Untitled Document

[00:00:00] This week, Monday, was Marjorie Taylor [00:00:02] Green's final day as a congresswoman for [00:00:04] the state of Georgia. She is leaving a [00:00:06] full year before her term was set to [00:00:08] expire. She has not formally announced [00:00:10] any future political ambitions, but I'm [00:00:13] going to explain why, in my opinion, [00:00:15] she's going to run for president in [00:00:17] 2028. [music] [00:00:35] I'm going to share with you the secret [00:00:37] of US politics that very few people talk [00:00:40] about. [00:00:41] The key to winning an election in the US [00:00:44] is turnout. In a US presidential [00:00:46] election, only 60% of the voting [00:00:49] eligible population will vote. This will [00:00:52] fluctuate every election cycle, but it [00:00:54] typically hovers around 60%. Here's a [00:00:57] chart of elections from 1789 until [00:00:59] today. And you can see that presidential [00:01:01] elections have hovered around 60% [00:01:04] turnout, while midterm elections only [00:01:06] get around 40% turnout. So, in any [00:01:08] presidential election, you are going to [00:01:10] have 40% of Americans who are not [00:01:13] voting. Voting takes a lot of effort. [00:01:16] You have to research the candidates. You [00:01:18] have to learn about really boring [00:01:20] subjects like health care and tax [00:01:22] policy. And people do not have time for [00:01:24] that. They have busy lives. A lot of [00:01:28] people think that politics is corrupt [00:01:29] anyway. So they just do not vote. So the [00:01:33] secret to winning an election in the US [00:01:35] is to be able to tap into this 40% of [00:01:38] potential voters. In the swing states, [00:01:41] you do not even need to increase a [00:01:42] percentage that much to win an election. [00:01:46] No one has been able to do this better [00:01:48] than Donald Trump. This is how he won in [00:01:51] 2016 and in 2024. In both elections, [00:01:55] Donald Trump brought in new voters who [00:01:57] had not voted before. In 2016, very few [00:02:01] people understood this concept. One of [00:02:03] those people was Milo Yiannopoulos. [00:02:06] Listen to this speech that he gave [00:02:08] before the 2016 election. Now, pollsters [00:02:11] will have you believe that the turnout [00:02:13] for this election is going to be similar [00:02:14] to Obama's historic run in in 2008, but [00:02:16] it's not going to happen. Hillary [00:02:18] Clinton cannot raise even a fifth of my [00:02:20] crowds. I sold No, I'm serious. I sold [00:02:23] out a um a 1,200 seater at Louisiana [00:02:27] State University in 48 hours. The same [00:02:30] night she had a rally with 200 people, [00:02:32] at least a hundred of whom were her own [00:02:34] staff. [00:02:36] You have to remember that what Milo was [00:02:38] saying was radical. [00:02:41] In 2016, everyone was predicting that [00:02:44] Hillary Clinton was going to win. And [00:02:46] Milo was going around the country [00:02:48] saying, "There's no way she's going to [00:02:50] win." People made fun of him. People [00:02:53] called him crazy. But what Milo realized [00:02:56] was that there was more people coming to [00:02:58] his speeches than at the Hillary Clinton [00:03:00] rallies. And Milo realized that Trump [00:03:03] was tapping into this 40% of the market [00:03:06] of new voters. [00:03:08] This is important because Milo used to [00:03:11] work for Marjorie Taylor Green. Milo [00:03:14] taught her the secret to US elections. [00:03:18] Last month, Marjorie Taylor Green talked [00:03:20] about leaving Congress on 60 Minutes. [00:03:23] >> A lot of people think you're doing it [00:03:25] and that you in a year or so are going [00:03:27] to run for some other office. I have [00:03:30] zero plans, zero uh desire to run for [00:03:34] president. I would hate the Senate. I'm [00:03:37] not running for governor. But Leslie, it [00:03:39] doesn't matter how many times I say it. [00:03:41] I'll have face tof face conversations [00:03:42] with people and I'll flat out tell them [00:03:44] to their face and they won't believe me [00:03:46] and they're like, "Oh yeah, sure." And [00:03:48] they wink at me and I'm like, "Okay." [00:03:50] Just like I don't know how to make it [00:03:52] more clear. [00:03:53] >> That sounds to me exactly what you would [00:03:55] say if you were secretly running for [00:03:57] president. And before you call me crazy [00:04:00] and leave angry comments, just so you [00:04:03] know, I'm not the only person saying [00:04:05] this. She believes in what she says. She [00:04:10] absolutely believes she is hardline MAGA [00:04:14] coupled to what we used to call Tea [00:04:16] Party. And she believes that. And she [00:04:18] believes it with with with all her [00:04:20] heart. I don't think she's for sale. I [00:04:23] think she's stepping out and I think [00:04:25] she's gonna go show up as a presidential [00:04:27] candidate. [00:04:28] >> People really should not underestimate [00:04:30] Marjorie Taylor Green. She's one of the [00:04:33] biggest fundraisers in the Republican [00:04:35] party. She's a very savvy politician who [00:04:38] always manages to get on the front page [00:04:39] of the news for every major political [00:04:42] issue. If you are pretending that [00:04:45] Marjorie Taylor Green is not a contender [00:04:47] for 2028, [00:04:49] I think you are a fool. Let us look at [00:04:51] the facts. Marjorie Taylor Green [00:04:54] announces that she is leaving Congress [00:04:56] and then she goes on a whirlwind media [00:04:59] tour. She goes on The View, Real Time [00:05:02] with Bill Maher, CNN, and 60 Minutes. [00:05:05] So, let me ask a simple question. If she [00:05:08] was really stepping away from public [00:05:10] life, [00:05:11] why would she do all of these [00:05:12] interviews? [00:05:14] Something does not add up here. Just [00:05:17] from a public relations perspective, a [00:05:19] string of interviews like this does not [00:05:21] happen organically. These are [00:05:24] high-profile spots. Any member of [00:05:26] Congress would kill to have this kind of [00:05:29] media exposure. [00:05:31] Why are these shows giving these [00:05:33] interviews to someone who is leaving [00:05:35] Congress? [00:05:37] It's not easy to book these time slots. [00:05:40] It looks to me like a powerful public [00:05:43] relations firm is working behind the [00:05:45] scenes to get all these interviews. [00:05:48] I think there is someone powerful with a [00:05:51] lot of money behind this. It all looks [00:05:54] too coordinated. [00:05:56] So the question we should be asking is [00:05:58] why is there this coordinated effort to [00:06:01] give Marjorie Taylor Green media [00:06:03] exposure? [00:06:05] I think it is because she's running for [00:06:07] president. The 60 Minutes interview is [00:06:09] especially interesting. This was a [00:06:12] 14-minute segment on the flagship [00:06:14] program for CBS News. Barry Weiss was [00:06:18] recently named as the editor-inchief for [00:06:20] CBS News. That means she has complete [00:06:23] control of what segments get shown on 60 [00:06:26] Minutes. We know this because there was [00:06:29] just a scandal last month where Barry [00:06:31] Weiss pulled a segment about the [00:06:33] Salvador in prison from a 60 Minutes [00:06:35] episode. This has led to allegations [00:06:38] that CBS News is just propaganda. [00:06:41] I believe that there was a reason that [00:06:43] Barry Weiss wanted Marjorie Taylor Green [00:06:45] on 60 Minutes. I've not yet figured out [00:06:48] what that reason is, but mark my words, [00:06:51] there is a reason. One of the things [00:06:53] that Marjorie Taylor Green explicitly [00:06:55] mentions in the interview is that she [00:06:57] does not take donations from the [00:06:58] pro-Israel lobbying group, Apac. Is [00:07:02] there no value in having the United [00:07:05] States Congress reaffirm the fact that [00:07:08] they denounce anti-semitism in the face [00:07:12] of a growing issue, a growing problem? [00:07:15] >> We don't have to get on our knees and [00:07:18] say it over