…D.N.Y. 2009) ............................................................................................3 Iridium India Telecom Ltd. v. Motorola, Inc., 165 F. App’x 878 (2d Cir. 2005) ............................................................................................6 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 …
…0 CONCLUSION.................................................................................................................. 10
ii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
CASES
AT & T Corp. v. Sprint Corp.,
407 F.3d 560 (2d Cir.
…v. Sprint Corp., 407 F.3d 560, 562 (2d Cir. 2005) (“It is presumptively unfair for courts to modify protective orders which assure confidentiality and upon which the parties have reasonably relied.”); see also Martindell v. Int’l Tel. & Tel…
…States v. Massino, 356 F. Supp. 2d 227 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) ....................................................................................... 3 iii Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1068 Filed 06/24/20 Page 4 of 24 United States v. Sattar, 471 F. Supp. 2d…
…minors. 3 Hilbert S. v. Cty. of Tioga, No. 3:03-CV-193, 2005 WL 1460316, at *15 (N.D.N.Y. June 21, 2005) (“However, the papers filed in the action, including the depositions of the infant plaintiffs, reveal…
…redactions should be applied sparingly to shield only information that would identify those who have not already been publicly identified. See McCord v. Reardon, No. 20-CV-2005 (EK), 2020 WL 5342637, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 4…
…2005) (“It is presumptively unfair for courts to modify 4 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1149 Filed 11/12/20 Page 6 of 18 protective orders which assure confidentiality and upon which the parties have reasonably relied…
Comments