gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.895.0.pdf PDF
…VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. --------------------------------------------------X Declaration Of Laura A. Menninger In Support Of Defendant’s …
Found 8 results
for “declaration”
in 55ms
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1256.17.pdf PDF
…Giuffre, Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ______________________________/ DECLARATION OF SIGRID S. MCCAWLEY IN PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR DEFENDANT’S RULE 37(b) &(c) SANCTIONS FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1320.34.pdf PDF
…GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. --------------------------------------------------X Declaration Of Laura A. Menninger In Support Of Defendant’s Motion For…
1320-34.pdf PDF
…GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. --------------------------------------------------X Declaration Of Laura A. Menninger In Support Of Defendant’s Motion For…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.375.0.pdf PDF
…Motion to Strike is improper because Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) allows a court to strike pleadings only . . . motions, declarations, and affidavits are not pleadings.”); Del Col v. Rice, 2014 WL 1834983, at *9 (E.D.N.Y…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.308.0.pdf PDF
…appropriate. Ms. Giuffre has complied with the requirements of Local Rule 83.6 for an order of contempt. The Schultz Declaration sets forth with particularity the conduct on which the contempt order is based – i.e., Ms. Kellen’s refusal…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1219.22.pdf PDF
…$15,000,000). Given the strong possibility of wrongdoing lurking here, a mere declaration of net worth promises to be next to worthless. To provide a simple example, if Defendant were to testify at trial she had a net worth…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1068.0.pdf PDF
…such material.” Id. All of the documents at issue, including motions, briefs, declarations, and exhibits, are therefore judicial documents entitled to a presumption of public access that can only be overcome by specific and substantial reasons for sealing. II. The…
Comments