…7433 (LAP) VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. / NOTICE OF REDACTION REQUEST – TRANSCRIPT In accordance with this Court’s forms and procedures, undersigned counsel acknowledges that redactions o…
…1 October 20, 2020 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska Counsel may proceed with filing the relevant District Court Judge documents to the public docket, subject to the United States District Court previously-ordered redactions. SO ORDERED. Southern District…
…Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 26 Log Privilege Doc ID Email Sent Date Email From Email To CC Address …
…982. The parties met and conferred several times over the past two weeks, and were able to reach agreement with the exceptions of Categories 4 and 10 below. Plaintiff believes that all documents concerning trial deposition designations (including objections and…
…a judge or a member of the public or media. The parties have seven (7) calendar days from the date of filing of this NOTICE to file with the court any NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST REDACTION of this transcript…
…23, 2020, hearing, the Court held that Defendant “fail[ed] to rebut the presumption of public access to the motions at issue and the documents filed in connection with those motions. Accordingly, those papers shall be unsealed.” July 23, 2020…
…mistaken transcription, and the answer transcribed was not the answer actually given. Counsel shall re-file the stricken document, with the redactions ordered by this Court, as soon as is practicable. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 10, 2024 New York, New…
…Filed 01/04/24 Page 2 of 27 Log Privilege Doc ID Email Sent Date Email From Email To CC Address …
…279, 315, 320 & 335 and to file under seal Exhibit D thereto. The Protective Order governing this case states: Whenever a party seeks to file any document or material containing CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION with the Court in this matter, it shall…
…a judge or a member of the public or media. The parties have seven (7) calendar days from the date of filing of this NOTICE to file with the court any NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST REDACTION of this transcript…
…1026-3 is not an accurate list of non-party names. Since this filing, the parties have provided the Court with an updated list of non-party names (“Document”), and disclosure of docket entry 1026-3, which is now outdated…
…Filed 01/03/24 Page 2 of 27 Log Privilege Doc ID Email Sent Date Email From Email To CC Address …
…2. The Reality: Courts routinely seal records concerning underage victims – well beyond replacing their names with initials – and victims do not forego their rights to privacy merely because they have played a role in a civil or criminal case against…
…320, & 335 (combined with Plaintiff’s Position) DATE DOC. # DEFENDANT’S POSITION C/I1 PLAINTIFF’S POSITION FILED Unseal and redact only (1) medical …
…172 by redacting names at pages 9 and 15 but not at page i. But DE 172, page i is presently publicly available on the docket with no redactions. Accordingly we did not redact what is already publicly available. Second…
…468 640 DATE DOC. # DEFENDANT’S POSITION C/I[1] Status FILED Redact all citations to J. Sweet 4/16/16 Sealed Order consistent with partially 345 8.9.16 redacted Order a…
…redacted Letter to the Court and her proposed redactions to Sealed Materials under seal. The Protective Order governing this case states: Whenever a party seeks to file any document or material containing CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION with the Court in this matter…
…Ms. Maxwell is submitting any proposed redactions to the materials to be unsealed tomorrow morning that are in conflict with Plaintiff’s proposed redactions. These redactions all relate to “descriptions of nonparty conduct that would allow readers to discern the…
…NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Plaintiff writes with respect to Defendant’s Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Objections to Unsealing Materials Related to Docket Entries 231, 279, 315…
…Unsealing Decided Motions The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.…
Comments