…and engages in ad hominin, scurrilous attacks on Ms. Maxwell and her lawyers. The document should be stricken because it violates the Court’s Order of July 22, 2016; it violates basic rules of pleading, and is not a supplement…
…of Florida. In pleadings filed in that action, Mr. Edwards made representations on behalf of the Plaintiff here that were stricken by the Court as “immaterial and impertinent.” These statements were publicized and subsequently denied by Ms. Maxwell. Thereafter, Mr…
…pleadings. However, the Court should be aware that DEs 165-3, 185-2 and 185-15 are pleadings that were stricken pursuant to Rule 12(f) by U.S. District Court Judge Marra and thus are not, as Plaintiff claims…
…was in relation to. And guess what? 4 Judge Marra down in the Southern District of Florida has 5 stricken the declaration from public access. He has stricken 6 the actual paragraphs making all of these allegations, and has 7…
…as discussed below), the Rule 21 Motion will be denied. The Court also concludes that portions of the Rule 21 Motion—and related filings—should be stricken from the record. Pending for this Court’s consideration is a Motion for…
…Kenneth A. Marra, Judge) sua sponte struck all allegations against additional parties from the pleadings, including those against Dershowitz, and therefore denied Dershowitz’s motion as moot.5 The stricken allegations, however, quickly found their way into the press, and…
…as discussed below), the Rule 21 Motion will be denied. The Court also concludes that portions of the Rule 21 Motion—and related filings—should be stricken from the record. Pending for this Court’s consideration is a Motion for…
…more inculpatory context. Accordingly, we have attached as a sealed exhibit to this letter our original Non- Party List and have stricken from that list (a) the names of any reporter, (b) the names of Plaintiff’s medical treatment providers…
…as discussed below), the Rule 21 Motion will be denied. The Court also concludes that portions of the Rule 21 Motion and related filings should be stricken from the record. Pending for this Court' s consideration is a Motion for…
…allegations were false. 12. On January 5, 2015, Dershowitz filed a motion to intervene to argue to have the allegations stricken. DE 282. Dershowitz also argued that Ms. Giuffre had not provided a sworn affidavit attesting to the truth of…
…Plaintiff’s Joinder Motion, ordered the portions of the Joinder Motion pertaining to non-parties such as Ms. Maxwell stricken as ‘immaterial and impertinent,’ and restricted the documents mentioning those ‘lurid details’ from public access.” Id. at 4-5 (citations…
…Kenneth A. Marra, Judge) sua sponte struck all allegations against additional parties from the pleadings, including those against Dershowitz, and therefore denied Dershowitz’s motion as moot.5 The stricken allegations, however, quickly found their way into the press, and…
…the Southern District of Florida, ordered the portions of the Joinder Motion pertaining to non-parties including Ms. Maxwell stricken as “immaterial and impertinent,” and restricted the documents mentioning “lurid details” from public access. Mot. to Dism. at 4-5.…
…Kenneth A. Marra, Judge) sua sponte struck all allegations against additional parties from the pleadings, including those against Dershowitz, and therefore denied Dershowitz’s motion as moot.5 The stricken allegations, however, quickly found their way into the press, and…
…are ‘redundant, immaterial, impertinent, [and/] or scandalous,’ were ‘not relevant to the performance of the judicial function,’ and therefore should be afforded no presumption of access and either stricken or kept under seal.” Id. at 21. The Court should reject…
…ARE IMPROPER Plaintiff advocates “re-releasing” DE 356. The Court need only look at the docket to see that DE 356 is the refiling of DE 316 (stricken due to a filing error), which was ruled on in Round 2…
…as discussed below), the Rule 21 Motion will be denied. The Court also concludes that portions of the Rule 21 Motion—and related filings—should be stricken from the record. Pending for this Court’s consideration is a Motion for…
…Kenneth A. Marra, Judge) sua sponte struck all allegations against additional parties from the pleadings, including those against Dershowitz, and therefore denied Dershowitz’s motion as moot.5 The stricken allegations, however, quickly found their way into the press, and…
…that is disproportionate to the initial statement;” nor that the Statement was excessively publicized,” relative to the wide publicity net cast by Plaintiff with her “exclusive interviews” to British media and now-stricken litigation declaration. Without any evidence that Ms…
…as discussed below), the Rule 21 Motion will be denied. The Court also concludes that portions of the Rule 21 Motion—and related filings—should be stricken from the record. Pending for this Court’s consideration is a Motion for…
Comments