gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.156.6.pdf PDF
…156-6 Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 3 Pre‐Existing Factual Documents Log Email Sent Privilege Page Doc ID Date Email From …
…156-6 Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 3 Pre‐Existing Factual Documents Log Email Sent Privilege Page Doc ID Date Email From …
…more efficiently without becoming unduly burdensome. The Original Parties therefore present the following options to the Court. Plaintiff’s Proposal Plaintiff proposes beginning to address Non-Party objections in the next round of unsealing, rather than first finishing the remaining…
…1099-1101.) The Court writes specifically to address Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell’s request for a three-week stay of the unsealing process due to the availability of “critical new information” related both to this action and to the pending criminal…
…BRINCKERHOFF 600 FIFTH AVENUE AT ROCKEFELLER CENTER FACSIMILE JONATHAN S. ABADY 10TH FLOOR (212) 763-5001 EARL S. WARD NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10020 WEB ADDRESS ILANN M. MA…
…no email prior to 2009, and still refuses to disclose the email accounts she used prior to that date. Defendant represents to the Court that there is no undisclosed email address, yet in the following sentence, she begins a three…
…2019 Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Defendant Maxwell’s Request for Clarification and More Time to Address Paragraphs 2, 3, and 5 of the…
…MATTHEW D. BRINCKERHOFF ATTORNEYS AT LAW FACSIMILE JONATHAN S. ABADY 600 FIFTH AVENUE AT ROCKEFELLER CENTER (212) 763-5001 EARL S. WARD 10…
…revisit those arguments. Third, Defendant’s note that certain testimony should be kept sealed so that she can challenge its admissibility at her criminal trial is not only speculative, but has also already been addressed by this Court. Jan. 19…
…may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited…
…may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited…
…may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited…
…UT 84112 (801) 585-52021 1 This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah for this private representation. …
…So they present more or less similar arguments. We request leave to address their three separate briefs in a single reply brief. We submit this will be more succinct and efficient and less repetitious for the Court. As the Court…
…Doe #1, Doe #2, and Doe #3. • Provide the address or contact information for each Non-Party or his or her legal counsel, which the Original Parties identified to the best of their ability. 2. Judicial Adjudication: Because of the…
…UT 84112 (801) 585-52021 1 This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah for this private representation. …
…project. Before reaching the merits of sealing/redaction of the Sealed Materials we think it appropriate and necessary to address the complexity and difficulty of the project as well as its difficult-to-overstate importance to the lives of Ms…
…the Non-Parties never received the Notice at all. Defense counsel was charged with providing notice to 91 Non-Parties. Of those: 12 had no known addresses, 18 had Notices that were returned without explanation by the U.S. mail…
…UT 84112 (801) 585-52021 1 This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah for this private representation. …
…Plaintiff. (See dkt. no. 1026.) The Court agrees with Defendant that Plaintiff’s proposed definition, which would only require a search of public records databases for the addresses of non-parties, is “too wooden.” (See dkt. nos. 1026, 1028.) Accordingly…
…contained in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient…
Comments