📄 Extracted Text (4,243 words)
Eye on the Market I July 9. 2012 J.P.Morgan
Topics: a self- assessment of our 2012 market, economic and investment views; the "ifs" in Europe, and an aerial view of
the June sununit
This week, a mid-year self-assessment of the views published in our 2012 Outlook. In volatile markets, assessments can swing
from red to green and back to red rapidly. With that caveat, here's a review of the major market, economic and investment
views that we shared with you in January. This exercise is a healthy part of any investment process, particularly when
looking at what views didn't work out. The first column refers to the page number in the 2012 Outlook; the second to the view;
the third is a discussion of the results; and the fourth is a simplified color gradient on how we did. Supporting charts appear on
page 5; market returns are all YTD through Friday's close unless noted otherwise.
Page The view What happened Grade
1, 2 OECD private sector economies will So far, yes. OECD fiscal stimulus appears to be ending, and
mostly have to make it on their own, monetary stimulus has been modest in the US and Japan. The
with fiscal stimulus coming to an end ECB's balance sheet has grown by €620 billion Euros since we
and monetary easing modest outside wrote our report (ch.1), and may have to grow further. Despite
Europe. The ECB's balance sheet massive borrowing already, Spanish banks only finance 12% of
mi ht have to row b another trillion their assets at the ECB, and ma need a LOT more mone
I US economy more resilient than Europe US manufacturing surveys hovered above European and Asian
and Asia, with the latter two showing counterparts until the disappointing June report; now all of them
more signs of a slowdown look weak (ch.2). US new orders and export orders collapsed in
June, to the weakest reading since Spring 2009.
1 US is our largest regional equity The right call so far: US equities are up 9%, Asia ex-Japan is up
position, next largest Asia, with a large 7.9% and Europe is up 1.1% (ch.4). Japan is up 2.5%, Emerging
underweight to Europe and Japan Market equities are up 5.1%, and China is up 2%.
1 Optimistic on US corporate profits, but S&P earnings growth is coming down from 20%-30% y/y gains
rising earnings pre-announcements are a in 2010 and 2011 to 10% growth this year (ch.5). Weakening
sign that earnings growth is slowing foreign demand remains the biggest risk to profits.
3 German government debt ratio of 80% So far, Germany has resisted these measures, insisting on strict
would prevent it from acceptance of fiscal controls first. However, if the EU sovereign bailout
commingled risks such as Eurobonds or facility (ESM) directly recapitalizes EU banks, that's a level of
pan-European deposit guarantees burden sharing we haven't seen before (see p.3 for more details)
3 Markets are not convinced that Italy is Italy runs a tight ship in terms of its primary deficit, but its credit
solvent, and that its debt is declining. spreads remain high (ch.6). YTD, Italian banks have bought all
We remain very concerned about Italy's net issuance of the Italian government, and a lot of Italian gov't
low growth and high debt burden bonds sold by foreign holders. GDP contracting at a -2% pace.
3, 11 Spain is a mess and would be the focal Completely. Spain is in recession, capital flight out of Spain is
point of the EU crisis this year substantial, many of its banks need to be rescued, credit spreads
have risen sharply and its equity market is down 19.5%, the
most in Europe.
4 We expect US payroll growth of 200k We were close, but a bit too optimistic. Q1 GDP growth was
per month, US GDP growth of —2.25%, 1.9%, and Q2 looks to be 1.5% (ch.3). Why so low? Rising
and continued good news on US capital services consumption has not been high enough to offset
spending declining durable goods purchases, and the recovery in
residential investment hasn't been enough to offset declines in
construction and defense. Nonfarm and private payroll gains
have avenged 150W159k per month through June; the weather
flattered earlier results. Core capital goods orders are no longer
growing, and the strong contribution from equipment and
software spending since 2009 is fading (ch.7).
5 We remain concerned about the long- Bond markets are not nervous at all. We did not offer a
term US fiscal situation, and are prediction on US rates, but if we did, we would have been too
nervous about long-duration US high. Between Fed purchases (66% of all Treasury issuance in
government bonds 2011) and demand from foreign central banks, US banks and
households, there is plenty of demand for US Treasury bonds,
despite the untenable long-term fiscal outlook and an 8% deficit.
