…confidential, not discoverable, and inadmissible as evidence at any proceeding in this case. I. MANDATORY AND DISCRETIONARY INTERVENTION ARE PROPER Intervention is proper as a matter of right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a) because Mr. Epstein has…
…and unreasonably burdensome, as well as seeking irrelevant and inadmissible evidence and information not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Edwards and Cassell have collected many pages of documents pointing to Dershowitz's involvement in Epstein…
…therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Federal Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and § 90.410…
…and unreasonably burdensome, as well as seeking irrelevant and inadmissible evidence and information not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Edwards and Cassell have collected many pages of documents pointing to Dershowitz's involvement in Epstein…
…would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and …
…P. 11(0; (2) that because the Jane Does are seeking inadmissible evidence, they bear a burden of showing a proper basis for discovery; (3) that the plea negotiations are irrelevant because the Jane Does are not entitled to invalidate…
…overbroad, and unreasonably burdensome, as well as seeking irrelevant and inadmissible evidence and information not EFTA01172620 Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Case No.: CACE 15.000072 Answers To Defendant Dershowitz's First Set Of Docu…
…therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Federal Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and § 90.410…
…discussions . . .if the discussions did not result in a guilty plea . . . .' which are inadmissible in proceedings against the defendant making them under Rule 410." (DE 188 at 5) (citing United States v. Paden, 908 F.2d 1229, 1235 (5th Cir…
…KAM Document 115 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/31/2011 Page 3 of 19 precludes the lawyers and Mr. Epstein from litigating the inadmissibility and privileged nature of the defense plea negotiation letters and emails. The plaintiffs are mistaken. First…
…Mc Veigh, 119 F.3d 806, 813 (10th Cir. 1997) (there is no constitutional right to access inadmissible evidence). Finally, as argued earlier, there can be no valid particularized need when Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 seek relief…
…Evid. 408(b) (while settlement discussions are generally inadmissible, they are permissible for purposes other than proving the validity of a claim). 7 EFTA00208454 Case 9:08-cv…
…a plea of guilty, later withdrawn; a plea of nolo contendere; or an offer to plead guilty or nolo contendere to the crime charged or any other crime is inadmissible in any civil or criminal proceeding."), with Fed. R. Evid…
…Crim. P. 11(0 provides, "The admissibility or inadmissibility of a plea, a plea discussion, and any related statement is governed by Federal. Rule of Evidence 410." 'Federal Rule of Evidence 410 (a) provides in pertinent part: (a) Prohibited Uses…
…a plea of guilty, later withdrawn; a plea of nolo contendere; or an offer to plead guilty or nolo contendere to the crime charged or any other crime is inadmissible in any civil or criminal proceeding."), with Fed. R. Evict…
…P. 11(0; (2) that because the Jane Does are seeking inadmissible evidence, they bear a burden of showing a proper basis for discovery; (3) that the plea negotiations are irrelevant because the Jane Does are not entitled to invalidate…
…therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Federal Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and § 90.410…
…P. 11(0; (2) that because the Jane Does are seeking inadmissible evidence, they bear a burden of showing a proper basis for discovery; (3) that the plea negotiations are irrelevant because the Jane Does are not entitled to invalidate…
…discussions ); Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(f) ( the admissibility or inadmissibility of . . . a plea discussion and any related statement is governed by Federal Rule of Evidence 410"). Obviously, the plaintiffs intend to use the plea negotiation letters against Mr. Epstein…
…Crim. P. 11(0 provides, "The admissibility or inadmissibility of a plea, a plea discussion, and any related statement is governed by Federal. Rule of Evidence 410." 'Federal Rule of Evidence 410 (a) provides in pertinent part: (a) Prohibited Uses…
Comments