EFTA01073986.pdf

Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 08/19/2013 Page: 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 13-12923-C JANE DOE, Plaintiff-Appellee. versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee, ROY BLACK, MARTIN G. WEINBERG, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Intervenors-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Before: TJOFLAT, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: This appeal is DISMISSED IN PART as to the district court's order denying Defendant- Appellee's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Save the Bay, Inc. v. U.S. Army, 639 F.2d 1100, 1103 (5th Cir. Feb. 1981) (holding that the denial of a motion to dismiss is not a final, appealable order); see also Bonner v. City ofPrichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en bane) (adopting as binding Fifth Circuit rulings made prior to October I, 1981). Plaintiff-Appellee's motion to dismiss is CARRIED WITH THE CASE. EFTA01073986  Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 08/19/2013 Page: 1 of 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING 56 Forsyth StreeL N.N. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 John Ley For rules and forms visit Clerk of Caul www.ca I I .uscourts.eov August 19, 2013 MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES Appeal Number: 13-12923-CC Case Style: Jane Doe v. Roy Black District Court Docket No: 9:08-cv-80736-KAM This Court requires all counsel to file documents electronically using the Electronic Case Files ("ECF") system, unless exempted for good cause. The enclosed order has been ENTERED. Sincerely, JOHN LEY, Clerk of Court Reply to: Joe aruso Phone #: MOT-2 Notice of Court Action EFTA01073987