EFTA01069739
Eye on the Market I July 9. 2012 J.P.Morgan
Topics: a self- assessment of our 2012 market, economic and investment views; the "ifs" in Europe, and an aerial view of
the June sununit
6 Chinese inflation would slow, as would Mixed bag. Headline and core inflation are falling, allowing the
the rate of RMB appreciation, allowing government to ease bank reserve requirements and take other
for more monetary stimulus. We are modest easing steps (ch.8). We were also on target that the
optimistic on Chinese consumption, and Chinese RMB would stop appreciating (it's down 1.1% vs. up
do not see a hard landing in China 5% in 2011), and Chinese consumption as a % of GDP growth is
the highest it's been since the late 1990s. However, we did not
anticipate the degree of the slowdown in the Chinese economy,
which looks to have settled in at 6%-7% growth.
7 Putting some capital to work in equity Markets have been volatile, and this is a view that will have to
markets seems reasonable, given the be examined again later in the year. So far, despite the generally
largest sidelined corporate and poor macroeconomic global backdrop, the MSCI World Equity
household cash balances in 25 years, Index is up 5.8% and our preferred investment strategy of MSCI
and low valuations World ex-Europe is up 7.6%.
7 Technology stocks look attractive, The S&P 500 Info Tech sector is up 12.8%, outperforming the
given P/E multiples that are flat to the S&P 500 (which is up 9%)
broad market
7 Large cap multinational stocks are The Morgan Stanley Multinational Nifty Fifty Index is up 10.7%
worth looking at, at current valuations compared to the MSCI World up 5.8%
7 Continue to focus on high Individual portfolios vary, but the general outperformance of
dividend/equity income stocks dividend stocks in 2010 and 2011 stopped in 2012. As one
indication, the S&P Dividend Aristocrats Index is up 8.4%
YTD, behind the S&P 500 which is up 9%
8 Equity valuations: low and likely to stay We remain in a low P/E multiple environment, a reflection of
that way macro imbalances, and the fact that high profit margins are more
dependent on low labor compensation than in past cycles. The
MSCI World Index trailing P/E ratio started the year at 13x, rose
above 15x in March, and has fallen back to 14x (ch.9).
8. 9 Good value in loan portfolios sold by These are long-term investments that will take years to evaluate. N.A.
over-leveraged European banks, oil &
gas rescue projects, distressed real
estate and private market lending
("mezzanine debt")
9 We see value in both high yield and YTD, the Barclays High Yield Index is up 7.9% and the
leveraged loans. Two reasons: (i) we S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index is up 4.8%. Fed policy (zero
estimate that the demand for credit now interest rates) has created a lust for yield, the consequences of
outstrips supply, and (ii) on US high which will not be known for many years.
yield, implied default rates are above
the losses actually experienced during
the last 2 recessions
10 We see value in macro hedge funds YTD through May, the HFRI Macro Hedge Fund index is up
only 1%, compared to 1.6% for both the HFRI Fund of Funds
Diversified Index and the HFRI Fund Weighted Composite. In
other words, low returns and no outperformance vs. a broader
measure of hedge fund returns. Many macro managers exited the
long duration trade earlier in the year before the rally in the long
bond; others were whipsawed on the Yen which rallied after
selling off to 84; and most have not made money on oil or gold.
10 Gold will remain volatile, but until So far, a wild ride that's back where it started. Gold started the
monetary tightening is on the horizon, year at $1,563, rose close to $1,800 in February, and has since
we would not sell and believe gold will fallen back to $1,584.
end the year higher than where it began
2
EFTA01069740
Eye on the Market I July 9, 2012 J.P.Morgan
Topics: a self- assessment of our 2012 market, economic and investment views; the "ifs" in Europe, and an aerial view of
the June summit
US equity performance relative to change in Economic
Here's a summary: Europe looks as bad as we thought it would, but Surprise Index
our US economic outlook was too optimistic. However, as things 50% Fbsinve surprises
Positive returns
stand now, resilient corporate profits and a ton of liquidity (see below) 40% •
Ia •
930% 29th June 2012
has helped stabilize US equities. The disconnect between profits and
• •
economics does not happen very often. As shown in the chart, for a
5 20% • $.•
f. to%
period when US economic data has been generally subpar (i.e., a cf%
large YTD negative reading on Citigroup's economic surprise -to% • h• ••• ♦ * *
g -20%
index), US equities have done better than they have in the past.
a 30% • ♦ •
•
We have been considerably more bearish than consensus since March -40%
• Negative surprises
2010 on all things European, and are looking closely at the summit a Negative returns
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200
outcome to see if things are changing enough for us to revise our Citi US Economic Surprise index, 6
-month change
Source:Bloomberg...LP. Morgan Asset Msnagement. Data since 2003.
views. Our take on the summit appears below.
