gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1219.30.pdf PDF
…DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X ............................................. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. …
…DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X ............................................. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. …
…that the Defendant may be selling her assets in New York and transferring the money outside the jurisdiction. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion for a protective order should be denied.1 I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT As recounted by Defendant (DE 370 at…
…that the Defendant may be selling her assets in New York and transferring the money outside the jurisdiction. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion for a protective order should be denied.1 I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT As recounted by Defendant (DE 370 at…
…who was unable to produce the documents because of this Court’s Protective Order. 4 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1111 Filed 09/01/20 Page 5 of 14 ‘unduly delay and prejudice the adjudication of the…
…2016, and designated by Plaintiff as Confidential under the Protective Order. 9. Attached as Exhibit H (filed under seal) is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Deposition of Lynn Trude Miller taken in the above captioned matter…
…2016, and designated by Plaintiff as Confidential under the Protective Order. 9. Attached as Exhibit H (filed under seal) is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Deposition of Lynn Trude Miller taken in the above captioned matter…
…33); Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Documents Subject to Improper Objections (DE 35); Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding Defendant’s Deposition (DE 70); Plaintiff’s Motion for Forensic Examination (DE 96)…
…Continued Sealing. .............................................................................................................. 9 B. The Potential for “Media Abuse” Does Not Warrant Continued Sealing. ................. 9 C. The Protective Order Does Not Warrant Continued Sealing. ......…
…Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding Defendant’s Deposition (DE 70) - Defendant’s Motion Denied (DE 106). Plaintiff’s Motion for Forensic Examination (DE 96) - Granted in part (June 20, 2016 Sealed Order). …
…Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding Defendant’s Deposition (DE 70) - Defendant’s Motion Denied (DE 106). Plaintiff’s Motion for Forensic Examination (DE 96) - Granted in part (June 20, 2016 Sealed Order). …
…s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding Defendant’s Deposition (DE 70) - Defendant’s Motion Denied (DE 106); Plaintiff’s Motion for Forensic Examination (DE 96) - Granted in part (June 20, 2016 Sealed Order)…
…Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding Defendant’s Deposition (DE 70) - Defendant’s Motion Denied (DE 106). x Plaintiff’s Motion for Forensic Examination (DE 96) - Granted in part (June 20, 2016 Sealed Order). …
…33); Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Documents Subject to Improper Objections (DE 35); Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding Defendant’s Deposition (DE 70); Plaintiff’s Motion for Forensic Examination (DE 96)…
…33); Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Documents Subject to Improper Objections (DE 35); Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding Defendant’s Deposition (DE 70); Plaintiff’s Motion for Forensic Examination (DE 96)…
…33); Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Documents Subject to Improper Objections (DE 35); Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding Defendant’s Deposition (DE 70); Plaintiff’s Motion for Forensic Examination (DE 96)…
…Defendant’s first Motion to Stay. 2 Defendant has filed a Motion to Stay [DE 17], a Motion for Protective Order regarding Maxwell’s Deposition [DE 63], a Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Response Pursuant to Rule 26 [DE 64]…
…F.R.D. 346, 351 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) (granting intervention as of right to newspaper to seek modification of protective order and access to documents in judicial proceeding); and see Kelly v. City of New York, 2003 U…
…l Tel. & Tel. Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979) for the proposition that a protective order should not be set aside absent improvidence or a compelling need, but it is inapposite here. See Opposition at p. 18. In…
…Affidavits did not enable court to conclude that claim for privilege established – Maker of affidavits required to swear further affidavit dealing with matters on which earlier affidavits not satisfactory – Not appropriate to order cross-examination D – Civil Procedure Rules 1998…
…FL 33301 (954) 356-0011 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 885 Filed 05/02/17 Page 2 of 7 This Court recently issued an Order requiring that Defendant These documents are responsive to 2 Case 1…