…1026, 1028, 1029, 1030.) The Court rules as follows: 1. Decided Motions: The parties disputed whether two motions (dkt. nos. 468, 567) were actually decided by Judge Sweet and thus disagreed as to whether they should be included on the…
…831.7364 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 526 Filed 01/05/17 Page 2 of 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 ARGUMENT ..........................................…
…VENUE 2. This is an action for damages in an amount in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court. 3. This Court has jurisdiction over this dispute pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332 (diversity jurisdiction) as Giuffre…
…we said, we omitted it from our proposed List of Decided Motions. We took the Court’s acceptance of Doc.1007-1 at the January 16 hearing as an implicit resolution of the dispute. See Doc.1021, at 10:22…
…VENUE 2. This is an action for damages in an amount in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court. 3. This Court has jurisdiction over this dispute pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332 (diversity jurisdiction) as Giuffre…
…VENUE 2. This is an action for damages in an amount in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court. 3. This Court has jurisdiction over this dispute pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332 (diversity jurisdiction) as Giuffre…
…3d DCA 2014). In this case, Defendant does not appear to dispute that an attorney-client privilege exists with regard to the communications between Ms. Giuffre and her attorneys. Rather, Defendant’s argument is that the privilege has somehow been…
…4 not remember a man with his name. Thus, he has no relevance to 5 the issues in dispute in this matter. Given the sensitive and 6 potentially salacious issues in this lawsuit, there is no 7 public value in…
…S. 178, 182 (1962)). In addition to considering the effect of amendment on the parties, the court must consider “the importance of the amendment on the proper determination of the merits of a dispute.” 6 Wright & Miller, Fed. Prac. & Fed…
…Accordingly, the presumption of public access in filings submitted in connection with discovery disputes or motions in limine is generally somewhat lower than the presumption applied to material introduced at trial, or in connection with dispositive motions such as motions…
…S. 178, 182 (1962)). In addition to considering the effect of amendment on the parties, the court must consider “the importance of the amendment on the proper determination of the merits of a dispute.” 6 Wright & Miller, Fed. Prac. & Fed…
…3d DCA 2014). In this case, Defendant does not appear to dispute that an attorney-client privilege exists with regard to the communications between Ms. Giuffre and her attorneys. Rather, Defendant’s argument is that the privilege has somehow been…
…DE 1108, at 1. This next phase specifically contemplates individualized review for each affected non-party, and a provision is made for an evidentiary hearing to resolve any factual disputes as to each non-party. See id. at 3. We…
…3d DCA 2014). In this case, Defendant does not appear to dispute that an attorney-client privilege exists with regard to the communications between Ms. Giuffre and her attorneys. Rather, Defendant’s argument is that the privilege has somehow been…
…Accordingly, the presumption of public access in filings submitted in connection with discovery disputes or motions in limine is generally somewhat lower than the presumption applied to material introduced at trial, or in connection with dispositive motions such as motions…
…Accordingly, the presumption of public access in filings submitted in connection with discovery disputes or motions in limine is generally somewhat lower than the presumption applied to material introduced at trial, or in connection with dispositive motions such as motions…
…S. 178, 182 (1962)). In addition to considering the effect of amendment on the parties, the court must consider “the importance of the amendment on the proper determination of the merits of a dispute.” 6 Wright & Miller, Fed. Prac. & Fed…
…Accordingly, the presumption of public access in filings submitted in connection with discovery disputes or motions in limine is generally somewhat lower than the presumption applied to material introduced at trial, or in connection with dispositive motions such as motions…
…S. 178, 182 (1962)). In addition to considering the effect of amendment on the parties, the court must consider “the importance of the amendment on the proper determination of the merits of a dispute.” 6 Wright & Miller, Fed. Prac. & Fed…
Comments