…but you can see the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, 11 and Mr. Epstein talking about fabricating evidence by producing 12 a non-existent witness who will cover up for Ms. Maxwell. 13 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I object to this. 14…
…sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and Defendant were engaging in sexual trafficking conduct; the later part of that period includes the investigations by law enforcement and the co- conspirator’s efforts to coordinate and cover up the abuse that occurred. Therefore…
…receipt of payments from Epstein, and documents showing her attempts to cover up her wrongful sexual abuse of minors are relevant. There are already materials implicating Defendant’s post-2008 involvement with Epstein and the related cover-up. For example…
…You're very diligent. Maybe overly diligent. 7 Well, anyhow, whatever you are, I'm going to break 8 that up, I think. Plan to stay for another day next week. I 9 think also today, it probably makes sense…
…explanation for her expansive time frame as discussed below. The gist of Plaintiff’s temporal relevance argument is that, according to Plaintiff, Ms. Maxwell communicated or associated with Mr. Epstein after 2002 up to 2015. And, according to Plaintiff, Mr…
…and to seal this case, as it would facilitate the execution of a valid Rule 45 subpoena issued upon Jeffrey Epstein and follow the confidentiality order previously entered in this case by the U.S. District Court for the Southern…
…airport Leave car at Jet Aviation landing strip Leave the keys in the car Advise Jet Aviation …
…of 22 on a published article from the New York Post, it appears that Defendant’s townhouse (among other assets) might be part of a covert payoff from Epstein to Defendant. As the Post reports, “[a] lawyer with links to…
Comments