📄 Extracted Text (690 words)
20 November 2015
US Equity Insights
The drivers of our full S&P 500 intrinsic value model
Most of our valuation model inputs are fairly straightforward and typical of any intrinsic Intrinsic value drivers:
value model; such as interest rates, risk premiums, retained earnings ratio, return on I) NormalizedEPS
reinvestment, etc. But our normalized EPS input tends to require additional explanation. 2) Accounting adjustments
3) Long-term realinterest rate
Understanding our normalized EPS estimates
4) Equity risk premium
We assess EPS normality or sustainability by evaluating the ability of current year EPS
61 Growth premium
to grow at a healthy rate over the next several years. If EPS cannot grow at a healthy
Inflation affects EPS quality,
rate, which we approximate as the nominal cost of equity less the expected dividend
yield, then current year EPS must be considered cyclically peaked. It is not enough for and the risk premium.
EPS to merely grow; in order to be considered normal or sustainable, EPS must grow at
a rate that yields a return equal to the cost of equity on any additionally retained EPS.
Let us explain further using our S&P 500 EPS estimates. Although our 2015E S&P 500
EPS is $119, we think $122 better represents normalized S&P 500 EPS for 2015. Apart
from Energy and Managed Health Care, we think 2015 earnings generally represent
normal mid-cycle earning for most sectors. We think Energy is under earnings in 2015
and parts of Health Care and some other industries over earnings. We think Managed
Health Care (HMOs) profits could drift lower on higher industry taxes, limits to premium
hikes and the mix of new enrollees weighted towards elderly or with pre-existing
conditions. Our $122 normalized EPS estimate for 2015 captures the outlook for
improving profitability at Energy and weakness to come at HMOs. We consider our
2016E EPS of $125 to be roughly $2 shy of fully normalized mid-cycle earnings.
Comparing EPS growth expected over the next several years to a value neutral hurdle
rate is how we capture the magnitude of current cyclical EPS distortions and the time it
should take to return to healthy long-term growth in our normalized EPS estimates.
ki'Vhy an accounting quality adjustment to normalized EPS'
We deduct $12 from our normalized S&P 500 EPS estimate for accounting quality. Pro We reduce our pro tonna
forma or non-GAAP EPS tends to overstate and GAAP EPS tends to understate true normalized EPS est to ensure
EPS. A good measure of EPS should capture what FCF per share would be when no that it represents steady-state
investments are made for growth. At steady-state EPS = FCF/sh = DPS.
FCF per share and DPS.
An EPS discount model versus a dividend discount model e<plained
In a dividend growth or free cash flow discount model, future flows can be discounted Our normalized S&P 500 EPS
directly because earlier period flows should be reduced by investments that fed growth. estimate is the main driver of
However, earnings growth cannot be discounted directly because earnings growth fails our intrinsic value model.
to account for what portion of prior period earnings were retained to feed growth. Thus.
an EPS discount model must separate EPS growth into two parts: 1) growth from
The mechanics of our model
reinvestment at returns equal to the cost of equity, 2) growth from returns in excess of
are equivalent to a DDM.
the cost of equity or economic profit growth. Our EPS discount model calculates value
by taking the present value of growth in economic profits (not ordinary profits) and
adds this to the capitalized value of current normalized EPS.
DCF: Value = PV of all future free cash flows
DDM: Value = PV of all future dividends
Economic Profit Model: Value = book value plus all future economic profits
Incremental EP Model: Value = capitalized EPS plus all future economic profit growth
Once economic profit growth stops, equity value is simply EPS capitalized at the real
cost of equity. This is because EPS growth only adds to steady-state value (EPS/real
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. Page 19
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SONY-0119288
CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00265472
EFTA01459073
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
119ae421379e4eb041f14e14542bdfe5ae81b39ef9e3b74dc67056c2517a7ff9
Bates Number
EFTA01459073
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
1