📄 Extracted Text (162 words)
Case 129340 — No Summary was attached
Case 129994 - not enough detail
Case 129875 — No Summary was attached
No retaliation at all. If you feel any did not warrant being returned, please let me know.
Cherie
From: Tammy McFadden
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 2:54 PM
To: Cherie Quigley
Subject: PRIME CASES - RETURNS/COMMENTS [C]
Classification: Confidential
Cherie —
I am noticing an unprecedented number of my PRIME October Cases being returned or commented on right on the tail
end of email correspondences I sent to your attention in regards to outstanding PRIME PEP deferred cases that have not
been properly waived and officially reviewed/ resolved by you. You actually started returning my October Cases less
than 2 hours after I sent the email questioning PEP deferred cases. I am hoping it is just coincidental, and not a display
of retaliation for being vocal.
Kind regards,
Tammy
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0049850
CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00196034
EFTA01361048
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
44b883280245db9270ad3f0f9808b8127ed17c923efe6a86b4c2ec7ab0d531df
Bates Number
EFTA01361048
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0