…11, 2013, and states: I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY In December 2009, Epstein filed suit against Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") and Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), based upon Epstein's well-founded belief at the time of filing his Complaint that these two individuals…
…than 30 months. As set forth in the Procedural History Section of the United States' Opposition to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victim Rights Act("CVRA"), at the last…
…Epstein be required to attend in person. PROCEDURAL HISTORY REGARDING INTERVENTION This action involves a petition filed on behalf of two individuals ("Jane Doe #1" and "Jane Doe #2") alleging that they were deprived of certain rights contained in the…
…any such participation on the pertinent intervenor "personally appear[ing] at the conference" (DE378 at 1). PROCEDURAL HISTORY REGARDING INTERVENTION This action involves a petition filed on behalf of two individuals ("Jane Doe #1" and "Jane Doe #2") alleging that…
…INTRODUCTION 1 I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 II. CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL 2 III. PROCEDURAL BACKGRO…
…11, 2013, and states: I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY In December 2009, Epstein filed suit against Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") and Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), based upon Epstein's well-founded belief at the time of filing his Complaint that these two individuals…
…Motion and the entire court file and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The facts giving rise to the above-styled cause, as well as its procedural history, are set forth in the Court's prior Order (DE 60)…
…11, 2013, and states: I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY In December 2009, Epstein filed suit against Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") and Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), based upon Epstein's well-founded belief at the time of filing his Complaint that these two individuals…
…than 30 months. As set forth in the Procedural History Section of the United States' Opposition to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victim Rights Act("CVRA"), at the last…
…Dkt. 182). For the reasons explained below, the Court determines that Plaintiff's motion should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On April 11, 2005, Plaintiff Julie Amanda Tilton ("Plaintiff") filed her original Complaint (Dkt. 1…
…for Summary Judgment on the Fourth Amended Counterclaim and Supporting Memorandum of Law, based on the law of the case doctrine. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In the Fourth Amended Counterclaim, Edwards raised two claims against Epstein: 1) abuse of process and…
…Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Brevard County. Frank Pound, Judge. DISPOSITION: Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED. CASE SUMMARY PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Petitioners sought review of an order from the Circuit Court for Brevard County (Florida), which granted…
…E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: Facsimile: E-Mail: casse p aw.utah.edu Counsel for Real Party in Interest Jane Doe …
…Pending) 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake Ci Utah 84112 Tel.: Fax: E-Mail Counselfor Bradley James Edwards EFTA00728061 …
…Letter Motions, and grant Professor Cassell and Mr. Edward's Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Upon Defendant's April 6, 2016, Letter in opposition to Professor Cassell's Motion for Appearance Pro Hac Vice, the Court…
…Epstein be required to attend in person. PROCEDURAL HISTORY REGARDING INTERVENTION This action involves a petition filed on behalf of two individuals ("Jane Doe #1" and "Jane Doe #2") alleging that they were deprived of certain rights contained in the…
…any such participation on the pertinent intervenor "personally appear[ing] at the conference" (DE378 at 1). PROCEDURAL HISTORY REGARDING INTERVENTION This action involves a petition filed on behalf of two individuals ("Jane Doe #1" and "Jane Doe #2") alleging that…
…Letter Motions, and grant Professor Cassell and Mr. Edward's Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Upon Defendant's April 6, 2016, Letter in opposition to Professor Cassell's Motion for Appearance Pro Hac Vice, the Court…
…STATES POINT IN FAVOR OF ALLOWING TO CALL JEFFREY EPSTEIN FOR PURPOSES OF OBTAINING AN ADVERSE INFERENCE. 2 A. Federal Law Controls This Procedural Issue 2 B. The LiButti Factors Poi…
…any such participation on the pertinent intervenor "personally appear[ing] at the conference" (DE378 at 1). PROCEDURAL HISTORY REGARDING INTERVENTION This action involves a petition filed on behalf of two individuals ("Jane Doe #1" and "Jane Doe #2") alleging that…