Found 7 results for “butler” in 113ms

gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1320.18.pdf PDF

giuffre-maxwell gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1320.18 40 pg

…Corp., No. 06 CIV. 1863 (JGK), 2008 WL 318343 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2008)...................................................18 Butler v. Harter, 152 So.3d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA, 2014).......................................................................................................30 Charter One Bank, F.S.B. v. Midtown Rochester…

gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1328.41.pdf PDF

giuffre-maxwell gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1328.41 31 pg

…full of those toys.” Id. at 76:11-15. In 2009, Epstein’s butler, Alfredo Rodriguez, testified that Dershowitz was at Epstein’s mansion when underage girls were there to give massages.10 Rodriguez also testified that Dershowitz was present…

gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.824.0_2.pdf PDF

giuffre-maxwell gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.824.0_2 47 pg

… He testified in this case 8 back in June and he was given the exhibit. He was the butler 9 for a period of time in Palm Beach. So he was responsible to 10 help with the management of the…

gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1137.14_2.pdf PDF

giuffre-maxwell gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1137.14_2 40 pg

…AT&T Corp., No. 06 CIV. 1863 (JGK), 2008 WL 318343 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2008) ................................................... 18 Butler v. Harter, 152 So.3d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA, 2014)....................................................................................................... 30 Charter One Bank, F.S.B. v. Midtown Rochester…

1320-18.pdf PDF

giuffre-maxwell 1320-18 40 pg

…Corp., No. 06 CIV. 1863 (JGK), 2008 WL 318343 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2008)...................................................18 Butler v. Harter, 152 So.3d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA, 2014).......................................................................................................30 Charter One Bank, F.S.B. v. Midtown Rochester…

gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1118.0.pdf PDF

giuffre-maxwell gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1118.0 21 pg

…a year after Mr. Epstein’s death – the single circumstance other than “efficiency” the Government cites in support of its Motion. These substantial delays militate against a finding of timeliness. See Butler, Fitzgerald Potter v. Sequa Corp., 250 F.3d…

👁 0 💬 0

Comments

Loading comments…
Link copied!