US commercial bank excess deposits Foreign exchange reserves US corporate cash balances
I 'Mons, USD Millions, USD Cash and equivalents /tangible assets
9 12%
Deposits a-
8 7- Emerging Markets
6- 10%
5-
4- 8%
3- Japan
2 6%
4
0
3 '70 '80 '90 '00 '10 4%
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Source: Ministryot FinanceJapan, IFS, 1952 1960 1968 1976 1984 1992 2000 2008
Source: Federal Reserve Board. J.P. Morg an Securities LLC. Source: Federal Reserve Board.
European Subiunctivitis
The markets liked the EU summit, presumably since a green light was given to the EU bailout facility (European Stability
Mechanism) to directly recapitalize banks, and buy Periphery bonds in the secondary market to stabilize yields. This was the
only major news from the summit, and was notable since Germany had objected to this beforehand. Germany had insisted that
as per its original mission, the ESM lend to governments who then recapitalize banks on their own. Merkel reportedly changed
her view after pressure from Italy and Spain, and the "French Resistance" (see next page). Recapitalization of banks is generally
good news: in most debt crises, recapitalization of banks has been more successful in boosting GDP and equity markets than
governments buying bad loans or lending to banks (see June 11 EoTM). That may explain the rally after the summit.
However, there's a lot of subjunctive tense that bears watching. The summit result on the ESM bank recap is good news...
• IF the ESM were established and ratified by all governments, which is expected to happen but hasn't yet. The EU only
needs approval from 90% of all capital commitments to activate, making it harder for smaller countries to derail it
• IF the ESM were to recapitalize banks and not just lend to them, the latter being its primary mission
• IF recapitalizations were not rejected by any member of the Eurozone, as the required protocols state
• IF subsequent losses on any recapitalizations do not end up discouraging future lending or investment decisions (Ireland's
National Reserve Pension Fund lost 80% on its bank recaps, so the risk of loss for the ESM in Spain is material)
• IF the German Constitutional Court does not concur with objections raised already, or with objections raised in the future
Given the pattern of prior summits disappointing markets once results were digested', caution is warranted here. The EU crisis
is primarily one of external imbalances between private sector economies in the core and the periphery. The sovereign and
banking issues are by-products of these private sector problems. The summit didn't do much to address this, so I'm waiting for
the next round of growth, employment and private sector credit data before drawing conclusions. As things stand now, loan
creation in Italy has gone negative for the first time in 20 years. This may prove problematic for a country with the lowest
growth rate in the OECD over the same period, other than Japan.
I Pavan Wadhwa at JP Morgan Securities LLC wrote a good, short piece on this last week with a chart showing post-summit disappointment
in credit and equity markets after the last 4 summits.
3
EFTA01069741
Eye on the Market I July 9. 2012 .1.1). Morgan
Topics: a self- assessment of our 2012 market, economic and investment views; the "ifs" in Europe, and an aerial view of
the June summit
I suppose the bottom line is that while Germany is inclined to do what it can to prevent any further sovereign or banking systems
failures in the Periphery, it is unclear what form this assistance will take. The markets would like a road map, but I am not sure
we will get a clear one. At least Europe is
trying to get off the front pages long enough
for markets to focus on the private sector
recoveries in the US and China, and whether
more monetary stimulus and lower oil prices
will help in the second half of the year.
One last thing: the politics of the EU
summit appear quite tense, and you have to
wonder if this is how monetary unions are
made or broken: by strong-arming the
Chancellor of the country primarily
expected to fund the Euro's survival. To
close this week's note, an aerial view of the
summit and how these maneuvers played out.
The next move is Germany's.
Michael Cembalest
J.P. Morgan Asset Management
June 2012 EU Summit Maneuvers
Key (This is my own read of who did what and why. Obviously, opinions will vary]
•••• The French Resistance to German austerity demands started with a threat by Hollande to surrender immediately, to not even
support his own growth compact and to let the summit fail, unless Germany changed course. The growth compact was then
agreed to. While it sounds good, no new monies were committed (the 120 bn Euros mentioned are from existing sources).
•••• Italy switches sides: Prime Minister Monti, whose technocratic government was approved by Germany and who was expected
to follow Germany's austerity line, defected to Hollande's camp and also threatened to allow talks to fail and blame the entire
mess on Merkel. Sidenote: watch for a possible Napoleonic return from Berlusconi should conditions in Italy deteriorate.
Spin allied itself with Italy, and allowed Italy to attack Germany directly, since Spain's banks and its entire economy are in
750F7,, much worse shape. Along with Italy, Spain is pushing for EU purchases of sovereign bonds with limited/no strings attached.
