EFTA01459723.pdf

5 February 2016 Focus Europe: Dark clouds, no storm yet Italy Economics Paola Satthi< I Research Analyst (+ Italy's bad bank(s): not enough, but it Mart," Strings, CFA Senior Economist helps This is a summary of the Special Report on Italian banks - 'State guarantee on NPL securitization: not enough, but it helps' published on 02 February 2016. :tali:: bad bank scheme Last week, after a year-long negotiation, the Italian government reached an agreement with the European Commission on a bad bank scheme that does not infringe state aid rules. According to the Italian Finance Minister there will Figure 1: Italy's too long average be no impact on Italy's large public debt. The final scheme is centered on a foreclosure time hinders growth state guarantee applied to the securitization of non-performing loans (NPL). Wet 00 5. 6Typ:cal.:hareem of • lamtdotufe remeclume• The Italian acronym of the scheme is GACS. so The main technicalities GACS is a tool that banks and NPL buyers can use to reduce the funding costs 30 24 24 of an NPL securitization. Each bank can transfer some of its NPLs to a bank 20 s is 9 9 8 i ._,1 20 specific vehicle, obtain a rating from one of the ECB recognized agencies, buy the GACS guarantee on the senior notes, and then sell the equity/junior notes to 5 to deconsolidate the vehicle (improving its balance sheet quality). 0 --11 ,IL:11--,a- i IT PT OR FA 0E Avg• DE AT 0 Al While the natural buyers of equity/junior notes will be private equity investors 4•04•04 404400 12 4440 or hedge funds, the GACS guaranteed senior notes could be offered to a wider ••.440,402014 Sane Eat Deutsche Mt spectrum of investors, or they could be repurchased by the selling bank (especially if GACS guaranteed senior notes are eligible assets to obtain funding from the ECB). The cost of the GACS will be based on the CDS of Italian issuers (financial and non-financial entities with an underlying level of risk in line with the rating of the senior notes). The cost will increase over time, creating an incentive to accelerate the NPL recoveries. We calculate a cost of Figure 2: Stuttering credit impulse c.90bps for the first three years, moving up to c.120bps from the fourth year. pp of GOP vov rra %vev wnpgbt • 3m toilet Pm What could be the impact o€ the GADS on the NFL market, Prmno demesne demam:/. rlw A All in all, the GACS reduces the funding cost of the NPL securitization. 4 However, we estimate the GACS benefit to be modest, increasing NPL prices 2 • of 3-5%. This does not seem enough to close the gap between NPLs' current 0 • NYV AII ' 1: market pricing and carrying value in banks' books (>20ppt on average). - 14111 I ic k We think that banks will tend to sell only a part of their NPL portfolios (of higher quality/more covered). The process will be gradual. In this way, banks .. .6 4 will be able to limit or avoid losses. 12 Overall, the scheme is a marginal help but it does not represent a final solution 2006 2007 2008 2009 2011 2012 2013 2015 2016 to the EUR 200bn (-12% of GDP) NPL problem of the Italian banking system. Sane E00 Snow Hare 04.0440:4 Dansfiebn• Macro Implication of the GAGS: a marginal help From a macro perspective the GACS is unlikely to change lending dynamics, although it could be part of the solution. The GACS scheme, an effective implementation of last summer's bankruptcy reform which reduces foreclosure times (Figure 1) and additional measures for easier collateral repossession could have a more visible macro impact. On a less positive note, rising concerns about Italian banks could hinder the credit recovery (Figure 2) - see also Special Report "You cannot ignore Italy" from 22 January. We believe these concerns are overstated. Page 14 Deutsche Bank AG/London CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0120370 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00266554 EFTA01459723