and over again when we get [00:07:20] on our knees. [00:07:21] >> Yes, we do not have to get on our knees. [00:07:23] >> Well, most members of Congress disagree [00:07:26] with you. [00:07:26] >> Well, most members of Congress take [00:07:28] donations from Apac and I don't. On the [00:07:31] one hand, she is emphasizing how she [00:07:33] does not take support from Jewish [00:07:34] donors, but on the other hand, in other [00:07:37] interviews, she's trying to downplay her [00:07:40] other previous Jewish related comments, [00:07:42] like her statement about Jewish space [00:07:44] lasers. [00:07:46] >> And and [applause] I mean, you're famous [00:07:47] for and I don't think you ever said the [00:07:49] words Jewish space lasers. [00:07:51] >> No, I never did. [laughter] [00:07:53] But and I and I never I don't trust the [00:07:55] media ever when I hear something like [00:07:57] that because I know there's always [00:07:59] something more to it. Now when I hear [00:08:01] the more to it, I still might think it's [00:08:03] crazy. I'm be honest with you, but I [00:08:05] don't know. So what is the fuller [00:08:07] version of that that I don't know? What [00:08:09] I just heard Jewish Space Laser and you [00:08:11] never said those words. [00:08:13] >> I never did. [00:08:13] >> Okay. But what were you talking about? I [00:08:15] made a post in 2018 on my Facebook page [00:08:19] and talked about a very interesting new [00:08:22] technology where they were harnessing [00:08:24] the the sun's um [00:08:26] >> they [00:08:27] >> this company [00:08:28] >> no [00:08:29] joking [00:08:34] >> you might get accused if you [00:08:38] >> know the Rothschilds she said come on [00:08:40] >> back then I didn't even know the [00:08:42] Rothschilds were Jewish this was I [00:08:44] didn't know you I was no I didn't I [00:08:47] before politics I I didn't know much of [00:08:50] any of this stuff but I was commenting [00:08:52] on this technology. That's all I was [00:08:54] talking about. [00:08:54] >> I never even said the word Jewish in the [00:08:56] Facebook post. [00:08:57] >> Right. I mean just so you know [00:08:59] Rothschild to a lot of people is almost [00:09:01] synonymous with the word Jewish. [00:09:03] >> Yeah. [00:09:03] >> I had no idea. [00:09:04] >> Right. Well, now we know. [00:09:08] >> So she says she did not know that the [00:09:10] Rothschild family was Jewish. [00:09:13] I do not believe that for a second. Of [00:09:17] course, we cannot go inside her mind to [00:09:19] see what she was actually thinking, but [00:09:21] in my opinion, she is lying. Let me pull [00:09:25] up the Facebook post. Now, I'm not going [00:09:28] to read all of this because it is a very [00:09:30] long rant, but she's talking about the [00:09:32] fires in California. She says, "There [00:09:35] are now over 70 people confirmed dead [00:09:37] and over 1,000 missing." Just putting it [00:09:40] out there from some research I've done [00:09:42] stemming from my curiosity over PG&E [00:09:44] stocks. I find it very interesting that [00:09:47] Roger Kimmel on the board of directors [00:09:49] of PG&E is also vice chairman of [00:09:52] Rosschild Inc. international investment [00:09:54] banking firm. Oddly, there are all these [00:09:57] people who have said they saw what [00:09:59] looked like lasers or blue beams of [00:10:01] light causing the fires and pictures and [00:10:04] videos. I don't know anything about [00:10:05] that, but I do find it really curious. P [00:10:08] Genie's partnership with Solarin on [00:10:11] space solar generators starting in 2009. [00:10:14] What would that look like anyway? A [00:10:16] laser beam or light beam coming down to [00:10:19] Earth, I guess. Could that cause a fire? [00:10:21] Hm. I don't know. I hope not. That [00:10:24] wouldn't look so good for PG&E, [00:10:26] Rothschild, Inc. So, or Jerry Brown, who [00:10:30] sure does seem fond of PG&E. But what do [00:10:33] I know? I just like to read a lot. Hands [00:10:36] up emoji. [00:10:38] So, what do you think? Do you believe [00:10:41] her