…respect to such evidentiary and discovery matters can cause substantial harm” and that such motions “are therefore of value to those monitoring the federal court,” rendering them “subject to at least some presumption of public access.” 929 F.3d at…
…case. The Court should not allow such callous abuse of a First Amendment right, particularly as there is no merit to Dershowitz’s claim (Br. at 21) that ‘public monitoring has an important role to play here.’” Id. at 19…
…The paper’s value to “those monitoring the federal courts” would be “negligible,” id., since the federal court would have exercised no judicial authority in connection with the paper. 3 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 996 Filed…
…14 great weight is given to documents that are material to particular judicial decisions and thus critical to ‘determining litigants’ substantive rights -- conduct at the heart of Article III -- and . . . public monitoring of that conduct.’” All Funds, 643 F. Supp…
…See Amodeo, 71 F.3d at 1051. Accordingly, given the public’s interest in monitoring the judicial functions overseeing this case, that with important and national ramifications that have been widely reported in the media, the deposition material should be…
…of the presumption of public access by evaluating “the role of the material at issue in the exercise of the Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts.” United States v…
…criminal proceedings, Maxwell instead criticizes the court-ordered unsealing process generally, claiming that the unsealing process has been weaponized against her and that the media has not “served the function of ‘monitoring the federal courts.’” Maxwell Br. at 2. Maxwell…
…Record (19 Civ. 3377 (LAP)) 3 This highlights yet another issue regarding Dershowitz’s request – namely, that he provides no suggestion as to how the host of interested parties in Maxwell may monitor and, as necessary, object to Dershowitz’s…
…2d Cir. 2017) (explaining that, in considering whether the report of a monitor charged with assessing compliance with a deferred prosecution agreement is a judicial 14 Case Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP 16-3945, Document Document 315-2, 08…
…such 3 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 995 Filed 10/02/19 Page 5 of 11 evidentiary and discovery matters can cause substantial harm. Such materials are therefore of value to those monitoring the federal courts. Thus…
…presumption of access, which is a function of "the role of the material at issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power" and "the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts." See id.; Stern v…
…marks omitted). This presumption is grounded in principles of transparency and government accountability. As recognized by the Second Circuit: [P]rofessional and public monitoring is an essential feature of democratic control. Monitoring both provides judges with critical views of their…
…of access. “[T]he presumption of access must be governed by the role of the material at issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts. Generally…
…access that should be accorded it. The weight accorded a judicial document depends upon its role “in the exercise of Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts.” Id. at 49…
…s plight. However, when the Article III power of the Court is invoked, “access to testimony and documents” makes monitoring necessary to instill in the public “confidence in the conscientiousness, reasonableness, or honesty of judicial proceedings.” United States v. Amodeo…
…2d Cir. 2017) (explaining that, in considering whether the report of a monitor charged with assessing compliance with a deferred prosecution agreement is a judicial 14 Case Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS 18-2868, DocumentDocument 217-1, 07/03…
…2d Cir. 2017) (explaining that, in considering whether the report of a monitor charged with assessing compliance with a deferred prosecution agreement is a judicial 14 Case Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP 18-2868, DocumentDocument 273-2, 08/09…
…2019). Because “erroneous judicial decision-making with respect to such evidentiary and discovery matters can cause substantial harm,” the documents are “of value ‘to those monitoring the federal courts’” and “subject to at least some presumption of public access.” Id…
…of that presumption; that determination is “governed by the role of the material at issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts.” Id. The information generally…
…that the weight of the presumption is a function of: "(1) the role of the material at issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power and (2) the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts…
Comments