…Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ____________________________/ DECLARATION OF MEREDITH SCHULTZ IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S BRIEFING REGARDING DEFENANT’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT’S ORDER TO PRODUCE HER ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS AND …
…Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ____________________________/ DECLARATION OF MEREDITH SCHULTZ IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PERMIT QUESTIONING REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SEXUAL HISTORY AND …
…PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Court has considered the parties’ various submissions regarding the review protocol (“the Protocol”) to be utilized by the Court in its individualized review of the sealed materials at issue in this litigation. (See…
…Giuffre, by and through her undersigned counsel, respectfully submits the following authority for the application of the privilege claimed regarding her in camera submission, pursuant to the Court’s Order [DE 134] dated May 2, 2016.1 ARGUMENT Statements made…
…competing proposals for streamlining the unsealing process established by the Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions. See DE 1224. We write to express our views regarding the parties’ respective submissions, as well as that offered by the Miami Herald…
…Virginia L. Giuffre, Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ____________________________/ DECLARATION OF SIGRID MCCAWLEY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING…
…07433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, The parties have conferred and write today to seek clarification regarding the Court’s request for a list of names and contact information that is referenced in paragraph 2 of the Court’s October 28…
…please, when you 2 speak to say your name first so that the court reporter is able 3 to do a good transcript. 4 We have looked at your various letters regarding the 5 protocol, and with respect to paragraph…
…3771. DE1. She alleged that Jeffrey Epstein had sexually abused her and that the United States had entered into a secret non-prosecution agreement (NPA) regarding those crimes in violation of her rights. At the first court hearing on the…
…9, 2019). 4. Attached as Exhibit C is a list of Google results of internet news stories regarding Ms. Maxwell October 20, 2020. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1150 Filed 11/12/20 Page 2 of 3…
…3771. DE1. She alleged that Jeffrey Epstein had sexually abused her and that the United States had entered into a secret non-prosecution agreement (NPA) regarding those crimes in violation of her rights. At the first court hearing on the…
…3771. DE1. She alleged that Jeffrey Epstein had sexually abused her and that the United States had entered into a secret non-prosecution agreement (NPA) regarding those crimes in violation of her rights. At the first court hearing on the…
…Maxwell’s previously lodged objections to the various designations made by the Plaintiff and subject to anticipated motions in limine regarding various evidentiary and legal issues in this matter. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 592 Filed 02…
…3771. DE1. She alleged that Jeffrey Epstein had sexually abused her and that the United States had entered into a secret non-prosecution agreement (NPA) regarding those crimes in violation of her rights. At the first court hearing on the…
…were relevant, the Court addressed only the first (establishing “victim” status) and found that the “factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim (i.e., that…
…447 Unseal in full. 370: Defendant's Motion for Unseal and redact only names and identifying information of Non- Protective Order regarding Parties who have objected to unsealing or whose time to object to Financial Information unsealing has not yet…
…well,” Act § 2(a)(1)–(2), the Act requires the Government to publish the Materials subject to ap- propriate redactions regarding victim-identifying information. However, the Materials are subject to both (1) a protective order in this case (Dkt. 62)…
…P. 12(f). Petitioners’ Rule 21 Motion consists of relatively little argumentation regarding why the Court should permit them to join in this action: they argue that (1) they were sexually abused by 1 The Court notes that, regardless of…
…E. A Cautionary Note We conclude with a note of caution to the public regarding the reliability of court filings such as those unsealed today. Materials submitted by parties to a court should be understood for what they are. They…
…P. 12(f). Petitioners’ Rule 21 Motion consists of relatively little argumentation regarding why the Court should permit them to join in this action: they argue that (1) they were sexually abused by 1 The Court notes that, regardless of…
Comments