…Ms. Giuffre is entitled to a forensic examination of Maxwell’s personal computers and devices to recover deleted emails and to discovery when and if Maxwell has performed a “swipe” of her computers/devices to permanently destroy deleted emails. Second…
…for any of them. That is strong indicia that Defendant intentionally deleted documents. This strongly suggests that relevant documents either lie in the two email accounts that were not searched or Defendant has deleted these communications. Defendant does not state…
…didn’t believe this dialogue was “appropriate.” Defendant’s refusal necessitates a forensic review of her electronic data in order to ensure that Defendant is not wrongfully withholding discoverable material.5 Defendant has also declared that she regularly deletes documents…
…Of course, there are no Fourth Amendment implications in this case raised by having a neutral third-party (who is not a state actor) assist Defendant in recovering relevant/deleted material from her electronic data in this civil case. Similarly…
…no hits on two of Ms. Maxwell’s four email accounts, Plaintiff argues, “there is strong indicia that [Ms. Maxwell] deleted relevant documents.” Mot. Compel, at 16 (emphasis supplied). This “reasoning” is fundamentally flawed. Ms. Maxwell stated in her responses…
…. . or affidavits supported in support [of] the relevancy of discovery requests.” DE 324 at 8 (emphasis deleted). 16. In a later supplemental order, Judge Marra stated that the victims “may re-refile these documents omitting the stricken portions.” DE 325…
…. . or affidavits supported in support [of] the relevancy of discovery requests.” DE 324 at 8 (emphasis deleted). 16. In a later supplemental order, Judge Marra stated that the victims “may re-refile these documents omitting the stricken portions.” DE 325…
…. . or affidavits supported in support [of] the relevancy of discovery requests.” DE 324 at 8 (emphasis deleted). 16. In a later supplemental order, Judge Marra stated that the victims “may re-refile these documents omitting the stricken portions.” DE 325…
…If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by telephone or return e‐mail and delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving it in any manner. Thank you. 1 Case 1:15…
Comments