gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1219.30.pdf PDF
…DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X ............................................. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. …
…DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X ............................................. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. …
…VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. 15-cv-07433-RWS ...... GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. --------------------------------------------------X …
…of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X .. ............................................. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, …
…of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X ............................................. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. …
…Virginia L. Giuffre, Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ____________________________/ DECLARATION OF SIGRID MCCAWLEY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING FINANC…
…X .......................................... VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. 15-cv-07433-RWS ...... GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant…
…to Enforce Court Order and Direct Defendant to Answer Depo Questions 370: Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order regarding Financial Information 335: Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order for Court to Direct Defendant to Disclose Individuals Whom Defendant…
…the subpoena served on Ms. Ransome seeks documents that are wholly irrelevant to the underlying action including protected financial information and documents or communications between Sarah Ransome and her attorneys, which are protected by the attorney- client privilege and the…
…the subpoena served on Ms. Ransome seeks documents that are wholly irrelevant to the underlying action including protected financial information and documents or communications between Sarah Ransome and her attorneys, which are protected by the attorney- client privilege and the…
…6, 7 Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) ................................................................................................ 3, 6 Natixis Financial Products LLC v. Bank of America, N.A., 10 Civ. 3656, 2016 WL 7165981 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 7…
…the subpoena served on Ms. Ransome seeks documents that are wholly irrelevant to the underlying action including protected financial information and documents or communications between Sarah Ransome and her attorneys, which are protected by the attorney- client privilege and the…
…agree to unseal the identities of non-party Does where that information is still sealed in Maxwell: As used in this Protective Order, the term “Confidential Information” includes (i) private financial information, such as tax records and bank account numbers…
…that Does 73 and 93 were not “involved in any of the conduct underlying this action” or “accused of any wrongdoing” because they worked for Epstein in a “financial capacity” or because Plaintiff could not remember their names at deposition. …
…each person individually. 22 Q (BY MS. MENNINGER) Okay. Name the other 23 politically connected and financially powerful people 24 that Ghislaine Maxwell told you to go have sex with? 25 A Again, I'm going to tell you "they" …
…Court, and/or that plaintiff submitted to the Court for no valid purpose. The Sealing Opponents’ reputational (Dershowitz) and financial (the other Opponents) interests are diametrically opposed to Ms. Maxwell’s and the non-parties’. Because of their respective motivations…
…worked for or been in control of Ms. Maxwell. x Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein have had no financial, professional or employment relationship in more than a decade, many years before 2015 when the purportedly defamatory statement was published. Ms…
…full. 370: Defendant's Motion for Unseal and redact only names and identifying information of Non- Protective Order regarding Parties who have objected to unsealing or whose time to object to Financial Information unsealing has not yet expired. 371 Unseal…
…Ms. Maxwell’s personal financial information is not at issue in this matter and information relating thereto is irrelevant. This Interrogatory also violates Local Rule 33.3(a) – (c) in that it does not seek the name of witnesses or…
…at length calling the plaintiff in that case, 5 Mr. McNamee, a liar, calling him a liar 25 ways to Sunday, 6 talking about his financial motives, his potential financial 7 gain, et cetera. 8 Likewise, in the Davis v…
…worked for or been in control of Ms. Maxwell. Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein have had no financial, professional or employment relationship in more than a decade, many years before 2015 when the purportedly defamatory statement was published. Ms…
Comments