…burden (“Privacy Interests”). CI-4 - Preserving the fundamental rights of suspects or others under criminal investigation – including due process right to a fair trial and impartial jury unimpaired by excessive publicity, release of potentially inadmissible evidence for the Criminal Action…
…422, 468 640 DATE DOC. # DEFENDANT’S POSITION C/I[1] Status FILED Court Keep sealed – Non-Party reliance on ordered ot…
…Maxwell. The arguments should not be re-litigated. Maxwell argues that “[t]he Sealed Items contain information relevant to the Criminal Action that may or may not later be determined inadmissible in that trial,” and that “[u]nless suppressed, the…
…are not strictly and inescapably necessary.” Id. “After the commencement of the trial itself, inadmissible prejudicial information about a defendant can be kept from a jury by a variety of means. When such information is publicized during a pretrial proceeding…
…Reports, some redacted, some unredacted, with multiple references to Non-Party Does. Exhibit 4 and 7 are inadmissible hearsay transcripts from an unreliable deceased individual never deposed by Ms. Maxwell. Exhibits 5 and 6 concern J. Doe 1. III. DE…
…burden (“Privacy Interests”). CI-4 - Preserving the fundamental rights of suspects or others under criminal investigation – including due process right to a fair trial and impartial jury unimpaired by excessive publicity, release of potentially inadmissible evidence for the Criminal Action…
…little weight at 23 this stage with respect to these specific documents. The 24 public's First Amendment right of access to these documents is 25 not outweighed by the prospective inadmissibility of certain of SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.•• …
Comments