…her deposition. BACKGROUND On February 6, 2017, Defendant served non-party witness Sarah Ransome with a subpoena that included 30 different document requests and set her compliance date for just seven (7) days later on February 13, 2017. In addition…
…r entification Information (Fingerprints, palm Information 1'19.071 (2)(e) Confession 3€>!5.171 (15) Identity of 911 reports are confidential for period of 60 days after seHvice 1 'I …
…C entification Information (Fingerprints, palm Information C 1rn.071 (2)(e) Confession C ormants C 3E>t,.171 (15) Identity of 911 reports are con…
…in this matter requires that, after an objection is made to a confidential designation, the party seeking to protect the designation must file a motion within ten business days of the date of the objection. See D.E. 62 at …
…ECF No. 1157), and in light of Does 1 and 2 not submitting any objection to unsealing within 14 days of being served with their relevant excerpts, Plaintiff files excerpts of Doe 1’s deposition transcript (DEs 204-3, 212…
…to intimidate, harass and cause undue burden to a non-party. Indeed, Defendant - just days ago - publicly admitted that his goal of deposing Jane Doe No. 3 has nothing to do with this Florida Defamation Action; rather, he is trying…
…practical method of obtaining the information sought than a request for production or a deposition,” and because they were served in advance of the period “30 days prior to the discovery cut-off date.” Local Civil Rule 33.3(b)…
… In a hotel. 20 Q. And how long did you spend 21 with Mr. Pottinger on that occasion? 22 A. Two days. 23 Q. How many hours over the two 24 days? 25 A. Gosh, about 16. Highly Confidential…
…A. I was present for his mother's -- 4 his mother died in 2004 so I was there for 5 his mother's death and the funeral and I was 6 at the house maybe a handful of days, again…
…During the hearing, the Court granted in part, Ms. Giuffre’s Motion to Compel. Now, twenty-six (26) days later, Defendant has still failed to produce any additional documents. In contrast, to date, Ms. Giuffre has produced over 4,700…
…A Yes. 14 Q December 30th, 2014, correct? 15 A Yes. 16 Q And the corrected motion was filed a few 17 days later, correct? 18 A Yes, correct. 19 Q If I could turn to Defendant's Exhibit 3…
…A Yes. 14 Q December 30th, 2014, correct? 15 A Yes. 16 Q And the corrected motion was filed a few 17 days later, correct? 18 A Yes, correct. 19 Q If I could turn to Defendant's Exhibit 3…
…practical method of obtaining the information sought than a request for production or a deposition,” and because they were served in advance of the period “30 days prior to the discovery cut-off date.” Local Civil Rule 33.3(b)…
…in that manner, Plaintiff should not be permitted to 1 course, Plaintiff’s Joinder Motion was followed three days later by the denial of Ms. Maxwell’s press agent that forms the basis of this defamation action.). While the present…
…Second Request for Production. See Schultz Decl. at Exhibit 1. In that letter, the undersigned proposed we meet and confer call at Defendant’s counsel’s convenience over the next couple days. On Monday, June 13, 2016, the following business…
…A Yes. 14 Q December 30th, 2014, correct? 15 A Yes. 16 Q And the corrected motion was filed a few 17 days later, correct? 18 A Yes, correct. 19 Q If I could turn to Defendant's Exhibit 3…
…practical method of obtaining the information sought than a request for production or a deposition,” and because they were served in advance of the period “30 days prior to the discovery cut-off date.” Local Civil Rule 33.3(b)…
…See McCawley Decl. at Exhibit 6, SAO 2830. Maxwell was also organizing “massages” for Epstein in 2004 with underage girls and indicating which girls she had lined-up on given days. See McCawley Decl. at Exhibit 6, SAO 02841. Plaintiff…
…is proper at this time because, as of the date of this filing, fact discovery closes in 17 days (although Ms. Giuffre has recently filed a motion for a 30-day extension of the deadline). In order to give the…
…and his partner Sigrid McCawley, who represent several witnesses in this matter, have also made public and presumptively prejudicial statements in recent days, notwithstanding the fact that such conduct is prohibited by Local Rule 23.1, which applies to lawyers…
Comments