An isolated Germany retreated on its ESM lending stance and got little in return other than vague language about region-wide
banking oversight by the ECB. Germany now has to sort out the internal politics of post-summit magazine covers showing an
Italian kicking a soccer ball with Merkel's head on it; a letter from 160 German economists criticizing Merkel's approach at
the summit; a comment by the German President that Merkel has the duty to describe in great detail what summit agreements
mean for Germany's budget; and France still reluctant to cede banking system or fiscal authority to an EU regulator, one of
Germany's demands.
Austria, Finland (inset) and the Netherlands. fiscally conservative allies of Germany, are dealt a blow by German
concessions. Certain ESM provisions requiring 85% and 90% thresholds appear designed to thwart their potential objections.
Ireland sees itself as a big winner from the Hollande-Monti revolt, having argued since 2009 that the rich members should
recapitalize EU banks directly, rather than each country being responsible for its own banks. Without any concessions from
Germany, Ireland's debt-GNP ratio would rise above 140%. Not clear if reality matches Irish expectations; perhaps Ireland
will convince the EU to recap Allied Irish Bank and the Bank of Ireland with 15 billion (around 10% of Irish GNP).
After Great Britain vetoed the fiscal compact last year (which probably would not have applied to them anyway), it has
been left on the sidelines politically, in "Splendid Isolation". Given what is going on in Europe. not a bad place to be. The UK
is not in great shape, but would be in disastrous shape had it joined the European Monetary Union.
Swiss wall of monetary neutrality under siege by capital inflows from the Periphery. Swiss National Bank FX reserves have
grown by 40% of GDP since 2009. an enormous amount that China took over a decade to accumulate.
In a speech last November, Poland's foreign minister stated that he may be the first to say he feared German inaction
Ori}
more than German action. On the other hand, he stressed the value of money, responsibility and the honest intention to
repay as being the foundations of a moral order. Bottom line: Poland still wants to join the EMU, but is waiting for Germany
to clean up the mess, and for the Periphery to adhere to new fiscal rules which would be "almost impossible to block".
4
EFTA01069742
Eye on the Market I July 9. 2012 J.P. Morgan
Topics: a self- assessment of our 2012 market, economic and investment views; the "ifs" in Europe, and an aerial view of
the June summit
Report card charts
[1] Central bank balance sheets [2] Global manufacturing surveys [3] US real GDP growth
Percent of GDP Purchasing Managers Index. sa Percent change, annualized
ECB 60 4%
31% 58 -
56 - 3%
27%
III
54 -
2%
23% 52 -
50 - 1%
19% 48 -
46 - 0%
15% 00 00 v- N W
Jan-11 May-11 Sep-11 Jan-12 May-12 44 CO
N nt N
0
Source: FRB. BEA. ECB. Eurostat, Bo E. UK Office Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan•11 Jul-11 Jan-12
for National Statistics. BoJ.Japan Cabinet Office. Source: ISM. Markit, J.P. Morgan Securities. Source: BEA. JRAAM
[4] Regional equity returns [5] Trailing 4-qtr S&P 500 operating [6] Italian 10-year government bond
Total return. USD. percent EPS, Percent change. YoY yield, Percent
18% 50% 7.25%
13% 40% 6.75%
8% 30% 6.25%
3% 20%
5.75%
10%
-2% 5.25%
0%
-7% o - - - ^ w 4.75T
N
Jan-12 Mar-12 May-12 Jul-12 O O O O O Jan-12 Mar-12 May-12 Jul-12
Source: Bloomberg. n N <9 n 5 Source: Bloomberg.
Source:Standard &Fooes.
[7] Equipment + software spending [8] Chinese reserve requirement [9] MSCI World price to earnings
Contribution to real GDP growth. percent ratio and YoY headline inflation Trailing multiple
2% - 22.0% - 7% 40
35
6%
21.5% •
30
5%
21.0% 25
4%
20
20.5% •
3% is
-3% 20.0% • 2°/ 10
2005 2007 2009 2011 0S11 09/11 12/11 03/12 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011
Source:BEA. Source: PBOC. NBS. Source: Bloomberg.
OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
ECB European Central Bank
RMB Ren Min Bi
MSCI Morgan Stanley Capital International
LIFRI Hedge Fund Research Inc
EU European Union
ESM European Stability Mechanism
5
EFTA01069743
Eye on the Market I July 9. 2012 J.P.Morgan
Topics: a self- assessment of our 2012 market, economic and investment views; the 'ifs" in Europe, and an aerial view of
the June sununit
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates do not provide tax advice. Accordingly; any discussion of U.S. tax matters contained
herein (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used. and cannot be used. in connection with the promotion, marketing or
recommendation by anyone unaffiliated with JPMorgan Chase & Co. ofany of the matters addressed herein orfor the purpose ofavoiding U.S. fat-related
penalties. Note that J.P. Morgan is not a licensed insurance provider.
