…s Intentional Destruction of Evidence and further states as follows: INTRODUCTION In 2013, after Plaintiff was in the process of attempting to join the Crime Victims’ Rights Act litigation (“CVRA Litigation”) represented by her current counsel, Plaintiff willfully and deliberately …
…Plaintiff’s Intentional Destruction of Evidence and
states as follows:
INTRODUCTION
All of Plaintiff’s hyperbole and indignation cannot change the simple fact that Plaintiff
willfully and intentionally
She then either lost a destroyed
…have already suffered such a terrible and painful loss over the last few days that I can't even see what life after press he'll even looks like - statements that don't address all just lead to more questions .…
…other than what you just said? 18 A No. 19 Q Okay. Do you know where she went to work 20 after Mar-a-Lago? 21 A I think she went with Mrs. Maxwell. 22 Q But do you know…
…s proposed language stating that Non-Parties “will not be identified in any court filing” is misleading. After the objections are considered, it is likely that Non-Parties will be identified because the public interest in disclosure outweighs any asserted…
…Victims Refuse Silence, Inc. 2. No law enforcement agency pursued any criminal charges against Ms. Maxwell, even after both federal and state investigators fully scrutinized Ms. Maxwell’s one-time 1 employer, Jeffrey Epstein, who was …
… I will 16 ask the parties to check my work and notify me afterwards if I 17 have omitted either of those documents in error. 18 Now on to the particularized findings as to each 19 document. 20 With respect…
Comments