gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.156.1.pdf PDF
…and Work [email protected],bra …
…and Work [email protected],bra …
…and Work [email protected],br …
…and Work [email protected],br …
…Argument About Her Right to a Fair Criminal Trial Was Raised and Rejected on Appeal. ...............................................................................................8 IV. Maxwell’s Argument Concerning Potential Evidence at Her Criminal Trial Was Raised on Appeal and is Irrelevant to t…
…Work Product/joint 2/16/2015 [email protected],robiej defense/common 2 1:05 [email protected] [email protected] Discussion of evidence among client and attorneys interest Wit…
…Protective Orders and Court Orders (“Motion to Compel”) 2. Motions in Limine re. Admissibility of Evidence and Related Orders (“Motion in Limine re. Admissibility of Evidence”) 3. Motions in Limine re. Expert Testimony and Related Orders (“Motion in Limine re…
…and Work [email protected],br …
…overly broad and unduly burdensome, as individually logging all privileged responsive documents would be over…
…burdensome, as individually logging all privileged responsive documents would be overly burdensome. Plaintiff …
…Preska September 18, 2019 Page |2 2. Motions in Limine re. Admissibility of Evidence and Related Orders (“Motion in Limine re. Admissibility of Evidence”) 3. Motions in Limine re. Expert Testimony and Related Orders (“Motion in Limine re. Expert”) 4…
…51 (2d Cir. 2019) (explaining the same). This Document is akin to a summary exhibit under Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 — a mere aid prepared by the parties to assist the Court in carrying out its work. It includes the…
…burden (“Privacy Interests”). CI-4 - Preserving the fundamental rights of suspects or others under criminal investigation – including due process right to a fair trial and impartial jury unimpaired by excessive publicity, release of potentially inadmissible evidence for the Criminal Action…
… CI-6; Doe to and deposition testimony potential CI-7 remain evidence. sealed (#338- 9) …
…Finally, the materials at issue should not be released publicly because the criminal court overseeing Ms. Maxwell’s criminal prosecution has not yet had an opportunity to determine whether the evidence will be admissible at trial or suppressed. I. As…
…portion of her transcript, it is clear her real concern, expressed on the second page, is concealing potential evidence of perjury. This is not a recognized countervailing interest to overcome the presumption of public access. First, Ms. Maxwell’s privacy…
…supra, 464 U.S. at 510)). Ms. Maxwell’s arguments next. According to the Herald, Ms. Maxwell seeks to “suppress” evidence of perjury. Dkt. 1195 at 2. Not so. Ms. Maxwell did not lie during her depositions, and the government…
…authority’s findings. See, id. (“’For the prosecutors to describe her as not credible means only that they did not think they had sufficient evidence to win. But she was raped,’ the lawyer said in - a statement.”). Unfortunately, counsel’s…
…internal quotations omitted). B. “Ancillary” court submissions. A court’s authority to oversee discovery and control the evidence introduced at trial is ancillary to the court’s core role in adjudicating a case. Brown, 929 F.3d at 50. Accordingly…
…18 Maxwell argues that the unsealing process should be put on hold 19 because the Court that is overseeing her criminal prosecution 20 has not yet determined whether these documents will be 21 considered admissible evidence or testimony at trial…
…will remain sealed. It mentions various Doe names, but 21 more seriously, it marshals evidence in a manner that might be 22 prejudicial to a fair trial for Ms. Maxwell, so this document 23 will remain sealed for those reasons. …
Comments