gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1049.0.pdf PDF
…Discovery 22 12.15.15 28 1.20.16 Pending Decision on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Bring Personal Electronic Device 27 1.8.16 51 3.14.16 …
…Discovery 22 12.15.15 28 1.20.16 Pending Decision on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Bring Personal Electronic Device 27 1.8.16 51 3.14.16 …
…public’s interest in this litigation, which involved voluminous documents and testimony about Jeffrey Epstein’s transcontinental sex-trafficking operation and documents concerning various public agencies’ utter failure to protect and bring justice to his victims. See United States v…
…COURT: But the letter itself is pretty much legal 5 argument, right? 6 MS. MENNINGER: I have no objection to the letter 7 being put on the docket. 8 THE COURT: Would you do that, please? 9 MS. MENNINGER: Yes…
…deposition. 2 The parties attempted to call the court for a ruling during the deposition but were advised by chambers to “bring any issue to him after the conclusion of the deposition.” See 316- 6 at 79-89. 3 Exhibit…
…I get a message saying we don't recognize this one, "this 10 one" being the email address. That is Exhibit 1 to our brief 11 on this matter. 12 We wrote a letter to opposing counsel citing some 13…
…wants to publicize police reports concerning Ms. Giuffre - most of them from when she was a child, some of them concerning her being raped when only 14 years. Defendant’s challenge to Ms. Giuffre’s confidentiality designation is without merit…
…Order in this case, drafted by Defendant,” (DE 316-6 at 10). These facts bring the deposition well within the protection afforded by the Second Circuit’s case law governing access to judicial documents. See Martindell v. Int’l Tel…
…50 (2d Cir. 2019). The underlying documents being considered for unsealing were filed with decided motions and have already been determined to be judicial documents. The Does’ objections and parties’ responsive briefs arguing whether to disclose or withhold these judicial…
…any presumption 24 of public access to this document is barely cognizable and, 25 accordingly, the objections of the Does to this document being SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 MBIMGUIC Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP…
…any presumption 24 of public access to this document is barely cognizable and, 25 accordingly, the objections of the Does to this document being SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 MBIMGUIC Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP…
…award attorneys’ fees to Ms. Giuffre for bringing the instant motion, and 5 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 885 Filed 05/02/17 Page 6 of 7 provide such other relief as the Court deems just and…
…2016, Opinion with agreed upon redactions. The Court ordered as follows: This matter being subject to a Protective Order, the parties are directed to meet and confer regarding redactions to this Opinion consistent with that Order. The parties are further…
…that “personal identifying information as to any person mentioned in the documents and the names of nonparties other than Does 1 and 2 and other portions related to such nonparties’ specific conduct will be redacted from the materials being unsealed…
…going forward, the Original Parties would need to redact fewer names in documents that are ordered unsealed because they would have a list of Non-Parties who have no objection to their names being unsealed. Plaintiff suggests that the Original…
…wants to publicize police reports concerning Ms. Giuffre - most of them from when she was a child, some of them concerning her being raped when only 14 years. Defendant’s challenge to Ms. Giuffre’s confidentiality designation is without merit…
…able to review Plaintiff’s proposed redactions, however, and each concluded that they sufficiently obscured information such that the public would not be able to identify the nonparty being discussed. In any event, Maxwell’s vague and ambiguous reference to…
…Plaintiff contests that Doe 17 was named only by mistake (as opposed to the cited testimony being mistaken only about what her alias was), and that Does 73 and 93 were not “involved in any of the conduct underlying this…
…E (GM00777-00779). This report is during the time Plaintiff allegedly was a “sex slave” to Jeffrey Epstein. The report documents that she was not then being held captive by Mr. Epstein, was living independently in an apartment with her…
…never received Notice of the Protocol at all. Second, among those for whom the Notice was returned without ever being delivered are Non-Parties who gave deposition testimony upon a promise of confidentiality pursuant to the Protective Order. For example…
…employment.” Id. at *2. Thus, in addition to the fact that Microsoft failed to identify any “privacy interest [they had] in not being associated with Plaintiffs’ employment,” their identities were, rather, quite “important to Plaintiffs’ claims.” Id. Here, on the…
Comments