EFTA00086910
EFTA00086911 DataSet-9
EFTA00086913

EFTA00086911.pdf

DataSet-9 2 pages 380 words document
V16 V9 P17 D6 D4
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (380 words)
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 56 Filed 09/04/19 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 500 PEARL STREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10007 (212)8084715 USDC SDNY CHAMBERS OF DOCUMENT RICHARD M. BERMAN ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DOC it: i DA.TS SLED: Bruce A. Green September 4, 2019 Louis Stein Chair Fordharn University School of Law 150 West 62"d Street Room 7-168 New York City, NY 10023 Dear Professor Green, Thank you for your letter of August 30, 2019.1 appreciate your taking the time to clarify the record. I learned that you had been "retained to provide opinions as an expert on legal ethics" in owing the August 27, 2019 public hearing in US v. Epstein. I learned of your role in theme case by reading your affidavit, dated June 7, 2019, which includes your legal ethics opinion that David Boies should be di ualified from representing Ms. in that matter. As you are aware, both Mr. Boles and Ms. were invited to testify at the August 27, 2019 hearing. ain surprised that your advocacy of Mr. Boles' disqualification from representing Ms.. Lirint(in a case obviously related to US v. Epstein) was not disclosed simultaneously with your August 26, 2019 Law Journal opinion piece entitled "The Judge in Epstein's Case Should Not Turn the Dismissal Into a Drama for the Victims." I am also surprised that you would find the August 27, 2019 public hearing to be an inappropriate occasion for transparency in light of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 57 and the Crime Victims' Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771. You wrote: "This is an odd moment for transparency in a criminal case." 1 EFTA00086911 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 56 Filed 09/04/19 Page 2 of 2 Finally, it is unfortunate that your opinion piece may have been construed as an effort to chill Ms. a and Mr. Boies' right to be heard under 18 U.S.C. § 3771 at the August 27, 2019 public hearing. You wrote: "[W]hatever informational interests the victims may have would be served by affording them a chance to attend the hearing, not by giving them a speaking role." Sincerely. Richard M. Berman U.S.D.J. cc: A ey; Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.; Reid Weingarten, Esq.; David Boies, Esq. 2 EFTA00086912
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
06cdbfff25fcf9a03b9ebaced4d05dc68f8f5fa18ff032572c53ab63a438025a
Bates Number
EFTA00086911
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!