…the Court to reconsider its unsealing order with respect to “13 of the 29 documents that this Court unsealed,” based on her assertion that the Court’s ruling was somehow inconsistent with its prior orders concerning other Non-Party Does…
…s approach would capture far fewer docket entries implicating Does 1 and 2, and is therefore inconsistent with the Court’s decision to proceed by non-party, as opposed to by motion.1 It would also delay the unsealing process…
…are overbroad, and seek to obscure wide swaths of information in a manner wholly inconsistent with this Court’s (and the Second Circuit’s) direction that any redactions be narrowly tailored. 1 Pursuant to the Court’s October 21, 2020…
…the objection (and non-objection) was lodged prior to receipt of the excerpts. Moreover, it is fundamentally inconsistent to permit “unsealing” but keeping their names anonymous. Ms. Maxwell raised some concerns about Doe 1 in the unredacted “Reply in Support…
…Ms. Maxwell’s narrow and targeted request of this Court. For her part, plaintiff’s letter is patently inconsistent. The stakes first. “No right ranks higher than the right of the accused to a fair trial.” Press-Enter. Co. v…
… For example, the September 25 Email is internally inconsistent in that it purports not to object to unsealing but in the same breath objects to the unsealing of the names of Does 1 and 2. This evinces a fundamental misunderstanding…
…C, D. Further, Ms. Maxwell’s claim that the Court’s ruling on these documents is premature because they name other third parties who have not yet received notice is inconsistent with the Court’s note in Dkt. 1053. There…
…to "prove" an assertion about the allegedly changing nature of a public "story." Similarly, to the extent that the Joinder Motion is inconsistent with published articles by Churcher, that would b e apparent from the face of the Articles themselves…
…upcoming trial. In raising this point, we certainly do not suggest that the deposition would be inadmissible should Ms. Giuffre offer inconsistent testimony at trial. Of course, a witness who gives inconsistent statements can be impeached with those statements, as…
…statement to be admitted to rebut an “implied” charge of fabrication. The Second Circuit has made clear that the party admitting a prior consistent statement does “not have to point to a specific inconsistent statement” being attacked. United States v…
Comments