:38] is funded by Israel and is supported by
[01:46:41] Israel's military bot networks.
[01:46:46] And when there's a false consensus being
[01:46:48] pushed by a military apparatus,
[01:46:51] a lot of innocent people get swept up in
[01:46:53] the hype. Just like happened during CO
[01:46:58] where you push a mass hysteria narrative
[01:47:01] and you get so many people to go along
[01:47:04] with it and to align on it that it looks
[01:47:06] like this is just what we're all doing.
[01:47:09] And human nature has this built-in
[01:47:11] mechanism of wanting to be in the tribe.
[01:47:15] And when it looks like the whole tribe
[01:47:17] is aligned, you don't want to be outside
[01:47:19] the tribe.
[01:47:23] So, let this be my reminder to you.
[01:47:27] You're not alone.
[01:47:29] I think the majority of regular real
[01:47:32] American people and as well as people
[01:47:34] all around the world are over the Israel
[01:47:37] [ __ ] And when it comes to Charlie Kirk
[01:47:39] specifically, I think that the majority
[01:47:41] of regular Americans and probably people
[01:47:43] around the world that have actually
[01:47:44] heard about the case, the majority of
[01:47:47] them are also not entirely buying this
[01:47:49] narrative. And that's coming from polls,
[01:47:52] that's coming from reporting, that's
[01:47:53] coming from general sentiment,
[01:47:55] [clears throat]
[01:47:57] that's coming from just living in the
[01:47:58] information space. There's lots of
[01:47:59] people that are totally with the Fed
[01:48:01] slop narrative.
[01:48:03] But ultimately,
[01:48:06] I see people saying, "Can someone tag
[01:48:08] Ian? Can someone tag? What did
[01:48:09] Wildflower Gypsy just drop in hard in
[01:48:11] here?
[01:48:20] I saw someone mentioning $200 somewhere
[01:48:23] and it's not in my
[01:48:26] Oh, no. It's not in my list of supers.
[01:48:30] Maybe I can just chat scroll it.
[01:48:37] Boom. I picked it out. Wildflower Gypsy.
[01:48:40] There's the huge $200 dono. Awesome. I
[01:48:43] am so grateful that you exist. Thanks
[01:48:45] for turning me on to Nate. Absolutely,
[01:48:48] Wildflower Gypsy. And Wildflower Gypsy,
[01:48:50] you've been along for the ride for quite
[01:48:52] some time. You've been a huge supporter
[01:48:53] and I notice and I appreciate it. Thank
[01:48:55] you. I see it when you repost the stuff.
[01:48:57] I see it when you share it on Instagram
[01:48:59] and stuff like that. Really appreciate
[01:49:00] it. Thank you. Means a lot. Um I don't
[01:49:03] have the time always to acknowledge all
[01:49:05] different people and to acknowledge um
[01:49:07] every single message obviously and
[01:49:09] everything, but I do see a lot of it and
[01:49:11] I do appreciate it. It means a lot. So,
[01:49:13] thank you.
[01:49:14] Thank you. Um,
[01:49:19] cool. So, I grabbed that one. Appreciate
[01:49:22] it. So, now I'm going to save the rest
[01:49:25] of the supers for another show this
[01:49:26] weekend and we'll get into them all.
[01:49:28] We'll have an open discussion. Um, I
[01:49:30] hadn't been planning to do it that way,
[01:49:31] but with my super chatter broken and
[01:49:33] with Nate, I believe, going live right
[01:49:35] now. Um, I think it just makes more
[01:49:38] sense because it's a lot more fun to
[01:49:39] read supers when you guys are on the
[01:49:40] screen when I can have the supers up on
[01:49:42] the screen. And Nate is now live. Um, so
[01:49:46] I'll show you real quick where we're
[01:49:48] going. We have the chat, we have the
[01:49:49] whole stream set up so that when our
[01:49:51] stream is done, we're just going to dump
[01:49:53] straight into Nate's stream and you're
[01:49:54] not going to be disappointed. Nate is
[01:49:56] the man. He is a green beret. So, he is
[01:49:59] extremely experienced and an expert to
[01:50:01] talk about ballistics and about gunshot
[01:50:04] wounds and about all these things that
[01:50:06] Nick Fuentes has been weighing in on
[01:50:08] lately.
[01:50:10] And Nate's political takes are also
[01:50:13] really based and fair and wise. And so,
[01:50:17] I could not um sing Nate's praises
[01:50:19] enough. He's one of the coolest dudes on
[01:50:21] YouTube and he's one of my favorite new
[01:50:23] finds and friends of 2025. So,
[01:50:28] that's all I've got for you tonight.
[01:50:30] Remember to be a good person, be a whole
[01:50:33] person, be a real person, and take good
[01:50:36] care of yourself. Drink water, eat
[01:50:38] healthy food, tell people that you love
[01:50:39] them, get good sleep, and genu generally
[01:50:42] try to improve your own quality of life
[01:50:44] so that that way you can improve your
[01:50:45] own community and then improve your city
[01:50:47] and then improve your whole country
[01:50:49] because America is a nation of
[01:50:51] Americans, right? And wherever you are
[01:50:54] out there in the world,
[01:50:57] you matter. And if you're not at your
[01:51:00] best, your people aren't going to be at
[01:51:02] their best. So, thanks for being here.
[01:51:05] Thanks for watching. Thanks for liking,
[01:51:07] sharing, subscribing. Thanks for
[01:51:08] downloading Buyer and dropping a
[01:51:10] fivestar review for it. Thanks for all
[01:51:12] the support, the supers, the hype, the
[01:51:14] love. It means a lot.
[01:51:17] And with that,
[01:51:19] I will see you this weekend.
[01:51:22] Conspiracy theories [music] are entering
[01:51:24] a danger.
[01:51:25] >> Information is the oxygen of a
[01:51:28] democracy.
[01:51:28] >> There's so much evidence [music] out
[01:51:30] there that even if less than 1% is true,
[01:51:34] that be enough to collapse the current
[01:51:36] paradigm.
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
yt_u4nYsdY6y58
Dataset
youtube
Comments 0