…Because Ms. Giuffre has shown the importance of reopening Defendant’s deposition on these several important documents, because Defendant has not offered any substantial countervailing consideration, the Court should allow Ms. Giuffre to question Defendant in a deposition about these…
…Because Ms. Giuffre has shown the importance of reopening Defendant’s deposition on these several important documents, because Defendant has not offered any substantial countervailing consideration, the Court should allow Ms. Giuffre to question Defendant in a deposition about these…
…to why she could access one email account from Epstein’s private server, but not her other account from Epstein’s private server. No details are offered. Accordingly, Defendant fails to meet her burden under Rule 26(b)(2)(B…
…signed and the documents have been produced; and 2) there is no prejudice because they have offered to permit the re-deposition of Plaintiff on newly revealed medical providers and belatedly produced documents. The law does not permit a Plaintiff…
…Ms. Giuffre would need to designate significant parts of the Dershowitz transcript to respond to the misleading impression that the designations offered by Defendant would create. And as the 8 Similar hearsay problems riddle all of references See, e.g…