…Intervenor Michael Cernovich d/b/a Cernovich Media originally sought to intervene and unseal the wholly-redacted summary judgment documents filed by Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell and the subsequent summary judgment documents that would be filed relative to Maxwell’s motion…
…1026.) The Court disagrees. Because a subsequent naming of a non-party in the sealed materials may carry a different context from the naming of that non-party in the unsealed materials, the unsealing may present different consequences for the…
…trial. Ms. Maxwell’s responses to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories are based on information currently known to her and are given without waiving Ms. Maxwell’s right to use evidence of any subsequently discovered or identified facts, documents or communications. Ms…
…. . prior rulings in subsequent stages of the same case absent cogent and compelling reasons such as an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” United…
…the motion 12 to strike the testimony that you allowed over the 13 ruling. 14 SPECIAL MASTER: And there's a series of 15 those things that might need to be cleaned up in a 16 subsequent sitting. 17 MR…
…itself. Such argument occurred in open court, with counsel for Movant present throughout the entirety of the arguments, as well as the subsequent conference regarding case logistics. Notably, immediately prior to the beginning of his argument on summary judgment, counsel…
…has reviewed confidential and sealed materials from Maxwell, the Court subsequently directed the parties in Dershowitz to confer regarding “reasonable accommodation concerning Mr. Dershowitz’s requests for various filings and discovery materials from Giuffre v. Maxwell” so as to be …
…case. 3. Ransome responds to the requests as she reasonably interprets and understands the requests. Should Defendant subsequently assert an interpretation of any individual request that differs from her understanding, she reserves the right to supplement the responses. 4. To…
…case. 3. Ransome responds to the requests as she reasonably interprets and understands the requests. Should Defendant subsequently assert an interpretation of any individual request that differs from her understanding, she reserves the right to supplement the responses. 4. To…
…case. 3. Ransome responds to the requests as she reasonably interprets and understands the requests. Should Defendant subsequently assert an interpretation of any individual request that differs from her understanding, she reserves the right to supplement the responses. 4. To…
…the parties unrestricted authority to disclose publicly the confidential materials from Maxwell--not least of all because the parties only may agree to downgrade confidentiality designations for materials that the “designating party has subsequently produced in this action,” i.e.…
…had publicly defamed her in statements made by individuals operating at his direction or within scope of their employment. Cases that cite this headnote Complaint was subsequently amended to include similar claims by two additional plaintiffs. Defendant moved to dismiss. …
…trial. Ms. Maxwell’s responses to Plaintiff’s requests are based on information currently known to her and are given without waiving Ms. Maxwell’s right to use evidence of any subsequently discovered or identified facts, documents or communications. Ms…
…of Florida. In pleadings filed in that action, Mr. Edwards made representations on behalf of the Plaintiff here that were stricken by the Court as “immaterial and impertinent.” These statements were publicized and subsequently denied by Ms. Maxwell. Thereafter, Mr…
…specifically filed in the CVRA case to oppose his efforts to intervene in that case and was unquestionably already in his possession. Plaintiffs subsequently delivered a Bates stamped version of their original July 2015 document production to Dershowitz's counsel…
…place where they are located.” (cleaned up)). C. The government’s subpoena to was an unconstitutional Fourth Amendment seizure. Although Fourth Amendment challenges typically involve “the subsequent search of the container rather than to its initial seizure by the authorities, …
…Mar. 25, 2021). 3 There is no basis to believe that the protective order or subsequent sealing of documents were imposed solely for Maxwell’s benefit; Judge McMahon discussed “Maxwell[’s] … degree of pro- tection” because she “assume[d]…
…Mr. Dershowitz by requiring him to pay Ms. Giuffre's attorneys' fees relating to sealing Mr. Dershowitz's affidavit and the subsequent work and motion practice related to his continuing violations of thi s Court's Order. See, e.g.…
…No bullets or numbering, Tab stops: 1", Formatted: Font: 12 pt failure to do so shall not preclude a subsequent challenge thereto. Moreover, …
…court. It holds “that when a court has ruled on an issue, that decision should generally be adhered to by that court in subsequent stages in the same case,” unless “cogent” and “compelling” reasons militate otherwise. United States v. Quintieri…
Comments