…the police reports demonstrate Plaintiff’s tumultuous home life, bearing no relationship to any press statements or alleged defamation and providing alternative causation to any of Plaintiff’s now-claimed emotional distress. It makes perfect sense that Plaintiff would want…
…Plaintiff has been attempting to dodge the production of these documents for months. First, Plaintiff claimed that the documents were protected by a non-existent “investigative privilege.” When Ms. Maxwell demonstrated that the “investigative privilege” did not exist, Plaintiff threw…
…the police reports demonstrate Plaintiff’s tumultuous home life, bearing no relationship to any press statements or alleged defamation and providing alternative causation to any of Plaintiff’s now-claimed emotional distress. It makes perfect sense that Plaintiff would want…
…June 20, 2016, Order directing Defendant to turn over documents that she improperly claimed as “privileged,” Defendant redacted the public version of the Order to erase all reference to her extensive communications with her boyfriend, convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. While…
…Further, it is not the Court’s role to weigh the veracity or credibility of the statements contained within to determine whether disclosure is warranted. Claimed inaccuracy is not a recognized countervailing interest to overcome unsealing. See Krause v. Rhodes…
…at least one press source claimed to “crack” the redactions to identify witnesses and potential testimony by or 3 https://www.npr.org/2020/10/22/926590153/jeffrey-epstein-update-read-the-deposition-that- ghislaine-maxwell-fought-to-hide 4…
…1 5.1.16 Plaintiff's Letter Motion to Seal 138 Brief in Support of the Privilege 5.4.16 146 5.6.16 Claimed for In Camera Submission Plaintiff's Brief in Support of the 140,140‐1, 139…
…settlement of an issue in a case and in this case a motion for summary judgment is dispositive as it seeks to settle the entire case. The claimed compelling reasons must be supported by specific factual findings. United States v…
Comments