…2 of 20 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .................................................................................................1 ARGUMENT ..............................................................................................................................3 I.…
…Maxwell objected to the second deposition, based in part on her privacy concerns about testifying to her adult consensual activity (id.); • Judge Sweet overruled Ms. Maxwell’s objections to the deposition, ruling that her “privacy concerns are alleviated by the…
…2016 that Ms. Maxwell must sit for a second deposition on eight topics all “relating to [her] own sexual activity” and “her knowledge of the sexual activity of others.” (DE 316-6 at 10) Judge Sweet overruled Ms. Maxwell’s…
…a non-existent “investigative privilege.” When Ms. Maxwell demonstrated that the “investigative privilege” does not exist, Plaintiff threw up the inapplicable “public interest” privilege, the assertion of which was overruled by your Honor on April 21, 2016. The Court ordered: …
…When Ms. Maxwell demonstrated that the “investigative privilege” did not exist, Plaintiff threw up the inapplicable “public interest” privilege, the assertion of which was overruled by the Court on April 21, 2016. The Court Ordered: “The criminal investigation. Any materials…
…of this 20 production on -- you are going to have to -- well, wait a 21 minute. Let me put it this way. The objections to this 16 are 22 overruled except for the privilege. OK? 23 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor…
…85. B. Dershowitz’s Present, Expanded Second (or Third) Bite at the Apple and Giuffre’s Acquiescence to the Same With his objections to the protocol overruled in Maxwell, and having already failed to circumvent it once in Dershowitz, Dershowitz…
…of this 20 production on -- you are going to have to -- well, wait a 21 minute. Let me put it this way. The objections to this 16 are 22 overruled except for the privilege. OK? 23 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor…
…1247 at 20, Plaintiff only addresses Does 28, 97 and 144’s replies. The Court should overrule their objections.1 In its April 19, 2022, ruling concerning the first set of Non-Party Objectors, the Court ordered that certain documents…
…and Ogden v. London Electric Railway Co. . (1933) 49 T.L.R. 542, C.A. overruled. Anderson v. Bank of British Columbia (1876) 2 Ch.D. 644, Sir George Jessel M.R. and C.A. and Grant v. Downs (1976…
…testify under pseudonym because “these generalized concerns are present in every high-profile criminal case”). Accordingly, the Court should overrule the objections of Doe 133 and unseal the judicial documents pertaining to them. 1 By order dated July 20, 2023…
…s objections should suffice. 14 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1156 Filed 11/19/20 Page 19 of 19 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Court should overrule Maxwell’s objections as to Docket Entries 231, 279…
…be unsealed now will reduce the need to revisit documents already partially unsealed and will streamline the unsealing process (likely by years). CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Court should overrule Maxwell’s objections as to Docket Entries 345, 356…
…sanctions against Defendant, Alan M. Dershowitz in connection to his filing the Motion in Limine to Overrrule Objections As to Application of Settlement Rules, Filing# 35429605 E-filed 12/11 /2015 at 10:08:04 a.m., and to strike…
…seizure—within the meaning of the fourth amendment.” Boyd v United States, 116 U.S. 616, 634–35 (1886), overruling in part on other grounds as recognized in Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 407–08 (1976). Finally…