…without redaction after ninety (90) calendar days. This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: Social Security numbers; dates of birth; minors’ names; and financial account numbers. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2…
…without redaction after ninety (90) calendar days. This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: Social Security numbers; dates of birth; minors’ names; and financial account numbers. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2…
…without redaction after ninety (90) calendar days. This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: Social Security numbers; dates of birth; minors’ names; and financial account numbers. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2…
…without redaction after ninety (90) calendar days. This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: Social- Security numbers; dates of birth; minors’ names; and financial account numbers. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2…
…pending motion to intervene and to unseal documents. 2. In my previous declaration, I characterized the offenses to which Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty as “involving sex with minors” (¶ 7) and “related to sex with minors” (¶ 10). These statements were imprecise…
…1999. .................................... 56 2. The January 2015 statement accurately denied that Ms. Maxwell “regularly participate[d] in Epstein’s sexual exploitation of minors” and that “the Government knows” such fact. ..................…
…nor disseminate them to third parties. They contain personal, sensitive, and embarrassing information. Many of them also concern minors and a victim of sexual assault; therefore, they are protected by various state statutes. Ms. Giuffre requests that this Court maintain…
…without redaction after ninety (90) calendar days. This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: Social Security numbers; dates of birth; minors’ names; and financial account numbers. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2…
…The Intervenors’ requests to unseal should be denied. A. Intervenors’ First Proposition of Law: For minor victims of sexual abuse, “redactions should be applied sparingly to shield only information that would identify those who have not already been publicly identified…
…As the newspapers suggest, it is unlikely that the entirety of these documents should properly be sealed, especially where none of the witnesses are minors. Moreover, the Court seems to have misunderstood Intervenor’s motion to unseal. Intervenor did not…
…1999. .................................... 56 2. The January 2015 statement accurately denied that Ms. Maxwell “regularly participate[d] in Epstein’s sexual exploitation of minors” and that “the Government knows” such fact. ..................…
…unsealed. As set forth in Intervenors’ prior responses, any privacy rights Ms. Maxwell may have are far outweighed by the public interest in allegations of sexual trafficking of minors, Ms. Maxwell’s reliance on the protective order was not reasonable…
…UNSEALING OF SEALED DOCUMENTS A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. This case involves allegations of sexual abuse and sexual trafficking of minors. Some documents submitted to the Court were filed under seal…
… 6, 52, and, in essence, that anyone setting foot in any Epstein’s residences, including Dershowitz, was or should have been aware Epstein was engaged in the sex trafficking of minors. See id. at ¶¶ 61-63, 71. Dershowitz is entitled…
…12 Does 55 and 56. These Does were minors at the time of 13 the incidents at issue in this action and played no part in the 14 allegations that form the basis of this action. There is no 15…
…demonstrated at length at Ms. Maxwell’s recent criminal trial, this case concerns the widespread abuse, sexual assault and trafficking of minors. It was only after and because of Intervenors' investigative reporting that Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell were arrested…
…UNSEALING OF SEALED DOCUMENTS A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. This case involves allegations of sexual abuse and sexual trafficking of minors. Some documents submitted to the Court were filed under seal…
…Epstein pleaded to the state charges.” Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 45 (2d Cir. 2019) Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of 1) Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts, 18 U.S.C. § 371…
…to our revised Rule 26 disclosures, 13 we, in order to divulge all information relevant to the case, 14 had a list of individuals on there who are allegedly victims of 15 sexual abuse themselves as minors or witnessed things. …
…Sexual content alone is insufficient to justify continued sealing of Ms. Maxwell’s deposition transcript. This case concerns allegations of sexual assault and trafficking of minors. There is no recognized privacy interest in allegations of sex trafficking. Any privacy interest…