that she had no idea that the [00:10:43] Rothschild family was Jewish? [00:10:46] I think she knew exactly what she was [00:10:49] talking about. Regardless, I think her [00:10:52] description on Bill Maher's show [00:10:54] tremendously misrepresents what she [00:10:56] wrote in her post. This raises the [00:10:59] question, why is she lying about this? [00:11:02] Why is she trying to downplay the Jewish [00:11:05] space lasers while at the same time [00:11:07] emphasizing that she does not take money [00:11:09] from Apac? [00:11:11] Something does not add up. What is also [00:11:14] relevant is that last month Marjorie [00:11:16] Taylor Green just got engaged to Brian [00:11:19] Glenn. It was announced on this post on [00:11:21] X.com. She said yes. Brian Glenn is a [00:11:25] political journalist for Real America's [00:11:27] Voice. Brian, [00:11:29] >> I'll give you five. You lay down and do [00:11:31] snow angels. Oh my gosh. Do a snow [00:11:33] angel. Come on, Brian. Do it. Do it for [00:11:36] the people. [00:11:36] >> I I I I'll do it. I'll do it. I don't [00:11:38] know. Service over here might uh have [00:11:41] something to say about it, but uh I'm [00:11:43] more than Well, you know what? Here, [00:11:44] hold this microphone. [laughter] [00:11:46] >> Oh gosh. [00:11:47] >> Here he goes. [00:11:47] >> OH MY GOSH. OH MY GOSH. [00:11:49] >> I love it. [laughter] [00:11:51] >> Oh my god. [00:11:54] >> Look at that. [00:11:55] >> I owe Brian Glenn five bucks. I owe him [00:11:58] five bucks. I love it. [00:12:01] >> Real America's Voice is also the network [00:12:03] that hosts Steve Bannon's show, War [00:12:06] Room. In fact, Brian Glenn often appears [00:12:09] as a correspondent on the War Room. You [00:12:12] have to understand that Steve Bannon is [00:12:15] incredibly influential in US politics. [00:12:18] I do not think that someone can win the [00:12:20] Republican primary without the support [00:12:22] of Steve Bannon. It is widely known that [00:12:26] Steve Bannon was also involved with [00:12:28] Jeffrey Epstein. [00:12:30] Let me be clear. I do not think that [00:12:32] Steve Bannon did anything shady with [00:12:35] Jeffrey Epstein, but we have to [00:12:36] acknowledge that there was a [00:12:38] relationship there. And now Marjorie [00:12:40] Taylor Green is getting married into [00:12:42] this network of people who are at the [00:12:44] center of presidential politics. The [00:12:47] timing of all of this is just a little [00:12:50] too convenient. Just for transparency, [00:12:53] I'm a conservative person. I like Steve [00:12:56] Bannon and I agree with most of his [00:12:58] ideas, which is why I know his position [00:13:02] on Israel. [00:13:04] Let me show you Steve Bannon speaking at [00:13:06] the Zionist Organization of America [00:13:08] dinner in New York in 2017. [00:13:12] It is time for us to act. And I believe [00:13:15] the only way to act is not through [00:13:18] moderation. I am not a moderate. I'm a [00:13:21] fighter. [00:13:23] [applause] [00:13:28] And that's why I am proud to stand with [00:13:30] the state of Israel. That's why I'm [00:13:32] proud to be a Christian Zionist. That's [00:13:34] why I'm proud to be a partner to one of [00:13:35] the greatest nations on earth and the [00:13:37] foundation of the Judeo-Christian West. [00:13:40] [applause] [00:13:44] I feel like Marjorie Taylor Green and [00:13:47] CBS News are trying to manipulate us. [00:13:50] Marjorie Taylor Green emphasizes that [00:13:52] she does not take any donations from [00:13:54] Apac. But what about her fiance who [00:13:57] works with Steve Bannon? Is he receiving [00:13:59] money through his job with Steve Bannon? [00:14:03] Whatever your position on Israel, I do [00:14:06] not like the feeling like I'm being lied [00:14:08] to. It feels to me like there's a secret [00:14:11] agenda going on with a group of people [00:14:13] who are trying to create a presidential [00:14:15] candidate. [00:14:17] Am I the only person who thinks this [00:14:19] feels like a scop? [00:14:21] I just want someone in