…Court. The Government claims that it can prevail regardless of what the true facts are, so the Court should take the Government at its word and evaluate the case on the facts presented (without contradiction) by the Government. Moreover, the…
…Court. The Government claims that it can prevail regardless of what the true facts are, so the Court should take the Government at its word and evaluate the case on the facts presented (without contradiction) by the Government. Moreover, the…
…shall remain in force until the end of 2024 and beyond." It could be terminated by either Washington or Kabul with two years advance written notice. There is however what US officials believe is a contradiction in the July draft…
…optional; and suggested that wearing a mask was a political statement against him personally.L52OJ Trump's contradiction of medical recommendations weakened national efforts to mitigate the pandemic.[519115201 Despite record numbers of COVID-19 cases in the U.S…
…that our substantive arguments regarding why a federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein is not warranted were "compelling." However, in contradiction to assertion that CEOS had provided an independent, de novo review, CEOS made clear that it did not do so…
…that wearing a mask was a political statement against him personally. 2i Trump's contradiction of medical recommendations weakened national efforts to mitigate the pandemic.[5.191.I's_?2_1 Despite record numbers of COVID-19 cases in the…
…in fact, do nothing of the sort, because it appears to depend on at least one ridiculous assumption and two glaring contradictions. That's for starters; confident we'll see more absurdities when the full proposal is released soon. Page…
…the U.S. Attorney's Office dragged on, including a personal meeting between Jane Doe No. 1 and the U.S. Attorney in December 2010. In seeming contradiction to this position, on March 17, 2011, the U.S. Attorney's…
…confer with their Office under the CVRA in this case because in its view the case is "civil" litigation rather than the "criminal" litigation (doc. #41 at 3). 2 2 In seeming contradiction to this position, on March 17, 2011…
…: archon; why a kdvral prosecution \1r. Ipstein IN 2114 %%on-anti:11 vn:- lowever. iii contradiction to Mr. Slinnan s assertion that C.D.'S hail provickd an independent. Sc' now/ review. CEOS made clear that it did not tin…
…Such affidavits would be in contradiction with the limited factual record that exists in this case at this point, which is presumably why Epstein has not provided any factual record about the confidentiality of the materials at issue. But regardless…
…proper investigation, and that Ms. Villafana's list included only those persons as to whom the USAO was then "prepared to indict Mr. Epstein." Despite the written representations and in direct contradiction of Mr. Acosta and Mr. Sloman, by the…
…the U.S. Attorney's Office dragged on, including a personal meeting between Jane Doe No. 1 and the U.S. Attorney in December 2010. In seeming contradiction to this position, on March 17, 2011, the U.S. Attorney's…
…plea bargaining secret from the victims without any urging from Epstein. Such affidavits would be in contradiction with the limited factual record that exists in this case at this point, which is presumably why Epstein has not provided any factual…
…Such affidavits would be in contradiction with the limited factual record that exists in this case at this point, which is presumably why Epstein has not provided any factual record about the confidentiality of the materials at issue. But regardless…
…the U.S. Attorney's Office dragged on, including a personal meeting between Jane Doe No. 1 and the U.S. Attorney in December 2010. In seeming contradiction to this position, on March 17, 2011, the U.S. Attorney's…
…the following timeline of events leading up to Mr. Epstein's entry of plea makes clear, the facts are in contradiction eennadietwith your assertion that Mr. Epstein willfully breached the NPA by delaying his sentence, and compellingly demonstrate that Mr…
…confer with their Office under the CVRA in this case because in its view the case is "civil" litigation rather than the "criminal" litigation (doc. #41 at 3). 2 2 In seeming contradiction to this position, on March 17, 2011…
…confer with their Office under the CVRA in this case because in its view the case is "civil" litigation rather than the "criminal" litigation (doc. #41 at 3). 2 2 In seeming contradiction to this position, on March 17, 2011…
…Such affidavits would be in contradiction with the limited factual record that exists in this case at this point, which is presumably why Epstein has not provided any factual record about the confidentiality of the materials at issue. But regardless…