…as Plaintiff now concedes. It read: “In 1999, Jane Doe #3 was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell,” and continuing that “Maxwell persuaded Jane Doe # 3 (who was only fifteen years old) to come to Epstein's mansion . . .” Plaintiff now concedes that…
…Page 12 of 23 ” That the government claimed, indicated that the Nowhere did the government acknowledge that had in fact approached the prosecutors multiple times well bef…
…based on this discovery, that she was not 15 years old, she now has conclusive proof that she was an underage minor when Ghislaine Maxwell approached her, recruited her, introduced her to Jeffrey Epstein, and sexually trafficked her as an…
…not “was wholly irrelevant” to Boies’s involvement in court. Separately, Dershowitz took issue with the way he said Boies’ firm approached him after Roberts’ claims first arose in late 2014. Dershowitz said that one of Boies Schiller’s lawyers…
…the property called 'Tuckedaway' was 'troubling'. They wrote that when the FBI arrived they were confronted by a locked gate which they forced their way through. The filing said: 'As the agents approached the front door to the main house…
…Jane Doe #3 would prove the following: In 1999, Jane Doe #3 was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell, one of the main women whom Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities and a primary co-conspirator in his…
…to have his friends go away. He says that he did. ~ l s osays that at this time he was also approached by his neighbor, who is a real estate agent and is selling his p a r ~ . …
…I have film footage all over Europe itching to be released.” Ex. 1 (RANSOME_000521); x Her friend was “approached, by Special Agents Forces Men sent directly by Hilary [sic] Clinton herself, in order to protect her presidential campaign.” Ex…
…as Plaintiff now concedes. It read: “In 1999, Jane Doe #3 was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell,” and continuing that “Maxwell persuaded Jane Doe # 3 (who was only fifteen years old) to come to Epstein's mansion . . .” Plaintiff now concedes that…
…as Plaintiff now concedes. It read: “In 1999, Jane Doe #3 was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell,” and continuing that “Maxwell persuaded Jane Doe # 3 (who was only fifteen years old) to come to Epstein's mansion . . .” Plaintiff now concedes that…
…Jane Doe #3 would prove the following: In 1999, Jane Doe #3 was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell, one of the main women whom Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities and a primary co-conspirator in his…
…counsel in this case. According to the Criminal Complaint filed against Mr. Rodriguez in 2009, Mr. Rodriguez approached one of the lawyers and offered to sell the lawyer evidence against Mr. Epstein. United States v. Rodriguez, United States District Court…
…Jane Doe #3 Circumstances is false, . It read: “In 1999, Jane Doe #3 was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell,” and continuing that “Maxwell persuaded Jane Doe # 3 (who was only fifteen years old) to come to Epstein's mansion . . .” . Menninger Decl.…
…Jane Doe #3 would prove the following: In 1999, Jane Doe #3 was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell, one of the main women whom Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities and a primary co-conspirator in his…
…been categorical and succinct. It was neither. The decision turned on the Second Circuit’s lengthy discussion of the First and Third Circuits’ divergent approaches to the question, when is a mere document transformed into a judicial one? The Third…
…at 119-20. It is a given accepted by the Protective Order that the trial and all trial documents are accessible and public absent special circumstances. Under the common law approach, once a document is classified as a judicial document…
…been categorical and succinct. It was neither. The decision turned on the Second Circuit’s lengthy discussion of the First and Third Circuits’ divergent approaches to the question, when is a mere document transformed into a judicial one? The Third…
…The parties in Dershowitz have done just that and have presented a “reasonable” approach in which Giuffre has no objection to producing certain enumerated categories from among the Maxwell confidential materials and sealed filings in her possession so long as…
…here. Indeed, she cannot approach that standard, as she has made no showing whatsoever of any compelling or particularized need for these materials. Defendant is attempting to improperly interfere with an ongoing criminal investigation, and under New York law, disclosure…
…2017, followed up on this by presenting argument on the Motion to Compel that relied almost entirely on the rules-violating reply. Because of the unfairness from plaintiff’s chaotic approach to motion practice, we requested on March 9 leave…
Comments