…Matter of Subpoena Duces Tecum Directed to for production of unreasonable amount of the Honorable Kevin M. documents, United States had strong interest in DILLON, District Attorney of Erie County. insuring just enforcement of its criminal laws, and Civ. No…
…154 F.R.D. at 92-93. Despite this prohibition, counsel for the defendant approached the Manhattan District Attorney's Office and suggested that it had evidence of criminal violations relating to the case. Id. at 93. A grand jury…
…reflect communications between the various identified United States Attorney's Offices that would be inconsistent with the duty to not circumvent or transfer a case from the immunizing district to another district even if the NPA is ultimately determined to…
…Matter of Subpoena Duces Tecum Directed to for production of unreasonable amount of the Honorable Kevin M. documents, United States had strong interest in DILLON, District Attorney of Erie County. insuring just enforcement of its criminal laws, and Civ. No…
…2011, from the District Attorney of the County of New York. We thank you for providing notice of the intended disclosure but we do object to any disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and the related list of witness/victims…
…reflect communications between the various identified United States Attorney's Offices that would be inconsistent with the duty to not circumvent or transfer a case from the immunizing district to another district even if the NPA is ultimately determined to…
…reflect communications between the various identified United States Attorney's Offices that would be inconsistent with the duty to not circumvent or transfer a case from the immunizing district to another district even if the NPA is ultimately determined to…
…154 F.R.D. at 92–93. Despite this prohibition, counsel for the defendant approached the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and suggested that it had evidence of criminal violations relating to the case. Id. at 93. A grand jury…
…Registration 6 III. The Board's Recommendation 7 IV. Pre-Hearing Investigation By the District Attorney 11 V. SORA Hearing 12 ARGUMENT …
…Chief, Scx Crimes Unit New York District Attorneys Office One Hogan Place New York, NY 10013 Patrick Egan, Esq. Assistant District Attorney, Scx Crimes Unit / Thal Bureau 40 New York District Attorney's Office One Hogan Place New York, NY…
…from so radically reversing course on appeal. The District Attorney's Office 1 EFTA01168863 was the party representing the State of New York and statutorily bore the burden of proof at the SORA hearing. In dire…
…Chief, Sex Crimes Unit New York District Attorney's Office One Hogan Place New York, NY 10013 Patrick Egan, Esq. Assistant District Attorney, Sex Crimes Unit / Trial Bureau 40 New York District Attorney's Office One Hogan Place New York…
…Registration 6 III. The Board's Recommendation 7 IV. Pre-Hearing Investigation By the District Attorney 11 V. SORA Hearing 12 ARGUMENT …
…from so radically reversing course on appeal. The District Attorney's Office 1 EFTA01085680 was the party representing the State of New York and statutorily bore the burden of proof at the SORA hearing. In dir…
…Chief, Sex Crimes Unit New York District Attorney's Office One Hogan Place New York, NY 10013 Patrick Egan, Esq. Assistant District Attorney, Sex Crimes Unit / Trial Bureau 40 New York District Attorney's Office One Hogan Place New York…
…Registration 6 III. The Board's Recommendation 7 IV. Pre-Hearing Investigation By the District Attorney 11 V. SORA Hearing 12 ARGUMENT …
…the Assistant District Attorney who represented the People at the SORA hearing -- no less than the Deputy Bureau Chief of the Sex Crimes Unit -- reached the same conclusion as that reached by officials from every other jurisdiction to have examined…
…Bureau Chief, Sex Crimes Unit New York District Attorneys Office One Hogan Place New York, NY 10013 Patrick Egan, Esq. Assistant District Attorney, Sex Crimes Unit / Trial Bureau 40 New York District Attorneys Office One Hogan Place New York, NY…
…the Assistant District Attorney who represented the People at the SORA hearing -- no less than the Deputy Bureau Chief of the Sex Crimes Unit -- reached the same conclusion as that reached by officials from every other jurisdiction to have examined…
…from so radically reversing course on appeal. The District Attorney's Office 1 EFTA00792574 was the party representing the State of New York and statutorily bore the burden of proof at the SORA hearing. In dire…
Comments