The material contained herein is intended as a general marker commentary. Opinions expressedherein are those ofMichael Cembalest and may differfrom those of other LP.
Morgan employees and affiliates. This information in no way constitutes J.P. Morgan research and should not be treated as such. Further. the views expressedherein may differ
from that contained in J.P. Morgan research reports. The above summaryprices/quotes/stafistics have been obtainedfrom sources deemed to be reliable. but we do not
guarantee their accuracy or completeness, any yield referenced is indicative and subject to change. Past performance is not a guarantee offuture results. References to the
performance or character ofour portfolios generally refer to our Balanced Model Portfolios constructed by J.P. Morgan. It is a proxy for client performance andmay not
represent actual transactions or investments in client accounts. The model portfolio can be implemented across brokerage or managed accounts depending on the unique
objectives ofeach client and is. erviced through distinct legal entities licensedfor specific activities. Bank. trust and investment management services are provided by JP
Morgan Chase Bank NA. and its affiliates. Securities are offered through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS), Member NYSE. FINRA and SIPC. and its affiliates globally as
local legislation permits. Securities products purchased or sold through 1PMS are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"): are not deposits or
other obligations ofits bank or thrift affiliates and are nor guaranteed by its bank or thrift affiliates: and are subject to investment risks. including possible loss of the principal
invested. Not all investment ideas referenced are suitable for all investors. Speak with your J.P. Morgan Representative concerning your personal situation. This material is not
intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale ofany financial instrument. Private Investments may engage in leveraging and other speculative practices that may
increase the risk ofinvestment loss. can be highly illiquid. are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuations to investors and may involve complex tax. tructures and
delays in distributing important tax information. Typically such investment ideas can only be offered to suitable investors through a confidential offering memorandum which
fully describes all terms. conditions. and risks. This material is distributed with the understanding that J.P. Morgan is not rendering accounting. legal or tax advice. You should
consult with your independent advisors concerning such matters.
In the United Kingdom. this material is approved byJ.P. Morgan International Bank Limited LIPM1B) with the registered office located at 25 Bank Street. Canary Wharf.
London El4 5JP. registered In England No. 03838766 and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. In addition, this materialmay be distributed by:
!Morgan Chase Bank. N.A. (JPMCB) Paris branch. which is regulated by the French banking authorities Aurorae; de Contrble Prudenfiel and Autoriti des Marches
Financiers: J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA. regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority: JPMCB Bahrain branch. licensed as a conventional wholesale bank by
the Central Bank ofBahrain (for professional clients only): JPMCB Dubai branch. regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority.
In Hong Kong, this material is distributed by JPMorgan Chase Bank. N.A. (JPMCB) Hong Kong branch except to recipients having an account atIPAICB Singapore branch
and where this material relates to a Collective Investment Scheme (other than private funds such as private equity and hedgefunds) in which case it is distributed by J.P.
Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) limited (JPMSAPL). Both JPMCB Hong Kong branch and JPMSAPL are regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority.
In Singapore. this material is distributedby JPMCB Singapore branch except to recipients having an account at JPMCB Singapore branch and where this material relates to a
Collective Investment Scheme (other than private funds such as a private equity and hedgefunds) in which cue it is distributed by J.P. Morgan (S.E.A.) limited (JPMSEAL).
Both JPMCB Singapore branch and JPMSEAL are regulated by the Monetary Authority ofSingapore.
Each recipient ofthis presentation. and each agent thereof may disclose to any person. without limitation, the US income andfranchise tax treatment and tax structure ofthe
transactions describedherein and may disclose all materials ofany kind (including opinions or other tax analyses) provided to each recipient insofar as the materials relate to a
US income orfranchise tax strategy provided to such recipient by JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries. Should you have any questions regarding the information
contained in this material or about J.P. Morgan products and services. please contact your LP. Morgan private banking representative. Additional information is available
upon request. "J.P. Morgan" is the marketing namefor _Willman Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide. This material may not be reproduced or
circulated without J.P. Morgan's authority. O 2012 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.
6
EFTA01069744
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
1cb979c0bdf1767dd0e22e5005982a7ee1e7e0d6f7dba3466792cb86460c2824
Bates Number
EFTA01069739
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
6
Comments 0