politics who [00:14:24] tells the truth. I also just do not [00:14:27] believe Marjorie Taylor Green's excuse [00:14:29] for leaving. She claims that Trump was [00:14:32] angry with her for voting to release the [00:14:34] Epstein files. [00:14:36] >> I stood for women who were raped when [00:14:38] they were 14 years old. And the [00:14:41] president that I fought for for 5 years [00:14:43] called me a traitor for that. [00:14:45] You say the president put your life in [00:14:47] danger. You blame him. You say he he [00:14:50] fueled a hot bed of threats against me [00:14:53] and that you blame him for the uh [00:14:56] threats against your son. [00:14:57] >> The subject line for the direct death [00:14:59] threats on my son was his words. [00:15:02] Marjgery Trader Green. Those are death [00:15:05] threats directly fueled by President [00:15:07] Trump. [00:15:08] >> Her life is in danger. Who's that? [00:15:11] >> Marjorie Taylor Green. because [00:15:13] >> Marjorie Trader Green, uh, I don't think [00:15:16] her life is in danger. I don't think, [00:15:18] frankly, I don't think anybody cares [00:15:20] about her. [00:15:21] >> First of all, you have to admit that [00:15:24] Marjorie Trader Green is kind of funny. [00:15:27] Where does Trump come up with these [00:15:29] things? Because that's pretty clever. [00:15:32] But second, I do not believe that her [00:15:35] feelings were hurt because of this [00:15:37] little nickname. [00:15:39] Marjorie Taylor Green is a tough woman [00:15:41] who's been through a lot. I do not [00:15:44] believe that she quit Congress because [00:15:46] Trump was mean to her. What I do believe [00:15:50] is that it is a smart move for her to [00:15:52] try to run for president. [00:15:55] Let me go back to my first point. She [00:15:58] knows that the key to winning elections [00:16:00] is picking up new voters who do not [00:16:02] usually vote. Most people agree that the [00:16:05] front runner for the Republican primary [00:16:07] is JD Vance. He was just endorsed by [00:16:10] Erica Kirk. [00:16:12] And I just have to say, why is she [00:16:15] caressing his head like this? Am I the [00:16:18] only person who thinks this is strange? [00:16:20] But moving on, the assumption is that JD [00:16:23] Vance will keep all the new voters that [00:16:25] Trump managed to capture in 2024. [00:16:29] That is a huge mistake. [00:16:32] Trump already lost those voters from his [00:16:34] decisions on the Epstein files. Those [00:16:37] voters are upset and they're not coming [00:16:40] back to vote for JD Vance. Meanwhile, [00:16:43] Marjorie Taylor Green has swooped in and [00:16:46] branded herself as the person who stood [00:16:48] up for releasing the files. Look, I like [00:16:52] JD Vance. He is hands down the best vice [00:16:56] president of my lifetime. [00:16:58] But I keep telling you guys, I don't [00:17:01] think he's going to win the Republican [00:17:02] primary. It is because Trump is selfish. [00:17:08] I don't know why no one listens to me [00:17:10] about this. This should not be a [00:17:12] surprise to anyone. Trump is making [00:17:15] decisions that are in his best interest [00:17:17] and not what is best for the Republican [00:17:19] party. [00:17:21] He keeps screwing over JD Vance like [00:17:24] with his decisions on Epstein and it's [00:17:26] only going to get worse. So JD Vance is [00:17:29] losing new voters and at the same time [00:17:32] Marjorie Taylor Green would be gaining [00:17:34] new voters. So in my opinion, it's a [00:17:37] very good environment for her to run in [00:17:39] 2028. [00:17:41] She could do what Bernie Sanders did [00:17:43] when he almost beat Hillary Clinton in [00:17:46] 2016. I will share with you my biggest [00:17:49] concern. And this is a concern for both [00:17:52] Marjorie Taylor Green and JD Vance. When [00:17:55] I think about the president for 2028, my [00:17:58] number one concern is which candidate is [00:18:01] going to prevent World War II. [00:18:04] We are so close to World War II and most [00:18:08] people do not realize