…communications with counsel) and her Motion to Compel for Improper Objections. Even then, Defendant’s counsel refused to even take the routine step of looking at Defendant’s email and other electronic documents to find responsive documents, but produced, instead…
…communications with counsel) and her Motion to Compel for Improper Objections. Even then, Defendant’s counsel refused to even take the routine step of looking at Defendant’s email and other electronic documents to find responsive documents, but produced, instead…
…communications with counsel) and her Motion to Compel for Improper Objections. Even then, Defendant’s counsel refused to even take the routine step of looking at Defendant’s email and other electronic documents to find responsive documents, but produced, instead…
…on the basis of relevant and non-specious factual support. Court intervention should not be invoked to resolve routine discovery matters on the basis of a supposition of bad faith. Further filing of frivolous or vexatious motions lacking sufficient factual…
…communications with counsel) and her Motion to Compel for Improper Objections. Even then, Defendant’s counsel refused to even take the routine step of looking at Defendant’s email and other electronic documents to find responsive documents, but produced, instead…
…information was obtained " solely " o r " merely " or " primarily " for the legal adviser. (4) Such a communication remains G privileged notwithstanding the fact that it is brought into existence as a matter of routine, or in accordance with standing instructions…
…the materials in this case, and the materials at issue in the instant motion, are sensitive in nature, and therefore fall squarely into the categories of material over which courts routinely grant protection. C.F. Strategic Growth Intern., Inc. v…
…nominally served 13 months of an 18-month sentence in a county jail: Epstein spent one day a week there, the other six out on "work release." one who routinely settles civil lowsuits Today, Jeffrey Epstein is a free man…
…Sept. 25, 1992)) (“[D]iscovery should not be routinely stayed simply on the basis that a motion to dismiss has been filed;”...“had the Federal Rules contemplated that a motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(6) would [automatically] stay…
…years ago. And, critically, such allegations will never be resolved here in light of the parties’ settlement. Courts routinely protect the identities of non-parties who are subject to unproven allegations of impropriety. See, e.g., Nixon v. Warner …
…not go to 7 any claim or defenses in this case. 8 Courts in the Southern District of New York routinely 9 exclude evidence of prior drug use under both of these rules, 10 as fully briefed in the papers…
Comments