…1993) (internal citations omitted). The Defendant’s continued systemic foot-dragging and obstructionism – even following the Court’s June 20 Sealed Order and August 10, 2016 Order [DE 352] – makes an adverse inference instruction with regard to Defendant’s documents…
…and in light of the defamation claim in this case, is so unfounded and obstructionist that it constitutes a violation of this Court’s Order, whether or not Defendant actually engaged in the “extraordinary and unreasonable” task of running the…
…sanctions by complying once caught in her improper conduct. “The sanctions imposed by Rule 37 for obstructing or failing to comply with discovery procedures would be hollow indeed if they could be imposed only on those whose efforts at concealment…
…of Defendant’s electronic data to ensure compliance with this Court’s Order. In addition, in view of the pattern of obstructive behavior, the Court should give to the jury an adverse inference instruction. October 28, 2016 8 For example…
…is still hiding. “The sanctions imposed by Rule 37 for obstructing or failing to comply with discovery procedures would be hollow indeed if they could be imposed only on those whose efforts at concealment proved to be successful. Plaintiff may…
…his statements. Mr. Rodriguez is a convicted criminal, and was convicted for obstruction of justice based on the very testimony Plaintiff seeks to admit. He either created evidence to use in those proceedings, or he hid evidence in them. Either…
…complied with discovery obligations. As fully set forth in the Reply, a party cannot avoid the penalties of its own sanctionable conduct simply because the opposing party has been able to overcome some of the obstructionist tactics. Nittolo v. Brand…
…is still hiding. “The sanctions imposed by Rule 37 for obstructing or failing to comply with discovery procedures would be hollow indeed if they could be imposed only on those whose efforts at concealment proved to be successful. Plaintiff may…
…complied with discovery obligations. As fully set forth in the Reply, a party cannot avoid the penalties of its own sanctionable conduct simply because the opposing party has been able to overcome some of the obstructionist tactics. Nittolo v. Brand…
…is still hiding. “The sanctions imposed by Rule 37 for obstructing or failing to comply with discovery procedures would be hollow indeed if they could be imposed only on those whose efforts at concealment proved to be successful. Plaintiff may…
…production - long after the close of fact discovery - would be untimely and prejudicial. Accordingly, based on Defendant’s systematic foot-dragging and obstructionism during the entire discovery period, and based on the prejudice to Ms. Giuffre concerning the late production…
…1993) (internal citations omitted). The Defendant’s continued systemic foot-dragging and obstructionism – even following the Court’s June 20 Sealed Order and August 10, 2016 Order [DE 352] – makes an adverse inference instruction with regard to Defendant’s documents…
…sanctions by complying once caught in her improper conduct. “The sanctions imposed by Rule 37 for obstructing or failing to comply with discovery procedures would be hollow indeed if they could be imposed only on those whose efforts at concealment…
…is still hiding. “The sanctions imposed by Rule 37 for obstructing or failing to comply with discovery procedures would be hollow indeed if they could be imposed only on those whose efforts at concealment proved to be successful. Plaintiff may…