…17, 2024 notices of appeal in this case untimely by several years. Maxwell Br. at 14–18. We are not persuaded. Appellate jurisdiction generally exists only over the “final decisions of the district courts,” 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and…
…Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, 814 F.3d 132, 142 (2d Cir. 2016) (“The courts have long recognized the “general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.”) (citing Nixon, 435 U.S. at 597…
…Yet, with this second batch of documents, Ms. Maxwell offers only the same repackaged generalized arguments, which this Court and the Second Circuit have already rejected as insufficient to support the continued sealing of documents in this matter. Giuffre, 827…
…158 (1945) (“Moreover, we are not prepared to concede that the general right of inspection of public records enables one in every instance to publish such records broadcast without regard to the truth of defamatory matter contained in them.”). Here…
…court. It holds “that when a court has ruled on an issue, that decision should generally be adhered to by that court in subsequent stages in the same case,” unless “cogent” and “compelling” reasons militate otherwise. United States v. Quintieri…
…even so, the privacy interests at stake outweigh any presumption of public access to the Document. The public does not have an absolute right to access and inspect court documents; rather, courts may exercise their supervisory power to ensure that…
Comments