…this review. 15 THE COURT: Bless you, my daughter. 16 MS. McCAWLEY: A few ideas that we have come up 17 with -- we have submitted the letter to you, obviously, which 18 poses an approach dealing with the non-parties…
…Id. at 1. But it should not come as a surprise that those “non-parties,” including those implicated as potential abusers within Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking conspiracy, would seek to obscure as much information concerning their conduct as possible…
…she has attracted more media attention. London’s tabloid the Sun placed a “£10,000 bounty on Maxwell’s head, dangling its checkbook to encourage anyone with information on her whereabouts to come forward.”1 Vanity Fair reported, “Now, perhaps…
…that the motion is untimely under the Protective Order, or that these documents do not come within the ambit of the existing protective Order, this Court still clearly has the inherent power to determine that these documents are confidential and…
…952 F.3d at 67. “Unlimited access,” therefore, should not come at the cost of “adverse[] affect[s] [to] law enforcement interests or judicial performance.” Amodeo, 71 F.3d at 1050–1051. C. Intervenors’ Third Proposition of Law: “[I]t…
…extend the deadline 30 7 days. I'll direct counsel to meet and confer and see if they 8 can come up with a schedule that both sides will agree upon. 9 Second, the plaintiff wants to maintain certain 10 …
…that the motion is untimely under the Protective Order, or that these documents do not come within the ambit of the existing protective Order, this Court still clearly has the inherent power to determine that these documents are confidential and…
…and file the redacted version in the ECF system. We could not come up with a better idea. We assume—but have no way of knowing—that the number of non-parties who will make excerpt requests and file objections…
…closure 21 is essential to preserve higher values and is narrowly tailored 22 to that interest. That comes from Supreme Court decisions. 23 So we're at a point where, had my client been looking 24 at this issue earlier…
…the lack of a clear fit with the literal terms of Rule 24(b), every circuit court that has considered the question has come to the conclusion that nonparties may permissively intervene for the purpose of challenging confidentiality orders.”). Here…
Comments