…issuing the denial. Plaintiff’s attempt to amplify this proceeding into something broader should not be condoned. Because the evidence sought is nothing more than extraneous inadmissible “circumstantial evidence” 7 irrelevant to proving the essential elements of the claim, “the…
…issuing the denial. Plaintiff’s attempt to amplify this proceeding into something broader should not be condoned. Because the evidence sought is nothing more than extraneous inadmissible “circumstantial evidence” 7 irrelevant to proving the essential elements of the claim, “the…
……”). Although relevance in discovery is broader than that required for admissibility at trial, "the object of inquiry must have some evidentiary value before an order to compel disclosure of otherwise inadmissible material will issue." Zenith Electronics Corp. v. Exzec…