it. This has been [00:18:10] one of the major strengths of Donald [00:18:13] Trump. To everyone's surprise, he's done [00:18:16] a remarkable job of keeping peace around [00:18:18] the world in some very complicated [00:18:20] situations. He got the hostages out of [00:18:23] Gaza. He's making progress on ending the [00:18:25] war in Ukraine. And he resolved a number [00:18:28] of conflicts around the world. It's [00:18:30] really quite staggering what he's [00:18:32] accomplished. [00:18:34] And I don't know why we're all so [00:18:35] surprised by this because he wrote [00:18:38] everything he was going to do in his [00:18:39] book, The Art of the Deal. [00:18:42] I don't know why none of us just read [00:18:45] his book because it would have saved us [00:18:47] all kinds of trouble. He literally told [00:18:50] us how he could do all these deals [00:18:53] around the world. So in international [00:18:55] policy, Trump has been a huge success. [00:18:59] What worries me about Marjorie Taylor [00:19:01] Green is she says stuff like this. [00:19:04] >> I am so America first. I I just I feel [00:19:07] like I live it and breathe it and that's [00:19:10] my district and that's what people want. [00:19:13] They are so tired of their hard-earned [00:19:14] tax dollars being sent overseas to [00:19:16] foreign wars and foreign aid and foreign [00:19:19] causes while life in America just [00:19:22] becomes more and more unfor [00:19:23] unaffordable. We want this money [00:19:25] invested at home for our infrastructure, [00:19:27] for programs, for our people, and most [00:19:30] importantly for my children's generation [00:19:33] and their children and their children [00:19:34] and generations to come. [00:19:36] >> Okay, that sounds nice to say you're [00:19:39] America first. But ignoring the rest of [00:19:42] the world is not going to stop World War [00:19:45] II. [00:19:47] As soon as Donald Trump leaves office, [00:19:49] do you know what is going to happen? [00:19:52] China is going to invade Taiwan. India [00:19:54] is going to invade Pakistan. Iran is [00:19:56] going to attack Israel. And Russia is [00:19:59] going to invade Ukraine. And all of you [00:20:01] know that I'm right about this. Welcome [00:20:04] to World War II. So, we have to ask some [00:20:08] tough questions. Does Marjorie Taylor [00:20:11] Green have a good relationship with our [00:20:13] veterans? Is she good interacting with [00:20:16] soldiers in uniform? These are things I [00:20:19] would like to know about. There is a [00:20:21] concept called total war. And most young [00:20:25] people do not know what this is. Total [00:20:28] war means that every person in a war [00:20:31] fights to the death. It doesn't matter [00:20:34] if you're 10 years old or 80 years old. [00:20:37] If you can stand, you are given a gun [00:20:40] and told to fight to the death. And if [00:20:42] you say you do not want to fight, your [00:20:44] own military executes you on the spot. [00:20:48] That is called total war and it was [00:20:51] implemented three times during World War [00:20:53] II. Stalenrad, the final battle in [00:20:57] Berlin and in Japan at the end of the [00:20:59] war. Old people, women, and children [00:21:03] were given weapons and told to fight to [00:21:05] the death. And it didn't matter if you [00:21:07] were on the winning side or losing side [00:21:09] of World War II. Both sides had [00:21:11] situations where they declared total [00:21:14] war. Imagine if this happened in Los [00:21:17] Angeles. If Los Angeles was surrounded [00:21:20] by enemy troops, all the people in Los [00:21:23] Angeles would be ordered to fight to the [00:21:25] death. [00:21:27] I don't think that would turn out very [00:21:29] well. I'm explaining this because [00:21:31] Americans are not taught in school about [00:21:34] what happened in Stalenrad. [00:21:36] Most Americans have no idea. The Nazis [00:21:40] had invaded Russia and got all the way [00:21:42] to Stalenrad. [00:21:44] Stalin refused to evacuate civilians [00:21:47] partly to motivate the army to