…s accountability and legitimacy.” No. 14-CV-6867 (VEC), 2016 WL 1071107, at *9. “And the public has a right to know how its resources are being used—courts are funded by the public, . . . and the laws under which parties…
…Motion for Sanctions (“Sur-Reply”), stating as follows: INTRODUCTION Plaintiff’s Response and Sur-Reply are founded entirely on a miscomprehension of the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 and 33. She strenuously argues that she has “disclosed…
…Motion for Sanctions (“Sur-Reply”), stating as follows: INTRODUCTION Plaintiff’s Response and Sur-Reply are founded entirely on a miscomprehension of the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 and 33. She strenuously argues that she has “disclosed…
…present in her case-in-chief. Ms. Maxwell has filed well-founded motions in limine to exclude the testimony of both Dr. Kliman and Professor Coonan prohibiting from providing their credibility and vouching opinions. This is the subject matter of…
…Court addressed. Accordingly, the objection is well founded. Plaintiff’s tortured explanation about how the question fits into the Court’s Order is nonsense. 16 G. Objection to Question Number 8 “In terms of preparing for this deposition, what…
…14 all avenues available to us to obtain this information. There 15 is really no place else to go. And so there is -- I think it 16 is not well founded, your Honor, that there is some notion that 17 …
…the objection is well founded. Plaintiff’s tortured explanation about how the question fits into the Court’s Order is nonsense. 16 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1327-26 Filed 01/05/24 Page 19 of 27…
…Thus, the notion that Churcher may be compelled to testify simply because she “observed” firsthand some of the events about which Maxwell is inquiring in this civil case is not well founded. In any event, the various accusations of Churcher…
…from testifying at trial. Taylor is not properly qualified as an expert on some subjects that he plan to testify about, his testimony is not well-founded on reliable principles, will not be helpful to the jury, and is prejudicial…
…simply too tangential and remote to be relevant even under the most broad definitions of relevance. Accordingly, Ms. Maxwell’s objection is well founded and should be sustained by the Court. II. MS. MAXWELL’S SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS ARE PROPER Ms…
Comments