EFTA00596701.pdf PDF
…s Motion is Distinct from Prof. Dershowitz's 9 3.0 CONCLUSION 10 ii EFTA00596702 …
…s Motion is Distinct from Prof. Dershowitz's 9 3.0 CONCLUSION 10 ii EFTA00596702 …
…the Court are letter-motions filed by Intervenors Julie Brown and Miami Herald Media Company, (dkt. no. 1321), and Intervenor Alan Dershowitz, (dkt. no. 1323), seeking to unseal in part docket entry 1026-3 to disclose the identities of the…
…JJ?/, td !£.I] OSED ORDER GRANTING DERSHOWITZ'S SEPTEMBER 26 2016 LETTER MOTION TO PUBLICALLY FILE A LESS REDACTED VERSION OF DERSHOWITZ'S REPLY DECLARATION Sweet, D.J. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Proposed Intervenor Alan M…
…LAURA A. MENNINGER 21 EMERY CELLI BRINCKERHOFF & ABADY LLP 22 Attorneys for Intervenor Alan M. Dershowitz BY: ANDREW G. CELLI 23 RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP PLLC 24 Attorneys for Invervenor Julie Brown BY: JAY MARSHALL WOLMAN 25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P…
…15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Dear Judge Preska: We write respectfully on behalf of non-party John Doe with regard to the Protective Order that was proposed by the parties in Giuffre v. Dershowitz, 19 Civ. 3377 (LAP) (“Dershowitz”) on December…
…a “Compelling Reason” nor “Good Cause” to Seal the Summary Judgment Documents ........................................................... 8 2.2.3 Movant’s Motion is Distinct from Prof. Dershowitz’s ........................................... 9 3.0 CONCLUSION.................................…
…2.2.2 The Parties Have Provided Neither a “Compelling Reason” nor “Good Cause” to Seal the Summary Judgment Documents ........................................................... 8 2.2.3 Movant’s Motion is Distinct from Prof. Dershowitz’s ........................................... 9 3.0 …
…3 A. The newly produced documents require that the deposition be reopened ....................... 3 B. The documents confirm that Ransome’s refusal to respond to questioning concerning her alleged representation by Dershowitz was improper................................................. 9 II. MS. RANSO…
…trustworthiness, and background. C. Alan Dershowitz Epstein has identified exhibits relating to a defamation lawsuit Edwards filed in January 2015 against Alan Dershowitz (one of Epstein's attorneys).' In that action, Edwards alleged: Despite having previously been the victim of…
…documents. Accordingly, 7 the names and identifying information for Does 1 and 2 should 8 be unsealed. 9 Additionally, Alan Dershowitz's name and information 10 identifying him may be unsealed. By his letter at docket entry 11 1138, he…
…Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and action against Epstein not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by …
…6-Statements made in judicial and Abady LLP, New York, NY, for official proceedings Intervenor-Appellant Alan M. Dershowitz. Under New York law, immaterial Marc Randazza (Jay Marshall Wolman, Las and impertinent statements in court Vegas, …
…documents. Accordingly, 7 the names and identifying information for Does 1 and 2 should 8 be unsealed. 9 Additionally, Alan Dershowitz's name and information 10 identifying him may be unsealed. By his letter at docket entry 11 1138, he…
…unsealing. 369-15 Ruled on in second round of unsealing. 369-16 Ruled on in second round of unsealing. 362: Alan Dershowitz Motion to Intervene or Modify Already public. Protective Order Unseal and redact only names and identifying information of…
…see 2 This plan was admitted by her joint defense partner, Alan Dershowitz, in his baseless Motion to Intervene (DE 362). 2 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1199-16 Filed 01/27/21 Page 4 of 12 Case…
…conference. 15 Additionally, as before, Alan Dershowitz's name and 16 information identifying him may be unsealed. As you know by 17 his letter at docket entry 1138, he has requested that 18 redactions of his name in these materials…
…20 This is a deposition excerpt from a Florida state 21 litigation attached by Mr. Dershowitz to his motion to 22 intervene in this case. The document played no apparent role 23 in the Court's decision on the motion…
…except CI-1, CI-2, CI- 407-4 8.29.16 Dershowitz and Does 1 and 2; unknown 3, CI-4 whether subject to protective order in …
…20 This is a deposition excerpt from a Florida state 21 litigation attached by Mr. Dershowitz to his motion to 22 intervene in this case. The document played no apparent role 23 in the Court's decision on the motion…
…See, e.g., DE 1138 (Prof. Dershowitz’s request that his name be unredacted). Ms. Maxwell asserted only that knowledge of who was objecting might aid the Court in “conducting future proceedings.” See DE 1100 (“Although [providing notice to all…
Comments