fight [00:21:49] harder defending them. He issued order [00:21:52] number 227, not one step back, which [00:21:55] ordered blocking units to shoot [00:21:58] retreating soldiers. Some of you may [00:22:00] know the movie called The Hunt for Red [00:22:02] October. [00:22:04] The symbolism of the submarine Red [00:22:06] October comes from Stalenrad because Red [00:22:11] October is the name of the factory where [00:22:13] Russia made one of their final last [00:22:15] stands. [00:22:16] Civilian factory workers fought [00:22:19] alongside Russian soldiers to hold back [00:22:22] the Nazis. [00:22:24] Red October symbolizes a moment that [00:22:27] changed the course of human history. [00:22:30] Now, total war strategically is always a [00:22:33] horrible idea because you're never going [00:22:36] to defeat an army with a bunch of kids [00:22:38] and old people. The goal of Total War is [00:22:41] to just slow the enemy down until you [00:22:43] can bring in reinforcements. [00:22:46] So, think about this. You are killing [00:22:48] off your own citizens to buy yourself [00:22:50] some time. In the case of Stalenrad, it [00:22:54] worked. Russian troops ended up [00:22:56] encircling the Nazi army. There were [00:22:59] roughly 800,000 Nazi troops who were [00:23:01] either captured or killed, and Germany [00:23:03] was never able to recover from this [00:23:05] loss. [00:23:07] The number of Russians who were killed [00:23:09] was 1.1 million people, including [00:23:13] civilians. [00:23:15] This is what young people do not [00:23:16] understand. [00:23:18] World War II is not a joke. You could be [00:23:22] facing total war. [00:23:25] young people, you better start [00:23:27] toughening up. [00:23:29] That is why when I look at presidential [00:23:31] candidates, preventing World War II is [00:23:34] my biggest issue. There is one thing [00:23:37] that could change everything for the [00:23:39] 2028 election. If Ivanka Trump enters [00:23:42] the race, [00:23:44] she already is a celebrity and she could [00:23:46] bring in a whole new set of young [00:23:48] voters. She also, like her father, has a [00:23:52] lot of experience negotiating deals [00:23:54] around the world. So, she comes in [00:23:56] already with foreign policy experience [00:23:58] and experience working in the White [00:24:01] House. Now, of course, none of these [00:24:04] people have announced that they are [00:24:05] running yet. I think my point here is [00:24:08] that the outcome of the 2028 election is [00:24:11] completely up in the air, but I think [00:24:14] there's a good chance that the next [00:24:16] president could be a woman. I know that [00:24:19] a lot of people right now are feeling [00:24:21] frustrated and let down with politics, [00:24:24] but you have to remember that we the [00:24:27] people determine the future course of [00:24:29] this country. It's not the bureaucrats. [00:24:32] It's not the lobbyists. It's not even [00:24:34] the rich and powerful. It is we the [00:24:37] people. [00:24:39] Just by being interested in who the [00:24:41] candidates are directs the conversation [00:24:43] about what issues get done and it holds [00:24:46] people accountable. And we're going to [00:24:49] cover all the developments for the 2028 [00:24:51] race right here on Wolves in Finance. [00:24:55] Now, I want to hear from you. Do you [00:24:57] think that Marjorie Taylor Green will [00:24:59] run for president? Let me know in the [00:25:01] comments down below. And if you like [00:25:02] this video, don't forget to hit that [00:25:04] subscribe button so you don't miss out [00:25:05] on future videos. If you want to support [00:25:08] independent journalism like this [00:25:10] channel, consider signing up for a [00:25:11] membership on my website, [00:25:12] wolvesenfinance.com. [00:25:14] For $6 a month, your support helps me to [00:25:16] keep making these videos. Thank you to [00:25:19] everyone who has signed up. I'm Zach [00:25:21] from Wolves and Finance. Thank you for [00:25:23] watching. [00:25:25] [music] [00:25:32] [music]