EFTA01100373.pdf PDF
DRAFT EPSTEIN - CVRA - REPLY TO PETITONER'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION: 1. Any failure to notify or consult were not the result of any "conspiracy" with JE, nor any bad faith by the Government: they were the result of the USAO…
DRAFT EPSTEIN - CVRA - REPLY TO PETITONER'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION: 1. Any failure to notify or consult were not the result of any "conspiracy" with JE, nor any bad faith by the Government: they were the result of the USAO…
…Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the…
…Ex. S, ¶ 14. In seeking summary judgment, Jane Doe No. 2 bears the burden of coming forward and showing that there are no facts in dispute regarding her desire to consult with the prosecutor and her status as a victim…
…Civ.P. 56(c), summary judgment is appropriate after adequate time for discovery and upon motion, against a party who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to the party's case, and…
…the foregoing Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment was filed with the Clerk of the Court and served on counsel on the attached service list using CM/ECF. Assistant United States Attorney 9…
…rulings interpreting the CVRA. After failed efforts to settle the case, the parties' cross motions for summary judgment remained pending for more than a year. In 2017, President Donald Trump nominated Acosta to be Secretary of Labor. At his March…
…Ex. S. 1 14. In seeking summary judgment, Jane Doe No. 2 bears the burden of coming forward and showing that there are no facts in dispute regarding her desire to consult with the prosecutor and her status as a…
…Civ.P. 56(c), summary judgment is appropriate after adequate time for discovery and upon motion, against a party who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to the party's case, and…
…S STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment…
From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:35:54 +0000 Importance: Normal There was a motion for summary judgment in the federal suit the victims filed, but the facts centered on victim notification, so the…
…rulings interpreting the CVRA. After failed efforts to settle the case, the parties' cross motions for summary judgment remained pending for more than a year. In 2017, President Donald Trump nominated Acosta to be Secretary of Labor. At his March…
…rulings interpreting the CVRA. After failed efforts to settle the case, the parties' cross motions for summary judgment remained pending for more than a year. In 2017, President Donald Trump nominated Acosta to be Secretary of Labor. At his March…
…rulings interpreting the CVRA. After failed efforts to settle the case, the parties' cross motions for summary judgment remained pending for more than a year. In 2017, President Donald Trump nominated Acosta to be Secretary of Labor. At his March…
…18 U.S.C. § 3771. They have recently filed a sixty-page summary judgment motion (DE 361), supported by more than one hundred exhibits, primarily incontestable emails between the Government and Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel. These emails establish incontrovertibly…
…the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48) (the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the…
…vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408)…
…08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT …
…20, 21 iii EFTA01194980 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This matter arises from the Appellant, Bradley Edwards's appeal of the trial court's final Order granting Appellee's Motion for Summary Judg…
…the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48) (the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the…
…vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408)…
Comments